Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumGallup's Unemployment Numbers Are As Suspect As Are Their Presidential Horse Race Numbners
monmouth (21,027 posts)
3. I read somewhere it's 7.0%...n/t
3. I read somewhere it's 7.0%...n/t
Response to monmouth (Reply #3)Fri Nov 2, 2012, 12:22 PM
DemocratSinceBirth (45,272 posts)
4. According To Gallup
That might be a jinx given their suspect accuracy.
DemocratSinceBirth (45,272 posts)
4. According To Gallup
That might be a jinx given their suspect accuracy.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 932 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gallup's Unemployment Numbers Are As Suspect As Are Their Presidential Horse Race Numbners (Original Post)
DemocratSinceBirth
Nov 2012
OP
DrToast
(6,414 posts)1. Gallups numbers aren't seasonally adjusted
You cannot compare the two.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)2. I Don't Rely On Anything From Them/nt
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)3. It seems to me that reality is catching up to Gallup after all these years
They probably never were any better. It is just that there wasn't much competition, and it wasn't all that easy to judge the effectiveness of a pollster.
Today we have lots of people taking polls so the outliers become apparent very quickly, and with millions of people watching this stuff, an inept or biased pollster gets called out pretty quickly.
The whole notion of polling as "science" is bullshit. You cannot accurate represent 120,000,000 voters in a diverse country by having a bunch of minimum wage clerks talk to 400 people, most of whom don't really want to be bothered in the first place.
Gallup had a nice long run conning people into believing they actually had something of value.