2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumEXCLUSIVE: HILLARY CLINTON AND HER STAFF MAY HAVE COMPROMISED COUNTERTERRORISM OPS WITH ‘SLOPPY’ COM
This doesn't sound good... Almost like someone was reading her emails or listening to her phone calls because she wasn't using secure methods....
http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-email-terrorism-sloppy-communications-463605
Updated | A retired senior State Department military adviser claims that Hillary Clintons sloppy communications with her senior staff when she was secretary of state may have compromised at least two counterterrorism operations.
Bill Johnson, who was the State Departments political adviser to the special operations section of the U.S. Pacific Command, or PACOM, in 2010 and 2011, says secret plans to eliminate the leader of a Filipino Islamist separatist group and intercept Chinese-made weapons components being smuggled into Iraq were repeatedly foiled.
Johnson says he and his team eliminated the possibility of other security leaks before settling on the unprotected telephone calls of the secretary of state and her aides as the likely sourcethough he quickly adds they have no proof.
I had several missions that went inexplicably wrong, with the targets one step ahead of us, Johnson tells Newsweek in an exclusive interview.
....
procon
(15,805 posts)Johnson says he and his team eliminated the possibility of other security leaks before settling on the unprotected telephone calls of the secretary of state and her aides as the likely sourcethough he quickly adds they have no proof.
Bad show. The only that is "sloppy" here is the journalism, and the OP who cherry picked the parts that painted the picture he wanted... and got got at it.
TimPlo
(443 posts)"Johnson says he and his team eliminated the possibility of other security leaks before settling on the unprotected telephone calls of the secretary of state and her aides as the likely sourcethough he quickly adds they have no proof. "
It is there in his post word for word what you typed?
Bob41213
(491 posts)You can read the rest of his article and draw your own conclusions.
Edit: and the only cherry picking I did was counting the first 4 paragraphs.
I saw the bold too. Did the other poster just want to post some fake title and make a straw-man argument? I don't even wrap my mind around how people can be so blinded they can't even read a simple post of and not even read the dam thing.
procon
(15,805 posts)Everything after that amounts to nothing more that unfounded hearsay, conspiracy theories and idle gossip. Without proof, this is nothing more than a fiction story.
YouDig
(2,280 posts)arikara
(5,562 posts)I saw another post like this where people were jumping all over the OP. Click the link and check it out before you jump all over them please.
cali
(114,904 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]
Dem2
(8,168 posts)No all caps post has ever not been stupid.
dana_b
(11,546 posts)well, it will make today look like a good day for the former Secretary.
cliffordu
(30,994 posts)Emails about these things?
Emails 'lost' now?