Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

RBInMaine

(13,570 posts)
Mon May 30, 2016, 11:16 AM May 2016

Enough of the elitist purity. Hillary Clinton will be our PROGRESSIVE nominee.

Progressives are NOT "ignored" at all by the Democratic Party. A woman is head of the DNC. A woman is the House Democratic Leader. DEMOCRATS have voted for and pushed for full LGTB rights throughout the nation. We are the party that elected the first African American president TWICE. It is our party that had the first congressman in Barney Frank come out as a gay person. It is our party that has the Congressional Black Caucus and the Congressional Progressive Caucus. It is our party that fights for education, clean air and water, full healthcare, work rights, and fair taxation.

Has our party been 100% pure? No. It is a diverse party with some range of political thought. It always has been. Has our party made it's share of mistakes? Sure. That doesn't mean that on balance it isn't "progressive." Good grief.

"Progressive" means standing for PROGRESS, and that is what our party does, all the time.

Hillary Clinton was a middle class midwesterner who started with the Children's Defense Fund, worked hard to improved education in Arkansas, wrote a book called "It Takes A Village," fought hard for the people of NY and the victims of 9/11, as Sec. of State fought for LGTB rights and Women's rights around the globe, and on and on. She supports a woman's right to choose, debt free college, full healthcare coverage, clean water action, infrastructure investment, middle class economics, taking on the NRA for common sense gun safety, and on and on. This is PROGRESSIVE. Period!

Has she been perfectly pure? No. Few have. Even Bernie has voted for defense spending if it benefited his state. He has sided with the NRA on some votes. He has also attended fancy-shmancy political summer retreats and conferences where I don't think he minded the nice accommodations, dinners, etc. And he is turning his top guys, Weaver and Devine, into millionaires for their work on his behalf in this campaign. So BERNIE is not perfectly pure either.

And being progressive means being active ALL THE TIME. It means VOTING ALL THE TIME, not just during presidential years. Therefore Bernie's "revolution" can't only be about attending big rallies for him. It must be a MANY YEARS LONG effort to grow progressivism in the country, recruit candidates, work the ground, etc. In other words, it must be a real movement that is bigger than Bernie Sanders, as he has said himself, and for the LONGTERM.

Finally, PROGRESSIVE means BEATING THE RACIST MISOGYNISTIC RIGHT WING DEMENTED MONSTER WHO IS DONALD "FRANKENTRUMP" TRUMP! Anyone who is actually "progressive" better accept the nominee of this party and work to defeat Trump, or there is no way you can claim to be "progressive" because Trump is everything that a "progressive" is not.

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Enough of the elitist purity. Hillary Clinton will be our PROGRESSIVE nominee. (Original Post) RBInMaine May 2016 OP
Hillary Herself has debunked this. Rattlesnake Chaser May 2016 #1
Nice Snake... Saved Me The Trouble! Here Is Some Additional Material... CorporatistNation May 2016 #6
If progress towards more neo-liberalism is what you desire PowerToThePeople May 2016 #2
Excellent OP. This purity business is nonsense. It's like the Left has their own version of a Trust Buster May 2016 #3
So she is a "progressive" who supports "full healthcare coverage" and "clean water action"... JudyM May 2016 #4
Post removed Post removed May 2016 #9
she is the only PROGRESSIVE running. stonecutter357 May 2016 #5
Uh you go with that. Sadly it isn't true. pinebox May 2016 #8
are you a berniebro? stonecutter357 May 2016 #10
Funny you ask pinebox May 2016 #15
Bernie is no progressive Demsrule86 May 2016 #14
Right. Founded the progressive caucus and #1 ranked progressive pinebox May 2016 #16
He's a meaniebutt!!!!! QC May 2016 #22
A Laughable Statement On Its Face... CorporatistNation May 2016 #11
Progressive? LOL? pinebox May 2016 #7
The only elitist purity I see being spouted is by HRC acolytes. hobbit709 May 2016 #12
Of course Trump is a disaster. potone May 2016 #13
Goldman Sachs agree with this post! dmosh42 May 2016 #17
Your other OP calls for purity AgingAmerican May 2016 #18
This>> LuvLoogie May 2016 #19
LOL. Hillary is a center/right candidate, at very best. Good luck with changing definitions. nt Romulox May 2016 #20
I would quit pushing the "progressive" aspect. She's not, and all it does is NorthCarolina May 2016 #21
You belong to a center right party nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #23
Not sure HRC passes the Progressive test below EndElectoral May 2016 #24
Why do you post the same hippie-punching tantrum over and over? QC May 2016 #25
I resent the redefinition of progressive pengu May 2016 #26
'When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, QC May 2016 #27
Why so frantic? Because we don't agree? seekthetruth May 2016 #28
Bill Clinton did not preside as a progressive and neither will his wife, if elected. tabasco May 2016 #29
Your unity schtick is terrible. aikoaiko May 2016 #30
If Hillary wants to be our PROGRESSIVE nominee, k8conant May 2016 #31
Are "our" candidates and party supposed to be above criticism? Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #32

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
6. Nice Snake... Saved Me The Trouble! Here Is Some Additional Material...
Mon May 30, 2016, 11:26 AM
May 2016
MSNBC To the deniers... Watch THIS Video... It is not comforting to think that she may well be the Democratic Nominee...

Hillary really betrayed Andrea Mitchell... The entire context of this report was of a solemn nature... A Funeral so to speak...

Andrea Mitchell "I do not see this report as ...ANYTHING BUT... DEVASTATING!"

Chuck Todd "After this I don't think that she could get confirmed for Attorney General!"

Lots of FIBBING by Hillary here.. for more than a year!

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
3. Excellent OP. This purity business is nonsense. It's like the Left has their own version of a
Mon May 30, 2016, 11:19 AM
May 2016

Tea Party. I predict that they'll experience the same fate.

JudyM

(29,251 posts)
4. So she is a "progressive" who supports "full healthcare coverage" and "clean water action"...
Mon May 30, 2016, 11:22 AM
May 2016

How dumb do you think people are?

Response to JudyM (Reply #4)

Demsrule86

(68,583 posts)
14. Bernie is no progressive
Mon May 30, 2016, 11:30 AM
May 2016

No progressive would do the things he has done...at this point he helps Donald Trump.

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
16. Right. Founded the progressive caucus and #1 ranked progressive
Mon May 30, 2016, 11:33 AM
May 2016

in all of DC.

But don't let facts stop your false narrative.

Helps Trump? Bwahahahaha! Sure you go with that. Hillary is a big girl,. I'm sure she can handle the guy who fights for things like universal health care, a living wage, free college, you know, PROGRESSIVE ideals.

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
11. A Laughable Statement On Its Face...
Mon May 30, 2016, 11:29 AM
May 2016

See Above preceding... Define "Progressive..." Show us the damn TRANSCRIPTS... She IS OWNED and OPERATED by Thoe OLIGARCHY which includes Wall Street!

MSNBC To the deniers... Watch THIS Video... It is not comforting to think that she may well be the Democratic Nominee...

Hillary really betrayed Andrea Mitchell... The entire context of this report was of a solemn nature... A Funeral so to speak...

Andrea Mitchell "I do not see this report as ...ANYTHING BUT... DEVASTATING!"

Chuck Todd "After this I don't think that she could get confirmed for Attorney General!"

Lots of FIBBING by Hillary here.. for more than a year!

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
12. The only elitist purity I see being spouted is by HRC acolytes.
Mon May 30, 2016, 11:29 AM
May 2016

Vote for the candidate of the 1% in hopes that she can beat the other 1% candidate.

potone

(1,701 posts)
13. Of course Trump is a disaster.
Mon May 30, 2016, 11:29 AM
May 2016

No intelligent person thinks otherwise. But real progress is not just about social issues, as important as they are. Nor is it about tokenism. I don't care if the head of the DNC is a woman; I care that that person represents the interests of the majority of our citizens, not merely the wealthy and well-connected. I wish that I could view the Democratic establishment as being progressive, but I can't.

There is a reason that more and more people are leaving both the Democratic and Republican parties, and it has nothing to do with "elitist purity." We need genuine progressives, not Republican lite candidates. Bernie is a genuine progressive, and Hillary is not. Yes, she came from a middle-class background, but she has lost touch with that class. She and Bill are part of the 1% and that is who they associate with.

Many, many people in this country are just one paycheck away from disaster. This is a moral issue, and one that the Democratic establishment does not seem to be willing to address.

LuvLoogie

(7,011 posts)
19. This>>
Mon May 30, 2016, 01:03 PM
May 2016
And being progressive means being active ALL THE TIME. It means VOTING ALL THE TIME, not just during presidential years. Therefore Bernie's "revolution" can't only be about attending big rallies for him. It must be a MANY YEARS LONG effort to grow progressivism in the country, recruit candidates, work the ground, etc. In other words, it must be a real movement that is bigger than Bernie Sanders, as he has said himself, and for the LONGTERM.


You mean it's not phoning in once a week to a radio show, preaching to the choir, answering every question with the same response?
 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
21. I would quit pushing the "progressive" aspect. She's not, and all it does is
Mon May 30, 2016, 01:06 PM
May 2016

further anger progressives.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
23. You belong to a center right party
Mon May 30, 2016, 01:10 PM
May 2016

With a Cebter right candidate, who will be facing some legal issues. (Not about Sanders) but roughly the other half of the voters are not center right. You will try hard to kick them. Some of us already left. But that does not change the reality. You are part of a neoliberal right wing party

QC

(26,371 posts)
25. Why do you post the same hippie-punching tantrum over and over?
Mon May 30, 2016, 01:11 PM
May 2016

It wasn't any less dumb the first time and constant repetition hasn't improved it.

pengu

(462 posts)
26. I resent the redefinition of progressive
Mon May 30, 2016, 01:15 PM
May 2016

Progressives don't vote for Iraq. Progressives don't vote for the 2001 Bankruptcy bill. Progressives don't vote for the Patriot Act. Progressives don't push fracking. Progressives don't help get votes for welfare reform.

It's not about purity. It's about being in the ballpark. She isn't on either economics or foreign policy.

QC

(26,371 posts)
27. 'When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone,
Mon May 30, 2016, 01:18 PM
May 2016

'it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.'

'The question is,' said Alice, 'whether you can make words mean so many different things.'

 

seekthetruth

(504 posts)
28. Why so frantic? Because we don't agree?
Mon May 30, 2016, 01:20 PM
May 2016

Deal with it. To us, they're part of the same coin....just different sides.

Of course Trump is horrible, but so is Clinton. Clinton just hides her ugliness.

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
29. Bill Clinton did not preside as a progressive and neither will his wife, if elected.
Mon May 30, 2016, 01:21 PM
May 2016

Thanks to Bill Clinton's "leadership," I don't really recognize the Democratic party anymore.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
32. Are "our" candidates and party supposed to be above criticism?
Mon May 30, 2016, 01:41 PM
May 2016
There are no facts, only interpretations. Friedrich Nietzsche

Your interpretation of "progressive" differs from others. See her support for fracking, the TPP, the NSA, DOMA, Cluster bombs, Bush's wars, Libya, corporate donations for her campaign, prosecution of whistle-blowers, for a few examples of differences of interpretation.
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Enough of the elitist pur...