2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPresident Obama up to 81.1% in Nate Silver's forecast
Romney/Ayn Ryan at a measly 18.9%.
gateley
(62,683 posts)amborin
(16,631 posts)TroyD
(4,551 posts)I guess that makes sense. . .
Eventually Now & Nov 6 will be the same.
amborin
(16,631 posts)in his articles; and, as you say, it also makes sense intuitively.
He also discussed how, as we near nov 6, the model stops taking fundamentals (econ, etc.) into account as these get
reflected in the polls.
The now cast at one point right after the conventions was about 95%. Now it is 82%. The two have already effectively converged.
Romney still has a 1 in 5 chance of winning. Not high odds, happily, but: GOTV!
Adenoid_Hynkel
(14,093 posts)"Please proceed, governor."
Tennessee Gal
(6,160 posts)Yes, please proceed to disappear into oblivion.
Blue Idaho
(5,049 posts)faithfulcitizen
(3,191 posts)LeftofObama
(4,243 posts)about President Obama's re-election! I have to admit I was worried there for a while.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)Do not give the 1%er an even break
robertpaulsen
(8,632 posts)Is Florida light blue yet? State-by state probabilities don't show up on my computer.
TroyD
(4,551 posts)In both the Now-Cast and the Nov 6-Cast from what I can tell.
TroyD
(4,551 posts)Was hoping for more like 85%.
TroyD
(4,551 posts)The new Donnelly polls for Indiana are not in his model yet. As of now he still shows Mourdock winning. I'm curious to see what the new numbers will be after tonight.
Btw, why has Nate removed the list of Senate polls from underneath each Senate seat? I used to like referring to those.