NV convention was a sham, video doesn't lie!

[DanM]

Really smh at those in the establishment, media, "fact-checkers" (yes, in quotes for a reason), etc. saying "move along, nothing to see here".

The video is quite clear. Democracy was subverted at the Nevada convention.

[Cheese Sandwich]

1. Yep. That first vote where they voted on the rules, totally fake.

That was the root of the problem.

[DanM]

2. Video is great 'cause everyone can see what a sham it was, there's no opportunity for spin!

[Cheese Sandwich]

3. People who get their news from the internet and view first hand info, support Bernie.

People who get their news from TV, filtered through the corporate spin machine, they support Hillary.

The video is one thing, but we also have several credible eye witnesses who back it up.

[DanM]

6. Eye witnesses are good, but video is worth a thousand eye-witnesses! n/t

[bobbobbins01]

4. Yet they're still spinning.

The absolute disregard for what is on the video is maddening, both here and in the media.

[DanM]

7. Maddening and completely inexplicable! Well, there is an explanation . . . n/t

[boston bean]

5. What temporary rules did the BSers object to and why? Praytell, inform us all!

Maybe it was because they were there to disrupt only, and try to steal delegates from Hillary?

[jillan]

8. The cutoff time to join the convention was 10 am. Lange was making rule changes at 9:30 while

people were still checking in.

It was not the rules themselves, it was the way it was done.

[boston bean]

9. oh really?

[jillan]

10. What does your response mean? Sounds like you are calling me a liar.

https://johnlaurits.com/2016/05/15/what-happened-at-the-nevada-democratic-state-convention/

Yesterday morning, around 9:30AM (while many delegates were still in line to get in ), the leadership at the convention, led by Roberta Lange, decided to hold a quick “voice vote” (essentially, a shouting match between the two sides) about whether to change the rules of the convention.

[joshcryer]

12. The rules state that the convention is called to order at 9am.

What you want to call someone claiming that it was out of order, well, that's up to you to decide, but it's certainly not true.

You can read the rules here: http://nvdems.3cdn.net/ea5a7f0df495b0cf4c_z2m6bnqh5.pdf

[joshcryer]

11. The convention was called to order at 9:00am.

They waited 40 minutes to do the rules (note the rules were not "changed" the temporary rules were voted to be made permanent).

The 10 am deadline was for late registrants.

[jillan]

13. WRONG! Read the official instructions from Nevada.

http://nvdems.com/caucus/caucus-to-convention/

You will also need to complete the Delegate Intent Form/Statement of Candidacy by 10:00 am, Saturday, May 14th 2016.

That vote was held BEFORE the check-in time.

[joshcryer]

14. The convention was CALLED TO ORDER at 9am.

Before registration closed.

[jillan]

16. But people had until 10 am to sign in! Only an ahole would hold votes while people were signing in

during the scheduled time to do so.

[joshcryer]

17. Only lazy people wait until after it's been called to order...

...to register. They had like 12 hours to register. It's absurd.

[DanM]

18. The point isn't the content of the rules, it is how FAKE the voting result . . .

. . . announced and recorded by the chairwoman was. Look at her body and facial language, how quickly she spoke and gaveled to get the sham into the record. And most telling of all, in seeing so many people not buying the sham she was trying to stuff down their throat, how quickly and obviously irritated she was in announcing and gaveling the close of the convention and how quickly she got the hell out of there.

Video don't lie.

[YouDig]

15. "Ignore the fact-checkers" should have been Bernie's campaign theme.

[DanM]

19. That certainly applies to "fact-check" orgs who are also big dollar contributors to Hillary . . .

. . . Conflict-of-interest much?

[YouDig]

20. More conspiracy theories. Keep 'em coming.

[DanM]

24. No, a conspiracy theory is imagining something like a . . .

"Right-wing conspiracy". Repugs are out to beat ALL Dems politically, as nastily as possible. It's repugnant, but normal, when nasty political people nastily go after their opponents. Elevating that to a "conspiracy" against your individual person is unwarranted.

[PeaceNikki]

21. Youtube videos are how I figured out 9/11 was a collective hallucination

and the people who "died" are all living on Venus with the lizardmen whose leader is Barack Obama whose job here is to use the Bilderbergs to ship all of Earth's water to Venus.

If it's on the internet it can't be a lie after all.

[frylock]

22. Do you have family or friends nearby who can do a welfare check?

[PeaceNikki]

23. lol