Clinton EVISCERATES Sanders in his last false hope - California

[Corporate666]

It's beyond a beating, it's an embarrassment at this point.

Sanders has become a laughing stock - along with the supporters that were painting a picture of a clean sweep for him on June 7th along with predictions of winning PR, CA, NJ and others.

Is is getting CRUSHED in California. Not just beaten, but absolutely demolished.

Will he finally admit it's over? Will his supporters? Can we get back to talking about the nominee - Hillary Clinton?

[Metric System]

1. It's still early and it could tighten up.

[Joe the Revelator]

2. Look around you. The only 'bashing threads' being started are by Hillary folks

You can start talking about Hillary instead of Bernie whenever you want to.

[uponit7771]

5. This is false on its face

[Joe the Revelator]

8. Enjoy your victory. Go talk about your nominee.

[puffy socks]

29. so many Berners on DU have spent the better part of this election season being nothing

but condescending asshats. The constant demands for concessions and now demands to tell us what we shall talk about.

Would you like to know how much power you have over that.... none.
no one is forcing you to read this OP . I'm sure there is some other entertainment out there for the butthurt.

[Joe the Revelator]

32. Thank you for proving the point...

that you think this is a game. Have fun.

[puffy socks]

44. I couldn't care less about your "point" nt

[Joe the Revelator]

59. You don't have to, just keep on proving it for me.

I appriciate it.

[Matt_R]

103. June 16th can't come soon enough.

Because at that point, most will have to stop the name calling of Sanders supporters. And stop treating other Democrats badly.

[LexVegas]

6. What?

[Joe the Revelator]

25. Point me to some negative threads by Bernie supporters from tonight.

Here are some from your folks:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512153512
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512153410
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=2152737
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512153581
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512149023
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=2152075

Thats just from the front page. Why not go enjoy your victory?

[InAbLuEsTaTe]

52. I expected nothing less.

[grossproffit]

66. I like you. We don't agree on candidates, but I don't want to be hurtful towards you.

I'm really sorry. I know you're frustrated and upset. I don't mean this in a condescending way. I mean it from my heart.

[Joe the Revelator]

80. Thanks, I honestly don't take this stuff all that personally.

Congratulations and all of that tonight. Your side won, that's pretty clear. For whatever record there is, I've never ever had any problem with you. I can probably count on one hand the number of Hillary supporters on this board I couldn't sit down and have an enjoyable cup of coffee with.

Any frustration I have is with the party and the direction it's taking, but that's a discussion for another night. Sincerely, good luck in the GE. I won't be able to support her (I swear I say that with no 'it's my ball, and I'm taking it home with me!' malice. Everyone needs to vote their conscious.) Some Bernie folk will certainly 'come home' for the GE.

With all that said,and this entire post is becoming a bit of a ramble, but I read a good article why, even with her negatives, Hillary should be able to easily deal with Trump. The campaign side of me will always remain interested in stuff like this (can't put my hands on the article right now, but basically, he is what we thought he was, a amature way in over his head).

Anyway, really long post (by my standards) to say thanks and good luck.

[grossproffit]

91. Thank you. I read it all the way to the end.

[merrily]

18. Not the least bit unusual.

[puffy socks]

48. We're just catching up with the Berners on the bashing. We have several months yet to go to catch

up.

[Joe the Revelator]

60. Good idea. Focus on that, not the GE.

[puffy socks]

72. It makes me happy. sucks to be you..

y'all should have been cordial and actually discussed the issues, or it may just come back to bite you in the ass...like it is now..



Nice to see you still think everyone needs your permission on topics we can talk about.

get over yourself.

[Joe the Revelator]

84. It actually rocks to be me.

Outside of here, I'm happily married, I have a 16 month old I'm head over heals in love with, I love where I live, I love my neighborhood.I have a job that pays me fairly well. I worry about my country though and people who don't have it as good as I do right now.

Fuck me, right?

[metroins]

3. Your post is kinda mean

Might want to reword it.

She's definitely beating Sanders but no reason to be mean.

[lancer78]

89. And on the 16th

you will have to be cordial as well.

[puffy socks]

92. Yep

funny how now the Berners can't wait for the 16th. Perhaps you should all notify Skinner you're ready to behave like adults now and we can move up the date and start in on Trump.

[davidpdx]

95. Maybe he or she will learn a lesson from that kind of trash talk

On Wed Jun 8, 2016, 12:18 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

apparently youve missed the oh-so-sweet and gracious nature of the Bernie supporters on GDP
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=2154104

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Ugly and divisive broad-brushing and personal attack, and it's certainly odd that someone who only arrived six weeks ago knows what has happened over "the better part of this election season." People who are only here to stir shit are working against the party's best interests.

JURY RESULTS

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Jun 8, 2016, 12:25 AM, and the Jury voted 4-3 to HIDE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: The post is divisive and not in the spirit of DU. If you continue to hold a grudge against Sanders supporters, just what do you think that will accomplish? It is the attitude of Clinton supporters who stand on their pedestals to put down Sanders' supporters continually. I think you had better realize that BOTH sides attitudes will have to change then. If you don't then you are in for a strong wake-up call.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

4. Another sore winner.

Charming.

[itsrobert]

7. He brought it on himself

He bashed Hillary to no end. The people rejected that approach.

[merrily]

21. BALONEY He was helpful on her emails, extremely mild on the Clinton Foundation and

stayed away entirely from all the rest of the Clinton baggage. He's even said the corrupt primary was not corrupt.

The claims on DU to the contrary about Bernie have veered between dishonest and delusional. Unless the RW is in the bag for Hillary, too, the bubble Bernie left you all in is about to burst.

[itsrobert]

23. Well, maybe it was his surrogates and supporters on social media?

Could be Bernie's supporters cost him?

[merrily]

76. Also baloney. That processed stuff is bad for you.

#BernieLostMe and Bernie Bros were both recycled operations from the 2008 campaign (Obama boys).

[redstateblues]

54. Yes. He trashed Hillary on a regular basis

[yodermon]

63. "bashed"

It's called a primary.

[BlueStater]

70. Yes, how DARE he run against the Queen.

Oh, the audacity. It's her turn!!! She deserves to be president!!!

Of course, if the Democratic party had it's way, Queenie would have had no primary opponents at all and it truly would have been a coronation.

[itsrobert]

74. The only people calling her a Queen are Bernie supporters

Nothing was given to her, she earned it.

[BlueStater]

83. It was as close to a coronation as anything I've seen in the history of presidential elections.

She had almost the full support of the entire Democratic party before she even announced. Only four people even bothered to run against her (only *two* of whom survived until the actual voting began) and got nowhere near the amount of press she did. This entire primary was a joke.

[itsrobert]

88. It's called paying your dues in the Democratic Party system

She's been working for this for a long, long time.

Is there something wrong for a woman to do that?

[BlueStater]

90. And now you're pulling that "Hillary critics are sexists" bullshit.

Okay, we're done here. Enjoy your victory.

[seabeyond]

82. Childish.

[BlueStater]

86. Hillary supporters? Yeah, I agree. n/t

[JoePhilly]

9. Your OP is unnecessary.

I'm a strong Hillary supporter and I doubt you are an actual Hillary supporter.

You appear to be stirring shit just to stir shit.

[Corporate666]

22. BernieThink?

So.... people that are happy to see her delivering a death blow to a guy and a campaign that has stubbornly (for MONTHS) refused to accept defeat and instead has actively worked against HRC don't actually support her?

Sounds like some kind of BernieThink(tm) to me.

[JoePhilly]

26. Babble much?

You could not be more transparent.

[Corporate666]

34. Fee-fee's hurting?

You could not be more boorish.

[JoePhilly]

45. You need to speak more clearly ...

... there is a bad echo ... are you posting from under a bridge?

[Corporate666]

64. Being under a bridge

would explain why you are furiously going through the thread and repeating your personal attacks again and again and again.

But don't worry, it's *totally* normal to attack people and sit there refreshing the thread to reply within seconds. Totally normal.

In other news, I hear Bernie might have a job opening for you!

[JoePhilly]

69. Again ... you give yourself away.

My posting history is very clear. I'm a Hillary supporter.

And you are CLEARLY a troll.

Now ... you should ALERT on my post.

But I doubt you will.

[Corporate666]

79. When all you have is a hammer...

everything looks like a nail to you.

Lashing out when your fee-fee's are hurt is your only ability - and I correctly identified your type as soon as I noticed you going through the thread repeating the same thing over and over. And over.

The crowd is moving on - nobody has time to listen to the angry guy in the corner protesting and projecting.

[JoePhilly]

85. You are correct in one respect ...

... we will be leaving the trolls behind.

Instead ... we'll be helping Hillary kick Trump's racist ass.

I apologize if your ass gets in the way.

[Corporate666]

99. And where there's smoke there is fire

being correct about things tends to be a trend, just like like being racist or misogynistic tends to be a trend.

How many times is it now that have you made sure everyone knows that you're a REAL HRC supporter?

Sometimes thou doth protest too much. Be careful you don't wear out that F5 key, sport.

[Segami]

87. +1

for you!

[ExtraGriz]

38. +1

[geek tragedy]

10. people are voting for her. She's not disemboweling anyone nt

[okasha]

68. Check Mr.666's profile.

Sleeper.

[Dem2]

11. Uhm, it's early

And what the heck - why the harshness?

[Corporate666]

49. We've been listening to bullshit for months

and the volume and intensity has risen over the past weeks.

June 7th was always judgement day and it was pretty clear how it was going to come down.

I see nothing wrong with putting an exclamation point on the issue. If people are going to get butt-hurt and refuse to vote for HRC because someone on an internet message board hurt their feelings, then they were never going to vote for her in the first place.

[artislife]

12. Bill is packing up the humidor as you post. nt

[Corporate666]

37. LOL

Ok, that's actually funny

America could do a lot worse than the Clinton's back in the white house.

...having the Sanders in this white house, for example.

[BlueStater]

13. Another revolting supporter of an unlikable candidate.

I've been a member here for 11 years but I'm not sure I'll make it to 12. It's getting harder and harder to bite my tongue.

[JoePhilly]

31. umm ...

... the OP is not a Hillary supporter ... and could not be more transparent.

[BlueStater]

71. Based on my exposure to Clinton supporters here, I disagree. n/t

[JoePhilly]

73. Then you should ...

... definitely vote based on what this idiot is saying.

[jack_krass]

96. Same here. I think of her supporters as 1% wannabees

Many of them think supporting HRC somehow makes them "Part of the club". The very definition of "useful idiots"

[InAbLuEsTaTe]

43. Unreal... but not a surprise.

Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!

[oberliner]

14. It will get a lot closer

These are mail in ballots.

[Sparkly]

15. Chill, please.

California is up in the air, and Sanders is not a "laughing stock," nor are his supporters.

We're on the same side against Trump, and we're going to move ahead.

[Corporate666]

20. He's been a laughing stock for months

Sanders is most definitely not on HRC's side. He has actively worked against her and created a movement that was so intolerant of anything other than Sanders having everything handed to him, that the GE would be much more difficult if HRC wasn't running against a walking champanzee.

Thanks Bernie - for nothing.

[ExtraGriz]

50. same to you..TY for nothing. n/t

[Ken Burch]

33. Thank you.

You are helping your candidate by doing this.

[Trust Buster]

16. My goal was to see Hillary win the nomination. What was your goal ?

[writes3000]

17. I do NOT understand the need for humiliating language towards the competition.

Unless it's purposeful antagonism. Is that the goal?

[Ken Burch]

28. Most likely. n/t.

[anigbrowl]

41. Get Segami to explain it to you

S/he specializes in this sort of story and I think the OP is having some fun with a parody of the typical daily GD-P thread titles - having one word in CAPS is a bit of a giveaway.

[redstateblues]

58. Segami is the king of copy and paste hit jobs

[InAbLuEsTaTe]

47. Sounds like it to me!

[Ken Burch]

27. Please don't be this person.

There has never been any reason to mock Bernie for running and sneer and people who support him.

And you need ALL of us in November to win, because Trump's hate movement is just going to keep growing.

[Beacool]

30. Let's stay classy.

Sanders and his supporters deserve respect. We need to unite to defeat the real enemy: Trump.

Let's not be sore winners, it's tacky.

[LoverOfLiberty]

35. As a Clinton supporter

Go crawl back under that rock you came from. Its time for unity not divisiveness.

[Corporate666]

40. Let me know when Bernie takes your advice

and pledges his support for HRC, then crawls back under the rock he and you came out from.

Or is he still "taking it to the convention" (as he ditches the poor hard working folks that have been toiling for him these last months because they are no longer useful to him)?

[ExtraGriz]

55. blah blah blah

give it a fucking rest.

[eastsidemanglerNY]

36. Enough

Yes, Hillary Clinton is our nominee. I congratulate her and her supporters for making history tonight. Having said that, this OP is beyond childish and inflammatory. I don't care who started what or who attacked who first, this isn't elementary school. We're all Democrats, but most of all, we're ADULTS.

[InAbLuEsTaTe]

39. Nice, why don't you rub it in some more... hope you're proud. Congrats.

Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!

[Jon Ace]

46. Posts like yours do not help the process of unification. (n/t)

[Jitter65]

51. Its not over. But it is over! nt

[mythology]

53. Classy post

This is at the very best unnecessary.

[Hoyt]

56. Part of me feels the same way, but Sanders has run a decent campaign and I respect all but

most of the rabid Berners. With that said, I'm glad Clinton is looking good right now.

[GulfCoast66]

57. Hey man(or lady)

Hillary supporting, Bernie respecting voter here.

Do what you will, but I think this is just too much. This has been a hard fought campaign but even Hillary tonight made a strong point the the Sander's campaign has been good for the party.

And unless you have not had a candidate you strongly support lose then you know how the Bernie folks feel. Hell, I have felt it more often than not.

And if nothing else, we can always try to be a bigger person.

Preaching over. Congrats on a historic night. I am excited about having our first female president on the heels of our first African American president!!

[emulatorloo]

61. I suggest you self delete yr thread. Pointless bullshit flamebait.

[Retrograde]

62. Those are from the people who voted early

Californians have been voting since May 9, and what we're seeing first are the early and mail-in votes. I expect the gap to narrow as the more recent votes come in,

[JoePhilly]

65. OP is not a Hillary supporter ... very transparent.

[ucrdem]

75. So far it's a big spread, as big as NJ

Nice!

Democratic Results

CALIFORNIA
9.0% IN
Clinton 62.3%
Sanders 36.5%

http://www.npr.org/2016/06/07/481003293/clinton-looks-to-historic-night-while-sanders-hopes-for-calif-upset

[BainsBane]

77. Still 26 points ahead

Stunning.

The only state he won is ND, which has a caucus system that keeps voter participation extremely low.

[vercetti2021]

78. Trash

This is the kind of crap that is making me not vote for her.

[GulfCoast66]

105. I agree this thread is BS

But I have to ask. You state it is the kind of stuff that will keep you from voting for her.

Why would you let an anonymous poster in a public form have any impact on your vote?

I mean, I like Bernie and support Clinton and respect your right to vote how you want.

But please do not the emotions on this site sway you.

Have a nice evening.

[vercetti2021]

107. Because

Why does she deserve my vote? Alienating us is not the best way to get us to support her. That goes for anyone. Same with those who supported Bernie.

With that being said. The amount of threads that are popping up show me that they are confident they will win without us. So with that being said. I will choose not to, plus it'll go against my principles.

[GulfCoast66]

108. As I said

I respect your choice. But just do not let anything on this site effect your vote.

[Barack_America]

81. OMG, you are such a fool. Bye.

[lancer78]

93. Posts like this

should be used against Republicans when they are getting beat, not against people who agree with democrats 90% of the time.

This post makes me cringe, and gives me a bad taste in the mouth.

[LuvLoogie]

94. No drunk posting.

Your celebration is rapidly becoming a party of one.

[Snarkoleptic]

97. I find it interesting that your handle is Corporate666, yet you support the candidate of

the establishment/corporatocracy.

Not sure how to square that circle.

1) Nihilism
2) Fun with irony
3) It's her turn, turn a blind eye to the corparatism
4) Sanders polls better vs. Drumpf in the GE, but ____________

[Corporate666]

100. LOL

That's a lot of buzzwords for a single post, friend!

Did Sanders ever come up with that example of HRC being influenced by corporate donors? Last time he was asked he stammered and stuttered and looked foolish on national TV.

I think you will have a hard time finding many people who would tell you the Clinton years were economically bad times. Other than people who aren't old enough to have lived through them and who prefer echo chambers like Reddit to get their facts from.

It's actually very simple. HRC is an effective politician, Bernie isn't. HRC understands how the political game is played, BS doesn't. HRC isn't going with false promises and platitudes like BS is. She'll get things done.

[Snarkoleptic]

104. Back to my point, how do you have the handle Corporate666, yet support the candidate of

to corporatocracy?

I mean, Corporate666 would seem to imply that you feel the monitzation/corporatization of America is wrong, yet you appear to back the candidate who is MORE corporate than Nixon (and Drumpf).

As for the Clinton years, there was a push for mass incarceration, deregulation, and vilificaiton of welfare recipients, so yes, there are many who would tell you the Clinton years were economically bad times.

Very simple, your handle is anti-corporatist, yet your rhetoric supports the corporate candidate because she understands how to play their game?
What if the corporate game is not the only game to be played?

[Hekate]

98. This post really isn't necessary. BS is not a "laughingstock"-- he's actually brought some important

....issues to the fore, even if some of his online acolytes have been a pain and need to grow up.

Losing a hard fought campaign hurts like hell, and a lot of us have had that experience. Just ask anyone who lived through the 1968 presidential campaign, whether they worked for Senator Eugene McCarthy as I did (and so did Hillary Rodham) or for Senator Robert Kennedy.

I was in college in California, and Gene McCarthy lost lost lost. I went back to my apartment and the battery died in my transistor radio, so I didn't know what came after that until the next morning.

Many of my preferred candidates have never made it out of the primaries, and that's just how it is.

No need to rub salt in people's wounds, Corporate666. It doesn't do any of us credit, least of all you.

[warrprayer]

101. Your username

Says it all.

[Fresh_Start]

102. its too early to tell...there are something like 8 million ballots out

not all the ballots have even been received by the board of elections since ballots postmarked today are counted

[Logical]

106. Why the fuck do you have to be so snarky at this point? Nt