Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

larkrake

(1,674 posts)
5. Probably not, but there could be a heart attack, stroke, one could fall down stairs and die, both
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 04:21 PM
Jun 2016

candidates are aged people, and Hillary is hiding alot. Cenk is absolutely correct

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
6. I only saw one person...MSM...with an agenda that did not agree.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 04:32 PM
Jun 2016

That's not journalism. Censored. I rest my case.

Gothmog

(145,631 posts)
7. History is against Cenk-are all of the journalist who published these reports not journalists
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 04:36 PM
Jun 2016

Cenk is simply wrong. In every past contested Democratic primary, the presumptive winner was announced by the press based on super delegates. President Obama was correct in making this call and it will be appropriate for Hillayr Clinton to also make this call


?1464552977

?1464620111

?1464554531

?1464555844

?1464621209

?1464616682



History is a good thing and Sanders does not get special treatment that is different from all past contested democratic primaries. Cenk does not like history and that amuses me

toshiba783

(74 posts)
11. THANK YOU
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 05:07 PM
Jun 2016

It's unbelievable that so many people want to change the historical standards that have created a precedent for the coverage of elections - is Clinton really not supposed to garner the same treatment as her predecessors have?

Gothmog

(145,631 posts)
16. Trying to change the rules does set well with me
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 06:51 PM
Jun 2016

Sanders wants a different set of rules to apply to him

mmonk

(52,589 posts)
8. Cenk did fine. Attacks are more partisan than factual.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 04:36 PM
Jun 2016

That being said, I don't care what they say, just don't do it with millions left to vote or you are robbing them of something sacred concerning representative government.

Beacool

(30,253 posts)
9. Cenk is so far up Sanders' backside that Bernie is about to burp him.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 04:56 PM
Jun 2016

Cenk is being disingenuous. The reason that super delegates switched from Hillary to Obama in 2008 was because he ended the nominating process with more pledged delegates than Hillary. The hell with reality. Another fool......


pottedplant

(94 posts)
12. Cenk is consistent
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 05:08 PM
Jun 2016

I have been listening to him for years and he has not changed to align himself to sanders. His beliefs are largely my beliefs and sanders represents these beliefs on the national stage. I find it insulting that mr reliable sources is so shallow that he would extol the virtues of having a woman candidate at the expense of what she represents and what her record demonstrates. As has been noted in myriad posts, there are plenty of horrid women in politics none of whom I would want to fill an historic role. Astonishing that this fool would put form above substance.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
10. I only expect dishonesty at this point so I'm not surprised.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 05:05 PM
Jun 2016

This whole election is a travesty, and the media's role is pure propaganda, not news.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Cenk Uygur On CNN's Relia...