2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDoes that use of "democrat" as an adjective piss anyone else off?
I know he didn't start it but Romney uses it all the time talking about "democrat leaders"... duhhh the adjective is democratic, jackass!
Codeine
(25,586 posts)spockeye
(238 posts)KelleyD
(277 posts)MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)They really are a bunch of petulant brats.
AJH032
(1,124 posts)It's condescending, rude, and whoever does it sounds flat out stupid.
dchill
(38,539 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)because that's what they want.
On the other hand . . . they hate to be addressed with Teabaggers.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)TDale313
(7,820 posts)flamingdem
(39,328 posts)I was going to post about this and looked it up... it's been a slur since 1940
NCLefty
(3,678 posts)They like liberal too :p
regnaD kciN
(26,045 posts)Response to jcgoldie (Original post)
NCLefty This message was self-deleted by its author.
Walk away
(9,494 posts)It's a real slap in the face. They know what they are doing.
oldhippydude
(2,514 posts)the right wingers have been using it as a slur for at least a decade..
pnwmom
(108,995 posts)A long time pet peeve. It is an insult.
ProudProgressiveNow
(6,129 posts)tblue
(16,350 posts)Don't boo. Vote!
Poiuyt
(18,130 posts)I could be wrong about Lutz, but that's the reason it gets used by republicans.
oldhippydude
(2,514 posts)union_maid
(3,502 posts)It's meant to be irritating and it is, but I mostly think it makes the person using the term sound stupid. It started being used by the folks we fondly think of as "morans" and no matter who says it now, it makes me think of a third rate RW radio host or someone at a pro-war rally holding up a misspelled sign.
barbtries
(28,811 posts)ProudProgressiveNow
(6,129 posts)I can always tell where someone is coming from when they use use it.
theinquisitivechad
(322 posts)Whereas "democrat" refers to the actual Democrat party.
If that's not true, I guess I've just been bamboozled by all the inappropriate usage that gets thrown around by the other side.
jcgoldie
(11,647 posts)Its the "Democratic Party"... the difference in the party and the process you refer to would be expressed in the capitalization.
theinquisitivechad
(322 posts)But I think the reason they use the term "Democrat" is because they're trying to differentiate the term from anything having to do with a democratic system. They're trying to bifurcate the usage - a subtle dig, if you will. I think that is why they use it.
Applan
(693 posts)They know full well what they are doing
amuse bouche
(3,657 posts)I call them much worse. My favorite is Republiclowns
november3rd
(1,113 posts)A Jewish tax collector; a "tax farmer"; can also mean, "public contractor," etc...
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/publican
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Applan
(693 posts)Yes
northoftheborder
(7,574 posts)Interesting incident: at our primary, while we were setting up before voting opened, our Democratic election judge set everyone straight (it was half Republicans and half Democrats working that day in a joint primary) about the appropriate adjective being "Democratic" not "Democrat" when used as an adjective. I could tell that the Republicans looked slightly surprised, as though they didn't know that. Ha, ha. The one sitting next to me said, well is "Dems" OK? And I said "I guess so as long as we can call you "Repubs". She said nothing else, and everybody was on best behavior all day!
madaboutharry
(40,220 posts)he uses the word "democrat" as an adjective because he is an asshole.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)We People
(619 posts)as in "Democratic Party."
In the sentence "I am a Democrat," the word "Democrat" is a noun.
I've never known them to be any different.
When a speaker uses the word "Democrat" as an adjective ("Democrat Party" , it just makes that person sound stupid! And it also sounds foreign to someone my age. First time I heard it, I was at least 35, so it's obviously wrong to do it that way.
Saying "They are Democratics" sounds really out of touch, because it's not a noun and nobody says that anyway!
pamela
(3,469 posts)Well, Tweety did once, but no one else ever does. It's such an obvious, childish tactic that a fair media would halt every interview in which that term is uttered and ask why the person is using a grammatically incorrect term. If I was an interviewer I would say "Millions of American citizens identify themselves as members of the Democratic Party. Do you use the grammatically incorrect term to insult those Americans or are you simply not aware that you are making a grammatical error?"
Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)zbdent
(35,392 posts)pscot
(21,024 posts)but I'm over it.
BlueDemKev
(3,003 posts)It shows either a lack of education or just plain disrespect. Or BOTH.
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)I always want to kick them. Or say 'I can't hear you'.
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)yortsed snacilbuper
(7,939 posts)They can't think for themselves,they always have to sign oaths as to what their allowed to do!
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)xxqqqzme
(14,887 posts)tape/film? of Prescott Bush using 'Democrat' party. You can find it on youtube.
They have been doing it for years.
budkin
(6,716 posts)ThoughtCriminal
(14,049 posts)I'll stop using "Teabagger".
Pretty good deal for them.
catbyte
(34,454 posts)ProudProgressiveNow
(6,129 posts)Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)It's the correct name for the oldest political party in Thailand. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democrat_Party_(Thailand) (Sorry, the link doesn't translate properly and you'll have to do another click to read the article.)
People who use the term in reference to U. S. politics are implying that we can't handle our own problems, but have to involve foreigners. So I have to ask: Why do they hate America?
Third Doctor
(1,574 posts)NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)If anyone ever uses it talking to me in person, I either feign ignorance ("I've never heard of the Democrat Party? Is that a new party?" or just start saying "Republic Party".
UStillLose
(10 posts)it only shows the users ignorance.
Look at it this way of someone says "Your Mom blows dogs!" you could get upset or not care because you know for a fact your mom does not blow dogs of if she does you could respond "Yeah so what!"
PAMod
(906 posts)Otherwise, yes - it irritates the hell out of me - as do many intentional acts of disrespect.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)It's about controlling the language. If we let them get away with this little bit of RW Orwellianist NewSpeak, then it'll be that much more difficult to counter all their other lies.
polichick
(37,152 posts)Democratic leaders don't call them anything back though - seems like taking the high road but it doesn't really work. The President was right to coin the term "Romnesia." Words matter.
Carolina
(6,960 posts)pejorative and still is, as in emphasis on the RAT part at the end of Democrat.
It's also bad grammar which grates on my ears.
And it reinforces my opinion of repukes as hateful and ignorant.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)It's a dead giveaway and it makes them look like the sophomoric idiots they are.
rusty fender
(3,428 posts)ignorant of english grammar than nonpartisan, and that pisses me off. So, appearing to be stupid is more important to them than sounding educated.
michaelira
(1 post)The use of Democrat as a disrespectful, intentionally annoying, and pejorative adjective infuriates me, and the lack of a serious Democratic response marks us as wimps. Here's the cure!
From now on, any time a Democrat refers to Republicans, they are to use the term Reactionary. Not only is this term perfectly descriptive of today's "Republicans," but I find it really pisses them off to be labeled such. If Democrats, especially in the Congress, started using the term Reactionary exclusively, the "Republicans" would soon get the idea and either cease their insults, or they would refuse to return to civility, and their party would become known to the public as the Reactionary Party. Either way, we win.
Come on, Democrats, time to man up and beat the Reactionaries at their own game. I would love to see this idea go viral.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Welcome to DU!
texpatriot2004
(15,321 posts)Welcome to DU