Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
63 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Does that use of "democrat" as an adjective piss anyone else off? (Original Post) jcgoldie Nov 2012 OP
It pisses off just about everyone on this site, actually. . . nt Codeine Nov 2012 #1
Republicans use it as a slur. spockeye Nov 2012 #2
Like fingernails on a chalkboard! n/t KelleyD Nov 2012 #3
The right wingers are such children. MrSlayer Nov 2012 #4
I COMPLETELY agree AJH032 Nov 2012 #5
No... because it's supposed to. dchill Nov 2012 #6
Exactly! I correct them, but not in an angry way BlueCaliDem Nov 2012 #44
Bingo. I always ignore it. They hate that. Scuba Nov 2012 #53
Oh yeah. It's intended to. n/t TDale313 Nov 2012 #7
That needs to go in the garbage along with Willard! flamingdem Nov 2012 #8
"typical libs" NCLefty Nov 2012 #9
It always pisses me off when the Publicans do that... regnaD kciN Nov 2012 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author NCLefty Nov 2012 #11
Whenever a Foxnews watcher uses it I make a point of saying "Repuglican" to them. Walk away Nov 2012 #12
the worst part about is... that a few of our side have fallen into using it oldhippydude Nov 2012 #13
Yup. It's turning into the norm. pnwmom Nov 2012 #16
Me TomClash Nov 2012 #14
+1 nt ProudProgressiveNow Nov 2012 #22
Call them RepubliCONs. tblue Nov 2012 #15
I believe that Frank Lutz came up with the usage because "democratic" sounds too good Poiuyt Nov 2012 #17
+1 n/t oldhippydude Nov 2012 #47
It's annoying union_maid Nov 2012 #18
yes. barbtries Nov 2012 #19
Newt renewed it in the 90's. ProudProgressiveNow Nov 2012 #20
I thought "democratic" refers to the democratic process? Or is interpreted as such? theinquisitivechad Nov 2012 #21
No. jcgoldie Nov 2012 #24
Yes - I get that it's the Democratic Party theinquisitivechad Nov 2012 #28
I think they use it as a petty jibe to piss us off Applan Nov 2012 #45
Yep. bluerum Nov 2012 #23
No, because amuse bouche Nov 2012 #25
Publicans november3rd Nov 2012 #26
I thought a 'Publican' was one who operated a Pub. n/t PoliticAverse Nov 2012 #39
In the UK Applan Nov 2012 #46
Yes, it really irritates me. northoftheborder Nov 2012 #27
Romney knows it is used as a slur, madaboutharry Nov 2012 #29
Why are members of the Democratic Party 'Democrats' and not 'Democratics' ? n/t PoliticAverse Nov 2012 #30
Because the word "Democratic" is an adjective, describing which kind of political party We People Nov 2012 #37
What pisses me off is that no one in the media calls them on it. pamela Nov 2012 #31
I didn't know I was supposed to be offended by it until I saw it on here. nt Comrade_McKenzie Nov 2012 #32
What gets to me is when it says "Vote Democrat" on an obviously Democratic bumper ... zbdent Nov 2012 #33
It bothered me for the first hundred years or so pscot Nov 2012 #34
Absolutely. BlueDemKev Nov 2012 #35
They do it to annoy, because they know it teases. Shrike47 Nov 2012 #36
I never understood why Democrats get upset about that. limpyhobbler Nov 2012 #38
I call them rapeublicans! yortsed snacilbuper Nov 2012 #40
Yep, that's why I call them republicons. JRLeft Nov 2012 #41
There is an early TV xxqqqzme Nov 2012 #42
Yes. It's to imply that we aren't Democratic. budkin Nov 2012 #43
Here's my deal. When they stop using "Democrat Party" ThoughtCriminal Nov 2012 #48
It is my pet peeve. I immediately disregard anyone who uses it. pisses me off to no end. catbyte Nov 2012 #49
+1 nt ProudProgressiveNow Nov 2012 #52
"Democrat Party" is the correct name. Jim Lane Nov 2012 #50
This just shows their ignorance. Third Doctor Nov 2012 #51
Doesn't piss me off. It just makes the person sound stupid. NYC Liberal Nov 2012 #54
No not at all UStillLose Nov 2012 #55
It's useful to help identify teabaggers and Faux News addicts. PAMod Nov 2012 #56
No, but we should try to put an end to it all the same. baldguy Nov 2012 #57
It's meant to be an insult - sort of the way I say "Republicon"... polichick Nov 2012 #58
Yes; it was originally meant to be Carolina Nov 2012 #59
They think it's clever lunatica Nov 2012 #60
It tells me that they would rather be thought of as rusty fender Nov 2012 #61
Here's the Cure For the Use of Democrat as an Adjective michaelira Nov 2012 #62
It's also accurrate. Their entire 2012 strategy was to invent reactions to whatever Obama said/did arcane1 Nov 2012 #63
As we say, framing matters texpatriot2004 Nov 2012 #64

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
44. Exactly! I correct them, but not in an angry way
Sat Nov 3, 2012, 09:09 PM
Nov 2012

because that's what they want.

On the other hand . . . they hate to be addressed with Teabaggers.

flamingdem

(39,328 posts)
8. That needs to go in the garbage along with Willard!
Sat Nov 3, 2012, 07:59 PM
Nov 2012

I was going to post about this and looked it up... it's been a slur since 1940

Response to jcgoldie (Original post)

Walk away

(9,494 posts)
12. Whenever a Foxnews watcher uses it I make a point of saying "Repuglican" to them.
Sat Nov 3, 2012, 08:00 PM
Nov 2012

It's a real slap in the face. They know what they are doing.

oldhippydude

(2,514 posts)
13. the worst part about is... that a few of our side have fallen into using it
Sat Nov 3, 2012, 08:01 PM
Nov 2012

the right wingers have been using it as a slur for at least a decade..

Poiuyt

(18,130 posts)
17. I believe that Frank Lutz came up with the usage because "democratic" sounds too good
Sat Nov 3, 2012, 08:04 PM
Nov 2012

I could be wrong about Lutz, but that's the reason it gets used by republicans.

union_maid

(3,502 posts)
18. It's annoying
Sat Nov 3, 2012, 08:04 PM
Nov 2012

It's meant to be irritating and it is, but I mostly think it makes the person using the term sound stupid. It started being used by the folks we fondly think of as "morans" and no matter who says it now, it makes me think of a third rate RW radio host or someone at a pro-war rally holding up a misspelled sign.

theinquisitivechad

(322 posts)
21. I thought "democratic" refers to the democratic process? Or is interpreted as such?
Sat Nov 3, 2012, 08:06 PM
Nov 2012

Whereas "democrat" refers to the actual Democrat party.

If that's not true, I guess I've just been bamboozled by all the inappropriate usage that gets thrown around by the other side.

jcgoldie

(11,647 posts)
24. No.
Sat Nov 3, 2012, 08:10 PM
Nov 2012

Its the "Democratic Party"... the difference in the party and the process you refer to would be expressed in the capitalization.

theinquisitivechad

(322 posts)
28. Yes - I get that it's the Democratic Party
Sat Nov 3, 2012, 08:12 PM
Nov 2012

But I think the reason they use the term "Democrat" is because they're trying to differentiate the term from anything having to do with a democratic system. They're trying to bifurcate the usage - a subtle dig, if you will. I think that is why they use it.

northoftheborder

(7,574 posts)
27. Yes, it really irritates me.
Sat Nov 3, 2012, 08:12 PM
Nov 2012

Interesting incident: at our primary, while we were setting up before voting opened, our Democratic election judge set everyone straight (it was half Republicans and half Democrats working that day in a joint primary) about the appropriate adjective being "Democratic" not "Democrat" when used as an adjective. I could tell that the Republicans looked slightly surprised, as though they didn't know that. Ha, ha. The one sitting next to me said, well is "Dems" OK? And I said "I guess so as long as we can call you "Repubs". She said nothing else, and everybody was on best behavior all day!

We People

(619 posts)
37. Because the word "Democratic" is an adjective, describing which kind of political party
Sat Nov 3, 2012, 08:35 PM
Nov 2012

as in "Democratic Party."

In the sentence "I am a Democrat," the word "Democrat" is a noun.

I've never known them to be any different.

When a speaker uses the word "Democrat" as an adjective ("Democrat Party&quot , it just makes that person sound stupid! And it also sounds foreign to someone my age. First time I heard it, I was at least 35, so it's obviously wrong to do it that way.

Saying "They are Democratics" sounds really out of touch, because it's not a noun and nobody says that anyway!

pamela

(3,469 posts)
31. What pisses me off is that no one in the media calls them on it.
Sat Nov 3, 2012, 08:15 PM
Nov 2012

Well, Tweety did once, but no one else ever does. It's such an obvious, childish tactic that a fair media would halt every interview in which that term is uttered and ask why the person is using a grammatically incorrect term. If I was an interviewer I would say "Millions of American citizens identify themselves as members of the Democratic Party. Do you use the grammatically incorrect term to insult those Americans or are you simply not aware that you are making a grammatical error?"

Shrike47

(6,913 posts)
36. They do it to annoy, because they know it teases.
Sat Nov 3, 2012, 08:28 PM
Nov 2012

I always want to kick them. Or say 'I can't hear you'.

yortsed snacilbuper

(7,939 posts)
40. I call them rapeublicans!
Sat Nov 3, 2012, 08:42 PM
Nov 2012

They can't think for themselves,they always have to sign oaths as to what their allowed to do!

xxqqqzme

(14,887 posts)
42. There is an early TV
Sat Nov 3, 2012, 08:51 PM
Nov 2012

tape/film? of Prescott Bush using 'Democrat' party. You can find it on youtube.

They have been doing it for years.

ThoughtCriminal

(14,049 posts)
48. Here's my deal. When they stop using "Democrat Party"
Sat Nov 3, 2012, 10:17 PM
Nov 2012

I'll stop using "Teabagger".

Pretty good deal for them.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
50. "Democrat Party" is the correct name.
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 02:03 AM
Nov 2012

It's the correct name for the oldest political party in Thailand. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democrat_Party_(Thailand) (Sorry, the link doesn't translate properly and you'll have to do another click to read the article.)

People who use the term in reference to U. S. politics are implying that we can't handle our own problems, but have to involve foreigners. So I have to ask: Why do they hate America?

NYC Liberal

(20,136 posts)
54. Doesn't piss me off. It just makes the person sound stupid.
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 06:36 AM
Nov 2012

If anyone ever uses it talking to me in person, I either feign ignorance ("I've never heard of the Democrat Party? Is that a new party?&quot or just start saying "Republic Party".

 

UStillLose

(10 posts)
55. No not at all
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 07:03 AM
Nov 2012

it only shows the users ignorance.

Look at it this way of someone says "Your Mom blows dogs!" you could get upset or not care because you know for a fact your mom does not blow dogs of if she does you could respond "Yeah so what!"

PAMod

(906 posts)
56. It's useful to help identify teabaggers and Faux News addicts.
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 07:04 AM
Nov 2012

Otherwise, yes - it irritates the hell out of me - as do many intentional acts of disrespect.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
57. No, but we should try to put an end to it all the same.
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 07:36 AM
Nov 2012

It's about controlling the language. If we let them get away with this little bit of RW Orwellianist NewSpeak, then it'll be that much more difficult to counter all their other lies.

polichick

(37,152 posts)
58. It's meant to be an insult - sort of the way I say "Republicon"...
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 07:40 AM
Nov 2012

Democratic leaders don't call them anything back though - seems like taking the high road but it doesn't really work. The President was right to coin the term "Romnesia." Words matter.

Carolina

(6,960 posts)
59. Yes; it was originally meant to be
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 07:42 AM
Nov 2012

pejorative and still is, as in emphasis on the RAT part at the end of Democrat.

It's also bad grammar which grates on my ears.

And it reinforces my opinion of repukes as hateful and ignorant.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
60. They think it's clever
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 07:47 AM
Nov 2012

It's a dead giveaway and it makes them look like the sophomoric idiots they are.

 

rusty fender

(3,428 posts)
61. It tells me that they would rather be thought of as
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 12:40 PM
Nov 2012

ignorant of english grammar than nonpartisan, and that pisses me off. So, appearing to be stupid is more important to them than sounding educated.

michaelira

(1 post)
62. Here's the Cure For the Use of Democrat as an Adjective
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 09:27 PM
Nov 2012

The use of Democrat as a disrespectful, intentionally annoying, and pejorative adjective infuriates me, and the lack of a serious Democratic response marks us as wimps. Here's the cure!

From now on, any time a Democrat refers to Republicans, they are to use the term Reactionary. Not only is this term perfectly descriptive of today's "Republicans," but I find it really pisses them off to be labeled such. If Democrats, especially in the Congress, started using the term Reactionary exclusively, the "Republicans" would soon get the idea and either cease their insults, or they would refuse to return to civility, and their party would become known to the public as the Reactionary Party. Either way, we win.

Come on, Democrats, time to man up and beat the Reactionaries at their own game. I would love to see this idea go viral.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
63. It's also accurrate. Their entire 2012 strategy was to invent reactions to whatever Obama said/did
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 10:16 PM
Nov 2012

Welcome to DU!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Does that use of "de...