Reminder: Exit Poll Conspiracy Theories Are Totally Baseless
The Nation
I didnt have to read Bob Fitrakiss wonderfully titled piece, Joshua Holland, The Nations Truth Nazi, Needs to Calm Down. Ive become familiar with the genre since writing that theres no reason to suspect that election fraud has been a factor in the Democratic primary results. Similar pieces have been published by Counterpunch, The Huffington Post (by Tim Robbins!) and a slew of other fringier outlets. They all stick to the same formula: After questioning my intellectual capacity, they claim or imply that I dismiss the real problems with our piss-poor election systems, and follow that with a heaping serving of nonsense about how exit polls supposedly reveal widespread fraud committed by the Clinton campaign.
I suppose its better to be a Truth Nazi than the regular kind. And since well likely see a new round of this stuff following todays primaries, let me respond to all of these pieces by acknowledging that we have an election infrastructure that would embarrass most banana republics. But when it comes to exit polling, essentially everything these articles claim is dead wrong.
The laziest iteration of these claims is that the exit polls have diverged significantly from the final vote tallies in many of the states Clinton won, and the same pattern isnt evident in Republican contests. Thats simply untrue. The exit polls have been off in a couple of states, but for the most part theyve fallen within the margin of error in both Republican and Democratic contests.
But the conspiracy-mongers arent really talking about exit polls. Their claims are based on obsessively parsing preliminary exit poll data that some media outlets publish when the polls closethe same data that political reporters always tell people to take with a big grain of salt because theyre notoriously inaccurate. (Most of their claims are based on the work of Richard Charnin, who runs a blog devoted to JFK conspiracy and systemic election fraud analysis. Charnins also a mathematician, as Tim Robbins notes, but as well see, his calculations arent the problem.)