Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,595 posts)
Mon May 30, 2016, 02:30 PM May 2016

Has anyone noticed how much focus the Sanders folks are giving to the email story?

Because, that's NEVER been their issue with Clinton. They've been after her for being a neocon/DLCer/DINO/Wall St shill/practically a Republican. Unfortunately, the voters don't seem to agree. I guess if you can't sell the dog food, change the marketing.

81 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Has anyone noticed how much focus the Sanders folks are giving to the email story? (Original Post) brooklynite May 2016 OP
I notice they post with glee over a possible indictment. hrmjustin May 2016 #1
"Glee"? Hardly. Shame, more likely. bvf May 2016 #22
Feel better? hrmjustin May 2016 #25
Did you ever notice rock May 2016 #44
Yes. hrmjustin May 2016 #45
Point out the deflection. bvf May 2016 #72
That's rich rock May 2016 #74
So, what you're saying is, you can't. bvf May 2016 #77
Has anyone noticed how Hillary supporters are sticking their heads in the sand and refusing to see Live and Learn May 2016 #2
+10 99th_Monkey May 2016 #16
Or is it a resistance to swallowing rightwing bait like that... yallerdawg May 2016 #36
And the State Department and the FBI Armstead May 2016 #65
Yep. That's it in a nutshell. BillZBubb May 2016 #37
They are frightened because the People's Movement is growing every day and their precious rhett o rick May 2016 #48
Her loyalties are so obvious and some people simply refuse to acknowledge it. Sad. nt Live and Learn May 2016 #52
Nope. Corruption is corruption, same story. Our concerns are fact-based and these are newly proven JudyM May 2016 #3
Wouldn't it be funny Demsrule86 May 2016 #6
Ok, sure, whatever fantasy you need to escape seeing what she has done as corrupt, enjoy it JudyM May 2016 #10
LOL. Clinton becoming president. basselope May 2016 #17
That would be funny rock May 2016 #47
Took a while to recreate those 30,000 emails and find one of the trails libdem4life May 2016 #46
that is because it never was spelled out inthe detail hollysmom May 2016 #4
no Demsrule86 May 2016 #7
the bambboozling gnome won't save her, either. virtualobserver May 2016 #14
no, you are wrong. hollysmom May 2016 #21
The Corp-Oligarchy that Clinton ($150,000,000) represents is going down. It's time to get rhett o rick May 2016 #50
+10 99th_Monkey May 2016 #18
It was the OIG report....it is Hillary who has changed her tune. virtualobserver May 2016 #5
Remove Clinton nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #13
When you are losing by every metric Trenzalore May 2016 #8
This. It's just nasty and bitter scscholar May 2016 #11
Has not one thing to do with Sanders nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #15
Its politics Trenzalore May 2016 #20
But Sanders has not. nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #23
The alternative is a guy Trenzalore May 2016 #27
There is a looming disaster nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #29
She played it up...til she got caught with a photo of her and the same guy Armstead May 2016 #71
They're confusing "rules" with crimes. MADem May 2016 #9
Add CNN to that and editorial boards across the nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #12
lol. That's idoitic. We've consistently said she is a liability becuse morningfog May 2016 #19
...bad leadership... HumanityExperiment May 2016 #24
I noticed Sanders doesn't talk about the email scandal at his rallies Eric J in MN May 2016 #26
Exactly. And he tries to talk other issues nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #28
Too bad, though. He should have been on this from the beginning. BillZBubb May 2016 #35
Well now there is a report that challenges her story to an extent aikoaiko May 2016 #30
Trump - Sanders, two campaigns that are trying to bring down Hillary. Beacool May 2016 #31
Because DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #33
One down and one more to go. Beacool May 2016 #41
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #80
What about politics do you not understand. People run to win. libdem4life May 2016 #51
Notice how the Hillary folks just can't understand why we don't like Hillary? BillZBubb May 2016 #32
I fear that some (at least one or two) WhiteTara May 2016 #34
By golly, I agree with you. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #38
The FBI seems pretty interested... Yurovsky May 2016 #39
They have been preparing the ground on that nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #40
Desperation. MineralMan May 2016 #42
I'm not HRC's biggest fan, ZombieHorde May 2016 #60
Thanks. My humor is a bit warped, but I try. MineralMan May 2016 #61
Your warped humor is why I enjoy your posts. ZombieHorde May 2016 #63
Ever notice..... N.Y. to Paris May 2016 #43
I'm all done defending the Clintons. Grew tired of that after NAFTA! B Calm May 2016 #49
It's much more than "an e-mail story" flor-de-jasmim May 2016 #53
Their movement is dying before their eyes...it's just reactionary. nt anotherproletariat May 2016 #54
Marketing? pmorlan1 May 2016 #55
The digital equivalent of jaywalking is hardly a scandal. Hoyt May 2016 #56
Oh, so sending Blumenthal top secret material pertaining to national security Rattlesnake Chaser May 2016 #58
Assuming she did, which is questionable, Blumenthal is not a spy or security risk. Hoyt May 2016 #59
SAP material from NSA is not a nothing burget nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #69
All other roads lead to nowhere. JoePhilly May 2016 #57
Seriously, don't you ever get tired of defending the Clintons? NAFTA, IMPEACHMENT, B Calm May 2016 #62
It has been good for her family nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #64
Well I'm done defending them. I'll be damn if I'll be embarrassed by their actions! B Calm May 2016 #67
I am with you, but in their case nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #68
There is just so much to choose from. Honestly she is the gift that keeps on giving. Seeinghope May 2016 #66
Sanders said he did not care to speak of it, but noted it was under investigation - it still is karynnj May 2016 #70
Nope. My #1 issue with Hillary is her disastrous climate change policies riderinthestorm May 2016 #73
Kind of like the FBI! Lol. morningfog May 2016 #75
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #76
So fucking strange that people talk about a political issue on a political message board. Autumn May 2016 #78
Dead Enders gotta dead end. nt geek tragedy May 2016 #79
Yes, as they should. bigwillq May 2016 #81
 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
22. "Glee"? Hardly. Shame, more likely.
Mon May 30, 2016, 03:01 PM
May 2016

You should know better. You probably do.

The shame is yours.

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
72. Point out the deflection.
Mon May 30, 2016, 11:47 PM
May 2016

There was none.

Perhaps you could use a simpler vocabulary list.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
2. Has anyone noticed how Hillary supporters are sticking their heads in the sand and refusing to see
Mon May 30, 2016, 02:34 PM
May 2016

Last edited Mon May 30, 2016, 03:24 PM - Edit history (1)

how flawed and unethical their candidate is?

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
36. Or is it a resistance to swallowing rightwing bait like that...
Mon May 30, 2016, 03:13 PM
May 2016

generated from the Benghazi Committee, Judicial Watch, Republican "leaks" and Fox News sources using speculation and innuendo to hurt OUR candidate?

I'd rather be skeptical than a tool.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
48. They are frightened because the People's Movement is growing every day and their precious
Mon May 30, 2016, 03:45 PM
May 2016

corporate-oligarchy is in trouble. They are on the wrong side of this class war. Guess whose side Clinton is with her $150,000,000 wealth?

JudyM

(29,251 posts)
3. Nope. Corruption is corruption, same story. Our concerns are fact-based and these are newly proven
Mon May 30, 2016, 02:35 PM
May 2016

facts.

And apparently there are more facts to come. Better fasten your seatbelt if this is already making your head spin...

Demsrule86

(68,586 posts)
6. Wouldn't it be funny
Mon May 30, 2016, 02:38 PM
May 2016

If Clinton becomes president and Jane and Bernie go to camp fed over that college potential mortgage fraud scandal. Corruption is corruption. Hillary goes to the White House and Bernie goes to the er big house.

JudyM

(29,251 posts)
10. Ok, sure, whatever fantasy you need to escape seeing what she has done as corrupt, enjoy it
Mon May 30, 2016, 02:45 PM
May 2016

while you still can, my friend. We have only seen the prelude from State.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
46. Took a while to recreate those 30,000 emails and find one of the trails
Mon May 30, 2016, 03:43 PM
May 2016

that ties in the Clinton Foundation way beyond the email scandal. I believe that the reason it has gone on and on is that the Rabbit Hole has led to places formerly unknown.

Now with the discovery of the Large Donation of Bill's buddy through a secret Canadian source, I think it has heated up and has triggered a different look. Many of the Clinton Foundation donors, as I read it, are hidden behind a myriad of shell companies and similar tax/donation dodges.

But, nothing to see here. Move right along.

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)
4. that is because it never was spelled out inthe detail
Mon May 30, 2016, 02:36 PM
May 2016

that has been released by the department.
to me e-,mail is mostly a waste of time that I Have to despam all the time, Or annoying when I have to print some of it out. burt now that the law has been identified that was broken and the details of the case are all out there, it is a different story. I thought it was just a rule, I had no idea it was a law, so in the past I defended Clinton, But I think the failures of security and the exposed lies about what happened, and that damn blackberry has changed my opinion. She didn't eve password protect her e-mail, that is only possible because of her unsecured not password protected server - the people who told her not to do it that she ignored, the permission she never asked, it all adds up to someone hellbent on doing what they want and if a an international incident occurred, oh well, too bad.

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)
21. no, you are wrong.
Mon May 30, 2016, 02:57 PM
May 2016

You asked a question and I answered honestly - look back and see how many times I defended Clinton on this, But I can not do that anymore - I am an IT person and she offended me to the very core by not listening to people who knew what they were talking about. You don't have to be an IT expert, but if you don't know something listen to people who do, not yes men who will agree with what ever you say like her "security Expert" who is no expert. I mean can you justify not password protecting a server. For goodness sakes, I am on a specialized board and we password protected our video vault and it is mostly copies of old videos which were aging off the internet......And it was set up by old women 13 years ago!

So please stop assuming things based on what you want to believe and start looking at the facts of the case I am not in denial, I don't expect Sanders to win, I do believe he should be allowed to run unless we are living in some sort of dictatorship or something, I do believe that there is too much corporate influence in the party and would like to see that fixed.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
50. The Corp-Oligarchy that Clinton ($150,000,000) represents is going down. It's time to get
Mon May 30, 2016, 03:47 PM
May 2016

the influence of the Wealthy out of government. The People's Movement is gaining momentum.

 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
5. It was the OIG report....it is Hillary who has changed her tune.
Mon May 30, 2016, 02:37 PM
May 2016

She has moved from "it was allowed" to "I thought it was allowed".

It is proceeding like a textbook Clinton scandal.




 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
13. Remove Clinton
Mon May 30, 2016, 02:48 PM
May 2016

It is proceeding like a textbook scandal. This includes the lashing out and bunker mentality by supporters.

Trenzalore

(2,331 posts)
20. Its politics
Mon May 30, 2016, 02:57 PM
May 2016

I'm sure if there was a potential indictment in 2008 for Tony Rezko the Hillary people would have been playing it up till the last primary.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
23. But Sanders has not.
Mon May 30, 2016, 03:02 PM
May 2016

And this is the reality. Now trump already is

But back to reality, what the FBIi does is separate from the process. They are supposed to be independent. Learn that. If they recommend indictment your party will have to either change it's tune, or lose the election. That is where they intersect. For the record, I give two shits who your party nominates. But if suicide in November is your choice, full speed ahead. The country will suffer, but please nominate a weak, not natural politician (her words) and now deeply wounded politician. Go for it.

I know what I am doing. Who I am pretending to vote that is.

Trenzalore

(2,331 posts)
27. The alternative is a guy
Mon May 30, 2016, 03:06 PM
May 2016

Who couldn't beat the weak, not natural politician.

If there is a looming disaster, the best alternative is a dark horse candidate at the convention.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
29. There is a looming disaster
Mon May 30, 2016, 03:09 PM
May 2016

And the alternative is not one I intend to talk here. Suffice it to say, historians won't be kind with democrats if they stick with her. You will help elect a fascist

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
71. She played it up...til she got caught with a photo of her and the same guy
Mon May 30, 2016, 08:00 PM
May 2016
http://www.mtv.com/news/1580029/hillary-clinton-barack-obama-get-personal-at-testy-debate/
The second-to-last debate of the primary season found Obama and Clinton pulling out some nasty accusations about each other, with Clinton saying that while she was fighting against the bad ideas of Republican administrations, Obama was “practicing law and representing [his] contributor [Tony] Rezko in his slum-landlord business in inner-city Chicago.” She was referring to longtime Obama fundraiser Tony Rezko, who was indicted last fall on federal charges of business fraud and influence peddling.



http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2008/03/obama-and-rezko-any-there-there

In emails, on conference calls with reporters, on the campaign trail, Hillary Clinton and her aides have repeatedly raised the issue of Barack Obama's relationship with Tony Rezko, a developer now on trial on corruption charges. Clinton aides have said over and over that there are "unanswered questions" about this relationship and have encouraged reporters to dig, dig, dig (even though several reporters have already done so). Clinton referred to Rezko during the debates. Though Obama has been accused of no wrongdoing in the Rezko affair, he did--as he has acknowledged--screw up by getting into a personal real estate transaction with Rezko when the developer was under federal investigation.


For anyone wondering if there is any there there to the Rezko ma

MADem

(135,425 posts)
9. They're confusing "rules" with crimes.
Mon May 30, 2016, 02:45 PM
May 2016

It's funny, because there are rules here, and some don't feel the need to follow them and no one is calling that a "crime." I guess it's OK if you cheer for that team!

A week and a day...can't wait.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
19. lol. That's idoitic. We've consistently said she is a liability becuse
Mon May 30, 2016, 02:55 PM
May 2016

Of her poor judgment and that this story has legs. Those legs went to the OIG, FBI and DOJ.

 

HumanityExperiment

(1,442 posts)
24. ...bad leadership...
Mon May 30, 2016, 03:03 PM
May 2016

HRC is all about bad leadership, bad decisions...

What we 'notice', there is so much more... we just have this private server as the most recent to 'chat' about...

IRAQ War

Wall Street Deregulation

Keystone Pipeline

TPP trade, any trade deal for that matter...

Fracking

Same Sex marriage

Libya

and on and on....

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
26. I noticed Sanders doesn't talk about the email scandal at his rallies
Mon May 30, 2016, 03:04 PM
May 2016

...and only in interviews when he's asked.

aikoaiko

(34,172 posts)
30. Well now there is a report that challenges her story to an extent
Mon May 30, 2016, 03:09 PM
May 2016

It's not just partisan speculation now.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
31. Trump - Sanders, two campaigns that are trying to bring down Hillary.
Mon May 30, 2016, 03:11 PM
May 2016

Two campaigns that will fail to do so.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
41. One down and one more to go.
Mon May 30, 2016, 03:24 PM
May 2016

Hillary is on her way to the nomination. The next step will be to vanquish the Oompa Loompa candidate.

Response to Beacool (Reply #41)

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
51. What about politics do you not understand. People run to win.
Mon May 30, 2016, 03:48 PM
May 2016

Not to "bring down" or fulfill the Conspiracy Theories of a certain group of partisans. Go with your candidate. Shout out her strengths. Make your case. You support her. Stick with it.

Victims and children act/speak this way.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
32. Notice how the Hillary folks just can't understand why we don't like Hillary?
Mon May 30, 2016, 03:12 PM
May 2016

They give a list of a FEW of our issues with her. They of course omit the others that are just as important--they deal with her lack of character.

The emails are just the latest, of a thousand examples, of Hillary's dishonesty.

Oh, and the voters DO agree--just not the Democratic primary voters. The polls show a big majority of all voters know Hillary is dishonest and untrustworthy. The Hillary few just don't get it--what with there heads in the sand and all.

WhiteTara

(29,718 posts)
34. I fear that some (at least one or two)
Mon May 30, 2016, 03:12 PM
May 2016

will have a stroke they are so worked up. Multiple threads multiple times a day.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
38. By golly, I agree with you.
Mon May 30, 2016, 03:14 PM
May 2016
They've been after her for being a neocon/DLCer/DINO/Wall St shill/practically a Republican.

I don't know about "they" but those are my issues with her.

The email thing is just another indication of her unfitness for public office.
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
40. They have been preparing the ground on that
Mon May 30, 2016, 03:22 PM
May 2016

For months.

Why the OIG report was partisan. Yup, saw that here. The FBI is led by a registered republican (true) who was appointed by Obama. Before long, especially if there is an indictment, Obama will be part of it. This is never ever the fault of a Clinton

N.Y. to Paris

(110 posts)
43. Ever notice.....
Mon May 30, 2016, 03:29 PM
May 2016

how Clinton-folk are in denial of the email story, even
though we're talking about the FBI and she's already
admitted she screwed up? Sorry, either way; she's
damaged goods.... you want to jump up and down about
her, that's your business, BTW, I thought she'd won already,
why the 24-7 bashing of Bernie and "Sanders folks"? She's
incredibly divisive and so are these never ending, every
day arrogant posts? Is this how we bring the "Party" together?
Again; sorry, but you can have "BLUNDER WOMAN".....
Actually, what she needs is a new campaign slogan, something
like.....Straight To Hell With Hill!
Wait a minute...... that's not too bad!

pmorlan1

(2,096 posts)
55. Marketing?
Mon May 30, 2016, 04:09 PM
May 2016

I'm beginning to think Clinton Derangement Syndrome is not a description of her critics but her defenders. Whether you like it or not this is a serious issue and it has grave implications for our Party. Making light of it is just as bad as saying you know for sure she will be indicted. None of us knows how this will end but following this story is a no-brainer. I would have much more respect for Hillary supporters if they just said they will wait until the FBI finishes their investigation rather than attacking Sanders supporters for paying attention to this story and pretending it's Sanders fault.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
68. I am with you, but in their case
Mon May 30, 2016, 07:46 PM
May 2016

it makes sense. For us working stiffs... chickens for colonel sanders...

 

Seeinghope

(786 posts)
66. There is just so much to choose from. Honestly she is the gift that keeps on giving.
Mon May 30, 2016, 07:45 PM
May 2016

We all saw the debate where Bernie Sanders mentioned the Wall Street speeches and she countered with his tax return. He then said that he would release his tax return the next day so she could release the transcripts the next day too. She did an about face and then changed over and said "the Republicans should release their....." Bernie Sanders called her bluff and she failed. Her love of aggression in solving problems towards countries especially in the ME is obvious. She is totally tied in with the DNC who is fully supporting her and working against Bernie Sanders. It is nothing to be proud of but it is the truth.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
70. Sanders said he did not care to speak of it, but noted it was under investigation - it still is
Mon May 30, 2016, 07:48 PM
May 2016

In addition, the State Department IG just issued a report. Imagine if the Republican had been the one in Clinton's position (as part of a Republican administration.) She would speak of it.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
73. Nope. My #1 issue with Hillary is her disastrous climate change policies
Mon May 30, 2016, 11:54 PM
May 2016

Everything else is simply window dressing. I'll comment on other issues but honestly climate change issues are demonstrably my #1 focus.


Response to brooklynite (Original post)

Autumn

(45,106 posts)
78. So fucking strange that people talk about a political issue on a political message board.
Tue May 31, 2016, 09:05 AM
May 2016

Skinner needs to stop it at once!! We need to focus on how well she dresses.

 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
81. Yes, as they should.
Tue May 31, 2016, 09:57 AM
May 2016

Have you noticed how much focus the Hillary folks are giving Bernie when he has little shot at the nomination?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Has anyone noticed how mu...