Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
Fri May 20, 2016, 07:08 AM May 2016

What time slot should Bernie have at the convention?

Obviously, not on nomination night. I hope Elizabeth Warren is primetime, but with HRC, we have the added bonus of having Bill Clinton primetime....VP primetime. Barbara Boxer, primetime. BHO, Biden, Michelle Obama, Dr. Biden, Nancy Pelosi......we have a plethora of great Democrats.

I remember Al Sharpton had a 4 pm slot.

88 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What time slot should Bernie have at the convention? (Original Post) msanthrope May 2016 OP
4 o'clock TexasTowelie May 2016 #1
You don't think they are bad? Bohemianwriter May 2016 #6
If I actually thought that Democrat TexasTowelie May 2016 #23
Rejection, deflection and projection. Bohemianwriter May 2016 #39
TL;DR. TexasTowelie May 2016 #40
The mind of a Hillary supporter who loves rigged systems... Bohemianwriter May 2016 #46
Since you are so brilliant TexasTowelie May 2016 #53
Now, that was cold. N/T WiffenPoof May 2016 #79
Did you read the condescending comment above mine? TexasTowelie May 2016 #80
You should tone this up angrychair May 2016 #52
In your attempt to defend Bernie, you smear many good candidates karynnj May 2016 #71
Are you trying to alienate Bernie supporters... Bohemianwriter May 2016 #73
Your reading comprehension is pretty bad karynnj May 2016 #74
Could have fooled me... Bohemianwriter May 2016 #75
This makes incredibly little sense. nt karynnj May 2016 #76
What time is Debbie Wasserman Schultz giving her "reefer madness" speech? Warren DeMontague May 2016 #2
Look like DWS has done a bang up job. Nt msanthrope May 2016 #3
You mean when she allied herself with Sheldon Adelson to defeat medical marijuana reform in Florida? Warren DeMontague May 2016 #9
No....when she helped secure the nom for HRC. I'm sure she's responsible for ailing grannies msanthrope May 2016 #10
Not everywhere, no. But Florida isn't everywhere. Warren DeMontague May 2016 #11
I don't give a shit about weed. Think it should be decriminalized. But the granny msanthrope May 2016 #17
You're honestly defending that shit? Warren DeMontague May 2016 #21
no I'm not defending it. msanthrope May 2016 #48
For what it's worth, I think Hillary has won the primary fairly, or at least she legitimately Warren DeMontague May 2016 #70
So you admit that DWS was never impartial... Bohemianwriter May 2016 #12
It doesn't say a whole lot about Hillary if she needed DWS to "help secure" it for her. Warren DeMontague May 2016 #13
Hillary never faced a real challenge in an election until Obama in 2008.. Bohemianwriter May 2016 #16
She didn't have to use tactics to secure 3 million more votes. Bernie lost when he lost the South. msanthrope May 2016 #15
Keep putting on those blinders... Bohemianwriter May 2016 #29
tl;dr. nt msanthrope May 2016 #65
she helped secure the nom for HRC frylock May 2016 #66
Don't forget Martin O'Malley. FSogol May 2016 #4
I did. Which, ironically, encapsulates his campaign....But he should be primetime. Had more msanthrope May 2016 #5
Nah, he won't get a vp nod since Maryland will vote for HRC regardless. FSogol May 2016 #7
Definitely in the cabinet. I think Castro is the VP. Nt msanthrope May 2016 #8
Agree, it'll be Castro. n/t FSogol May 2016 #35
HHS seems more likely (nt) Recursion May 2016 #25
So yo9u want to give a candidate with only 1% of the votes over Bernie? Bohemianwriter May 2016 #30
"where has O'Malley been more concrete than Bernie on anything?" LOL, glad you asked FSogol May 2016 #38
And how does that marginalize anything that Bernie has stood for since the 60s? Bohemianwriter May 2016 #42
Clueless! FSogol May 2016 #49
+a zillion rbrnmw May 2016 #61
I like the sound of Vice President O'Malley btw. forjusticethunders May 2016 #69
The Acceptance Speech slot GreatGazoo May 2016 #14
He ain't getting that. Nt msanthrope May 2016 #19
lolz obamanut2012 May 2016 #57
+1 n/t lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #77
Prime time the night before the nomination. Nt. NCTraveler May 2016 #18
I'd rather have Pelosi, Warren, Biden(s) Michelle Obama. nt msanthrope May 2016 #20
They would clearly be worlds better. Nt NCTraveler May 2016 #24
When they take a potty break. boston bean May 2016 #22
I know! make him do the walk of atonement! Warren DeMontague May 2016 #27
Funny, I was just having nice little exchange with another DUer how the high sparrow boston bean May 2016 #28
Oh, i think Benioff and Weiss are being pretty obvious and deliberate, there. Warren DeMontague May 2016 #31
It is sort of ironic that you sorta end up hating the high sparrow more than Cercei! boston bean May 2016 #33
Some of us are high sparrow fans. We enjoy seeing Cersei get the shit kicked out of her & family JonLeibowitz May 2016 #54
Whatever he wants. Duh. cali May 2016 #26
Maybe they can shorten a coffee break, to squeeze him in...nt SidDithers May 2016 #32
What time does the Nominee usually speak? inchhigh May 2016 #34
Why not nomination night? If prefer NO Bill Clinton morningfog May 2016 #36
3:30 pm sounds about right Florencenj2point0 May 2016 #37
Depends on how he behaves. If he's cooperative and doesn't throw a tantrum, 7PM. Zynx May 2016 #41
This is better than my answer -- agree obamanut2012 May 2016 #58
Depends. At what point during the day are birds most alert? randome May 2016 #43
7:41 PT, 2nd day. joshcryer May 2016 #44
I hope Bernie will be that classy. nt msanthrope May 2016 #45
I don't see him suspending the roll call. joshcryer May 2016 #47
I agree with you obamanut2012 May 2016 #62
I love when she interrupted the roll call -- it gave me chills obamanut2012 May 2016 #59
I remember being on DU at that time. joshcryer May 2016 #64
Good lord obamanut2012 May 2016 #68
4 a.m. Monday morning. DavidDvorkin May 2016 #50
Sounds good to me! +1 COLGATE4 May 2016 #55
suspect DNC will give him an 8 am slot! oldandhappy May 2016 #51
4 pm -- I'd love for Warren to be before Obama introduces Hillary obamanut2012 May 2016 #56
How about 10 minutes prior to the 3pm snack break itsrobert May 2016 #60
The same spot Hillary had when she lost to Obama in 08. n/t ram2008 May 2016 #63
12th of Never KingFlorez May 2016 #67
Wrong day, wrong question. n/t Aerows May 2016 #72
That will depend on how much of his agenda the party chooses to honor. Orsino May 2016 #78
Whichever the presumptive nominee has, of course. nt silvershadow May 2016 #81
They need to wait and see how and when he finally bows out. A good Bernie gets a cookie, but anotherproletariat May 2016 #82
In '92 Brown didn't get to speak, because he hadn't suspended his campaign Recursion May 2016 #83
This gets my vote. nt msanthrope May 2016 #84
I checked: he was allowed a brief address when he seconded his nomination Recursion May 2016 #85
No....I knew it was Bill the moment I met him and HRC in 91. nt msanthrope May 2016 #87
Give him an early one so he can go home Demsrule86 May 2016 #86
None. All he's going to do is trash the party and muddy the water. ecstatic May 2016 #88

TexasTowelie

(112,252 posts)
1. 4 o'clock
Fri May 20, 2016, 07:15 AM
May 2016

a.m. What has Bernie to say that we haven't heard a thousand times before? Wall Street-bad. Billionaires-bad. Millionaires-wait a moment, Jane just told me what she has in the bank account.

 

Bohemianwriter

(978 posts)
6. You don't think they are bad?
Fri May 20, 2016, 07:31 AM
May 2016

Do you think they are good people? The fact that you care more about0ut the few tho0usands Bernie has in his account than the millions Hilary has taken from Wall Street, pretending she has ever said a single harsh word in their direction is quite telling. Seems that you side with self interested hedge fund managers over civil rights activists who has been working for the PEOPLE without getting rich from it.

Better people than inner city black kids who had to deal drugs after Bill took away funds to build their community?

Why should only CORPdems be allowed on stage?

Why should people be forced to listen to the garbage and lies from CORPdems like Bill Clinton and exclude REAL progressive from a convention run by a private corporation and huge donor to the HILLARY campaign? What new contribution will the same old worn out voices give to the convention that Bernie won't?
Why do you want to dismiss Bernie voters and only pander to the corruption of Wall Street?
And if you want Elizabeth Warren, why do you think she is better than Bernie since when they both have the same stance on Wall Street? Elisabeth Warren has called out Hilary's flip flopping over the banks.
Why do you prefer Wall Street hacks over real people with real concerns? Why should half of all the democratic voters be dismissed if Hillary should survive the nomination process and the FBI investigation at the expence of millions of alienated voters and the only clean candidate since Carter?

Because your hatred towards Bernie, his supporters and everything we stand for is endless and irrational?

Regards

A veteran peacenick and Bernie supporter

TexasTowelie

(112,252 posts)
23. If I actually thought that Democrat
Fri May 20, 2016, 07:58 AM
May 2016

rather than an opportunist I might feel differently about giving him a prime speaking spot.

I really don't have any negative issues about Bernie or his supporters only recently. However, when he failed to condemn the nonsense that happened in Nevada recentlyit reinforced my perception about his campaign being about his ego rather than what is good for his supporters, the party or Americans.

You can take your 20 questions elsewhere since I don't play that game.

 

Bohemianwriter

(978 posts)
39. Rejection, deflection and projection.
Fri May 20, 2016, 08:50 AM
May 2016

Why do I always feel the urge to play a certain Green Day song every time a Hillary supporter displays ones cognitive dissonance and faux poutrage over thinhgs that never happened ignoring the real issue?
'Is it because Hillary people love cheaters and voter suppression and act the victim if the people you seek to suppress doesn't bow down and praise your neocon candidate?

Voter su+ppression is fra more violent than outrcries over a rigged system where the cheaters are blunt about it.

Let me play the violin in sympathy with "poor, suppressed and intimidated party leaders who only want to rig the system in favor of Hillary. They rig the system in a way that makes it even remotely possible for Hillary to have a lead.

But please" Focus on the chair that was never thrown or the violence that never happened.,

If people have bigger issues with the reactions to a rigged system than with the people buying off your politician, you are a part of the problem and not the solution.

So we know what bag Hillary and her supporters are in. The same bag as the machinhes who flips votes. That is champaign sipping Wal -Street hacks who get their enteratinment from watching cops beat and tear gas OWS protesters.,



I guess that's the reason why Hillary shares the values of Wal Str5eet donors and not the vaues of Bernie Sanders and his supporters. So if you think thatthe democratic party embodies vaues that takes free money from rich donors, what else are candidates runniong for office then a bunch of freeoaders ooking for a free lunch?

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/07/us/politics/hillary-clinton-republican-party.html?_r=0

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/hilary-clinton-bush-donors-222872

Since you have this huge issue with aleged viooence, what do yo0u think of the thousand arrests outside Capiton Hill where the "criminals" let themselves be arrested with no violent resistance? -Would you prefer we al get arrested for excosrising our free speech to get corrup0tiopn out of pooiutics? And do you really have a bigger issue with fake news reports than actual news that is never reported in the MSM?

 

Bohemianwriter

(978 posts)
46. The mind of a Hillary supporter who loves rigged systems...
Fri May 20, 2016, 09:09 AM
May 2016

Comes out in drivel only.
Or perhaps the writing skills of a Hillary supporter is deteriorating by the minute when faces with uncomfortable truths?

You seem to confirm my views on Hillary supporter. Dumber by the minute and the rhetorical skills to match. Having difficulties in finishing whole words and meanings.

A Hilary supporters idea of a "debate" answering with random letters, hoping they will stick.
Reminds me of an average "news" cycle in MSM,

No wonder Barbra Boxer didn't want a debate in Nevada. No wonder DWS don't want to face the first real challenger in her entire privileged life. They, just like their supporters and apologists reflects their writing skills!

Ever heard of Iceland?
They arrest and sentence the bankers for doing the same thing in USA,
But in USA, the same bankers pay loads of money to their prefered candidate to smear the only candidate who don't want their money.
USA The land of the rich...freeloader injustice for poor people and mercy for afflueanza! The country where grandmothers go to prison for growing their own medical weed and banks who launder drug money not only get off free, but also are free to defraud people and buy their government, having their minions claming that their candidate is not being infuenced by the same dirty money!
Or did did Blankfein pay the fees to Hilllary for the bailout money she helped them acquire?




TexasTowelie

(112,252 posts)
53. Since you are so brilliant
Fri May 20, 2016, 10:14 AM
May 2016

didn't you know that Hillary is spelled with two "l"s in her name or that Senator Boxer's name is spelled "Barbara" instead of "Barbra"? You also misspelled "affluenza" and also have a few mistakes in the capitalization of the text of your reply. When you make elementary mistakes of that nature then you have no business lecturing anyone else about intelligence, writing skills or anything else.

By the way, you are replying to someone who has a college degree, who was the top ranking male student in his high school class, who wrote annual reports to the state legislature, and who prepared professional correspondence to lawyers and executives. I also wrote numerous technical manuals, procedure manuals and business contracts while employed and was lauded by my colleagues, one of whom had a degree in English. I am not a published author, but that is because I was a better student in mathematics, chemistry, physics, history and music than I was in English, yet I was an "A" student. I even found some ambiguous language in a contract that my English teacher wrote so that about half of the students received a higher grade so you really have no justification for calling me dumb.

I realize that you only represent a fraction of the Sanders supporters and I won't broadbrush all of them as you have done with Clinton supporters. However, I will urge you to get off your soapbox because your reply and your username accomplishes much more than I could with any derogatory comment.

TexasTowelie

(112,252 posts)
80. Did you read the condescending comment above mine?
Tue May 24, 2016, 05:05 PM
May 2016

The other poster decided to engage insults so I replied with facts and noted that the other poster's rhetorical skills are lacking so they aren't in a position to pass judgement on me or anyone else. You may find my reply to be cold, but I'm not going to let insults go by without a response.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
71. In your attempt to defend Bernie, you smear many good candidates
Fri May 20, 2016, 05:22 PM
May 2016

The fact is that the last three Democratic nominees were all every bit as "clean" as Sanders -- Obama, Kerry and Gore.

As to the convention, Clinton will get the final say on who speaks and when. She earned that. In fact, she has many obvious high powered people who will be given key roles. Her VP, whoever that is, President Obama and President Clinton could each be the headliner for the three nights with her as the Fourth. Not to mention, the keynote speaker is almost always an up and coming Democrat.

As to Bernie Sanders, I would guess that he will get a nice speaking spot as she needs to reach out to the 40 plus percent of the voters who voted for him. I also assume that - as is usually the norm - that speech, like most others, will be vetted by Clinton.

As to the OP - it is likely trying to create discord. Not to mention, some like Barbara Boxer are FAR LESS likely to get a prime speech than Sanders.

 

Bohemianwriter

(978 posts)
73. Are you trying to alienate Bernie supporters...
Sat May 21, 2016, 05:31 PM
May 2016

Why are you trying to lose the support of Bernie supporters with your false accusations and "artful smear", projecting your own weakness?



They are no worse than the ACTUAL attempts of character assasination of Bernie when your side have accused him for not "reaching out" to PoC. immigrants and many others.
What has any of your preferred corporate dems your choice over Bernie done for the African American community, voter suppression, police violence and actully help building their communities rather than destroy them?


There is only one side smear campaigns hase been launched. And they are paid by Hillary's Super PAC tp insult and smear Bernie and his supporters online. Instead of defending your candidate's policies, they go on personal attacks and poutrage mode online when your side cannot dictate the terms and get away with it.

And now you whine like a crybaby when asking about actual policies in which you cannot answer., instread you try to accuse Bernie supporters of smear campaigns as if your WANT to lose the GE if your corporate crimiknal and war profiteer Hillary steals thye nomination with the help of that machinery of smut you apparentlny take your m arching orders from.

Nothing of what your side have said and done gthr0ought your entired dirty campaign will not be forgotten come election day if the nightmare of Hillary getting her entitlement coronation.

Personally, I'd wish Bernie would run 3rd party if Hillary does not compromise and give Bernie supporters what they demand and make your side of corporate "Dems" blame yourself for any kind of loss.

Why? Because unlike you, we stand for principles and not the party dictatorship that apparently have chackled your mind.

If you take money from corporations, you owe them something. While your side is moaning about "free stuff" for the future generations and the poor, you have no problems accepting that Hillary takes millions of "free money" from bankers with vested interests with no string attached. Yet here your side comes and "Berniesplains" to us how WE are the naive, stupid, sexist, racists ones.

Sorry. But your side have burned too many bridges that the only way your side can ever win any GE is to link yourself to your TRUE ideological peers: The Bush donors church goers and gun nuts!

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
74. Your reading comprehension is pretty bad
Sat May 21, 2016, 05:56 PM
May 2016

In the first place, I have never supported Clinton -- and did not do so here. So, don't tell me whose "side" I am on.

My problem was that you smeared ALL former party nominees in your comment that Sanders was the first clean one. I am NOT saying Bernie is not clean -- I am saying that Kerry, Obama and Gore were every bit as clean.

 

Bohemianwriter

(978 posts)
75. Could have fooled me...
Tue May 24, 2016, 10:51 AM
May 2016

And condescention, rejction, deflection and projection is a bad tactic combination in this camp.

Ever thought that power mongering was a clean business?

I suggest you read Machiavelli.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
2. What time is Debbie Wasserman Schultz giving her "reefer madness" speech?
Fri May 20, 2016, 07:21 AM
May 2016

Can't wait, She can gushingly tell us about all the wheelchair bound grannies she's got in supermax for eating pot brownies. Keepin' us safe!

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
9. You mean when she allied herself with Sheldon Adelson to defeat medical marijuana reform in Florida?
Fri May 20, 2016, 07:34 AM
May 2016

I'm sure the medical marijuana patient who the cops followed home from the hydroponics store, now facing 10 years, says "thanks!"

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
10. No....when she helped secure the nom for HRC. I'm sure she's responsible for ailing grannies
Fri May 20, 2016, 07:37 AM
May 2016

everywhere, though.

FYI..rather than railing about vague geriatric pot smokers,DWS is vulnerable on payday loan regulations.....it makes a more informed rant.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
11. Not everywhere, no. But Florida isn't everywhere.
Fri May 20, 2016, 07:46 AM
May 2016

And given that she worked with Adelson to defeat medical marijuana reform in Florida In 2014--- a 52 year old medical marijuana patient recently moved from a legal state arrested in Florida also in 2014, arrested for growing in her own home and now facing 10 fucking years (remember, Denny Hastert gets 15 months for child molestation) is ab-so-fucking-lutely relevant.


She faces 10 years in prison, but she maintains she did nothing wrong.

"I'm a patient, not a criminal," Kirouac says. "I have no criminal background whatsoever."
..
"The reason that I was growing my own medicine was because I didn't know anybody here," she says. "I live my whole life doing everything that I can to avoid any more pain than I already have."


But I'm glad you recognize that the payday loan shit is pretty fucking obnoxious, too. I realize you East Coasters are still horribly hung up about weed. Give it 10 years, you'll catch up.



 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
17. I don't give a shit about weed. Think it should be decriminalized. But the granny
Fri May 20, 2016, 07:55 AM
May 2016

you cite knowingly moved to Florida, right?

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
21. You're honestly defending that shit?
Fri May 20, 2016, 07:57 AM
May 2016

DWS worked with Sheldon Adelson and his billionaire-funded Nevada reefer madness org to stop a law which quite probably WOULD HAVE PROTECTED THIS WOMAN FROM BEING PROSECUTED FOR GROWING HER OWN MEDICINE, and you want to defend it?

Why would she "knowingly move to Florida"? I don't know, don't a lot of people move to florida as they get older? Maine is fucking cold in the winter, isn't it? She obviously has health issues.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
48. no I'm not defending it.
Fri May 20, 2016, 09:15 AM
May 2016

Simply pointing out that people who go from legal states to states where pot is not decriminalized run a risk.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
70. For what it's worth, I think Hillary has won the primary fairly, or at least she legitimately
Fri May 20, 2016, 04:57 PM
May 2016

has received a significantly larger number of votes.

If anything, she's won despite DWS's "help", not because of it. Honestly I think being associated with DWS at this point is like being associated with chronic intestinal gas, or littering.

As for the woman in Stuart, FL- I don't think anyone wouldnt argue that she made some not-so-great decisions, however, people do have a tendency (perhaps wrongly) to believe that if they're minding their own business in their own homes, they aren't likely to run afoul of the authorities. It's worth noting that the only thing this woman allegedly did to get on the radar of the police, is shop at a hydroponics store, from where they followed her home. That in and of itself is pretty fucked up, in my estimation.

But it is just another in a long list of examples of why the drug war is a wrongheaded authoritarian clusterfuck that needs to end. Had she been really planning ahead, she should have moved to a state like mine.

Lastly, and then I'll stop grinding this axe, here- "decriminalization" is the civil unions of the marijuana debate. No one should spend too much time excessively patting themselves on the back for coming to the flat-out obvious conclusion that we shouldn't be arresting and incarcerating people for smoking pot. Oregon decriminalized in 1973, ffs. Legalization, regulation and taxation are the answer, and they work, not just in theory but in practice- exceedingly well, as a matter of fact.

And that is what is coming to the entire country, I believe, eventually.

 

Bohemianwriter

(978 posts)
12. So you admit that DWS was never impartial...
Fri May 20, 2016, 07:48 AM
May 2016

and have used the most disgusting tactics to rig the system against the only FDR candidate we have seen since Carter?

If you don't think that grandmothers in prison for medica pot is a big deal, I wonder what is in your word.

So there we have it. Not only are Hillary supporters dismissing millenials, PoC who vote for Bernie, union workers, LGBT people who knows his long record, or immigrants who risk being sent back to drug wear torn countries Clintons helped prop up.

They don't think BLM or grandmoters lives matters.





Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
13. It doesn't say a whole lot about Hillary if she needed DWS to "help secure" it for her.
Fri May 20, 2016, 07:50 AM
May 2016

Shit, I thought Hillary was the most qualified person to ever run for the job. She needed Debbie to pull strings?

I actually think it says something to Hillary's credit that she won despite Debbie's "help", certainly despite being associated with her. DWS is about as popular as toenail fungus.



 

Bohemianwriter

(978 posts)
16. Hillary never faced a real challenge in an election until Obama in 2008..
Fri May 20, 2016, 07:54 AM
May 2016

Neither has DWS.

The ony place I have read anything in defense of either of them are in here and the Hillarygroup.


 

Bohemianwriter

(978 posts)
29. Keep putting on those blinders...
Fri May 20, 2016, 08:11 AM
May 2016

And colifours for earplugs.

Sure! And the 2000 Forida ellection was a CLEAN win!

Sure! Every single voter that could be reached was counted. Even the indie ones!

No purges, no shenanigans, no rigged system, no corporate media to do hatchet jobs, asnd no voter suppression.

What do you call an election where they call out the results when people are still standing inh line to vote?

And if the enthusiasm for Hiary has beren so huge,k why do yo9u think Bernie i9s the one gathering the huge cro0wds but the same crowd who stands in lineonly to listen and no go stop by the poll a few minutes to cast that vote?

At least you admitted that DWS HELPED Hillary to the whatever votes she got and the system that favors her over her social democratic opponent who doesn¨'t think that Scandinavia is Fantasyland. Was helping Hilary to the nomination at the exp0ence of the other a part of the job descrip0tion of the loeaderhip of DNC?

You just admitted that DWS HELPED her this far, and not necessariloy the will of the people., You see, the American popuoace consists on more people than brainwashed Hilary supporters who seem to suffrer from chronic narcisstic poutrage over non-issues.

And you apparently don't like granmothers who use medical pot either and want to throw her under the bus just to force the coronation of St. Hillary on the rest of us. Keep feeding black kids and grandmothers in the private prison farms that has donated to both parties.

P.S. I don't believe for s second that Hilary is 3 million more voters POPULAR than Bernie in any case unless you gather a bunch of white, middle class PUMAs and shut the door on everybody else.

What bugs me is how a primary can happen at different times in different states. They should have ONE DAY of Primaries. All on the same day, and only a few weeks before any party convention. They should also have observers at the poling stations making sure that no vote is being purged or thrown away.l
That means, independent observers not in the bag of any candidate., The prfmaries shouold aso be open. In a tw3o party paradigm, denying indies voting in the primaries is effeningly excuding the largest voter block today. And if they must register, have same day registration.

Oh! And PAPER ballots with paper trace! Where the votes are double checked and ALL of them before any result be pubished.,



frylock

(34,825 posts)
66. she helped secure the nom for HRC
Fri May 20, 2016, 01:25 PM
May 2016

Nice to see some honesty from Hillary Supporter. Quite refreshing.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
5. I did. Which, ironically, encapsulates his campaign....But he should be primetime. Had more
Fri May 20, 2016, 07:28 AM
May 2016

concrete solutions than Bernie. Hope he's seriously considered for VP.

FSogol

(45,490 posts)
7. Nah, he won't get a vp nod since Maryland will vote for HRC regardless.
Fri May 20, 2016, 07:31 AM
May 2016

I do expect to see him in the cabinet, he's a terrific executive leader.

 

Bohemianwriter

(978 posts)
30. So yo9u want to give a candidate with only 1% of the votes over Bernie?
Fri May 20, 2016, 08:14 AM
May 2016

Ad where has O'¨Malley been more concrete than Bernie on anything?

why shoud he get a prime time sot over Bernie as if he represents more voters than Bernie Sanders?

Your hatred for progressive values and voices shows.

FSogol

(45,490 posts)
38. "where has O'Malley been more concrete than Bernie on anything?" LOL, glad you asked
Fri May 20, 2016, 08:29 AM
May 2016

Unlike Sanders, O'Malley isn't just talk, he already accomplished the stuff he discusses. For example:

Here's why I support him:

Martin O'Malley:

1. Ended death penalty in Maryland
2. Prevented fracking in Maryland and put regulations in the way to prevent next GOP Gov Hogan fom easily allowing fracking.
3. Provided health insurance for 380,000
4. Reduced infant mortality to an all time low.
5. Provided meals to thousands of hungry children and moved toward a goal for eradicating childhood hunger.
6. Enacted a $10.10 living wage and a $11. minimum wage for State workers.
7. Supporter the Dream Act
8. Cut income taxes for 86% of Marylanders (raised taxes on the rich).
9. Reformed Maryland’s tax code to make it more progressive.
10. Enacted some of the nation’s most comprehensive reforms to protect homeowners from foreclosure.
11. Banned the box in Maryland

There is a lot more, but I'll only add that Mother Jones magazine called him the best candidate on environmental issues.
Article here:
http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/12/martin-omalley-longshot-presidential-candidate-and-real-climate-hawk

As for concrete, check out his specific comprehensive plans:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12813600

 

Bohemianwriter

(978 posts)
42. And how does that marginalize anything that Bernie has stood for since the 60s?
Fri May 20, 2016, 08:57 AM
May 2016

You fail to show any actual comparison and only list what O'Malley allegedly have said and done.

As if Bernie hasn't worked with these issues a singe dayh in his life. _Got more smears to come with?

Perhaps Bernie was never a civil rights activist but rather a secret member of KKK, eh?

Or perhaps Bernie has covered al of those and more.
And you are too dishonest to recognise it in your vitriolic hatred towards Bernie and what he stands for.
Let me know when O'Malley have stood for unpopular policies and still have it right. Like LGBT rights in the 90s. OR the black kids being victimised by the dog whistle poiticfs of the same decade. His calls to end the war on drugs.
Where has O'Malley stood with striking workers last?

Where has O'Malley called to get money out of politics?

Where has O'Malley stood with the AA community against police brutality in his own state?

FSogol

(45,490 posts)
49. Clueless!
Fri May 20, 2016, 09:55 AM
May 2016

Here's O'Malley plan on getting Money out of politics and holding Wall Street accountable. Sanders is a good guy, but O'Malley has much more comprehensive plans on accomplishing things.

PROTECTING THE AMERICAN DREAM FROM ANOTHER WALL STREET CRASH

Governor O’Malley knows that the American Dream today remains out of reach for too
many families. To attack this problem, it will take a multi-pronged and fearlessly
progressive approach to addressing economic inequality. But the results of any steps we
take as a nation to raise wages, ensure retirement security, and make the dream of
homeownership a reality can be wiped out in an instant by another Wall Street crash.

We need to protect America’s economy. And we can only do it by implementing strong
accountability and structural reforms that build upon the Dodd-Frank Act
and put an end to too-big-to-fail, too-big-to-manage, and too-big-to-jail financial firms.

BRINGING REAL ENFORCEMENT TO WALL STREET—FINALLY

In April, former Fed Chair Paul Volcker wrote: “it is all too clear that the federal
financial regulatory structure is simply inadequate to head off future crises. The structure
that failed us in anticipating and responding to the emergency is largely still in place.”

He is right. While the Dodd-Frank Act made important strides forward in reforming the
financial industry, there is still much work to be done—both in terms of structural AND
accountability reforms.

As President, Governor O’Malley will change the culture of our regulatory and oversight
agencies and departments by immediately pursuing the following reforms to ensure that
Wall Street megabanks don’t get to play by their own set of rules. He will provide real
deterrents to recidivist behavior among the worst actors on Wall Street.

PROPOSAL: FINANCIAL REGULATORS MUST ACTUALLY BE INDEPENDENT

Today, there is a constantly spinning revolving door among both senior and mid-level
regulators and the prosecutors responsible for reining in Wall Street. Senior officials at
the Department of Justice1, Securities and Exchange Commission2, Treasury3 and other
key departments have been deeply entrenched in the industries they are supposed to
regulate, and often return to them after they leave government4., This practice undermines
their independence and public trust in the federal government’s role of independent
arbiter.

Governor O’Malley will:

Ensure Key Political Appointees Are Independent of Wall Street

Over the last seven years, both the SEC and DOJ have fallen down on the job of
enforcement—sending a message to Wall Street that they are “too big to jail.”5 The most
impactful step we can take toward stronger enforcement against Wall Street is appointing
people to key positions who will take financial regulation seriously.

Governor O’Malley will:

Appoint to Key Positions—Attorney General, Assistant Attorney General for the
Criminal Division, SEC Chair—Individuals Committed to Pursuing Criminal
Cases.
The DOJ and SEC have been over-reliant on financial settlements for
institutions that break the law. Settlements, even those in the billions of dollars, are
not appropriate deterrents for institutions with trillions of dollars of assets. O’Malley
will require that appointees to key positions have strong backgrounds in fighting for
the public interest and a proven ability to prosecute people who break the law.

Require the SEC Director of the Division of Enforcement to be a Presidential
Appointee, Subject to Senate Confirmation.
Currently, the SEC’s Director of
Enforcement is appointed by and entirely at the discretion of the SEC Chair. In
recent years, this has led to the indefensible practice of appointing both Wall Street
in-house lawyers and their outside lawyers to this critical position. O’Malley will
elevate this position to presidential appointee, forcing this critical appointment to face
greater scrutiny and transparency, along with a public vote from the U.S. Senate.

Close the Regulator/Prosecutor Revolving Door

Institute a Three-Year Revolving Door Ban: O’Malley will
bar anyone serving in a financial policy or regulatory role from working for any person or entity appearing
before their former agency/department — or any agency/department they had contact
with when serving the public —for three years. This triples and aggressively strengthens the existing bar, which currently applies only to “senior” officials.

Institute an Additional Three -Year Mandatory Disclosure Rule: In addition to the
above ban, O’Malley also will require these individuals to disclose any direct or
indirect contact with agencies/departments they had contact with for an additional
three years.

Agencies Affected by These Rules: This policy should include people working at the
CommodityFutures Trading Commission (CFTC), Securities Exchange Commission
(SEC), Department of Justice (DOJ) staff that work on economic crimes, Treasury
Department, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Federal Reserve Board, and Office
of the Comptroller of the Currency.

Apply the Same Scrutiny to Key Personnel at the Federal Reserve

The Federal Reserve has played a significant role in slowing downthe implementation
of important financial regulations, including delaying for two years a core part of the
Volcker Rule. Appointing people to key positions at the Fed who take financial crimes
seriously, and requiring them to play a more active role in regulatory decision-making,
will further strengthen enforcement on Wall Street.

Governor O’Malley will:

Require the General Counsel at the Fed to be a Presidential Appointee. The General Counsel wields outsized influence on
the Board, advising theboard on every
major decision. In fact, the current General Counsel is sometimes referred to as the “eighth Fed governor”.
Currently, the Fed’s General Counsel is appointed by the Board of Governors. By increasing transparency
around this appointment, O’Malley will elevate its importance and ensure that only appointees who can prove
independence and a will to work on behalf of the American people—and not the megabanks—will be appointed to it.

Require the President of the New York Fed to be a Presidential Appointee.The President of the New York Fed is the second most powerful member of the Fed. They serve as a permanent member and vice president of the Federal Open Market
Committee, which establishes the Fed’s monetary policy, and oversee the largest reserve bank in terms of asset and volume of activity. Currently, the president is appointed by the regional bank’s board of directors.

Require the Board of Governors to Vote on All Major Decisions, Including Those Regarding Financial Reform. The Fed has entered into multi-billion dollar settlements with financial institutions without its presidentially-appointed and Senate-confirmed
Board of Governors voting to accept them. Decisions not to hold institutions accountable when they break the law should not be left to staff. O’Malley will support requiring the Board to vote on all major enforcement and supervisory decisions made by the Fed.

Proposal: Put More Cops on the Wall Street Beat

Even as the need for oversight has increased, funding for and prioritization of critical
enforcement agencies has lagged.
Today, the CFTC’s staff is virtually unchanged from the 1990’s, despite the fact that their
area of oversight—commodity futures trading—has exploded in size, and that they are
now responsible for regulating over-the-counter derivatives. Given the financial industry’s focus on weakening derivatives regulation, this lack of funding can be seen as a backdoor attempt to water down Dodd-Frank.

Similarly, the SEC’s regulatory role has grown dramatically, while the agency has also been given additional responsibilities under Dodd-Frank. But the agency has been chronically under funded by Republicans in Congress –who propose hundreds of millions of dollars in cuts to the agency every year–and lacks the resources to adequately enforce laws on behalf of investors.

Immediately Double Funding for CFTC and SEC

The CFTC and SEC have been woefully underfunded in recent years. As a result, both
lack the staff and resources to police bad behavior on Wall Street. Fully funding these
two regulators is an investment that will have a large return over time—preventing the
same dangerous or fraudulent financial practices that led to the collapse of the U.S. economy, at a of
cost anywhere from $14 trillionto $22 trillion.

Governor O’Malley will:

Double CFTC Funding from $322 million to $644 million.

Double SEC Funding from $1.7 billion to $3.4 billion.


Elevate Focus on Economic Crimes at the Department of Justice

After the financial meltdown, the DOJ fell down on the job of prosecuting financial institutions for breaking the law.
Rather than focusing on more time-consuming investigations and criminal prosecutions, they resorted to a fines-only approach of
cracking down on law-breaking.

To date, not one single Wall Street CEO has faced criminal prosecution. Compare this stat to the aftermath of the 1980’s savings-and-loan scandal when hundreds of individuals were criminally prosecuted. Changing the culture at the DOJ will start at the top, but it should also be given the resources to investigate and prosecute financial crimes in-house.

Governor O’Malley will:

Create a Stand alone Economic Crimes Division Within DOJ. To increase the
focus on investigating and prosecuting financial crimes, Governor O’Malley will create a
Division of Economic Crimes within DOJ that is separate and co-equal to the
criminal division. The economic crimes unit should have an independent budget and
be staffed with top prosecutors and FBI agents.

Proposal: Enforce Real Penalties for Financial Crimes

Since the financial crash, the federal government’s key
enforcement agencies have sent a message to the largest financial institutions that they are “too big to jail” and somehow
above the laws that apply to every other entity and individual in America.

Rather than enforcing penalties that wouldhave real deterrent effects, enforcement
agencies have relied almost exclusively on settlements as a punitive measure. As a
result, banks like JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup, Barclays, UBS, and the Royal Bank of Scotland
have continued to break the law, because they know that they will face nothing more than a slap on the wrist—
a fine paid with shareholder money that can often be deducted from their taxes as a business expense.

Require Law-Breaking Banks and their Executives to Admit Guilt, Face Real Consequences


While the DOJ and SEC have touted the large fines they’ve imposed on law-breaking
financial institutions, they have failed to implement any policies that will serve as real deterrents against continued law-breaking.

Governor O’Malley will:

Implement Points Accrual System to Crack Down on Recidivist Banks. The
largest banks have been able to get away with repeated violations of the law because
the only penalty they have faced has been fines.Governor O’Malley will implement a
DMV-style points-accrual system that willassign points to infractions committed by
financial firms and their affiliates. He will makethe points system fully transparent—
so that employees, creditors, and investors all have access to them and can
make decisions based off them—and have the end result be the revocation of an entity’s
right to operate. This approach will send a strong message to institutions that racking
up repeat violations of the law will have real consequences, and it will give them the
opportunity to pursue course-correcting measures if they rack up points. To further
deter wrongdoing, each major fraud or violation could come with its own penalties,
through increased FDIC insurance premiums or increased capital requirements.

End Days of “Neither Admit Nor Deny.” The SEC continues to allow institutions
that break the law to avoid admitting guilt for their actions. If an institution commits a major crime or violation of a law, they should be required to admit their guilt, so that they face the full ramifications of parallel civil and criminal proceedings.

Reduce Reliance on and Increase Transparency Around Agreements Made With Law-Breaking Firms

Rather than pursuing criminal cases or even forcing law-breaking institutions to face the full force of
the law, the DOJ and SEC have adopted policies—often decided behind closed-doors—that allow law-
breakers to skirt accountability.

Governor O’Malley will:

Require Transparency Around Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPA’s) and Non Prosecution Agreements(NPA’S).
Currently, the DOJ relies heavily on deferred prosecution agreements and non-prosecution agreements with companies who have broken the law. Under these agreements, companies are permitted to avoid prosecution and real accountability for illegal activity.

Governor O’Malley will incorporate requirements to change senior leadership as part of DPA agreements, while also requiring the DOJ to submit a report explaining in detail the rationale for any DPA or NPA involving any significant economic crimes, including in particular why a DPA or NPA wasn’t used for similar crimes or matters.

Crack Down on SEC’s Use of Waivers By Requiring Public Votes, Statements on Them.
Currently, the SEC has wide berth to grant “waivers” to financial institutions that break the law.These waivers allow law-breaking banks to avoid penalties that come with their violations. To crack down on this process, I willrequire the SEC to
adopt strict procedures by which they can grant waivers. SEC Commissioners should be required to publicly vote on waivers given to too-big-to-fail banks, and require them to publicly state the reasons for their votes in detail.

BREAKING UP THE TOO-BIG-TO-FAIL, TOO-BIG-TO-MANAGE, TOO-BIG-TO-JAIL FIRMS BEFORE THEY BREAK US


While the vast majority of our financial system works quite well, a handful of too-big-to-fail, too-big-
to-manage, and too-big-to-jail megabanks continue to pose an enormous risks: to our financial system, the economy, and American families.

As President, Governor O’Malley will work tirelessly to eliminate the unique danger posed by too-big-to-fail banks, by making the following structural reforms.

Proposal: Break Up the Biggest Banks

Separate Risky Investment Banking from Ordinary Commercial Banking

For 70 years, the 1933 Glass-Steagall Act kept the U.S. economy safe from major financial crises by requiring commercial banks to be separate from investment banks to prevent them from putting everyday Americans’ deposits at risk. If Glass-Steagall hadn’t
been repealed in 1999, the financial crisis willlikely have been far less severe.

Governor O’Malley will:

Immediately Reinstate Glass-Steagall.The Volcker Rule, sometimes referred to as “Glass-Steagall Lite,”
is excessively complex, providing too many opportunities for banks to exploit loopholes and ambiguities. O’Malley
will introduce legislation to once again separate traditional banks from riskier financial services, while updating
protections to account for new banking activities and prevent the new rules from being watered down. This
willbe one of his top priorities.

End “Too Big to Fail”

Five megabanks still control half of the financial industry’s $15 trillion in assets. The
largest banks should be subject to strict size limits to prevent this small number of too-
big-to-fail financial institutions from threatening our economy.

Governor O’Malley will:

Right-Size Big Banks Using Living Wills.Although major banks are required to produce living wills under Dodd-Frank, they have resisted compliance. The FDIC found that the banks’ plan are “not credible,” and the banks continue to drag their feet without fixing them. If banks cannot produce a living will that credibly sets
forth a detailed plan on how they would be resolved in bankruptcy without causing a crash of the financial system and without any bail outs, O’Malley will require the Fed to take remedial action to make the bank smaller and less dangerous to our families,
workers, financial system, and entire economy.

Mandate Higher Capital Requirements for Big Banks. Higher capital
requirements are a straightforward, effective, and fair way to make the financial
system significantly safer. In addition to requiring banks to fund themselves with
equity instead of risky debt, they give regulators more leeway in the event of a crisis –without posing additional burdens on smaller banks. O’Malley will strengthen capital reserve requirements for the largest banks, requiring institutions with more
than $500 billion in assets to have capital reserves of not less than 15 percent.

Proposal: Limit Risky, Speculative Trading On Wall Street

Implement a Financial Transaction Tax to Limit High-Frequency Trading

High-frequency trading creates volatility and unnecessary risk in financial markets, while serving no productive purpose in the real economy. A small tax should be applied to each sale and purchase of a financial instrument to limit this activity—one that would be
nearly imperceptible to longer-term investors, but could dramatically cut down on high-risk, speculative activity on Wall Street.

Governor O’Malley will:

Implement a financial transaction tax. The tax will be well-designed not to soak
financial traders, but to fix bad incentives for speculation that comes at the cost of
real job-creating investment.

Proposal: Put Consumer's Interests First

Require Loan Brokers to Act in Consumers’ Best Interests

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has made great strides in improving financial
products for consumers, but there is still far to go. A next step should be creating a
fiduciary standard for mortgage brokers and others who hold themselves out as acting in
the best interests of consumers.

Governor O’Malley will:

Create a Fiduciary Standard for Loan Brokers. O’Malley
willadopt new rules to require mortgage brokers, as well as auto loan and student loan brokers, to
put the best interests of consumers first, while providing full and fair disclosure of all
conflicts of interest. This will build from the successful efforts of states such as California and Washington.




Note: Footnotes left out, but if you want to see the source of the facts, check out the original foot-noted version at
https://14d2r744okfe40r1ug1oqm6y-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/OMalley-Wall-Street-Reform.pdf


Still reading? Here's O'Malley on Crimminal Justice Reform:

A reinvestment and rehabilitation framework for America’s criminal justice system

America’s criminal justice system is badly in need of reform. For too long our justice system has reinforced our country’s cruel history of racism and economic inequality—remaining disconnected from our founding ideals of life, liberty, and equal treatment under the law.

Our country needs new leadership that will honestly assess our broken criminal justice system and put forward solutions that will:

Ensure that justice is delivered for all Americans—regardless of race, class, or place.
Build trust between law enforcement and the communities they serve.
Ensure fairness and equal treatment for all people at every step within our justice system.

We must also strive to make our “corrections” facilities actually achieve rehabilitation. Almost all men and women who serve time in jail or prison return to their former communities. We will be stronger as a nation if all of our fellow Americans are able to find jobs, rebuild their lives, and have a stake in our democracy. There is no such thing as a spare American.

1. build Trust in Law Enforcement

The causes of crime are complicated. But our fundamental values and principles as Americans are simple: that all people are created equal, and should be protected equally under the law.

Public officials especially, including police officers, must treat all communities fairly and earn their trust. The next president should work closely with law enforcement agencies to implement best practices in policing, and build cultures of transparency, accountability, and respect.

Ensure Transparency and Accountability in Law Enforcement


As President Obama’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing observed, law enforcement is at its best when officers work together with neighborhood residents to ensure public safety and promote the dignity of all people. This “guardian” ethic better protects citizens and law enforcement alike. Moreover, people have the greatest trust in law enforcement when officers’ strategies and policies reflect their own values and input, and when policing data and practices are transparent and accessible to the public.

As president, Governor O’Malley will:

Mandate and Expand Data Reporting. The FBI does not collect data on police-involved shootings. Local data is also poor and incomplete. O’Malley has called for—and will strongly support—legislation to require law enforcement agencies to report data on all police-involved shootings, custodial deaths, discourtesy complaints, and use of excessive force. This data should be centralized in a universal database and made publicly available, allowing communities to observe trends and develop policy responses when necessary.

Establish a National Use of Force Standard. State laws governing when police officers can use excessive force vary greatly. In order to protect citizen and officer safety, O’Malley will put forward national guidelines on the use of force, linked to the expanded mandatory reporting detailed above. He will support legislation to require states to review and amend their own use of force laws to comply with federal guidelines.

Expand Community Collaboration and Civilian Review of Police Departments. O’Malley would reward and encourage police departments to implement best practices in goal-oriented community policing, including through the eligibility criteria in federal grant programs. These include undergoing racial bias training and crisis de-escalation training; establishing internal accountability measures to track and review civilian complaints and address officer misconduct; and creating and empowering civilian review boards to independently monitor and audit policing cases.

Use Technology to Advance Transparency. Technology—including but not limited to body cameras—can improve policing and build community trust in law enforcement. But it must meet community and local law enforcement needs, without infringing on individual rights. O’Malley will work with law enforcement, advocates, and other stakeholders to establish national standards for deploying and developing technology, while protecting privacy and communities’ access to data produced by body cameras or similar tools.



Improve Access to Justice within the Criminal Justice System

To build trust in law enforcement, we must also build trust in our justice system, adopting policies and reforms that improve fairness and ensure access to justice.

As president, Governor O’Malley will:

Encourage Independent Investigations of Policing Cases. Local prosecutors must work closely with local police on a day-to-day basis, creating possible conflicts of interest in cases regarding police misconduct. As a result, states and cities have begun to appoint special independent prosecutors—or prosecutors from other jurisdictions—in cases where police use deadly force. O’Malley will make these measures model practices, and support legislation to encourage all states to adopt them.

Strengthen Federal Civil Rights Protections. Under the Obama Administration, the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division has successfully launched investigations into the deaths of Trayvon Martin, Eric Garner, and Michael Brown. However, the Department’s ability to prosecute cases is limited because federal officials must meet a very high legal standard to bring civil rights charges. O’Malley would call on Congress to revise this standard so that the federal government can act as an effective backstop for ensuring justice.

Reform Civil Asset Forfeiture to Prioritize Public Safety. Civil forfeiture allows law enforcement to seize any property they allege is involved in a crime, even if the owner has not been charged or convicted. Originally designed as a way to cripple large criminal organizations, civil forfeiture is now rarely used to address actual crime and is too often abused. O’Malley will support bipartisan efforts in Congress to reform civil forfeiture statutes, reorienting law enforcement activity toward improving public safety and community policing.

2. Increase Fairness In Sentencing

Skyrocketing spending on prisons and jails drains investment from schools, job creation, and community services: corrections spending at every level totals more than $80 billion a year. Racial bias remains ingrained in the justice system, and more needs to be done to reduce recidivism and expand successful reentry programs.


Ensure Fair Sentencing

Sentencing laws should treat all individuals fairly—ensuring that dangerous individuals are held accountable, setting lower penalties for less serious offenses, and providing opportunities for full rehabilitation.

As president, Governor O’Malley will:

Eliminate the Sentencing Disparity Between Crack and Powder Cocaine. This sentencing disparity has resulted in vast racial disparities within the justice system. Before Congress lowered the sentencing ratio in 2010 from 100:1 to 18:1, unjustifiably higher penalties for crack offenses led to African Americans serving roughly as much time for non-violent offenses as whites for violent offenses. O’Malley has called for and will continue to support legislation to completely eliminate this sentencing disparity.

Declassify Marijuana as a Schedule I Drug. O’Malley will direct the Attorney General to move to reclassify marijuana, while supporting bipartisan congressional efforts to legislatively reclassify marijuana as a Schedule II drug.

Reform Mandatory Minimum Sentencing. Over the past 30 years, mandatory minimum sentences have led to punishments that often do not fit the crime. Unnecessarily harsh sentences for non-violent offenses have not deterred crime, and have disproportionately impacted communities of color. O’Malley will support legislation that eliminates mandatory minimums for low-level drug offenses, while giving judges more flexibility to tailor sentences based on the facts of each case. He will also continue the Department of Justice’s successful Smart on Crime initiative, directing U.S. Attorneys to exercise greater discretion in their charging decisions.

Forge Consensus for Ending the Death Penalty. The death penalty is a racially biased and ineffective deterrent, and the appeals process is expensive and cruel to surviving family members. O’Malley has long opposed the death penalty as a matter of principle and as a matter of policy. As president, he will continue to oppose capital punishment and work to abolish death sentences under federal laws.



Reduce Recidivism Through Investments in Reentry

Up to 60 percent of individuals released from jail or prison return within three years. Programs that help people in prison or jail transition into society are saving taxpayer dollars that might otherwise be wasted on re-arrest or re-incarceration. Successful reentry options also give motivated individuals the tools and support they need to leave the criminal justice system for good, compete for a job, find stable housing, support their families, and contribute to their communities.

As president, Governor O’Malley will:

Invest in Job-Training Programs That Work. Roughly 9 million people return home from jail, and 650,000 from prison, every year. Getting and keeping a job is crucial to their ability to reenter their communities—and thus to reducing recidivism, and incarceration costs, overall. O’Malley will build on successful programs in Maryland and other states to train, place, and support those exiting the criminal justice system so they can secure employment. As president, he will work with Congress to secure additional funding for—and legislation that expands—community-based job training programs.

Support Reentry Programming. Since 2008, the bipartisan Second Chance Act has funded critical community services that help people return to their families from prisons, jails, and juvenile facilities. O’Malley will work with Congress to reauthorize and expand funding for Second Chance Act programs, and other important services that ease the transition back to the outside world. Such services include referrals for housing and benefits, substance abuse treatment, mentoring, education, and job training.

Expand Good Time Credits. O’Malley will support legislation to allow people in federal prison to earn sentence-reduction credits by completing education and reentry programs. More broadly, he will support evidence-based, cost-effective reforms that allow people in prisons or jails to earn more good time credit for greater sentence reductions than federal law currently allows.

Support Access to Higher Education in Prison. O’Malley will use existing funds and work with Congress to support multi-year educational and vocational training programs in correctional facilities, including providing funding for professional teachers and staff. He will also support legislation and take executive action to restore eligibility for Pell Grants for people in state and federal prison, which was eliminated in the 1994 crime bill. These investments will increase individuals’ chances of finding jobs once they’ve done their time, and decrease their chances of cycling back into prison later in life.

Dramatically Reduce the Use of Solitary Confinement and Ban Solitary for Juveniles.
Research shows that prisoners subjected to prolonged isolation may experience depression, rage, claustrophobia, hallucinations, and severe psychosis that can lead to random violence or suicide. Federal judges have called the long-term lack of interaction, mental stimulus, and exposure to nature “beyond what most humans can psychologically tolerate”. As president, O’Malley will reverse the runaway growth of solitary confinement, limiting its use to the most serious in-prison offenders. He will also fight to pass legislation banning the federal use of solitary confinement for juveniles nationally.

Provide Pathways to Full Restoration of Rights and Benefits


Nearly one in three Americans has a criminal record that, because of employer biases and state laws, could prevent them from even being considered for good-paying jobs. Moreover, nearly six million Americans are denied the fundamental right to vote because of regressive state laws that target people with felony convictions. This results in one out of every 13 African Americans being unable to vote.

As President, Governor O’Malley will:

Ban the Box. O’Malley will use existing federal dollars to encourage states to adopt “fair chance” policies, which direct employers to delay criminal record inquiries and individually assess job applicants based on their qualifications. He will make the federal government a model employer by adopting fair chance hiring policies for all federal contractors and agencies.

Expunge or Seal Criminal Records. O’Malley will also support legislation that provides paths to recourse for people with criminal records. This includes automatically expunging or sealing juvenile records, so young people have a fair chance to turn around their lives; allowing some categories of formerly incarcerated people to petition a court to seal their records; and expunging the records of arrests that did not lead to formal charges.

Restore Voting Rights to People with Felony Records. All those who served time and reentered society should be allowed to vote. O’Malley will call for and strongly support legislation restoring voting rights to individuals with felony records. He will explore and take advantage of every opportunity to use federal funds and administrative solutions to encourage states to restore voting rights.

Ensure Access to Temporary Support. O’Malley will call for and strongly support legislation that would end the drug felon ban on access to SNAP and TANF assistance. Formerly incarcerated people and their families should have access to crucial support to help them get on their feet after serving their time.



Work to Eliminate For-Profit Prisons

There are approximately 130 private prisons in the United States. They house nearly half of all immigrant detainees, in addition to six percent of the state and 16 percent of the federal prison population. These facilities earn the private prison industry $3.3 billion in annual revenue, backed by nearly $25 million in lobbying over the past 25 years. This includes industry lobbying to protect perverse incentives, the strict enforcement of sentencing and immigration laws, and contracts that require correctional facilities and immigration detention centers to remain full even when crime is falling.

As president, Governor O’Malley will:

Phase Out Federal For-Profit Prisons. This includes closing for-profit immigration detention centers, while using alternatives to detention in the immigration context whenever possible.

3. Reinvest To Ensure Justice

As a nation, our divestment in education, job creation, and healthcare has resulted in some communities turning to law enforcement as a first and last resort—from providing student discipline to addressing addiction and mental illness. Reversing this trend by reinvesting in these areas will relieve our overburdened justice system, and ensure that law enforcement is able to focus on the most violent crimes.


Medicalize our Response to Addiction and Mental Illness

Incarceration is an inadequate—and in most cases inappropriate—response for people in crisis. Far greater investment in community mental health and substance abuse treatment is required to provide individuals with the care and support they require, outside of the justice system.

As president, Governor O’Malley will:

Make Robust Investments in Drug Treatment. O’Malley will work to expand existing federal grants to states to support comprehensive drug treatment systems. He will call for tripling the number of states eligible for grants, as well as increasing the aid provided to each state. He will call for requiring states to make matching investments—ensuring that addiction is treated, and not ignored, at the local level. He will also support regulations and legislation to expand evidence-based treatment for addiction under Medicare and Medicaid.

Make Robust Investments in Community Mental Health Infrastructure. Although the rate of serious mental illness is two to six times higher among incarcerated populations, more than 80 percent of people with mental illness in jails and prisons do not receive care. O’Malley will invest to provide adequate mental health treatment and substance abuse treatment within correctional facilities. Additionally, he will call for community-based recovery for individuals suffering from mental illness, setting a national target for reducing the number of Americans with serious mental illness behind bars. He will work with Congress to make critically needed investments in housing, supported employment, and outpatient treatment.

Train and Equip Law Enforcement to Serve People in Crisis. Police officers have increasingly become first responders to people with mental illness or substance abuse problems, often without adequate training. O’Malley will establish federal guidelines for law enforcement on how to best serve people in crisis—including de-escalating encounters, equipping specialized staff and response teams, and intervening in partnership with civilian service providers. He will use existing federal funds to support state Crisis Intervention Training, work with Congress to make additional investments, and require states to adopt federal crisis intervention guidelines.

Address the Discriminatory and Punitive Application of Student Discipline

Underinvestment in public education has left many districts financially strapped, often unable to staff the counselors, special education teachers and social workers their students need. This has coincided with an increased reliance on suspensions, expulsions, and school resource officers to enforce school discipline—including for behavior that is far from a crime. As a result, student discipline increasingly reflects the adult criminal-justice system—with children, especially children of color, being charged, arrested, and even detained in juvenile facilities. This trend has dramatic economic implications as well: children with arrest records have a fraction of the chance of graduating compared to students without arrest records.

As president, Governor O’Malley will:

Enforce and Codify Federal Discipline Guidelines. Federal law already prohibits public school districts from administering student discipline in a discriminatory way. The Departments of Education and Justice put forward guidance last year to help schools identify, avoid, and remedy discriminatory discipline, so that all schools ensure equal educational opportunities for all students. O’Malley will enforce this guidance by bringing federal investigations or charges when necessary, and call to codify the guidance into law.

Reinvest in Other Services and Supports for Teachers and Students. Underinvestment in public education has left many schools with too little funding for counselors, special educators, teacher training, and other needs. This has sometimes created an over-reliance on law enforcement and school resource officers to enforce discipline. O’Malley will invest in federal grants to help deploy counselors and other school staff, including by reprioritizing existing federal funding currently used to place law enforcement officers in schools.



Fulfill the Constitutional Right to Counsel

The flood of misdemeanor cases for petty crimes has greatly overburdened state courts. Many poor defendants—about one in four—do not receive court-appointed legal counsel, despite their right to it. Crushing caseloads for public defenders can create an “assembly-line mentality” toward justice that contributes to individuals being unnecessarily imprisoned for minor offenses.

As president, Governor O’Malley will:

Ensure Access to Counsel and Legal Assistance. O’Malley would invest to protect every American’s constitutional right to counsel, providing funding for legal aid programs and public defenders, and ensuring their independence.

Bring Accountability, Due Process, and Immediate Relief to our Immigration System


Immigration-related cases make up more than 40 percent of federal prosecutions, more than any other type of prosecution—including drug crimes. Yet families are denied justice throughout the immigration system. Conditions at immigrant detention facilities are deplorable, due process is limited, assembly-line justice is common, and families are needlessly torn apart.

As president, Governor O’Malley will:

Use Detention Only as a Last Resort. O’Malley will direct the Department of Homeland Security to use alternatives to detention for the vast majority of people, including for all children, families, LGBT individuals, and other vulnerable individuals. This includes using the family placement and community-based supervision policies he successfully implemented in Maryland. He will also work with Congress to repeal mandatory detention and deportation laws, and to codify higher detention standards. When detention must be used, O’Malley will ensure conditions are humane and in line with our basic values as a nation.

End Operation Streamline. Under Operation Streamline, federal attorneys criminally prosecute, in assembly-line settings, virtually all undocumented immigrants that enter the United States through the Southern border. Fast-track prosecutions and group hearings raise serious concerns regarding the violation of due process. Moreover, thousands of immigrants who try to enter or re-enter the United States are the parents of U.S. citizens attempting to reunite with their loved ones. O’Malley will direct federal prosecutors to focus only on priority entry and reentry cases—those involving national security or serious crimes—and work with Congress to repeal the Operation Streamline program.

Disentangle Local Law Enforcement From Immigration Enforcement. Our immigration policies have fallen short of their goal to pinpoint and detain individuals who pose a clear and present danger to public safety. Instead, they have created an indiscriminate dragnet that can encourage racial profiling and undermines trust between law enforcement and New American communities. O’Malley has outlined his plan for disentangling law enforcement from immigration enforcement, including by closing loopholes in DOJ guidance that allow DHS agencies to profile Americans based on their ethnicity and religion.

Set High Standards for Customs and Border Protection (CBP). CBP is the nation’s largest law enforcement agency, and CBP officers must have the support and tools they need to do their jobs well. O’Malley will require CBP to implement the best practices in law enforcement, including equipping officers with body cameras, tracking and disclosing discourtesy and brutality complaints, providing robust training, and holding agents accountable for the use of excessive force.

Ensure Due Process. O’Malley will also implement critical reforms to expand due process protections in our detention and immigration systems, including providing counsel for immigrants in deportation proceedings, increasing the number of immigration judges and courts, ending telephonic and video hearings for detainees, and ensuring language access.

4. Address Economic Inequality

Actions to address racial disparities in the criminal justice system should be accompanied by a wide range of policies that help to alleviate deeply rooted disparities in economic security and opportunity among communities of color.

Today, too many families are hurt by active discrimination. What’s more, the legacy of institutionalized discrimination—such as redlining—has amplified the disproportionate harm that the recession inflicted on communities of color. As a result, our nation has endured 30 years of worsening economic inequality.

As a nation, we must strive to remove barriers to full participation in the social, economic, and political life of our nation, once and for all. Legal equality is absolutely necessary but not sufficient – we must strive for equal opportunity and a fair shot for everyone. That means helping to ensure good jobs that provide stable incomes; universal, high-quality childcare; affordable housing and homeownership; and greater equity in our education and health care systems—for all Americans.

Governor O’Malley has already called for a number of actions that would support greater economic security and opportunity for communities of color, including:

Raising the minimum wage to $15 dollars an hour.
Empowering labor unions.
Greatly expanding access to national service and job opportunities for young people.
Ensuring young people can attend public colleges and universities debt-free.
Passing comprehensive immigration reform.
Investing in universal childcare.


In the coming weeks and months, Governor O’Malley will lay out comprehensive plans to address poverty and support the millions of American families striving to join the middle class, as well as put forth agendas to reform K-12 education, address homeownership and the rental crisis, and improve access to affordable healthcare.




 

forjusticethunders

(1,151 posts)
69. I like the sound of Vice President O'Malley btw.
Fri May 20, 2016, 04:08 PM
May 2016

Only downside is that he doesn't help us on the electoral map.

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
28. Funny, I was just having nice little exchange with another DUer how the high sparrow
Fri May 20, 2016, 08:10 AM
May 2016

is Bernie in a nutshell.

He's gonna make all democrats atone for their perceived sins. While he holds the mantle of all that is good and pureness and purity! LOL

Added bonus is they actually look like one another.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
31. Oh, i think Benioff and Weiss are being pretty obvious and deliberate, there.
Fri May 20, 2016, 08:16 AM
May 2016

Especially the last episode. I mean, paint us a picture, why dont you.

So yeah, I agree wiith you. I'd be interested to go back to the books to see how much they finessed the writing to draw that parallel, but it is for sure there.

i hold no truck with fundamentalists, and I dont think Sanders is perfect or some kind of saint, either. I'd like to see some traction on some key issues in our party's direction, and personally I think he has been a net positive to the race, but obviously some disagree. Doesnt mean I can't look askew at the guy or appreciate it when he is being tweaked.

Plus I've been a Jonathan Pryce fan since Brazil.

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
33. It is sort of ironic that you sorta end up hating the high sparrow more than Cercei!
Fri May 20, 2016, 08:21 AM
May 2016

I mean, why am I feeling any sympathy for her! LOL But he can make you feel that way... All that true righteousness spoiled in the quest for his own power.




JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
54. Some of us are high sparrow fans. We enjoy seeing Cersei get the shit kicked out of her & family
Fri May 20, 2016, 10:27 AM
May 2016

:haha:

Zynx

(21,328 posts)
41. Depends on how he behaves. If he's cooperative and doesn't throw a tantrum, 7PM.
Fri May 20, 2016, 08:53 AM
May 2016

If he's not cooperative, maybe 4PM.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
43. Depends. At what point during the day are birds most alert?
Fri May 20, 2016, 08:57 AM
May 2016

I mean, a Sanders speech without an accompanying bird would be kind of a let-down, wouldn't it? You don't want to put some droopy-looking penguin in as a placeholder, no way.


[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
44. 7:41 PT, 2nd day.
Fri May 20, 2016, 08:58 AM
May 2016

The same time slot Clinton got when she graciously spoke for Obama at the convention (the convention was from August 25th to 28th, she gave her speech on the 26th, and the next day interrupted the roll call vote and nominated him by acclamation).





What has happened will happen again.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
47. I don't see him suspending the roll call.
Fri May 20, 2016, 09:14 AM
May 2016

Or releasing his delegates. Clinton released her delegates (nice story about how they didn't want her to essentially give them the freedom to vote for Obama, and the delegates were angry at her for doing that, and not letting them show how close it really was) and about half voted for Obama on "paper," another show of her class in that event. (It didn't really matter due to her call for nomination by acclimation, though.)

I think he'll make it about his movement affecting the party, and I think Clinton will welcome that, though people will still say she's conniving and all that nonsense.

In a twisted bit of irony, if Sanders doesn't release his delegates, then Clinton would get less delegates nominating her than Obama did, while she got the majority of pledged delegates, and a higher popular vote.

obamanut2012

(26,080 posts)
62. I agree with you
Fri May 20, 2016, 10:50 AM
May 2016

All this vitriol against Hillary, and yet she is first class, and knows what sportsmanship and being a team player means.

obamanut2012

(26,080 posts)
59. I love when she interrupted the roll call -- it gave me chills
Fri May 20, 2016, 10:42 AM
May 2016

What a spectacular moment, and what spectacular sportsmanship and a coming together. I literally stood up in my living room and cheered, and I supported her 100% in 2008.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
64. I remember being on DU at that time.
Fri May 20, 2016, 11:16 AM
May 2016

Here's a sample of the nastiness she was getting even then: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x6752874

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5218341

I can't find it but I posted a thread on August 27th when she nominated Obama. I was the only one to post that thread. Almost everyone on DU was silent as fuck when she did this.

The hatred for Clinton has been going on for a very very long time. And it is completely irrational and unfounded nastiness.

itsrobert

(14,157 posts)
60. How about 10 minutes prior to the 3pm snack break
Fri May 20, 2016, 10:43 AM
May 2016

If it's good enough for the Pope, it's good enough for the Democratic Convention.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
78. That will depend on how much of his agenda the party chooses to honor.
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:21 PM
May 2016

Same ol' same ol' will have plenty of slots.

I'd like to see some serious nods to progressive causes.

 

anotherproletariat

(1,446 posts)
82. They need to wait and see how and when he finally bows out. A good Bernie gets a cookie, but
Tue May 24, 2016, 08:45 PM
May 2016

a bad Bernie...

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
85. I checked: he was allowed a brief address when he seconded his nomination
Tue May 24, 2016, 10:36 PM
May 2016

I was still a grumpy Tsongas-or-bust-er who was convinced we were handing a winnable election to the GOP.

ecstatic

(32,712 posts)
88. None. All he's going to do is trash the party and muddy the water.
Tue May 24, 2016, 10:41 PM
May 2016

His smug/ disgusting comment about Hillary being the lesser of two evils should seal his fate. Uninvited. Bye Bernie!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»What time slot should Ber...