2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDon't they realize Hillary's going to be indicted and Biden's gonna have to step in...?
Lynn Smith Miller ?@millerlynn7772 3h3 hours ago
Los Angeles Times endorses Hillary Clinton in California Democratic primary http://upi.com/6316142t via @upi
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Works.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)There really is someone else running, who has quite a few delegates on his side.
If she is indicted, it needs to be before the Convention, so that they can simply go with Bernie instead. If it happens after the Convention, if she's nominated, most likely her VP choice will become head of the ticket and a new VP choice will happen. If Biden is her VP, which I seriously doubt will happen, then it will be him.
Otherwise, if the Party tries to cram Biden down our throats, it will be the end of the Democratic Party for sure.
bigtree
(85,998 posts)...mark my words.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)Just like back in January here on DU we were assured that Bernie Sanders would be lucky to win New Hampshire, and Hillary would put him away and secure the nomination no later than Super Tuesday. Gotcha.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)does she still not have the delegates to be certain of the nomination?
Oh, and the Super delegates are not pledged delegates and can change their vote at any time. So counting them, other than Bill Clinton, Super delegate, is a bit misleading.
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)as a world renowned law enforcement organization.
MSNBC To the deniers... Watch THIS Video... It is not comforting to think that she may well be the Democratic Nominee...
Hillary really betrayed Andrea Mitchell... The entire context of this report was of a solemn nature... A Funeral so to speak...
Andrea Mitchell "I do not see this report as ...ANYTHING BUT... DEVASTATING!"
Chuck Todd "After this I don't think that she could get confirmed for Attorney General!"
Lots of FIBBING by Hillary here.. for more than a year!
thesquanderer
(11,990 posts)FBI can recommend indictment, it still doesn't necessarily mean she gets indicted. As I understand it, that will be up to the DOJ... basically, Loretta Lynch.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I have no idea why people seem so certain the party would flock to Sanders in that hypothetical; an actual brokered convention would probably come out with a dark horse nominee.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)then her (his) pledged delegates are set loose, free to vote for whomever they choose.
I am not about to predict that even a single one would switch to Sanders, although it seams reasonable that some of them would.
It's distantly possible that some other names would be put into nomination on the first ballot, possibly several favorite sons/daughters. So the former pledged Clinton delegates could be split several ways, and not enough switch to Sanders to give him the nomination.
The Supers then become a deck of wild cards. Again, I'm not going to predict what most of them will do, but I would suggest that a much larger number of them would support Bernie than currently do. But if it's not enough to give him the nomination, then it goes to a second ballot, and then all bets are off.
For those of you interested in knowing how a completely obscure (in the political sense) person can end up as the nominee after many convention ballots, and eventually be elected President, I'd warmly recommend Destiny of the Republic by Candace Millard. She goes into some detail about how delegates' votes switched over the course of the 36 ballots that it took to nominate him.
I don't know just how most Hillary supporters feel, but as a Bernie supporter the thought of Biden being rammed down our throats, should she withdraw, is genuinely offensive. I hope most Hillary people would feel the same way, were the situation reversed.
ronnykmarshall
(35,356 posts)It's the troof!!!
Response to ronnykmarshall (Reply #3)
Name removed Message auto-removed
woolldog
(8,791 posts)is not going to nominate someone in Clinton's place (assuming she is indicted) who's spent the last 6 months slamming them as corrupt, part of the oligarchy etc.
If it's not Hillary, it will be Biden.
eastwestdem
(1,220 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Yup but the Indictment Fairy is going to let them down.
The berners have to cling to their fantasies for a few days more. Its pathetic really.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)that will be the delegates at the convention. Most of the delegates are more or less ordinary people who in one manner or another secured the delegate slot.
The Bernie Sanders delegates will not switch over en masse to Biden, certainly not on a first ballot. In fact, they can't because they'll be obligated to vote for Bernie at least for the first ballot, maybe longer. I'm not fully up on all the rules here.
woolldog
(8,791 posts)And BS cannot win without them. Hillary has them and also the majority of pledged delegates. They can vote for anyone after the first ballot. And the supers can vote for anyone even on the first.
The way it will likely happen if Hillary is indicted: first ballot, no one wins since the superdelegates will not vote for someone who has been indicted.
Then the Dem establishment turns to Biden.
Second ballot, superdelegates move to Biden, the free pledged delegates follow, but not enough. A lot of confusion. HRC asks her delegates to vote for Biden b/c of electability. Bill Clinton and the rest of the establishment rallies around Biden and persuades HRC's pledged delegates. Supers are already on board.
Third ballot or fourth ballot. Everyone coalesces around Biden, who can win without any Sanders delegates.
Biden is the nominee.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)would unite against Bernie to deny him the nomination. You are assuming that not a single Hillary delegate would switch to Bernie.
Here's my take: If (and that's a huge if) Hillary is indicted and (another huge word, that and) Hillary withdraws from the race, all of her delegates are set loose at that point. They are now free agents. At least some of them will have a sense of fairness sufficient to move them to vote for Bernie.
In your scenario, who do the super delegates vote for on the first ballot? If not Hillary, who? Already some (not very many, I grant you that) are planning to vote for Bernie. It's quite likely that very many more will turn to Bernie at this point, possibly enough to nominate him.
In reality, I don't see it going beyond the first ballot: Hillary indicted. She drops out of the race. Her delegates are now free agents. Some number of them move to Bernie. About half of the Supers likewise go with Bernie. And that's the nomination.
It's simply not credible to me that every single one of her pledged delegates would move directly to Biden.
The real nightmare scenario is that she's indicted either at the very start of the Convention, or anytime between it and election day.
A related question: Would a person have to have been formally nominated for the delegates, pledged and super, to be able to vote for him or her? Are they free to vote for anyone at all, once the votes to which they are bound ends?
annavictorious
(934 posts)by endorsing her.
Why is it that the editorial boards always endorse Hillary? How much is Brock paying them?
bigtree
(85,998 posts)livetohike
(22,145 posts)OhZone
(3,212 posts)yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)He's past it and he no longer has any broad appeal(if he ever did).
Nominating him would insult women and POC(he STILL hasn't apologized, as far as I know, for throwing Anita Hill under the bus) and would give Trump the perfect person to run against...a bland, detached establishmentarian who is totally out of touch with the people.
Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)They are in denial. It's not Benghazi and it's not the serve issues. It's going to be the Clinton Foundation "Pay to Play." You can't have an indicted nominee, even with the name Clinton.
katmille
(213 posts)And like Bernie? Can you say FEC violations?
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)is somewhat more serious than the FEC problem?
Are you still claiming that the FBI is only performing
a "security review", after what Comey said?
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)it was an "inquiry" by the Federal Bureau of Inquiries.
Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)For the record, I have said on many DU posts that ANY candidate (Bernie Sanders included) who has been indicted should not be the nominee of the Democratic Party. Can you say the same about Hillary Clinton?
BootinUp
(47,165 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Biden 2015
stone space
(6,498 posts)Last I heard, most of the delegates were split between two candidates.
I wasn't even aware that Biden was running.
apcalc
(4,465 posts)She will not be indicted. Silly. A republican wet dream.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)Aging socialists aren't who mainstream America is looking to elect.
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)brooklynite
(94,597 posts)I know; I posted it here.