2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumAmerica is a centrist, capitalist country. We are not and will never be socialist.
Deal with it. There is a rich and poor. There is a middle class. There is a right, left, and center. America is about inducing upward movement towards equality, not forcing downwards "equality" by taxing the rich until they're poor, at 80%. America is an exceptional nation that will lead the world and use our military if necessary to do so.
I know some Berners don't like this. But if you want the economy to take a hit with President Trump, keep opposing Hillary. If you don't, Be With Her.
There will be no Velikaya Oktyabrskaya Sotsialisticheskaya Revolyutsiya. There will be no "hasta la victoria, siempre" with the face of a mass murder to boot alongside it. And nor should there be either, ever.
One Black Sheep
(458 posts)GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)I told you guys a lot of Hillary supporters are former moderate republicans. Income inequality gap must widen. When it expands under her, they will blame the GOP.
Yurovsky
(2,064 posts)The only things they MIGHT share with other Democrats are social issues like reproductive rights or gender equity. Even LGBT rights are not a given, just take a look at Hillary's lack of courage on that issue, only coming out in support of gay marriage after the majority of Americans had.
Economic justice MUST be a fundamental cornerstone of Democratic values, policies, and priorities, or we might as well just close up shop.
QC
(26,371 posts)I think one of the worst things about the GOP's descent into madness is that it has sent so many relatively sane but conservative refugees rushing into the Democratic Party.
Rather than take their own party back from the crazies, they are trying to turn our party into GOP II.
They are the cuckoo in the nest.
Yurovsky
(2,064 posts)granted, both parties have lost ground to independents, but the GOP has been bleeding out relative to the scrapes & cuts the Democratic Party has suffered. What is left of the GOP is full on batshit crazy, and we've seen an influx of Wall Street/corporate-friendly types who may not have been comfortable with the snake-handling bible thumpers at the GOP helm.
CobaltBlue
(1,122 posts)That is a part of the reason why neoliberalism has been destructive to both the Democratic Party and the nation.
The unemployment percentage is really goodbut the neoliberal Democrats are wondering why there are people who feel things havent improved for their economic position.
villager
(26,001 posts)Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)Exilednight
(9,359 posts)You're known by those you quote.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)in that statement given the right wing sources that are continually posted Bernie supporters to attack Hillary? Even throwing their arms around the repulsive judicial watch?
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)tenderfoot
(8,437 posts)all over the site.
QC
(26,371 posts)Whenever I see someone with a handle like ViolentMaoistRevolutionary or whatever, I assume I'm looking at a conservative infiltrator who's trying way too hard.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)I've been posting here for 12 years just laying wait to fool everyone into thinking a pro choice, pro gay rights, pro union, pro human rights woman who lives in NY is actually a right winger. The idiocy I'm seeing here is very amusing.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)I defending right wing talking points? Got a link or just a blind lashing out because your candidate is losing?
trudyco
(1,258 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)FFS.
Republican talking points? That's how you all get away from discussing facts, call them republican talking points and not refute them because, you know, Republican talking points?
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)you babbling about? I decry right wing links whenever ANYBODY posts them. Go ahead and find a link to a post of mine that proves otherwise. I'll wait.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)I know exactly what I'm talking about and so do you.
I'm not the babbling mouseketeer supporting a corporate toady.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Better to just admit these things and maintain a modicum of dignity.
Pray tell, what did I lie about?
And while we're on the subject, what about these lies.
I was around during her first presidential run. I even have facts with links you can feel free to refute, but you won't because they're just Republican talking points.
Way to get around the "facts".
Below is why I
VOTED
for Bernie.
Well there's the lying:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x109944
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2008/mar/25/hillary-clinton/video-shows-tarmac-welcome-no-snipers/
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/lists/people/fact-checking-2016-democratic-presidential-candida/
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1017&pid=355426
There her IRAQ war vote:
http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/article/2015/sep/02/11-examples-hillary-clinton-and-bernie-sanders-hol/
There's the fact that she's moved right:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tony-brasunas/there-is-a-moderate-republican-in-this-race_b_9704194.html
How about the Corporate friendly nominee's donors.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/jul/07/facebook-posts/meme-says-hillary-clintons-top-donors-are-banks-an/
Here's one fact about Bernie:
http://www.politifact.com/california/article/2016/apr/19/bernie-sanders-has-never-felt-burn-politifacts-pan/
There's a whole lot more where that came from, but I'm done doing your homework for you.
Refute it.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)They played nice at a FUNERAL. BURN HER!!!
rockfordfile
(8,704 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)Deal with it.
trudyco
(1,258 posts)Yep. You nailed it. Scarier in that more and more they aren't even American.
Unpatriotic Corporate Socialism.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)My life and will continue. No oligarchy from either extreme for me.
clarice
(5,504 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)It can only come from.the 1%
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)"Liberal socialist oligarchy" is an oxymoron and exhibit #1 of a failed IQ test.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)socialist programs we rely on. We are indeed already a Social (ist) Democracy. Otherwise we'd be calling our neighbors or church folks before pulling out our debit cards so the fireman will turn on the water to save the burning house.
Oh, and the burglar coming in the window...the flashlight will be to get said debit card ready for the police.
Such silliness. Hopefully someone else kept that graphic. If not, intelligent people really can look at our long-standing social fabric and find the many places we are "socialist". Even insurance is socialist...socialist capitalism. Otherwise...well, I'm sure you get the drift.
RichVRichV
(885 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)What a stupid, pathetic post to put here.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)"America is an exceptional nation that will lead the world and use our military if necessary to do so."
DLevine
(1,788 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)wilt the stilt
(4,528 posts)is the reason people come to America is for a better life. AKA make more money. That is probably the most binding thought in this country. Should we have a better health care of course and it probably some form of single payer though after pricing out Medicare( turning 65) that certainly is not it. I figured under the current medicare a family of four who probably be in the $1400 per month with out prescription coverage.
Bernie cries for $15 minimum wage and fixing the infrastructure all great things but he never deals with the underlying problem. Rebuilding manufacturing.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)What family of 4 is 65 and over? Doesn't appear you have a clue what you're talking about.
wilt the stilt
(4,528 posts)it sounds good until you actually go in and understand how it works. It is fine for one not so hot for four since each person is a single instance. My portion to the government will be $243 with no supplemental.
Baobab
(4,667 posts)Single payer has to be free because otherwise you need tiers for those who cant pay.
Its also much cheaper, which is important, its what they hate. Also the government already pay2 2/3 of every healthcare dollar. So we are already paying enough for it.
Also jobs are going away fast so the current system wont work. Neither will sending sick people elsewhere help- globalizing it won't help, just crapify everything.
The system is literally doubled in cost by having the insurnce layer, which adds no value. Deal with it.
clarice
(5,504 posts)Karma13612
(4,552 posts)Disappear.
Cradle to grave.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)The problem he's pointing out is that that would be about $700 per month per adult for coverage with a $1000 deductible and no out of pocket maximum.
Baobab
(4,667 posts)The average cost of insurance in the US is rising and its almost $20k per year per person.
A huge chunk of that cost is the cost doctors and hospital staff spend arguing with insurers. Doctors in Europe maybe have one part time accountant. Here they might have three or four full time accounting staff.
The cost of all that makes healthcare much much more expensive. Bringing in lots of cheap nurses and doctors from India, Bangladesh, Africa, - (Hillary's plan, she has similar plan for education, throwing our teachers under the bus) will solve nothing if the underlying system isn't changed.
Plus, its irreversible, wages will never rise back up.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)The bigger issue is that doctors in Europe make half of what they make in the US, and we don't have the political will to tell US doctors to take a paycut.
At any rate, Medicare certainly has a deductible (a grand or so), so if the battle cry is "Medicare For All" it's hard to fault people for assuming everybody would have a deductible.
Baobab
(4,667 posts)about GATS Article I:3 (b) and (c) which is one of the reasons it has to be free, to escape the privatization monster.
The point I am getting at is that a single payer system because its the only game in town has to be free, it cannot have "tiers" - for example the deliberate attenuation of care given to everybody who is not the richest in the US. Everybody else in the US gets crappy care. And by the way, Americans don't use more care we use less care. These threads attract sock puppets like flies and they repeat the same BS over and over.
Another thing about single payer is that since people get care early, since its free, they catch illnesses earlier. Which means treating them is less expensive, dramatically less expensive.
Baobab
(4,667 posts)will make a lot less. Also, they will ship poorer sick people elsewhere for care. Or use virtual reality.
Wages will fall a lot. Its unavoidable when you have cheap foreign competition. That's unfair and going to be nasty because the people who will get the wage cuts or lose their jobs are not the people who are wasting money.
Its totally the wrong approach.
Look at it this way, jobs are going away for good. The last thing we need is a tiered system because the poor are going to be very very very poor and the rich are going to be very very rich. A system like that will lead, frankly to genocide.
Thirties Child
(543 posts)A pay cut might improve medical care. In 1959-60 we had neighbors from South Africa, both physicians, in New Orleans to study tropical medicine. They told us that with single payer (socialized medicine as it was called then) medical care improves. One reason is that those who are attracted to medicine choose the profession because they want to heal, not because they expect to make lots of money.
wilt the stilt
(4,528 posts)I'm not sure how to get there. I have paid insurance out of my pocket for multiple years. know the insurance market better than most. I am turning 65 and when i saw how much medicare actually costs I was pretty surprised.i use the "family of four" as a typical example. The cost in our present medicare for a family of four is almost $1600 with no prescription coverage. there must be a better way.
wilt the stilt
(4,528 posts)so if you apply today's medicare to "all then everyone is in and with today's rules it is not so hot.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)raging moderate
(4,306 posts)Capitalism is great, as long as it has some restrictions. The laborer is worthy of his hire, and where your treasure is, there will your heart be. The wealth of this country is being sucked upward so fast that there is not enough left at the lower levels. I am not complaining for myself. I had it rough as a kid, but I made it, thanks to sources that are being reduced as much as possible by the oligarchs. I am complaining on behalf of the children I worked with whose families could not provide properly for them, and for their children and grandchildren who seem destined to suffer even more.
The people who are running the country believe that rich people are best managed by fantastic over-reinforcement, but poor people are best managed by fantastic over-punishment. This snobbish assumption is visible throughout the social fabric, and it is wrong. My profession involved precise doses of reinforcement, so I know what that is better than most.
I worked with some children whose parents both worked split shifts at different times, just to keep a roof overhead and food on the table. These kids were taken by one parent to a relative's house and put to bed there, then awakened in the middle of the night and taken home by the other parent to be put to bed there for a few hours before being awakened at 6 to get ready for the school bus. I apologized to them on behalf of the people of the United States of America.
The world depicted on the TV series Little House on the Prairie never really existed; that is a fantasy. And the possibility of working out your own living off the land has been put out of reach for most people. The gap between incomes of rich people and poor people is too wide. When I was a girl, some textbooks mentioned such a gap as one of the factors that led to the French Revolution. Those of us who advocate for letting the poor people keep more of what they are producing are working to PREVENT violent revolution, not to foster it.
Bernie Sanders supporters actually want a more moderate country, in which rich people are not cossetted and worshipped. Where do you think Donald Trump came from? His candidacy is the inevitable result of giving too much unearned luxury to a few and inflicting too much unearned drudgery on many. This is not very different from what the other wing of the party USED to SAY they believed. I have worked for Democrats for several decades, when my drudgery allowed it. Can you hear me now?
Armstead
(47,803 posts)That fundamental truth has been lost in the nonsense such as the OP
7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)Why is there such a huge disconnect?
Globalization is not for the "working class".
"Working off the land", out of reach for most people. "Little House on the Prairie" never existed. Well yes, out of reach for most, sadly. Never existed, I question, I lived it, my grandparents lived it in the PanHandle of Texas.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Just due to government intervention on behalf of the medical industry.
polly7
(20,582 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Counterpoint: They'd have to come here for a metric shitload more money to achieve the same quality of life.
Medical care in the US costs the average family $25,000.
polly7
(20,582 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)Rather simplistic, in my view.
...............................................
I pay the now standard $104/ month for basic Medicare...
...plus a supplemental or "Advantage" plan..
Without PART D (prescription coverage. ) premiums varied between ZERO! and $35/mo.
Now WITH Part D $95/MO
TOTAL now for me is $200/mo = $2400/year,,
I am with a very good (if that is not an oxymoron) not-for-profit Insurance company.
I do not know where your $1400/month comes from for a family of 4.
Broward
(1,976 posts)according to a right-wing troll. Got it.
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)RKP5637
(67,111 posts)mac56
(17,571 posts)are paying you well for this post. Yay capitalism!
Yurovsky
(2,064 posts)they certainly aren't paying for "minds changed" or "opinions altered".
Screw the corporatists. I'm sure the folks who think it (the 1%-centric economy) is no big deal will change their tune when they eventually get laid off.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)rock
(13,218 posts)that you seem to have stirred up, you have a pretty good point. You are of course right in that this is a capitalistic culture and not socialistic.
mindem
(1,580 posts)The idea that your precious Hillary is even remotely familiar with what is going on with average folks is ridiculous. She flaps around like a flag in the wind - Hillary is about Hillary and that's it.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)With cushy free benefits. You act like he actually has some connection to average folks. He's a very slick politician telling people what they want to hear with absolutely no plan to actually accomplish anything. Revolution? What a joke
cali
(114,904 posts)in.Vermont's Northeast Kingdom.
You are clueless. There's a reason Vermonters support and approve of Bernie. One reason is how effective he's been. Btw, the state where hilly is least liked is Vermont. That was true before Bernie ran for president. And it's not because we're sexist or racist. Obama won here by greater margins than in any other state except for Hawaii. Hilly lost here by 70 points.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)Because they ALL get paid 6 figures.
Such bullshit.
seekthetruth
(504 posts)YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)Yeah, Sanders gets a pay check .. move on.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)phony as a three dollar bill.
These folks are corporate loving, intervention mongering liars and flimflam artists.
All they are is the secular wing of the TeaPubliKLAN party aka the more demographically inclusive money party.
vintx
(1,748 posts)HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)HRC is republican light, this supporter and corresponding post here is proof of point
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)Baobab
(4,667 posts)you freak out, consider that the process that's going on (economic integration of the developing world at the US working peoples expense) is a vast redistribution of wealth away from the middle class and has been hidden from the country in order to make corporations richer, not to effectuate any greater good.
Wages should go up not down. Bernie has the right idea, Hillary is playing a trick on the country.
Read up on labour mobility under investment agrmts. Its going to be a huge change people don't expect that's going to force wages way down and shovel away jobs to firms in developing nations.
vintx
(1,748 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)RKP5637
(67,111 posts)sinkingfeeling
(51,460 posts)Our willingness to spend 57% of our budget on murder via military interventions?
bvf
(6,604 posts)pinskinny
(82 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)"And you, Sorority Girl, just in case you accidentally wander into a voting booth one day, theres some things you should know. One of them is theres absolutely no evidence to support the statement that were the greatest country in the world. Were seventh in literacy. Twenty-seventh in math. Twenty-second in science. Forty-ninth in life expectancy. A hundred and seventy-eighth in infant mortality. Third in median household income. Number four in labor force and number four in exports. We lead the world in only three categories: Number of incarcerated citizens per capita, number of adults who believe angels are real, and defense spending, where we spend more than the next twenty-six countries combined, twenty-five of whom are allies.
Now none of this is the fault of a twenty-year-old college student, but you nonetheless are without a doubt a member of the worst, period, generation, period, ever, period. So when you ask what makes us the greatest country in the world, I dunno what the fuck youre talkin about. Yosemite?" -- The Newsroom
kcr
(15,317 posts)One doesn't even have to be a Berner to disagree with it. You don't sound like a centrist. You sound like a straight up right wing Republican with this drivel.
CrispyQ
(36,478 posts)demmiblue
(36,865 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)LWolf
(46,179 posts)have that "D" on your voter registration.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)TransitJohn
(6,932 posts)With disgusting enabling like this, nothing will change. You are in the wrong party, my friend.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)It's like they own Washington, see?
Yeah, Wall Street-on-the-Potomac, see.
For instance, in the the late 80s:
Know your BFEE: They Looted Your Nations S&Ls for Power and Profit
Then, after the Bankstershitstorm in September 21, 2008, :
Know your BFEE: Phil Gramm, the Meyer Lansky of the War Party, Set-Up the Biggest Bank Heist Ever.
What's weird is how, rather than the jail cell he so richly deserved, Phil Gramm ended up as Vice Chairman of UBS -- the Swiss Bank that received about $59 Billion with a Billion in TARP funds -- from where Gramm hired Bill Clinton, who signed into law the repeal of Glass Steagall. Since then, they've also brought in George W Bush to specialize in Wealth Management:
http://financialservicesinc.ubs.com/revitalizingamerica/SenatorPhilGramm.html
PS: Do you know what the only business named in the Constitution is, ericson00?
Rex
(65,616 posts)Notice the huge transparency page, it goes along with the agenda. I cannot wait to see them banned from DU, their divisive voice year after year has cost this site a lot of people leaving.
CanadaexPat
(496 posts)and has healthcare for all, one-year paid maternity leave, and in Ontario is experimenting with basic income support and starting free college. So...
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)NT
katsy
(4,246 posts)forjusticethunders
(1,151 posts)Also Hillary isn't as "centrist" as you (or ironically the Bernie or Busters you castigate here) think, largely because the coalition that has powered her to victory is considerably more marginalized and thus considerably more open to socialism and other radical solutions than you might think.
Not trying to be combative here, and I understand why you might feel this way but I don't agree with your analysis.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)...was denounced as socialist.
And there was truth to that, since ideas in the New Deal were in the Socialist Party platform.
FourScore
(9,704 posts)But you keep talking those republican talking points!!! It makes you seem real "centrist".
obamanut2012
(26,081 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)What happened to the Liberal idea of free thought and expression?
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)But at the same time, his right to expression ends at the tip of my nose. If I find something he's said to be stupid, I will exercise my right to free thought and expression, and tell him he is a moron. There is no evidence to support the assertion that we are an "exceptional" country. None. He deserves the lambasting he's getting.
clarice
(5,504 posts)That's why the flow of immigrants seems to run in one direction.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)You'd come running here too. How about some actual examples? You tell me, what makes us exceptional? We're 26th for child well-being. 28th for child poverty rates. 29th for teen pregnancy. 3rd for homicide. 34th on life expectancy, 41st on infant mortality. Quality of math and science? 47th. You tell me. What makes us so fucking exceptional? What makes us the arbiters of the entire goddamn globe? What makes you believe that we're some sort of God-given gift to the entire goddamn world? We have never in my lifetime been "an exceptional country".
So put up, or shut up-- because the only people I hear saying we're an exceptional country are Republicans.
Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-zuesse/how-the-us-performs-in-re_b_3080446.html
clarice
(5,504 posts)The fact that we can even HAVE a forum like this says a lot....
BTW.... is playing the "Republican card" all YOU got? Pretty weak.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)Wow, you're just as bad as he is. "The fact that we can have a forum like this"-- are you aware that we're only fourth in terms of countries with the most freedom of speech? Being beaten by Switzerland, Canada, and Ireland-- in that order. Two hundred and seven sovereign states in the world, at least a hundred fifty have the freedom to "have a forum like this". Please, educate yourself before you pull a neuron in your frontal lobe trying to mental gymnastic your way into slandering me.
clarice
(5,504 posts)"You cannot reason someone out of a position to which reason hasn't led them"
Have a great weekend...game, set, match goes to Clarice.
islandmkl
(5,275 posts)than the one you have been playing....
clarice
(5,504 posts)islandmkl
(5,275 posts)you are possibly 1-0 if you count scoring against yourself...
clarice
(5,504 posts)VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)for sheer fact that I have a hard time believing someone can really tout the Republican talking points of "American Exceptionalism" when we've done nothing but fuck the world up for the past sixteen years. I hope you can have peace with yourself inside that bubble.
clarice
(5,504 posts)some inner peace and relieve your "AMERICA phobias"
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)You're just-- a real piece of work, aren't you? Gimme a call when the propaganda wears off.
clarice
(5,504 posts)Amaril
(1,267 posts)Karma13612
(4,552 posts)sinkingfeeling
(51,460 posts)complain about government online. Really? Travel the world a little and learn something.
clarice
(5,504 posts)Exilednight
(9,359 posts)In over 60% of countries. Reporters Without Borders ranks America 41st in freedom of speech.
Tell me how exceptional we are. If you don't have empirical evidence, then you don't have a much of an argument.
clarice
(5,504 posts)You almost seem PLEASED to be able to report that we are ranked 41st.,
as if we are somehow an evil Country.
What is your opinion on America in general? I swear that I'm not trying to be argumentative,
and well aware that everyone has the right to their views. Just trying to understand the mindset.
PM me if you would like.
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)Thumping our chest that we're better than everyone else, and yet every measurable index puts us near the middle to the lower half of the scale.
An one point we lead the world in several categories, now we lead only in a handful. We're the largest consumer of goods, we lock up more people per capita, and we spend more on defense fighting pointless wars.
Please tell me: what do we have to be proud of?
clarice
(5,504 posts)probably never be repaid to Countries that are probably ahead of us on most lists. Just sayin'
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)that God forsaken area?
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)House troops there due to the Saudis.
We can't house air craft there due to Egypt.
We can't house tanks their due to Kuwait.
We can't house military hardware there due to Turkey.
We get attacked by Isis due to our alliance.
We get attacked by al queda due to our alliance.
We get attacked by any splinter group due to our alliance.
We get attacked by Israel just because they don't care we're their ally.
So why should we give them money when they can't do anything for us?
clarice
(5,504 posts)sa yin' that it's money better spent than the money that we send to many other hell-holes.
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)Exilednight
(9,359 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)chascarrillo
(3,897 posts)And, I should remind you that ericson00 supports closing off the borders to Syrian refugees, just like Trump. He red-baits, just like Trump. Why shouldn't those backward views be attacked by liberals?
clarice
(5,504 posts)If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
― George Orwell
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Or, use our free thought and expression to expose it?
clarice
(5,504 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)More reminiscent of Joe McCarthy than Mohandas Gandhi.
clarice
(5,504 posts)and yes, perhaps he/she could have been more diplomatic.....but I don't know
if it is worthy of some of the attending vitriol.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"attending vitriol..."
Like calling people America-phobic? (insert justification here to allow pretense you're not holding others to a higher standard than you hold yourself to-- as long as you believe it, it's good enough)
clarice
(5,504 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)mac56
(17,571 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)If nothing else, it proves that the subject of our complaints isn't a strawman. The Democratic party has been undermined by neoliberal corporatists.
clarice
(5,504 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)What happened to the Liberal idea of free thought and expression?
clarice
(5,504 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Precisely how do those verbal response prevent free thought or expression?
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)A conscious reminder of the oncoming fascism of the Democratic party.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)her fear and trembling.
I Hate it that this will likely be her last national appearance. She was one of the good ones. Like Steinhem, she squandered her usually good judgment to fall on the sword for someone who will likely never see the White House. HRC likely called in a favor.
We are getting used to lines of armed and ready types. Ugh.
amborin
(16,631 posts)we have many aspects of socialism already: public services, etc.
Let's not forget how Main Street bailed out Wall street: socialized debt
Armstead
(47,803 posts)?w=610
?w=610&h=343
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)So saying the country is 'centrist' is saying nobody believes in anything.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)How about LGBT rights? Voting rights? I could go on and on!
pinebox
(5,761 posts)And now I am going to debunk you.
Why is that you say "America is a centrist, capitalist country. We are not and will never be socialist."
Are you aware what Socialist even is because I'm thinking you don't.
Socialist is the former DDR and USSR, it isn't countries like Canada, Germany, Sweden or Denmark.
We need to clear the air with that first.
Secondly, you say we'll never be socialist but in reality we already are.
What are things like social security, national highways, libraries, police and fire and public education?
Now let's look at something else. That whole "we'll never be" thing.
Are you aware that most American's agree with Bernie's policies?
http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/more-and-more-americans-agree-bernie-sanders-and-not-just-those-who-identify-left
http://reverbpress.com/politics/datalog/americans-agree-bernie-sanders/
7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)and sharing. Thank you.
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)Yurovsky
(2,064 posts)Crickets from the corporate wing of the Party...
vintx
(1,748 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)I can't imagine why people would seek an alternative.
immoderate
(20,885 posts)--imm
cry baby
(6,682 posts)And please stop red baiting.
Response to ericson00 (Original post)
tenderfoot This message was self-deleted by its author.
cali
(114,904 posts)ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)islandmkl
(5,275 posts)your lack of historical knowledge seems to show that you either skipped some classes early in your education, didn't pay attention, or just bought into some rightwing fantasy about America (while thinking, somehow, that you are 'centrist')...
check out the income tax rates on the rich pre-Nixon...you know, the period after WWII with the greatest growth economically ever, a growth that benefited more Americans than ever before (yes, minorities got shorted...which doesn't change the math), with the greatest expansion of the Middle Class....
and let us all know how that Middle Class is faring now...how does the future look...?
Orsino
(37,428 posts)...but socialism is already here and working every day. Were you unaware of who pays for the military, for the Docial safety net, for fire and police forces, for disaster relief, etc?
WDIM
(1,662 posts)If Hillary supporters are really this far right there may not be much hope for this country.
There are many things that are socialized in this country and rightfully so and we should expand that to health care and higher education and banking and natural resources and utilities to name a few.
In the 1950s the top tax rate was 90 percent with a Republican President. And we built the great infrastructure that is crumbling today. It is time to rebuild our infrastructure and our country and the mega wealthy who benefit the most from this infrastructure should pay for it.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)In the 20's and 30's both communism and socialism were gaining a foothold because of inequality.
The New Deal and Unions stopped the trend.
I think that unless we either increase the social safety net or repeal Taft Hartley and give unions more power we will see a gradual move that way.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)The neoliberal moles who are now validated by DLC/Third Way politicians like Clinton to poke their heads out of the dirt where they have been industriously undermining the few remaining bits of the new deal and great society.
This primary has been the most distressing time to be a democrat that I can remember.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Oh well, the OP like so many other disruptive voices better enjoy their stay while they got it. It is interesting how all the people trying to keep us divided have a transparency page...that is overflowing with hides.
CobaltBlue
(1,122 posts)rockfordfile
(8,704 posts)tenderfoot
(8,437 posts)There. I finished your headline.
Now back to your copy of National Review. Or is World Net Daily more your speed?
Rex
(65,616 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)hamsterjill
(15,222 posts)Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know - every Bernie supporter who posts here will say I don't know what I'm talking about. It's their standard response to everything these days. Anyone who disagrees with what they say is just simply too stupid to understand. Well, believe me, I understand.
My issue with Bernie's platform is that he's not JUST going after the uber wealthy, but he's going after people who are middle income. He wants to take my money from me, and then give it back to me in a form that HE believes is appropriate. No, thank you.
It is hard work that has made this country great. No, that's NOT a Republican value - it's an American value. There is nothing wrong with being proud of the fact that you've worked your ass off to provide for your family and that you've made strides for doing that. That does not mean that you "have yours and to hell with everyone else". Like many of us, it means that the more we have, the more we can GIVE to causes that we believe in. Who here has the right to judge what any other does with their hard earned money?
Free tuition? I'm fine with that, but show me how it will be PAID for and show me how those who take advantage of it will give back for having received it? Military service? Community service? How many years of service for each year of free tuition? I mean, we're all about the common good, right? I applaud that. But what are these people going to do to contribute to the common good once they've received this benefit?
katsy
(4,246 posts)is in all modern industrialized countries. Full stop.
Single payer will work for all and everyone will chip in and it will be a savings for all of us.
Here's a heads-up about all you "hardworking" people who made this country great: AI
AI will replace most jobs in the future. So. Now what? Let the "freeloading" unemployed die off? Ovens for the newly "unemployable" so you don't pay a nickle more in taxes? What if you're replaced? Do you want us to fight for you?
You better look beyond those pennies you want to hoard to the bigger future. We either fight for our basic human right to life or we all burn together.
hamsterjill
(15,222 posts)Utterly pathetic. You don't know shit about what I do with my "pennies".
How much are you going to contribute to universal healthcare? Yes, I'd love for everyone to be covered, but that's not going to be reality in the wink of an eye and especially not under Bernie Sanders.
AI???? Put down your play station and join reality.
katsy
(4,246 posts)And yeah... Penny wise pound foolish.
Unless you already get Medicare & just don't want the same for others. Better to pay profiteers 20% and reduce services than let the govt negotiate pricing?
You are going on ignore because you don't make sense.
hamsterjill
(15,222 posts)That way, you won't feel compelled to answer my posts with utter nonsense.
The dire warnings about AI have been around since the 60's, you know that time period when America first rebelled against "the establishment"?
But you won't be reading this, of course.
katsy
(4,246 posts)But today's news is something you should read because it's not scifi as you implied.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141464906
Also... Adidas is making their products in Germany again using robots.
That is AI.
Crack a science or manufacturing journal & get a clue.
hamsterjill
(15,222 posts)Good grief! Please go forward with your intent to ignore me. It's not necessary that you respond further.
Lodestar
(2,388 posts)do American's most identify with? Who would make the best leader??
Who is the most trustworthy?
I think we ALL know who the majority of Americans would be in alignment with.
But lets do it...let's just simply ask in a very public way. No delegates to hide behind,
just a straight up questionaire.
libtodeath
(2,888 posts)VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)DemocraticWing
(1,290 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)so when are you privatizing all this?
Rex
(65,616 posts)Their ignorance of what socialism is, mirrors another groups ignorance...how curious?
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)Tell everyone here that's in the bottom 80% to go fuck off and accept social darwinism! Tell them that its their fault that they didn't have the gall to manipulate many people in order to become wealthy!
panader0
(25,816 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)is getting its money mostly by denying these things to the country (Emanuel even set up a "veal pen" to block it)
Sanders points this out, Clinton runs by saying she'll be Wall Street's biggest enemy
two different paradigms
BootinUp
(47,165 posts)AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)It's refreshing to see some honesty from Hillary supporters from a change, even if its ugly.
BootinUp
(47,165 posts)AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)neverforget
(9,436 posts)11 hides. Lovely.
merrily
(45,251 posts)and the OP name and I get the drift, so I don't bother to read the whole thread that ericsson starts. LOL!
What a group! They were an endangered species here on hides alone before amnesty. And they complain about us!
BTW, have you noticed the Brockolis today? I guess trained period ended? Proof! Links! Direct quotes! Exact words! Lots of demands, but under 40 posts total. It's hysterical. I never thought he was that clueless. I guess he makes up for it in sheer evil and souless-ness. (does soul less have two ls or one?)
QC
(26,371 posts)Sure, they're all robotic repetitions of talking points, along with a few personal attacks, but one must still admire the work ethic.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)...because we kept reelecting a Democratic Socialist.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)our economy is at risk with Hillary more than anyone. Bernie will only improve it
jamese777
(546 posts)Primaries' total popular vote as of May 20th
Hillary Clinton: 13,192,713 (55.5%)
Donald Trump: 11,266,041
Bernie Sanders: 10,158,889 (42.7%)
Clinton over Sanders: 3,033,824
Clinton over Trump: 1,926,672
Hillary Clinton: 1,775 pledged delegates
Bernie Sanders: 1,499 pledged delegates
Hillary Clinton: 522 superdelegates
Bernie Sanders: 42 superdelegates
Hillary Clinton: 2,297 total delegates
Bernie Sanders: 1,541 total delegates
Hillary Clinton: 26 contests won
Bernie Sanders: 21 contests won
derpderpderp
(43 posts)Sign says you should have turned right. Oh, you did.
katsy
(4,246 posts)Capitalism is an economic system. Well governed countries with effective safety nets for the common good also have a capitalist economic system.
Effective government regulates capitalistic endeavors so we don't end up fucking over the least of us.
Here are some problems that capitalism is either at fault for, not adequate for, or needs better regulation:
1. Healthcare is a human right in most 1st world countries. Capitalists should not dictate who lives or dies, who is worthy of life or not. That is not saying that common sense shouldn't apply to costs/risks. Just that corporations who answer to shareholders & are profit driven shouldn't be in charge of those decisions.
2. Environment, climate change & sustainability. This needs no comment. Governments must regulate better.
3. Ya wanna french kiss capitalism? It's ok by me but don't fucking look to taxpayers to bail out these banking fuckers when they fuck themselves over AND if taxpayer $$$$ was used to develop new tech that corps use... Consider us fucking shareholders. And pay your fucking taxes douchbags.
Now... If you are still confused, sign over your socialist social security check to me. Refuse help from your fire dept when your house is burning. Don't use the libraries. Ask your neighbor to take out that brain tumor cuz ya know who needs government regulations and accreditations. Don't send your kids to public school. Drink FLINT water. In short... Somalia is your fucking dream country.
Your op is ignorant. We are a representative democracy who pool resources for the good of the commons... We the people. It's the capitalists who stole our money and resources and diverted those funds to their own pockets and now we need to take that back.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Incrementalism isn't working.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)just another Hillary supporter with a yellow button.
Buh Bye!
plonk
Quixote1818
(28,947 posts)But you didn't take the time to look into that did you? That Sanders just wants to fix capitalism in the US not get rid of it. Make it work for everyone not just the 1% because currently there is NO free market, only one rigged to help the rich. Wall Street can collapse the economy and get bailed out while regular folks never get their debt waved. The Unions have been crushed and the middle class is in decline. Capitalism needs to be fixed to work for everyone and it takes a bit of socialism to balance things out. Not a radically difficult thing to understand.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)That's what our revolution was all about. We've come a long, long way from 1776 but the GOP can always play the history card when they need votes.
kentuck
(111,104 posts)The question is: Is that enough? That is at the core of the debate between Democrats and Republicans.
rockfordfile
(8,704 posts)The poster's first paragraph sounds like a republican.
I'm a democrat and that junk is right wing all the way.
merrily
(45,251 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)At least Limbaugh gets paid to speak this silliness.
treestar
(82,383 posts)really want instability. The US is extremely stable. Ask people from countries with unstable governments if it is worth it. And the "Revolution" can make things a lot worse than they had been.
Most Americans are happy with the system as it is, not assuming the worst of everyone else, and fine with the stability.
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)Sanders plan is by 2022. Objectively to the right of the majority opinion.
America may not be "socialist", whatever that means.
But it is definitely to the left of Sanders!
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Todays_Illusion
(1,209 posts)of people's beliefs and desires.
And there is opposing research to your talking point "centrist right nation" opinion.
http://www.salon.com/2014/07/28/gops_30_year_spin_job_is_over_why_we_are_not_a_center_right_nation/
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Yawn. Desperate nonsense from camp Weathervane.
imagine2015
(2,054 posts)What is "centrist capitalism" as opposed to "right-wing capitalism" and "left-wing capitalism" whatever the frick the later may be?
We sure don't want to tax the rich until they are poor and have to depend on food stamps and other government relief.
I didn't know that's what Bernie and his supporters were planning to do.
You must have inside information!
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)is never a virtue.
gordianot
(15,242 posts)The Socialism practiced here makes it possible for Capitalism to exisist. Think about it the next time you drive on a paid road.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)i think socialism could indeed happen in the U.S. with effective evolution. Revolution however, would send the concept into a death-spiral for 75 years.
Vinca
(50,279 posts)Try taking Medicare and Social Security away from Grandma, my friend. She'll straighten you out about socialism.
Amaril
(1,267 posts)Nice.
AND, a President Trump will be all on you for backing a candidate who couldn't beat him. YOU deal with THAT.
Oh, and, buh-bye.
seekthetruth
(504 posts)Deal with it.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)kaleckim
(651 posts)says 1986. Look at the polling on the actual issues. The "center" is defined by popular opinion, and the center is to the left of people like yourself and corrupt politicians like DWS and HRC on the issues. Sorry if it's hard to keep up with the changes in the country, but the system has not benefited enough people for people to feel the need to maintain the system. You forgot to make policies equitable enough to get enough people that want to maintain the system, and now the chickens are coming home roost.
CobaltBlue
(1,122 posts)EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)etc...
What an idiotic black and white op.
forjusticethunders
(1,151 posts)And really, it's honestly not an economic system (neither is capitalism), it's a political outlook in terms of who has power, the capitalists or the workers. Socialism in America would, even if every other country went socialist, be more market based most likely (for example I could see a formally socialist United States still having Wall Street, even if it's still 10% of the power and influence it currently has). That's why social democracy and market socialism exist. This is why we call fascist states in the 30s capitalist even though businesses were highly regulated by the state, and we callled states like the pre 1980s UK socialist, despite having markets and corporations, because the state was directed more towards human needs.
That's why it's incoherent to say that Scandinavia isn't socialist or even that we weren't moving in a socialist direction in 1960-1970 (granted Vietnam fucked it up) because we were seeing that people power was starting to become a powerful counterweight to corporate power (though the racism of the white working class fucked it up too)
That's why I consider socialism and capitalism more of *political* outlooks than social ones.
cliffordu
(30,994 posts)Just keep up the republican talking points and name calling and slander and you can HAVE your republican presidency.
Free religionist psychotics included, some assembly required.
craigmatic
(4,510 posts)period.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)Oh wait!
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Britain is not a socialist country yet it has most of the things Bernie is campaigning for Britain has. America needs to get its act together or fascism will come to America or perhaps its here already?
brush
(53,792 posts)The country needs to move left as the oligarchs are attempting to take over.
Many of Sanders' ideas are good, he is just the wrong proponent of them. Too bad Warren didn't run.
He bashes the Democratic party more than he does Trump and the repugs.
dflprincess
(28,079 posts)than there currently is in the United States.
Might explain why we don't see hoards of Scandinavians swarming our embassies and begging for refuge from their socialist hell holes.
Karma13612
(4,552 posts)Pols and corporations have created this mess.
This is not a fair representation of what the actual voting citizens of this country have wanted to happen.
We have been down trodden and taxed/managed/controlled/lied to and ignored into this current mess.
And please update yourself: there is barely a middle class alive anymore.
rdking647
(5,113 posts)America is a centrist country.
calling hillary a right winger shows just how far to the left some bernie supporters are. america however is not that far left.
its time for bernie supporters to face reality.
he isnt going to be the nominee. its not going to happen.
and declaring that if he isnt the nominee you wont vote for HRC is really just cutting off your nose to spite your face
its almost like they want trump to win so they can protest .
forjusticethunders
(1,151 posts)Everyone agrees on this. The problem with the Bernie supporters is that they put the cart before the horse. Reagan was the result, not the cause, of the conservative counterrevolution in the 80s. To shift it back left, it takes a lot of activism and coalition building and outreach, and while some of it has happened, a lot of it still needs to be done.
frustrated_lefty
(2,774 posts)I'd say more about how moronic your position is, but you're too stupid to comprehend your own idiocy within the context of history. You go on cheering for the 1% and see how far it gets you.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)snowy owl
(2,145 posts)Do you know?
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Not in my book.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)floriduck
(2,262 posts)TransitJohn
(6,932 posts)And pretty fucking disgusting.