Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)
Fri May 20, 2016, 01:16 PM May 2016

What will it take to get YOU to unplug from corporate media's cable news channels?

If corporate media's 24/7 breathless reporting on Sanders' supporters "violence" and "chair throwing" and "people fearing for their safety" since Saturday night has not gotten you to cut the cord, what will it take?

If being treated to almost a full week of blatant, indisputable boldfaced lies is not enough to get you to cut the cord for good, what will it take?

The establishment still thinks it can do whatever the fuck it wants simply because it has the power to get corporate media to report whatever blatant lies it wants.

Unplug your cable cord, or at least block their channels on your remote. You can read about their lies online. But please stop feeding the beast, if only to protect your own sanity from their constant lies and consistent inanity.

63 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What will it take to get YOU to unplug from corporate media's cable news channels? (Original Post) mhatrw May 2016 OP
Already unpluged. TheBlackAdder May 2016 #1
I unplugged months ago. 840high May 2016 #14
Me too. RufusTFirefly May 2016 #31
I cut the cord on 12/31/15 to start the new year right. nt Snotcicles May 2016 #44
This message was self-deleted by its author artislife May 2016 #28
Been there done that tularetom May 2016 #2
ON my fourth year now... I only occasionally see linked video from cable "news" hlthe2b May 2016 #3
i havent watched much of tv news in general for the last five years or really watched tv at ll. allan01 May 2016 #4
The only way to get their attention is to cost them $$$ casperthegm May 2016 #5
Only Nielsen families hold the key to ratings yeoman6987 May 2016 #60
I don't watch ANY cable news underthematrix May 2016 #6
I have long cut the cord... GeorgiaPeanuts May 2016 #7
I'm out already. . . my last addiction was Maddow but she's dead to me now. pdsimdars May 2016 #8
It's amazing how much Time Warner (Hillary's 7th biggest doner) owns Quixote1818 May 2016 #9
wow 840high May 2016 #33
I don't have cable. nt antigop May 2016 #10
Pulled the plug when they switched from analogue to digital StarTrombone May 2016 #11
Same here, but just slightly before. Melissa G May 2016 #52
I did it several months ago. redwitch May 2016 #12
Already Old Codger May 2016 #13
If everyone is out to get you, and all the news media have conspired together procon May 2016 #15
If you trust the pundolts and other talking heads that corporate media provides for your propaganda mhatrw May 2016 #17
So you got nothing either? procon May 2016 #21
Thanks, Judith Miller! Go Team Halliburton! Find those WMDs! mhatrw May 2016 #36
The thing that's depressing is that the majority of the country still perceives reality through the bjo59 May 2016 #56
There's a whole world wide web of opinion out there! And much of it is much better than what you get reformist2 May 2016 #20
Cut the cord last year. bvf May 2016 #16
Mostly done. I'll turn on CNN from time to time. There are too many other options. jillan May 2016 #18
If the Ms. Corporate Leader is elected I will cut the cords. derpderpderp May 2016 #19
I checked out a couple months ago and don't miss it one bit neverforget May 2016 #22
I unplugged 16 years ago. nt LWolf May 2016 #23
Don't believe everything you read on the series of tubes either. nt BootinUp May 2016 #24
Right now they are still chasing a downed airplane nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #25
Nothing like holier than thou posts... brooklynite May 2016 #26
And that's why you always make sure to watch Fox News. Right? mhatrw May 2016 #37
No - you are not disgusted by media that LIES to you. You choose to spin it instead of facing it. vintx May 2016 #39
they know your mind is wired to accept their b/s and you will never look beyond. juxtaposed May 2016 #54
I course I will...think of all the time I spend here... brooklynite May 2016 #63
I already have. I have the CNN mobile app for breaking news, and weather radio for tornadoes. moriah May 2016 #27
Been off since coup 2000 Carolina May 2016 #29
stopped watching cable nooz shortly after 9-11 - figured out where things were going azurnoir May 2016 #30
Never had cable passiveporcupine May 2016 #32
I unplugged Oct 2004 with Kerry. seabeyond May 2016 #34
I'll also tune out Cenk and the Sane Progressive for balance. nt oasis May 2016 #35
very fair and balanced of you mhatrw May 2016 #38
Why tune him out? Just don't tune in. Love Cenk but computer all day is hard. TV should do it. snowy owl May 2016 #42
I agree although the best I could do so far is default to CNN where I am seeing attempts at fairnes snowy owl May 2016 #40
James Woolsey, Stansfield Turner, Dean Rusk & Wesley Clark were also Rhodes Scholars. mhatrw May 2016 #46
So, that doesn't change my post. Maddow and Clinton aren't exemplar examples are they? snowy owl May 2016 #47
I did not mean to imply that. I was mentioning them because I think they are also shady. nt mhatrw May 2016 #48
Thanks for specifying. I always thought Rusk was okay. I know fifties but still. . . snowy owl May 2016 #50
Sorry, how do you get "corporatism" from Rhodes's life? Recursion May 2016 #49
Have been for a while. Twitter for me and that's about it. ThePhilosopher04 May 2016 #41
I watch CNN for one reason and one reason only. Uncle Joe May 2016 #43
I unplugged a couple of years ago cliffordu May 2016 #45
over ten years ago I cut the cord on cable. I haven't turned my tv on in almost a year. juxtaposed May 2016 #51
Been done with it for months. elleng May 2016 #53
I unplugged my cable cord 10 years ago. bjo59 May 2016 #55
I left all that about 1990, Propaganda and manipulation, not news and the political agenda driven Todays_Illusion May 2016 #57
If you're waiting for me tazkcmo May 2016 #58
I only watch so I know what the memes are. I spend all day refuting them. nt silvershadow May 2016 #59
I watch Thom Hartmann and Ed Schultz on RT America. Manifestor_of_Light May 2016 #61
Except for on-the-spot coverage of such things as airplane crashes or Nay May 2016 #62

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
31. Me too.
Fri May 20, 2016, 09:23 PM
May 2016

Years ago.

In general, I find that I am far better informed, although I must confess that I'm rarely up to date when it comes to news about Justin Bieber or the extended Kardashian clan.

https://m.

Response to TheBlackAdder (Reply #1)

hlthe2b

(102,294 posts)
3. ON my fourth year now... I only occasionally see linked video from cable "news"
Fri May 20, 2016, 01:23 PM
May 2016

but generally read about the "low lights" and move on...

allan01

(1,950 posts)
4. i havent watched much of tv news in general for the last five years or really watched tv at ll.
Fri May 20, 2016, 01:32 PM
May 2016

i also dumped our local newspaper as well. my right to know has been supersceeded by my right to stay sane .muhahehahahaha.

casperthegm

(643 posts)
5. The only way to get their attention is to cost them $$$
Fri May 20, 2016, 01:35 PM
May 2016

Less viewership = less advertising revenue. Money and power trumps everything with msm these days. If we stop watching the crap they put out there things might change.

Problem is, where am I going to get unbiased news? I never could have imagined it would be so challenging.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
60. Only Nielsen families hold the key to ratings
Sun May 22, 2016, 02:36 AM
May 2016

About 100,000 American families make our viewing choices for the other 300 million. I hate the system.

underthematrix

(5,811 posts)
6. I don't watch ANY cable news
Fri May 20, 2016, 01:44 PM
May 2016

NONE. On extremely rare occasions I will post a segment link that I've watched at The Obama Diary. For the past four years, I have consistently called for people to STOP watching cable news. Most of the stories whether are designed to manipulate perceptions rather than to inform. The best way to find out what is really going on is to READ print media and READ multiple stories on the same issue from multiple perspectives. Yes this includes conservative perspectives. Finally, people should read history books, old history books published before 1990, especially about former presidents in the early 20th century. You can learn from these texts both the context of our current condition and also how people responded to it which was not much different from today.

 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
7. I have long cut the cord...
Fri May 20, 2016, 01:46 PM
May 2016

I use Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon to view the movies and tv shows I want to watch and avoid having to subject myself to the mental torture that is MSM news.

The Young Turks, Secular Talk, and Humanist Report are fabulous progressive news mediums on youtube.

 

StarTrombone

(188 posts)
11. Pulled the plug when they switched from analogue to digital
Fri May 20, 2016, 02:04 PM
May 2016

And my cable decoder boxes quit working

That was 15 years ago in Phoenix

And 8 or 9 years ago up nort at the cabin in Minnesota

Isn't that what torrents are for

redwitch

(14,944 posts)
12. I did it several months ago.
Fri May 20, 2016, 02:06 PM
May 2016

I had been watching less and less of it anyway. I tuned in for the debates. Well, most of them. I didn't stick around to see what Wolf or Rachel or whoever had to say.

procon

(15,805 posts)
15. If everyone is out to get you, and all the news media have conspired together
Fri May 20, 2016, 02:37 PM
May 2016

to report uncomplimentary stories on Sanders campaign, and everyone is lying, what is left? You're saying "cutting the cord' is the answer to ducking those unfriendly articles, so that only leaves pleasant, feel good essays to stroke your ego, but what the point of hiding from the existing problems and surrounded yourself with yes-men and ass-kissers?

Who are the acceptable news sources, the trust political pundits, and the proved journalists with real bonafides who've earned their chops? Where are they, the bootlickers who only pen glowing testimonials for Sanders and offer up, encouraging -- but fuzzy -- math, and soft, but believable deceptions about delegates and convention rules? Quick, tell me who is safe so I can see for myself the excellent CVs of these worthies.

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)
17. If you trust the pundolts and other talking heads that corporate media provides for your propaganda
Fri May 20, 2016, 08:35 PM
May 2016

Last edited Sat May 21, 2016, 02:48 AM - Edit history (1)

consumption, you should really try to exercise some critical reasoning skills.

Do you really need groomed personalities to make your opinions for you in scheduled 30 minutes increments of propaganda surrounded by even more blatant corporate advertisements? Can't you find the information you need on demand on the internet?

Corporate media's parade of lies about what happened in Nevada in just the latest example of something that has been going on for eons. Or do you not remember the run up to the last two Gulf Wars?

procon

(15,805 posts)
21. So you got nothing either?
Fri May 20, 2016, 08:59 PM
May 2016

No source, no names, no news service... maybe an unknown blogger? Sorry, but I'm just not into lists of conspiracy theories, paranoid panics or all this emotional angst that everyone is in some mysterious mass collusion. If that appeals to you devout Sanders followers, get on with it.

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)
36. Thanks, Judith Miller! Go Team Halliburton! Find those WMDs!
Sat May 21, 2016, 02:47 AM
May 2016

Corporate media lies daily. If you choose to swallow those lies, go right ahead.

Most "news" reported by corporate media is either pro-establishment propaganda or inane drivel. Being too dense to realize this obvious fact doesn't make you skeptical or informed or circumspect or reasoned. It just makes you yet another gullible pawn.

The first thing any honest and trustworthy corporate reporter would report on is the obvious and blatant pro-corporate, pro-war, pro-establishment bias of the huge media conglomerate he or she works for. Only those with the courage to do so have my trust. How about you, gullible Gomer? Which corporate media sellouts do you trust? Care to supply all of us with your list of trusted corporate news sources?


bjo59

(1,166 posts)
56. The thing that's depressing is that the majority of the country still perceives reality through the
Sun May 22, 2016, 01:24 AM
May 2016

lens of the corporate owned media. Depressing as hell.

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
20. There's a whole world wide web of opinion out there! And much of it is much better than what you get
Fri May 20, 2016, 08:56 PM
May 2016

on NBC ABC CBS CNN MSNBC FOX etc..

jillan

(39,451 posts)
18. Mostly done. I'll turn on CNN from time to time. There are too many other options.
Fri May 20, 2016, 08:38 PM
May 2016

FSTV, RTAmerica, TYTnetwork is expanding - just to name a few.

Corporate news has been worthless for years.
CNN and their toy airplanes; Rachel Maddow and her finger puppets....
it's all been a joke.

neverforget

(9,436 posts)
22. I checked out a couple months ago and don't miss it one bit
Fri May 20, 2016, 09:01 PM
May 2016

I'm enjoying watching the NHL playoffs now.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
25. Right now they are still chasing a downed airplane
Fri May 20, 2016, 09:18 PM
May 2016

They broke for a shooting at the WH for about 2 seconds. (ok in the perimeter, but it did go on lockdown)

brooklynite

(94,598 posts)
26. Nothing like holier than thou posts...
Fri May 20, 2016, 09:19 PM
May 2016

...Personally, I'm not afraid of media that disagrees with me.

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)
37. And that's why you always make sure to watch Fox News. Right?
Sat May 21, 2016, 02:52 AM
May 2016

Now I understand where you picked up your reasoned argumentative style.

 

vintx

(1,748 posts)
39. No - you are not disgusted by media that LIES to you. You choose to spin it instead of facing it.
Sat May 21, 2016, 02:54 AM
May 2016

Wonder why that is...

moriah

(8,311 posts)
27. I already have. I have the CNN mobile app for breaking news, and weather radio for tornadoes.
Fri May 20, 2016, 09:19 PM
May 2016

From broadcast TV altogether. And if I want to watch TV shows, I stream them. It's lovely not seeing commercials!

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
30. stopped watching cable nooz shortly after 9-11 - figured out where things were going
Fri May 20, 2016, 09:23 PM
May 2016

moreover when you have the net you have the world at your keyboard- you can read any story from multiple sources both US and international the spin and counter spin can be really quite interesting

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
32. Never had cable
Fri May 20, 2016, 09:24 PM
May 2016

haven't had TV for 15 years. On-line is my only resource for news, information, entertainment and socializing.

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
42. Why tune him out? Just don't tune in. Love Cenk but computer all day is hard. TV should do it.
Sat May 21, 2016, 03:14 AM
May 2016

TV under FCC and is public. TV should give us truth or a semblance of it. It has become Radio Russia.

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
40. I agree although the best I could do so far is default to CNN where I am seeing attempts at fairnes
Sat May 21, 2016, 03:08 AM
May 2016

I keep recommending Dana Bash over Maddow if you want to hear excellent analysis over propaganda. Bill Clinton Rhodes Scholar and Maddow Rhodes Scholar - I'm beginning to rethink the integrity of the Rhodes Scholarship Rhodes was a diamond mine owner in Africa who was the epitome of Corporatist slavery.

Wiki: As elaborated on in his will, Cecil Rhodes' goals in creating the Rhodes Scholarships were to promote civic-minded leadership among "young colonists"[4]:24 with "moral force of character and instincts to lead," for "the furtherance of the British Empire, for the bringing of the whole uncivilised world under British rule, for the recovery of the United States, for the making the Anglo-Saxon race but one Empire."[4]:59 With the scholarships, he "aimed at making Oxford University the educational centre of the English-speaking race."[4] Since its creation, controversy has surrounded both its former exclusion of women (thus leading to the establishment of the co-educational Marshall Scholarship), and Rhodes' white supremacist beliefs and legacy of colonialism.

I need to move to Democracy Now more often. TV is easier that sitting at computer all day. I guess I need to buy a tablet. Would that help?

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)
46. James Woolsey, Stansfield Turner, Dean Rusk & Wesley Clark were also Rhodes Scholars.
Sat May 21, 2016, 03:33 AM
May 2016

"It is our duty to seize every opportunity of acquiring more territory ... more territory simply means more of the Anglo-Saxon race, more of the best, the most human, most honorable race the world possesses ... the absorption of the greater portion of the world under our rule simply means the end of all wars." Cecil Rhodes

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
47. So, that doesn't change my post. Maddow and Clinton aren't exemplar examples are they?
Sat May 21, 2016, 06:11 AM
May 2016

Not in my book. Did that make them smarter than people who aren't Rhodes Scholars or more ambitious? It's like the attraction of Ivy League schools which aren't really any better than non-ivy league. We are so caught up in labels, aren't we?

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
50. Thanks for specifying. I always thought Rusk was okay. I know fifties but still. . .
Sun May 22, 2016, 12:54 AM
May 2016

maybe I accepted too easily then.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
49. Sorry, how do you get "corporatism" from Rhodes's life?
Sat May 21, 2016, 08:11 AM
May 2016

I mean, I can think of a lot of things to complain about with Rhodes, but "corporatism"? What the hell does this word mean at this point?

Uncle Joe

(58,366 posts)
43. I watch CNN for one reason and one reason only.
Sat May 21, 2016, 03:18 AM
May 2016


“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

― Sun Tzu, The Art of War


http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/17976-if-you-know-the-enemy-and-know-yourself-you-need



Thanks for the thread, mhatrw.

cliffordu

(30,994 posts)
45. I unplugged a couple of years ago
Sat May 21, 2016, 03:30 AM
May 2016

After Olbermann left MSNBC

I don't miss one fucking thing about it.

Todays_Illusion

(1,209 posts)
57. I left all that about 1990, Propaganda and manipulation, not news and the political agenda driven
Sun May 22, 2016, 01:27 AM
May 2016

programs served via revolting and offensive commercials. It is nothing but indoctrination and marketing 24/7.

Nay

(12,051 posts)
62. Except for on-the-spot coverage of such things as airplane crashes or
Sun May 22, 2016, 10:07 AM
May 2016

tornadoes, I haven't watch media news channels in many years. I suspect many people are like me.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»What will it take to get ...