2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThere was no violence at the Nevada Dem convention
A thousand zombies can say that there was, but that doesn't make it true. There was however skulduggery perpetrated by the DNC at the convention. And the dirty deeds are being continued here by a zombie army repeating as many false allegations and flat out lies as their fingers can type.
As a long time DUer said earlier today, it feels more and more like The Discussionist here then the website where we were once united against electoral fraud and the disenfranchisement of voters.
The_Casual_Observer
(27,742 posts)dchill
(38,505 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Actually only ONE chair, ONE time, that was picked-up and then promptly set back down
onto the floor.
I saw that ONE chair -- over and over, again and again and again and again, --- repeatedly
on my TeeVee, so it MUST be true that "people threw chairs"
What a crock of shit.
Tavarious Jackson
(1,595 posts)She said she feared for her life.
dchill
(38,505 posts)somebody brings her the wrong sweetener.
Dawgs
(14,755 posts)There was also a strong police presence.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)She didn't seem to exhibit much fear when she was onstage trolling Sanders supporters.
Joob
(1,065 posts)Let's not address what actually happened, that's not how the trick works
Tavarious Jackson
(1,595 posts)bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)There is plenty of video of the event. Please provide one piece of evidence that shows violence. If you can't, how is that logical?
Tavarious Jackson
(1,595 posts)Barbara boxer is a liar? Who do you believe besides Sanders camp> No one?
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Disruption and anger are par for the course when you try to disenfranchise people. Lets see the violence, that is what you're claiming. And yes, if she said there was violence and nothing backs up her claim, then she lied.
I don't need to believe anyone from either camp, there is video of the entire event.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)It's at the end of an article about 3 Sanders supporters who sent harassing emails to the NVDSP chair. :
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)No chairs thrown? Got it.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)That isn't violence. But nice try.
pokerfan
(27,677 posts)So no, in other words...
frylock
(34,825 posts)the video clearly show that a CHAIR was PICKED UP, and then set BACK DOWN. So where's the violence?
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)And hating on Hillary is a force that gives us meaning.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Cant imagine why Sen. Boxer would have been worried about a howling mob screaming BITCH! and picking up chairs and rushing the stage like that.
Bettie
(16,110 posts)they are protest.
There was no violence, there were unhappy people voicing their displeasure, some with words that were loud and profane.
And one guy picked up a chair and then put it down. That is not violence.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Let's get real.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Documented video evidence backs up Nina's version of events.
Fairgo
(1,571 posts)no time to think about the corruption
eastwestdem
(1,220 posts)It makes it easy to believe that people were throwing chairs, particularly when eye witnesses made this claim. Then add in the phone messages, and you can see why people easily accept that there was physical violence.
I'm just saying...given what has been on the news, it's easier to believe that story than the one you're telling.
me b zola
(19,053 posts)...reminds me of how the Bush* administration would plant fake stories in the news then use that fake story as evidence that the story is true.
eastwestdem
(1,220 posts)It sure makes it easy to believe that violence ensued.
me b zola
(19,053 posts)It sure makes it easy to believe when every Easter there are lots of bunnies and tons of eggs.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Eggs come from a chicken
Not a bunny
Dummy
frylock
(34,825 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Pretty menacing, hunh.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)It's kind of pointless to pretend it didn't happen.
whirlygigspin
(3,803 posts)they are emerging everywhere!!!
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Nothing? One guy who thought about doing something? Somebody using a rude word?
Rumor-mongering in the face of no real evidence (despite the presence of hundreds of cameras) does severe damage to the already dismal credibility of the Clinton/DWS campaign.
me b zola
(19,053 posts)I did see Don Lemon play a video of convention goers yelling and he called that violence. No pushing, no shoving, and no magical chairs flying. Yelling. Convention goers.
I believe what you are saying is that it is pointless to fight against the Clinton smear machine.
I say the Clinton's smear machine is exactly why we must keep fighting.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Got links?
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)It's in the HRC group so be forewarned:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1107&pid=133389
frylock
(34,825 posts)Really? This is your damning evidence? People booing Barbara Boxer? This is the riot? Really?!!
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)There is no emerging video. Stop the lying.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Directed, in particular, at the NV Democratic party chairwoman.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)Dawgs
(14,755 posts)Every heard of 'Correct the Record'?
oberliner
(58,724 posts)They were not. All of the men we spoke to were genuine Sanders supporters, most with well-documented histories online of feeling the Bern. (Although only their first names are used below and their phone numbers have been redacted, we verified all of their identities.)
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/pro-bernie-trolls-on-why-they-harassed-nevadas-democratic-chair-20160518#ixzz4979WxSjy
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)It seems like that would be unnecessarily litigious.
People ought not to leave such messages, but I don't know that it warrants charges being filed. Maybe if they persist over a longer period of time from the same individuals.
frylock
(34,825 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Has a report been filed with law enforcement?
pmorlan1
(2,096 posts)Hillary supporters have a right to support their candidate but when they choose to push hyperbolic lies to do it they only reinforce people's belief that she is not trustworthy. You say Hillary will be the nominee and she probably will. So why in the world would you use a campaign tactic that clearly alienates the very people she needs to vote for her in the GE?
Most of you are not new to politics. You know how this narrative has been worked into the media these past days. You think it's successful and you are right. The narrative has successfully demonized Sanders supporters. Congratulations. The media has run with it with glee. But the problem is this is not the GE. This is a primary where your candidate needs her opponents voters when it's done. So every time you push the lies you potentially drive more Sanders supporters into the Bernie or Bust movement. Is that what you want? Really? Have you ever heard the words - politically tone deaf?
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)I had been planning to hold my nose and Vote Blue Matter How Much Pee-yew but no longer. I will do my down-ticket duty but DWS has just flipped me from blue to Green.
frylock
(34,825 posts)They really screwed the pooch on this.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)Actor
(626 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Resulting from the Nevada convention but it doesn't change the facts. Why did the minority group try to impose their will on the majority group, you do know Sanders delegates did not show up and had less in number than Clinton's group, shy should the majority group be disenfranchisement?
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Despite your claims otherwise.
So tell me again about how important facts are.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)me b zola
(19,053 posts)First plant a false story in the media. Then point to that fake story as evidence that the story is true.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)already fully developed, and ongoing. Setting the stage.