Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumVox’s Puff Piece on Goldman Sachs Doesn’t Reveal Goldman Sponsors Vox
Remember Vox's bogus tax calculator that misrepresented Bernie's tax plan. Goldman Sachs is their sponsor.
Voxs Puff Piece on Goldman Sachs Doesnt Reveal Goldman Sponsors Vox
By Adam Johnson - April27 2016
Voxs Matthew Yglesias (4/25/16) gave a generous write-up to Goldman Sachs new commercial banking subsidiary, GS Bank, without noting that Goldman Sachs is a sponsor of Vox.
~Snip~
Missing from this report was any disclosure that Goldman Sachs is a sponsor of Voxs podcast, The Weeds, co-costed by Yglesias. How much exactly Goldman Sachs pays Vox Media is unknown, but any amount should compel the new media company to note this fact when reporting on Goldman Sachs especially when its promoting both its economic and political bottom line.
One of those Goldman-sponsored podcasts last week also served the investment banks interests: After much hand-wringing, the episode argued that raising income taxes on the super-wealthy didnt actually do much to reduce inequality, with Yglesias asserting, It is not a great idea to adopt an inequality focus. While its possible this conclusion may have been arrived at in good faith, its easy to see why Goldman Sachswhose partners are worth an average of $24 million would be interested in sponsoring a media company that aggressively argues against radical redistributive policies.
Last fall, the same week Voxs podcast made an earlier argument against higher income taxes on the rich, Vox ran another Goldman Sachs puff piece: Goldman Sachs Paid to Expand Pre-K in Utah. It Worked (10/19/15), education reporter Libby Nelsons glowing 870-word portrayal of Goldman Sachs as an educator of disadvantaged children. There was no disclosure in that piece, either, that Goldman was a Vox sponsor.
Vox Media, which landed a $200 million investment last August from Comcast (the same cable giant that helped seed it back in 2009 and 2012), has had previous disclosure problems. A Vox explainer last September (9/8/15; FAIR.org, 9/9/15) asserted that cable bundling almost certainly saves customers money in aggregate, singling out Comcast as a company that may not be much loved by its customers, but it has the weight of their collective voice in its bargaining over carriage fees. And Voxs repeated attacks on single-payer healthcare (FAIR.org, 1/30/16) failed to mention that Comcast is a major investor in for-profit healthcare technology companies...
Read more:
http://fair.org/home/voxs-puff-piece-on-goldman-sachs-doesnt-reveal-goldman-sponsors-vox/
By Adam Johnson - April27 2016
Voxs Matthew Yglesias (4/25/16) gave a generous write-up to Goldman Sachs new commercial banking subsidiary, GS Bank, without noting that Goldman Sachs is a sponsor of Vox.
~Snip~
Missing from this report was any disclosure that Goldman Sachs is a sponsor of Voxs podcast, The Weeds, co-costed by Yglesias. How much exactly Goldman Sachs pays Vox Media is unknown, but any amount should compel the new media company to note this fact when reporting on Goldman Sachs especially when its promoting both its economic and political bottom line.
One of those Goldman-sponsored podcasts last week also served the investment banks interests: After much hand-wringing, the episode argued that raising income taxes on the super-wealthy didnt actually do much to reduce inequality, with Yglesias asserting, It is not a great idea to adopt an inequality focus. While its possible this conclusion may have been arrived at in good faith, its easy to see why Goldman Sachswhose partners are worth an average of $24 million would be interested in sponsoring a media company that aggressively argues against radical redistributive policies.
Last fall, the same week Voxs podcast made an earlier argument against higher income taxes on the rich, Vox ran another Goldman Sachs puff piece: Goldman Sachs Paid to Expand Pre-K in Utah. It Worked (10/19/15), education reporter Libby Nelsons glowing 870-word portrayal of Goldman Sachs as an educator of disadvantaged children. There was no disclosure in that piece, either, that Goldman was a Vox sponsor.
Vox Media, which landed a $200 million investment last August from Comcast (the same cable giant that helped seed it back in 2009 and 2012), has had previous disclosure problems. A Vox explainer last September (9/8/15; FAIR.org, 9/9/15) asserted that cable bundling almost certainly saves customers money in aggregate, singling out Comcast as a company that may not be much loved by its customers, but it has the weight of their collective voice in its bargaining over carriage fees. And Voxs repeated attacks on single-payer healthcare (FAIR.org, 1/30/16) failed to mention that Comcast is a major investor in for-profit healthcare technology companies...
Read more:
http://fair.org/home/voxs-puff-piece-on-goldman-sachs-doesnt-reveal-goldman-sponsors-vox/
Hillary's favorite bank sponsors the media site that produced a bogus calculator with factually incorrect data to malign Bernie. And the corporate media giant Comcast whose lobbyists are busy raising money for Hillary also are a major investor in VOX.
Wake up people. You're being taken for a ride....
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 337 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Vox’s Puff Piece on Goldman Sachs Doesn’t Reveal Goldman Sponsors Vox (Original Post)
think
May 2016
OP
Octafish
(55,745 posts)1. Redefining ''Disclosure Problems'' as they speak.
I mean, "spin."
Thank you, think! FAIR is TOPS!
MisterP
(23,730 posts)2. Yglesias, eh?
http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2013/04/24/international_factory_safety.html
http://crookedtimber.org/2013/04/26/would-it-not-be-easier-for-matt-yglesias-to-dissolve-the-bangladeshi-people-and-elect-another/
http://inthesetimes.com/duly-noted/entry/14930/no_matt_yglesias_bangladeshi_workers_didnt_choose_to_be_crushed_to_death
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/apr/29/bangladesh-factory-tragedy-sweatshop-economics
http://crookedtimber.org/2013/04/26/would-it-not-be-easier-for-matt-yglesias-to-dissolve-the-bangladeshi-people-and-elect-another/
http://inthesetimes.com/duly-noted/entry/14930/no_matt_yglesias_bangladeshi_workers_didnt_choose_to_be_crushed_to_death
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/apr/29/bangladesh-factory-tragedy-sweatshop-economics
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)3. Just wow.
Are we still allowed to say corporate and especially media whores?