2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThey just showed Hillary marching in a Memorial Day parade on MSNBC
I have no words.......
I wonder how many people watching the parade lost loved ones in Iraq?
Depaysement
(1,835 posts)Like in Bosnia?
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)Hillary really betrayed Andrea Mitchell... The entire context of this report was of a solemn nature... A Funeral so to speak...
Andrea Mitchell "I do not see this report as ...ANYTHING BUT... DEVASTATING!"
Chuck Todd "After this I don't think that she could get confirmed for Attorney General!"
Lots of FIBBING by Hillary here.. for more than a year!
merrily
(45,251 posts)Merryland
(1,134 posts)Depaysement
(1,835 posts)Winner! See ya at JP!
JonathanRackham
(1,604 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)She voted for a war which never should have happened and I lost 3 friends. I'm sorry but every single politician who supported it should be held accountable and they ZERO business being around any Memorial Day parade.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)And if she is to be president i want her to remember the costs of war.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)That's why they conduct periodic purity tests and post threads with comments salivating for the day when Hillary's critics can be purged and the site will be pure "all Hillary all the time." http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512084725
But until then, let us continue to talk freely, for this IS a primary and there are two candidates in this primary contest.
Response to pinebox (Reply #12)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)retrowire
(10,345 posts)OwlinAZ
(410 posts)beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)Memorial Day....disparaging service to our country isn't...
pinebox
(5,761 posts)isn't an honor, it's utterly disgusting.
Nobody should have died in Iraq. NOBODY.
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)Dishonoring people who serve doesn't belong here and doesn't belong especially on Memorial Day
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Iraq has nothing to do with Memorial Day?
Ford has nothing to do with cars.
Kellogg's has nothing to cereal.
Cigarette's have nothing to do with cancer.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)Is about....you best educate yourself
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)So no one serving in the Armed Forces died in Iraq?
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)Really....
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Is there a problem?
A war is a war is a war. American servicemen and women died in Iraq. To say Iraq has nothing to do with Memorial Day is simply, well, goofy.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)A death is a death.
Whether the blood runs into the sand of the Middle East or the sand of Normandy Beach. The soldier is just as dead, the mother grieves just as much, the children are just as fatherless.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Memorial Day is about remembering our troops who gave their life.
This isn't Veterans Day.
Are you confused?
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)As I said I lost 3 friends in Iraq. It's Memorial Day, we remember them and I know damn well they'd be here today if people like Hillary hadn't voted for that bullshit war.
Response to beachbumbob (Reply #67)
pinebox This message was self-deleted by its author.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)... send our Best and Brightest to die for their greed and hubris, it will ALWAYS be about politics.
There's something really wrong on all levels with the statements you've made on this thread. You should be ashamed, but like most Clinton fans, you likely have no shame.
Response to beachbumbob (Reply #67)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
TheSarcastinator
(854 posts)liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)Memorial day is a day to remember those who died. You might want to self delete to avoid embarrassing yourself further.
merrily
(45,251 posts)not dishonor anyone who served.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Wow! I'm speechless.
So few posts, and yet I think you've already made it into the Hall of Fame.
reddread
(6,896 posts)Autumn
(45,106 posts)jack_krass
(1,009 posts)The logical fallacies they will try to push as truths...
The mud they are willing to crawl in
All In order to prop up this fatally flawed candidate.
Sad.
Response to jack_krass (Reply #90)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Do you read?
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)"Wars Hillary helped start don't count"
DFab420
(2,466 posts)You just insulted, whether intentional or not.
LP2K12
(885 posts)I'd like you to meet some Gold Star Families who lost loved ones in Iraq. They'd have some very colorful responses to your statement.
Depaysement
(1,835 posts)The point is to honor the fallen. Get it right or leave it alone.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)with hatred, even on Memorial Day.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Marching in a Memorial Day parade after her votes and policies have caused so many to even be memorialized is the height of hubris.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)political hatred.
BootinUp
(47,165 posts)beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)So it's easy for them to pile the hate on....
liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)Merryland
(1,134 posts)I don't hate HER, but I am sickened by the mess she has created with her self-inflicted stupidity.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)He's an Army veteran.
He came home one night two weeks ago and announced he wasn't voting this year if it's Clinton and Trump. I talked him into at least voting for the handful of Democrats running locally and in our state downticket and told him just to vote Green or leave the top blank.
I wonder how many people have said that in the past couple of weeks?
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)Hugs to both of you. I made the same choice.
DookDook
(166 posts)My wife and I talked about this issue a few weeks ago and he never talked about why he didn't vote and I my theory went along the lines of the fact that he may have thought that voting was legitimizing a government that would draft young men into he M.I.C. But I really don't know, he didn't talk about his politics or religion and he never talked about the war.
I'm glad your husband is okay and I hope he votes, it used to drive us all crazy that her dad refused to vote and we used to tell him as much.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)It is pure Americana. The cnn press critter tried to ask questions and was properly ignored though
pinebox
(5,761 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)At least he is a former marine. But he was in better shape and outran me. But I agree...how they play the press is one reason people do hate pols
Fritz Walter
(4,291 posts)Was her sedan chair being re-upholstered?
And before someone misinterprets my comment, here you go:
pinebox
(5,761 posts)but to some above, Iraq has nothing to do with Memorial Day.
Demsrule86
(68,586 posts)so spare me your faux outrage.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)and you know better.
annavictorious
(934 posts)My goodness. Aren't you cavalier with other people's lives.
We get it. There's always an excuse when Sanders does it. He's the exception to every rule.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)on false pretenses in those conflicts?
We'll wait.
Hillary voted for a war based on lies and did NOT have the judgement to tell that. Obama and Bernie did. That's reality. Your spin is only that, spin, like a top that just fell on its side.
annavictorious
(934 posts)You need to brush up on the actual facts if you want to make a cogent argument.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Speaking out against the war can be done outside the hallowed halls of Congress.
OwlinAZ
(410 posts)annavictorious
(934 posts)that the Department of Defense didn't want, but Sanders insisted they needed because he had cut a deal to have it manufactured in Vermont.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)ebayfool
(3,411 posts)but I missed it when originally posted. So it wasn't wasted effort - TY!
WhiteTara
(29,718 posts)before Iraq. You may adore and love him, but in the end, he is a politician.
Response to pinebox (Original post)
Post removed
pinebox
(5,761 posts)that 2 of my favorite people voted against a war we shouldn't have fought. Obama and Bernie.
There's your reality.
annavictorious
(934 posts)Obama was a state senator in Illinois at the time of the Iraq war vote. He wasn't yet in Congress.
My suggestion is that you might want to read up on your two favorite people. You don't seem to know much about them.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Funding. In 2007 he voted against a bill which ad no time table pull out.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)math as your fellow Hillary supporters claim to be.
Here's a little fact about the 2000 election and "Naderites" who you claim caused Gore to lose... Tennessee had 11 electoral votes. Had Al Gore managed to win his OWN HOME STATE, he would have won the election no matter how many recounts they had in Florida. Those 11 electoral votes would have put him over the top. Ralph Nader's votes in Tennessee had no bearing on who got those 11 electoral votes.
QC
(26,371 posts)and demanding that everyone else leave--voted for Bush in Florida.
But we're supposed to kiss the asses of the "blue dog" types.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)But it's Nader's fault that Gore lost. There's some real contorting going on there.
Tom Rinaldo
(22,913 posts)I think that's a stretch too far. She can honor those who have served, in fact if anything she has more of an obligation to do so than most of us.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)If you voted for the biggest blunder in American history which lead to the senseless death of millions of people, you shouldn't be serving in Gov't period.
Tom Rinaldo
(22,913 posts)and I respect where you are coming from.
Response to Tom Rinaldo (Reply #25)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)Alfresco
(1,698 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)In a parade she does not have to answer questions. Interesting.
TheFarS1de
(1,017 posts)High visibility and an inability to be questioned ..... hiding in the open .
Softail1
(56 posts)...and turn them into political footballs?..Really?..gross. We honor those that sacrificed their lives in the name of their country. Nothing more, nothing less. I find it sad that some are incapable of putting politics aside for even one moment. Yes, I am a veteran, my dad was a veteran, and my son is a veteran.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)for people who died who never should have.
It's Memorial Day. A day when we remember them. I lost 3 friends in a war which never should have happened and that is the biggest blunder in American history. Hillary supported that war.
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)Have a hug.
Rattlesnake Chaser
(23 posts)That's for sure.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)This insults/sickens you?
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Go read the responses in this thread.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Everyone ought to march in a Memorial Day parade if they are able.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....as he would put it, "that bill would have passed anyway".
And before you say not funding the was would have left the troops stranded, that is NOT true, they would have been brought home sooner.
Have it your way.
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)How do you feel when you look at bush and cheney?
And Trump who's prepared to start a whole lot of new wars based on his warped sense of reality?
the bounds of hatred must cloud rational thinking.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)I feel the same way when I look at Bush & Cheney. You have a problem with that?
Sorry but this isn't about Trump, spin as you may.
It's about Hillary marching in a Memorial Day parade where she has zero business marching. As I said, I wonder how many people watching her do that lost loved ones in Iraq, a war she voted for and a country she called a "business opportunity".
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)talk about deluded.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)It wants their lost in the forest ideology back.
RandySF
(58,899 posts)So many heads are going to explode at the convention that we all may need to wear garbage bags. Why don't you all just save yourselves the stress and just vote for Trump?
Ino
(3,366 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)It's the main reason why I avoid events at which celebrities will be present -- whether politicians or movie types. I don't need to be reminded that I'm a nobody and there must be a physical barrier separating me from the big shots with money, power, and influence.
coco77
(1,327 posts)What was she thinking.
coco77
(1,327 posts)She has bad Judgment
Broward
(1,976 posts)That Hillary is the presumptive nominee for the Dem Party shows that there's no cost to politicians that vote for bullshit wars.
madamesilverspurs
(15,805 posts)to disparage those veterans who walk beside her and campaign for her?
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Of course you can't.
MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)Nice knowing you. I know DU doesn't allow Republican agitators.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)His YEA votes were used as part of the justification for the IWR.
Here are a few words on the topic: http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/02/16/blood-traces-bernies-iraq-war-hypocrisy/
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)The Serbian response asked for by Bill Clinton was almost a NATO Allied response due to extreme atrocities and expansion of Serbia into Europe. btw...this didn't cost one US life.
The response in 2001 was in Afghanisitan who was harboring and actively supporting terorrists who had just directly bombed the trade centers.
Iraq had not invaded any foreign country since Kuwait a decade earlier, had no WMD's and was not harboring Al Queda.
Let me illustrate a point between HRC and Sanders. Sanders "wants" regime change in Syria and would vote for it to get rid of Asad, but he would not authorize military action in the current civil war. HRC would take immediate military action to do so. Both have made this quite clear. Sanders prefers to work via the UN. HRC prefers to act based on her own intelligence sources.
If we leaned anything from Iraq it is that wars are easy to get into, more difficult to get out of. Something George Washington warned in his farewell address after serving as our first President.
MADem
(135,425 posts)authorizing it in the first place?
Don't pull out that "the troops won't get fed" canard as a retort, either. A continuing resolution, absent a budget, keeps the troops fed and paid, and the ships and aircraft fueled--at the same levels as the previous year. I know--I did my duty for months at a time on them.
He's part of the MIC. His fans studiously ignore this, but it obvious to anyone who understands his burgeoning relationship with Lockheed Martin and Sandia Labs (they don't make toasters, fwiw--but they have been known to create quite the burn).
http://cdn.thedailybeast.com/content/dailybeast/articles/2016/02/09/bernie-sanders-loves-this-1-trillion-war-machine/jcr:content/image.crop.800.500.jpg/48501610.cached.jpg
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/02/09/bernie-sanders-loves-this-1-trillion-war-machine.html
The socialist trumpets his antiwar record. But he doesnt mind expensive war machinesif theyre based in his home state.
MANCHESTER, New Hampshire Sen. Bernie Sanders has railed against big defense corporations at rallies, but he has a more complex history with the military-industrial complex. Most notably, hes supported a $1.2 trillion stealth fighter thats considered by many to be one of the bigger boondoggles in Pentagon history.
Sanders has made his opposition to Hillary Clintons hawkishness a cornerstone of his campaign. But he hasnt exactly been antiwar all his career. When it has come time to choose between defense jobs and a dovish defense policy, Sanders has consistently chosen to stand with the arms-makers rather than the peaceniksleading to tension with some of the most adamant adherents of progressive ideology.
In 1985, for example, protesters massed at the General Electric plant in Burlington, Vermont, where Sanders was serving as mayor. They were protesting the fact that the plant was manufacturing Gatling guns to fight socialists in Central America.
Jim Condon, now a Democratic state legislator in Vermont, was news director of a local radio station at the time and describes himself as an old acquaintance of the senator.
There were protesters who were unhappy that General Electric was manufacturing Gatling guns at the plant, and so they would lock themselves to the gates and engage in civil disobedience. And so the mayor, Bernie, finally got cops to go in and arrest the protesters, Condon told The Daily Beast. The GE plant was one of the largest providers of jobs in the city. So it was economically important that the plant stay open and people who worked there went to work.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)is not even remotely equivalent.
MADem
(135,425 posts)PERPETUATES war--it feeds the beast. Not voting to fund a war, as I said, and you ignored, places the Services in a "last year" continuing resolution funding level. People get paid and fed, at the exact same levels as last year, they just can't buy those new and expensive systems of destruction -- you know, like that crappy boondoggle F-35 Sanders loves so well.
Voting to "authorize" war leaves the choice to proceed--or NOT--up to the CinC. It does not make war inevitable, it simply gives the CinC room to move. Smart CinCs use it like that. Stupid ones invade countries, not even realizing that there's "More than one type of Muslim."
Bernie is way more MIC-friendly than you realize. He's not a plowshares guy. Don't buy the hype. He's never met a drone he didn't like.
It doesn't matter anyway. He's got just over a week to switch gears, get settled back into his office in the Senate, and tell his remaining staff to pay off the rest of the bills, and send out one last fundraising blast if he comes up short. Which he might, because those recurring donations have been cut off and his money spigot is starting to run dry.
"Poor Tad Devine" will have to find another campaign--his company has pulled millions in on this one. And Chuck Todd's wife will have to find new work, too--though she's unlikely to get a gig with a million dollar+ payday like this one.
It will be an adjustment, but there's no path for him--there hasn't been for some time now.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)have their beans and bullets, through a continuing resolution, even if everyone voted NAY or the POTUS vetoed the appropriations bill. I've said this three times. It's not going to change by ignoring it. I'm afraid you're the one with the difficulty "seeing the diff."
Romulox
(25,960 posts)TheFarS1de
(1,017 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)Go Google and look it up and keep defending your pro war candidate.
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)He has 2. But you knew that already.
How crass and disgusting to be holding full blown campaign events on Memorial Day.
Enjoy the next couple weeks. Tick tock tick tock...
pinebox
(5,761 posts)I'll show you.
Enjoy more wars and more dead should Hillary be the nominee. You obviously like that sorta thing.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)Or are you, y'know, being a little hypocritical?
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)You have to answer that. I have.
IMO, voting to supply arms and supplies to troops in the field, is NOT the same equivalency as voting to give an idiot carte blanche to invade a despot who had attacked zero foreign powers in over a decade.
Sorry, this specious argument that because Bernie voted to help troops rearmor their vehicles for protection and be supplied munitions to protect themselves jsut doesn't cut it in the face of HRC's 'by her own admisssion" mistake. Which I call a tragedy.
TwilightZone
(25,471 posts)Revisionist history. The assertion that she voted to start a war is nonsense. Always has been.
From Slate "Hillary Clinton Told the Truth About Her Iraq War Vote":
The evidence is clear. On Oct. 10, 2002, during the Senate debate on a resolution to authorize the use of force in Iraq, Clinton rose to express her highly qualified support. First, though, she criticized the idea of attacking Saddam then and there, either alone or with any allies we can muster. Such a course, she said, is fraught with danger, in part because it would set a precedent that could come back to haunt us, legitimizing invasions that Russia might launch against Georgia, India against Pakistan, or China against Taiwan.
So, she continued, the question is, how do we do our best to both diffuse the threat Saddam Hussein poses to his people, the region, including Israel, and the United Statesand, at the same time, work to maximize our international support and strengthen the United Nations.
She went on to say that there was no perfect approach to this thorny dilemma and that people of good faith and high intelligence can reach diametrically opposing conclusions. But, she concluded, I believe the best course is to go to the United Nations for a strong resolution that calls for complete, unlimited inspections with cooperation expected and demanded from Saddam.
If we get the resolution the president seeks, and Saddam complies, Clinton added, disarmament can proceed and the threat can be eliminated.
If we get the resolution and Saddam does not comply, we can attack him with far more support and legitimacy than we would have otherwise. This international support is crucial, she added, because, after shots are fired and bombs are dropped, not all consequences are predictable.
More:
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/war_stories/2016/02/hillary_clinton_told_the_truth_about_her_iraq_war_vote.html
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)Her reservations are the same as a President's signing statement on a bill. It's face saving.
She voted to authorize the war. That's what the bill was. She knew damn well Bush would go in as everyone did if she voted for that bill. Everyone knew.
TwilightZone
(25,471 posts)Sanders voted for regime change in Iraq twice. That makes him a warmonger.
Without context, that's just as true. That's why context matters. Sanders should have known that voting for regime change might lead to, well...regime change. That seems to be your reasoning re: Clinton.
Sanders-supporter-favorite Political Compass actually calls Sanders a militarist for his support of just about everything re: the MIC *except* for one vote: the 2002 Iraq resolution.
You agree?
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)There are other ways to encourage regime change than by a massive US military operation which Clinton voted to initiate in Iraq.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)We'll wait.
To try and liken giving troops amour in combat as the same as invading an entire country says it all about your spin
Tarc
(10,476 posts)Sanders votes for funding the Iraq invasion are well-documented.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)2 very different things Tarc and you know this.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)Same thing, my bro. I know it'd tarnish Bernie's halo in your eyes a tad if you really considered how many wards he has voted to fund, but facts are facts.
LuvLoogie
(7,011 posts)What's Bernie doing today? Hitting up college kids for money?
pinebox
(5,761 posts)and why your candidate had such clouded judgement to send our troops into a war based on lies when Bernie saw the truth? If not for Hillary & the others, those who gave their lives in Iraq would be here today.
You can't unring a bell.
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)Since the Berner OP has established that it's immoral to campaign or for a pol to give the impression of campaigning by appearing in public on Memorial Day I'm sure Bernie has no events today.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Tell us why Hillary has such bad judgement that she chose to send our troops into a war based on lies and deceit please.
If Hillary and other politicians didn't vote for Iraq, people's loved ones would still be here today.
It's Memorial Day. Sadly some politicians have no honor.
reddread
(6,896 posts)dont invite anyone.
TwilightZone
(25,471 posts)It's not just about Iraq. But you knew that.
That you have chosen to plead total ignorance in a feeble attempt to score a few political points on a day of remembrance says a lot about you.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)It's about remembering those who perished fighting in the line of duty and service.
Some didn't have to and shouldn't have.
I'm sorry that your candidate walks in a parade which honors the our war dead, war dead she helped create under lies.
That says a lot about you that you don't get it.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
BootinUp
(47,165 posts)msongs
(67,413 posts)hands
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Like Syria. Libya. Honduras. Iraq.
Ya he sure does doesn't he?
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)I have no problem with them as they are pawns to the system.
senz
(11,945 posts)for a nice-sized kickback creates memorials all over the world.
Nice cover of Dylan's anti-war classic.
Is your money that good? Will it buy you forgiveness? Do you think that it could? Well I think you will find when your death takes its toll, all the money you made will never buy back your soul.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)our fallen soldiers. What's the problem?
Jackilope
(819 posts)Hawk .....
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)directly led to the deaths of U.S. soldiers. They'd be alive today if she and the other equally guilty politicians who voted for it had the good sense not to vote for a war based on lies. Anyone paying attention knew the crap the public was being fed at the time was complete bullshit. She had to have known Cheney, Bush, et. al. couldn't be trusted, but she voted for it anyway.
Response to pinebox (Original post)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
TheFarS1de
(1,017 posts)And nothing will change my personal views on what is right or wrong . And as such either the DNC will give us someone the majority of voters will back across the spectrum or their anointed insider with a baggage train of issues .
LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)June 14th.....
senz
(11,945 posts)Simply awful to read all these contrary viewpoints!
LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)I'm ready to move along just like I was LAST time when it was apparent that the person I was supporting in 2008 to be POTUS--Hillary Clinton--was NOT going to secure the Dem nomination. I was ready to pivot to the GE then and I certainly am now, and especially so since the person I am supporting this time around is moving onto the GE vs Trump.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Skwmom
(12,685 posts)SharonClark
(10,014 posts)Mike Nelson
(9,959 posts)...to see a Memorial Day parade become an opportunity to attack our likely nominee. I don't agree but am aware of the many Bernie supporters who hold Hillary Clinton responsible for their related war dead. Given that, I understand how repulsed you must be at the sight of Hillary marching. I am sorry for your pain. Realizing she may become President must be unbearable.