2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHas anyone noticed how much focus the Sanders folks are giving to the email story?
Because, that's NEVER been their issue with Clinton. They've been after her for being a neocon/DLCer/DINO/Wall St shill/practically a Republican. Unfortunately, the voters don't seem to agree. I guess if you can't sell the dog food, change the marketing.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)You should know better. You probably do.
The shame is yours.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)rock
(13,218 posts)How BSers first choice for a reply always seems to be deflection?
bvf
(6,604 posts)There was none.
Perhaps you could use a simpler vocabulary list.
Not LOL funny, but still pretty funny.
bvf
(6,604 posts)OK, then.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Last edited Mon May 30, 2016, 03:24 PM - Edit history (1)
how flawed and unethical their candidate is?
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)generated from the Benghazi Committee, Judicial Watch, Republican "leaks" and Fox News sources using speculation and innuendo to hurt OUR candidate?
I'd rather be skeptical than a tool.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)corporate-oligarchy is in trouble. They are on the wrong side of this class war. Guess whose side Clinton is with her $150,000,000 wealth?
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)JudyM
(29,251 posts)facts.
And apparently there are more facts to come. Better fasten your seatbelt if this is already making your head spin...
Demsrule86
(68,586 posts)If Clinton becomes president and Jane and Bernie go to camp fed over that college potential mortgage fraud scandal. Corruption is corruption. Hillary goes to the White House and Bernie goes to the er big house.
JudyM
(29,251 posts)while you still can, my friend. We have only seen the prelude from State.
basselope
(2,565 posts)That's funny.
0 chance.
But funny.
rock
(13,218 posts)Even if Hillary didn't become president. That's just icing on the cake!
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)that ties in the Clinton Foundation way beyond the email scandal. I believe that the reason it has gone on and on is that the Rabbit Hole has led to places formerly unknown.
Now with the discovery of the Large Donation of Bill's buddy through a secret Canadian source, I think it has heated up and has triggered a different look. Many of the Clinton Foundation donors, as I read it, are hidden behind a myriad of shell companies and similar tax/donation dodges.
But, nothing to see here. Move right along.
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)that has been released by the department.
to me e-,mail is mostly a waste of time that I Have to despam all the time, Or annoying when I have to print some of it out. burt now that the law has been identified that was broken and the details of the case are all out there, it is a different story. I thought it was just a rule, I had no idea it was a law, so in the past I defended Clinton, But I think the failures of security and the exposed lies about what happened, and that damn blackberry has changed my opinion. She didn't eve password protect her e-mail, that is only possible because of her unsecured not password protected server - the people who told her not to do it that she ignored, the permission she never asked, it all adds up to someone hellbent on doing what they want and if a an international incident occurred, oh well, too bad.
You just want Bernie to win but he lost so you grasp at straws...indictment fairy not coming.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)hollysmom
(5,946 posts)You asked a question and I answered honestly - look back and see how many times I defended Clinton on this, But I can not do that anymore - I am an IT person and she offended me to the very core by not listening to people who knew what they were talking about. You don't have to be an IT expert, but if you don't know something listen to people who do, not yes men who will agree with what ever you say like her "security Expert" who is no expert. I mean can you justify not password protecting a server. For goodness sakes, I am on a specialized board and we password protected our video vault and it is mostly copies of old videos which were aging off the internet......And it was set up by old women 13 years ago!
So please stop assuming things based on what you want to believe and start looking at the facts of the case I am not in denial, I don't expect Sanders to win, I do believe he should be allowed to run unless we are living in some sort of dictatorship or something, I do believe that there is too much corporate influence in the party and would like to see that fixed.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)the influence of the Wealthy out of government. The People's Movement is gaining momentum.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)She has moved from "it was allowed" to "I thought it was allowed".
It is proceeding like a textbook Clinton scandal.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)It is proceeding like a textbook scandal. This includes the lashing out and bunker mentality by supporters.
Trenzalore
(2,331 posts)Your only hope is misfortune for your opponent.
scscholar
(2,902 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Or is the FBI working for the Sanders campaign?
Trenzalore
(2,331 posts)I'm sure if there was a potential indictment in 2008 for Tony Rezko the Hillary people would have been playing it up till the last primary.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)And this is the reality. Now trump already is
But back to reality, what the FBIi does is separate from the process. They are supposed to be independent. Learn that. If they recommend indictment your party will have to either change it's tune, or lose the election. That is where they intersect. For the record, I give two shits who your party nominates. But if suicide in November is your choice, full speed ahead. The country will suffer, but please nominate a weak, not natural politician (her words) and now deeply wounded politician. Go for it.
I know what I am doing. Who I am pretending to vote that is.
Trenzalore
(2,331 posts)Who couldn't beat the weak, not natural politician.
If there is a looming disaster, the best alternative is a dark horse candidate at the convention.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)And the alternative is not one I intend to talk here. Suffice it to say, historians won't be kind with democrats if they stick with her. You will help elect a fascist
Armstead
(47,803 posts)http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2008/03/obama-and-rezko-any-there-there
For anyone wondering if there is any there there to the Rezko ma
MADem
(135,425 posts)It's funny, because there are rules here, and some don't feel the need to follow them and no one is calling that a "crime." I guess it's OK if you cheer for that team!
A week and a day...can't wait.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Country.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Of her poor judgment and that this story has legs. Those legs went to the OIG, FBI and DOJ.
HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)HRC is all about bad leadership, bad decisions...
What we 'notice', there is so much more... we just have this private server as the most recent to 'chat' about...
IRAQ War
Wall Street Deregulation
Keystone Pipeline
TPP trade, any trade deal for that matter...
Fracking
Same Sex marriage
Libya
and on and on....
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)...and only in interviews when he's asked.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)He gave her a pass.
aikoaiko
(34,172 posts)It's not just partisan speculation now.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)Two campaigns that will fail to do so.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Beacool
(30,250 posts)Hillary is on her way to the nomination. The next step will be to vanquish the Oompa Loompa candidate.
Response to Beacool (Reply #41)
Name removed Message auto-removed
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Not to "bring down" or fulfill the Conspiracy Theories of a certain group of partisans. Go with your candidate. Shout out her strengths. Make your case. You support her. Stick with it.
Victims and children act/speak this way.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)They give a list of a FEW of our issues with her. They of course omit the others that are just as important--they deal with her lack of character.
The emails are just the latest, of a thousand examples, of Hillary's dishonesty.
Oh, and the voters DO agree--just not the Democratic primary voters. The polls show a big majority of all voters know Hillary is dishonest and untrustworthy. The Hillary few just don't get it--what with there heads in the sand and all.
WhiteTara
(29,718 posts)will have a stroke they are so worked up. Multiple threads multiple times a day.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)I don't know about "they" but those are my issues with her.
The email thing is just another indication of her unfitness for public office.
Yurovsky
(2,064 posts)I guess that make the FBI already complicit in the VRWC.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)For months.
Why the OIG report was partisan. Yup, saw that here. The FBI is led by a registered republican (true) who was appointed by Obama. Before long, especially if there is an indictment, Obama will be part of it. This is never ever the fault of a Clinton
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)"O FBI kenobi, you're our only hope!"
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)but that is pretty funny.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)N.Y. to Paris
(110 posts)how Clinton-folk are in denial of the email story, even
though we're talking about the FBI and she's already
admitted she screwed up? Sorry, either way; she's
damaged goods.... you want to jump up and down about
her, that's your business, BTW, I thought she'd won already,
why the 24-7 bashing of Bernie and "Sanders folks"? She's
incredibly divisive and so are these never ending, every
day arrogant posts? Is this how we bring the "Party" together?
Again; sorry, but you can have "BLUNDER WOMAN".....
Actually, what she needs is a new campaign slogan, something
like.....Straight To Hell With Hill!
Wait a minute...... that's not too bad!
B Calm
(28,762 posts)flor-de-jasmim
(2,125 posts)anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)pmorlan1
(2,096 posts)I'm beginning to think Clinton Derangement Syndrome is not a description of her critics but her defenders. Whether you like it or not this is a serious issue and it has grave implications for our Party. Making light of it is just as bad as saying you know for sure she will be indicted. None of us knows how this will end but following this story is a no-brainer. I would have much more respect for Hillary supporters if they just said they will wait until the FBI finishes their investigation rather than attacking Sanders supporters for paying attention to this story and pretending it's Sanders fault.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Rattlesnake Chaser
(23 posts)is jaywalking?
Uh-huh.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)Etc.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)they are in the top you see.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)it makes sense. For us working stiffs... chickens for colonel sanders...
Seeinghope
(786 posts)We all saw the debate where Bernie Sanders mentioned the Wall Street speeches and she countered with his tax return. He then said that he would release his tax return the next day so she could release the transcripts the next day too. She did an about face and then changed over and said "the Republicans should release their....." Bernie Sanders called her bluff and she failed. Her love of aggression in solving problems towards countries especially in the ME is obvious. She is totally tied in with the DNC who is fully supporting her and working against Bernie Sanders. It is nothing to be proud of but it is the truth.
karynnj
(59,504 posts)In addition, the State Department IG just issued a report. Imagine if the Republican had been the one in Clinton's position (as part of a Republican administration.) She would speak of it.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Everything else is simply window dressing. I'll comment on other issues but honestly climate change issues are demonstrably my #1 focus.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Response to brooklynite (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Autumn
(45,106 posts)Skinner needs to stop it at once!! We need to focus on how well she dresses.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)bigwillq
(72,790 posts)Have you noticed how much focus the Hillary folks are giving Bernie when he has little shot at the nomination?