Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
2016 Election Results Map - Clinton vs Sanders - Caucus vs Primary (Original Post) LVZ Jun 2016 OP
Interesting resemblance to previous years' red/blue maps. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2016 #1
Really? I don't see much resemblance at all. n/t Las Vegas Mixx Jun 2016 #4
That's because there isn't any. Garrett78 Jun 2016 #20
Primary States Won - Clinton 26, Sanders 10 ... n/t Las Vegas Mixx Jun 2016 #2
Yea, that other map was very misleading that was posted One Black Sheep Jun 2016 #3
I really wish we could just stop having caucuses. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #5
I Think I Read that Sanders Won A Majority of Registered Democrats in Exactly One Primary Stallion Jun 2016 #6
Caucus Systems - much lower participation - less representative of Democratic voters Las Vegas Mixx Jun 2016 #7
less than 400 TOTAL voted in ND "caucus" lol. More than that in the WalMart down the street now nt msongs Jun 2016 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author Las Vegas Mixx Jun 2016 #9
What if there were no caucuses in 2016? Las Vegas Mixx Jun 2016 #10
My calculations RobertEarl Jun 2016 #11
So you are advertising that you cannot do math? Las Vegas Mixx Jun 2016 #12
Write (sic) over your head, eh? RobertEarl Jun 2016 #13
Yes, we love snarkiness. Thanks for your humorous prediction, Nostradamus - woulda-coulda-shoulda Las Vegas Mixx Jun 2016 #14
Heh RobertEarl Jun 2016 #15
Nothing to refute - silly faith-based guesswork is more appropriate for Tea Party and Fox News folks Las Vegas Mixx Jun 2016 #16
Robert Reich says it best RobertEarl Jun 2016 #17
No disagreement. I agree with Bernie on most issues just not on whining about "process". n/t Las Vegas Mixx Jun 2016 #18
I doubt that. Here, read this RobertEarl Jun 2016 #19
 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
1. Interesting resemblance to previous years' red/blue maps.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 07:16 PM
Jun 2016

And no, I'm not saying that to bash Clinton in any way. It's just an interesting pattern, IMO.

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
20. That's because there isn't any.
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 07:13 PM
Jun 2016

Anyway, I take issue with these sorts of maps, as they don't give any indication as to margin of victory or population size in each state. Nonetheless, it's quite evident that the race wouldn't have been even remotely close if not for vote-suppressing caucuses.

Lord Magus

(1,999 posts)
5. I really wish we could just stop having caucuses.
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 07:27 PM
Jun 2016

Make every state a primary. As for whether they should be open primaries...I prefer Ohio's "semi-open" primary because no way should Republicans be getting to weigh in on who their candidate's opponent will be.

msongs

(67,438 posts)
8. less than 400 TOTAL voted in ND "caucus" lol. More than that in the WalMart down the street now nt
Wed Jun 8, 2016, 07:36 PM
Jun 2016

Response to msongs (Reply #8)

Las Vegas Mixx

(296 posts)
10. What if there were no caucuses in 2016?
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 12:10 AM
Jun 2016
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-system-isnt-rigged-against-sanders/

Harry Enton and Nate Silver - FiveThirtyEight.com - The System Isn’t Rigged Against Sanders

Sanders fans have claimed that because caucuses have lower turnout the current national caucus and primary vote underrates how well Sanders is doing. In fact, the opposite is true. When we switch all caucuses over to primaries, Sanders actually does worse. Clinton’s lead in the popular vote would grow from 2.9 to 3.3 million votes. Moreover, her edge in elected delegates would expand significantly. Instead of her current lead of 272 elected delegates, Clinton would be ahead by 424. Some states that were won by Sanders in caucuses, including Colorado and Minnesota, would be won by Clinton in primaries, according to our calculations.


 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
11. My calculations
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 12:23 AM
Jun 2016

If the race had been fair and square, the media unbiased and even handed with its reporting, and the Democratic party doing what it supposed to do by supporting unfettered real democracy, Bernie Sanders would have won 35 states and be declared the winner already.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
15. Heh
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 12:58 AM
Jun 2016

You just stick with your 538 worship. You have not refuted any of what I said, because you can't.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
17. Robert Reich says it best
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 01:13 AM
Jun 2016

Dear Bernie:

I don’t know what you’re going to do from here on, and I’m not going to advise you. You've earned the right to figure out the next steps for your campaign and the movement you have launched.

But let me tell you this: You’ve already succeeded.

At the start they labeled you a “fringe” candidate – a 74-year-old, political Independent, Jewish, self-described democratic socialist, who stood zero chance against the Democratic political establishment, the mainstream media, and the moneyed interests.

Then you won 22 states.

And in almost every state – even in those you lost -- you won vast majorities of voters under 30, including a majority of young women and Latinos. And most voters under 45.

You have helped shape the next generation.

You’ve done it without SuperPACs or big money from corporations, Wall Street, and billionaires. You did it with small contributions from millions of us. You've shown it can be done without selling your soul or compromising your conviction.

You’ve also inspired millions to get involved in politics -- and to fight the most important and basic of all fights on which all else depends: to reclaim our economy and democracy from the moneyed interests.

Your message – about the necessity of single-payer healthcare, free tuition at public universities, a $15 minimum wage, busting up the biggest Wall Street banks, taxing the financial speculation, expanding Social Security, imposing a tax on carbon, and getting big money out of politics – will shape the progressive agenda from here on.

Your courage in taking on the political establishment has emboldened millions of us to stand up and demand our voices be heard.

Regardless of what you decide to do now, you have ignited a movement that will fight onward. We will fight to put more progressives into the House and Senate. We will fight at the state level. We will organize for the 2020 presidential election.

We will not succumb to cynicism. We are in it for the long haul. We will never give up.

Thank you, Bernie.

Bob
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
19. I doubt that. Here, read this
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 01:24 AM
Jun 2016

catnhatnh (8,844 posts)

Why Bernie can't drop out? Because he is being deceived. Repeatedly.

I won't list a litany of cases from the missing Colorado delegate to the "My fingers were crossed" promised California debate to this weeks surprise Clinton Coronation BEFORE the primaries by a "news outfit". But at midnight, a day after announcing Sanders had been beaten in California we are told that nearly half (three million) votes have not yet been tabulated and may not be for two more weeks!

This is usually the part in a hard fought campaign when an "honest broker" works to reconcile the candidates and their supporters. Well in this case the head of the DNC is out. Sander's cannot trust his opponent-she has a history of reneging on promises. Obama is the only possibility and now if he calls for Sanders to drop out before the convention he to may be viewed as tainted.

So no-I'm not ready to make nice. Clinton and the DNC and the media has earned my distrust. They'll just have to live with that.



http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512162332

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»2016 Election Results Map...