Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'm waiting for the M$M to announce that the Democratic Party Convention is cancelled (Original Post) 99th_Monkey Jun 2016 OP
Same thing happend with Obama 8 years ago. riversedge Jun 2016 #1
It is not the same at all. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #21
I'm waiting for Sanders to burst into the convention and cause a ruckus KingFlorez Jun 2016 #2
It won't be just him. Don't think his supporters will take this sitting down. HerbChestnut Jun 2016 #3
You are so right. kayakjohnny Jun 2016 #7
To much money at stake Skink Jun 2016 #4
This is nothing new--if the person gets the required delegates book_worm Jun 2016 #5
Neither candidate can win the nomination until the supers cast their ballots at the convention me b zola Jun 2016 #14
It was a stacked deck from the very beginning One Black Sheep Jun 2016 #6
Truth Hydra Jun 2016 #18
You must be new to politics. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #8
Conventions are where delegates cast votes to decide on the Party's nominee, or should be. nt 99th_Monkey Jun 2016 #10
why you upset Robbins Jun 2016 #17
Ratings, baby. They aren't going to cancel it. Barack_America Jun 2016 #9
You may be right. 99th_Monkey Jun 2016 #12
The convention has simply reflected the will of the voters for decades Zynx Jun 2016 #11
When was the last time we had a convention without knowing sufrommich Jun 2016 #13
1968 99th_Monkey Jun 2016 #15
Thank you.nt sufrommich Jun 2016 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author artislife Jun 2016 #20
1968. Is that what you were hoping to recreate? BainsBane Jun 2016 #23
"required number of delegates to win." <- is determined BY votes AT Philly's Dem Convention 99th_Monkey Jun 2016 #24
There is a presumtive nominee Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #19
However have you all survived every other presidential election BainsBane Jun 2016 #22
 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
3. It won't be just him. Don't think his supporters will take this sitting down.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:24 PM
Jun 2016

We're pissed, and tonight demonstrates why. This race has been a sham from the beginning.

kayakjohnny

(5,235 posts)
7. You are so right.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:31 PM
Jun 2016

This has been a terrible year for this country.

Not a lick of integrity in the proceedings.

Skink

(10,122 posts)
4. To much money at stake
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:26 PM
Jun 2016

Hotels booked. Uber fares priced in. Some aspiring presidential canidate to give a resounding speech. It's an Olympic event.

book_worm

(15,951 posts)
5. This is nothing new--if the person gets the required delegates
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:26 PM
Jun 2016

they are the nominee. It happens every four years.

me b zola

(19,053 posts)
14. Neither candidate can win the nomination until the supers cast their ballots at the convention
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:45 PM
Jun 2016

But you know that.

One Black Sheep

(458 posts)
6. It was a stacked deck from the very beginning
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:28 PM
Jun 2016

These shenanigans by the DNC started way back before Iowa, and then continued the whole way through. The corrupt establishment was determined to nominate Hillary. no matter what the people wanted. Hillary was given 3 aces from the dealer as a starting hand on purpose, and yet, she still almost blew it and lost to Bernie. That is how flawed a nominee she is.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
18. Truth
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:42 PM
Jun 2016

She had every possible advantage, legal and otherwise. Even being a mediocre candidate she should have finished 95%/5%.

I'm looking forward to the convention. Interesting times.

TwilightZone

(25,471 posts)
8. You must be new to politics.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:36 PM
Jun 2016

This happens nearly every election cycle. It's the norm; not the exception. Hillary reached the number of delegates because the delegates indicated a preference, not the media.

The convention is there to get people motivated to vote for Democrats, and not just at the top of the ticket. It's a place to showcase Democrats who are relatively new to the scene, like one Barack Obama.

It's not there to serve as a place for people who lost to continue to demonstrate why they lost.

Robbins

(5,066 posts)
17. why you upset
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 10:13 PM
Jun 2016

you right wing corporate neocon clinton supporters getting what you want.many of us bernie supporters will leave DU as it becomes clinton underground and democratic party becomes clinton party.

your candiate anbd husband have attacked us personly and say you don't need us.fine you can have it.

Zynx

(21,328 posts)
11. The convention has simply reflected the will of the voters for decades
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 09:42 PM
Jun 2016

The will of the voters has been clear for some time.

Response to 99th_Monkey (Reply #15)

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
23. 1968. Is that what you were hoping to recreate?
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 03:38 AM
Jun 2016

and usher in decades of GOP presidents as a result?

There is not going to be a contested convention. We have a candidate who has the required number of delegates to win. We also have a group of people who have decided the votes of the majority don't matter and that they should be able to impose a nominee against the will of the electorate. Ultimately, it doesn't matter how certain Bernie that his desire for power matters more than elections or that his supporters believe themselves superior to everyone else. The winner is the person who won the most votes and the most delegates, and Bernie supporters are just going to have to deal with the fact that the Democratic party is not willing to disenfranchise the majority to assuage them.

Next time you want a candidate to win, find someone actually willing to put in the work to organize get-out-the-vote efforts and then work like hell to get them elected.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
24. "required number of delegates to win." <- is determined BY votes AT Philly's Dem Convention
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 04:15 AM
Jun 2016

Not by the M$M at their whim.

This is nothing new. Th M$M has been pushing Hillary on the electorate since day-one. This
is just the (they hope) .... the final straw, where the Sanders campaign (according to Hillarian
"logic&quot totally "Implodes" into Oblivion .. hopefully never to be heard from again.

No fucking way. Wishful thinking^ It ain't gonna happen.

Believe it or not, Sandernistas are actual human beings, authentic & aware humans in search
of a political home, and on-fucking-fire for an actual Revolution, preferably in a non-violent
manner.

It is what it is.

Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.
~John F. Kennedy

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
22. However have you all survived every other presidential election
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 03:27 AM
Jun 2016

In your lives? This is ridiculous. Bernie lost. Deal with it. He stayed in longer than anyone who has trailed by such a wide margin. It's been obvious since March 15 that he wouldn't win. The entire nation isn't responsible for indulging the feelings of people who can't deal with the fact millions more voters have cast ballots for Clinton.

Most nominations have been decided far earlier. Did you whine about cancelling conventions then? Get over it already.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I'm waiting for the M$M t...