According to many Hill supporters here, she does NOT have experience in intentional relationships...

[Luminous Animal]

but was merely a mouthpiece and a conduit for Obama's policies

If she was just doing what Obama told her to do, how can we judge her on her own merits?

[still_one]

1. Well intentional relationships are a problem, and so is not using the spell checker

Though probably a dictionary would have been a better source

[Nye Bevan]

5. The problem is that "intentional" is also a word.

Spell checkers can lull yew into a false cents of security.

[still_one]

8. Absolutely, and that is why I added a dictionary would have been a better

source. I wonder if it will be corrected

[floppyboo]

9. What's wrong with 'intentional'? I think that's pretty spot on.

[tandem5]

19. Hey wait a minute I think you used the wrong words internationally.

[floppyboo]

2. except when she went behind his back to claim some glory. She's strong!!! Woot woot!!!

[grasswire]

3. can't be so

She hid her rogue foreign policy from him on her private server, while getting intel from her own rogue and flawed sources.

So which is it?

If you say that Obama knew about all that and directed her, then he is a co-conspirator.

Can't have it both ways.

[Luminous Animal]

4. She was a strong and forceful SoS, except when she was doing O's bidding

which was all the time except for those times that she was a strong and forceful SoS.

[floppyboo]

6. makes you think some times that the monied Wahabist Saudis own them both.

It's all very sick. Get money out of politics!!!

Bomb Yemen, bomb Palestine, bomb Iran! Like kids on a skateboard for the first time - pawns to an ancient family feud. And now, the big man baby Trump? Hillary at least still has her prom buddies.

[grasswire]

7. well, we know how much the Sauds gave her. nt

[floppyboo]

10. It's all sick, sick, sick

'we came, we saw, he died' sic

[floppyboo]

11. And someone has got to mention Bin Laden

It's pretty much out in the open now (at least to the international community with 'news') that the US knew damn well that Bin Laden was in prison. He was dying. Al Queda was its own thing after, what - 2004-5? Some little fact that was known post 2009. A fucking disastrous publicity stunt, thank you SOS.

[COLGATE4]

14. You really need some better sources than Alex Jones

and Free Republic.

[floppyboo]

16. I actually have no idea what free republic is. Alex Jones, you'd have to be dead to not be aware of

his craziness.
Here are some other links you might approve of: (and btw - where do you get your news?!)
The New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/12/magazine/the-detail-in-seymour-hershs-bin-laden-story-that-rings-true.html?_r=0
The Guardian http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/may/09/osama-bin-laden-pakistan-pm-gilani
Democracy Now http://www.democracynow.org/2016/4/25/part_2_seymour_hershs_new_book

But I just googled that now. It was on France24, PressTV, RT - all those 'other'ness news outlets. You should cut yourself off cable immediately! Bad for the planet, bad for you!

[still_one]

20. seymour hersh has been discredited on that story. Not only by the Navy Seals who were

there, but by others.

You want to wear the tin foil hat, that is your right, but I take Peter Bergen over Hersh anytime on this story

http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/18/opinions/bergen-new-york-times-bin-laden-death/

[JonLeibowitz]

43. Seymour Hersh has been right about quite a lot that was originally mocked and dismissed.

[still_one]

48. I am addressing this specific incident.

[Eko]

12. I had to rec this

just because of the misspelling gaff, it gave me a laugh, thanks.

[still_one]

13. and it seems some do not even realize what is wrong. It isn't the gaff that is the problem

it is ignoring the gaff

Yes, its funny

[Eko]

15. Well,

"bin laden was in a prison" ,, someone so passionate would probably either not see or just discount the misspelling, they have an agenda to promote dont ya know.

[floppyboo]

17. bull fucking shit! I just think it was an appropriate Freudian slip

and sorry if you can't see that - really really sorry

[Eko]

18. Appropriate how?

[floppyboo]

21. shirley, you jest!

okay, I don't know if your name is Shirley, and I'm not guessing you'll get that either! Intentional/International - Clinton doesn't seem to be able to separate the two. While she did right by distancing herself legally from the Clinton Foundation when she publicly geared up for her presidential run, you can't seriously believe she didn't have intentional relations with that (fill in the blank) state.
I find it amusing. I think your avatar would find it amusing too!

[floppyboo]

23. Have you seen that flick Insignifigance? Brilliant! Einstien, Joe DiMagio and Marilyn - awesome! nt

edit - got the name wrong - illusion was another slip!

[still_one]

28. Insignifigance, old movie, but good movie

[Eko]

25. seeing as how the word

intentional is not in the original quote you are referencing I'd say that is quite a stretch. I mean one could just as easily use pretty much any adjective and it would make just as much sense.

[floppyboo]

29. I was referencing the OP, if that qualifies as a quote. Did I miss something? Please correct!

[Eko]

30. So your werent

referencing Bill Clinton?

[floppyboo]

33. huh? No! Just the SOS. Go wash your mind with soap!

Now, why would you think that? Oh forget it. I'll have to start charging you couch fees!!! JK!

[Eko]

35. No,

you were, and now you have not been able to connect it with what you are saying. Any adjective would have worked but like I said you have an agenda.

[floppyboo]

36. show me - give me my words back in quotes. If I said it, it was subliminal to me!

[Eko]

37. "didn't have intentional relations with that"

[floppyboo]

39. that remark was well after you started getting cheeky! Now, go to your room!

[Eko]

41. And that invalidates it?

Your remark is now erased somehow? You choosing an adjective, any old adjective and inserting into a quote to further smear someone is now negated? Give me a freaking break. I will be happy to engage you on both fronts, the cheeky one and the one where you used a misspelled gaffe to further your narrative. Will you stay or tell me to go to my room again as a way for you to run from the discussion we are having.

[floppyboo]

38. oh, just forget about it. We are clearly not on the same page-Words do that sometimes-ticky bastards

[Eko]

42. There ya go

In quotes even.

[floppyboo]

44. yup, but the Freud thing and the 'you guys don't get it' was too much fire bait to ignore... so...

and anyways, look at the #'s of the posts - my continued Freudian slip is way down the list of what I was addressing. I thought you were in for a fun conversation given the hilarity of the OP, and the total random interjection of 'Airplane'. missing, as I had guessed the 'subliminal' intention of the OP but I was wrong. Oops. I mis-typed.

[Eko]

45. But this was fun.

[floppyboo]

46. Yes, we are indeed not all the enemy! Cheers!

[Eko]

47. Cheers!

[Eko]

26. Yeah its from Airplane.

So,,,

[floppyboo]

31. ???

Here's a little synopsis from the LA Times - but I found the political stuff around McCarthy and JFK (the meta story) super interesting

Nicolas Roeg's 1985 film "Insignificance," newly issued in standard and Blu-ray DVD editions by the Criterion Collection, has an irresistible premise that suggests a blind item from a parallel universe. Four characters identified only as the Actress, the Professor, the Ballplayer and the Senator — but instantly recognizable, thanks to some none too subtle identifying traits, as Marilyn Monroe, Albert Einstein, Joe DiMaggio and Joseph McCarthy — somehow converge in a Manhattan hotel room over the course of an eventful night in summer 1954.

As the film opens, the Actress (Roeg's then-wife, Theresa Russell) is shooting a scene that will soon be seared into the popular consciousness — standing under a theater marquee as the wind from a subway grate blows up her billowing white chiffon dress. Roeg stages this moment, from Billy Wilder's "The Seven Year Itch," as an inside-Hollywood set piece, with bustling crew and gaping onlookers, including the guy operating the wind machine below, who blissfully claims to have seen "the face of God."

Done for the night, the breathy Actress instructs her chauffeur to drop her off at the hotel, where the frizzy-haired Professor (Michael Emil), clad in a Princeton sweatshirt, has been pacing absently amid a sheaf of papers. She appears to be seeking the companionship of a fellow lonely celebrity. But what she wants most of all is to act out for the Professor the theory of relativity, which she does by crawling around the floor of his room, using a flashlight, a toy train and some tin soldiers as props.

[Eko]

32. shirley, you jest!

[floppyboo]

34. hey, don't call me Shirley!

[apnu]

22. Then those Hill supporters saying that have no idea what the SoS is or does.

They also seem to forget the times she traveled around the world a FLOTUS, Senator and a celebrity private citizen meeting international power brokers.

Its amazing what people will ignore.

[floppyboo]

24. I know super models who have done more - except they can publicly brag about getting in bed nt

[mia]

27. Sure she does.

She knows just what's she's doing. Sometimes it backfires, though.

[Scootaloo]

40. Well, her mistakes and failings are always someone else's fault

She'd show us perfection, if only all these other, lesser beings weren't constantly dragging her down, see?

[Cheese Sandwich]

49. Trying to have it both ways. That's a popular move