2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary is our Mitt Romney
Out of touch, calculating, propped up by party elites, refuses to release documents electorate wants to see, wants to be president just to be president, already lost a primary battle in previous election season, serial flip flopper, and pretty much unlikable.
The parallels are uncanny. She will have the same fate as him in a general election, unfortunately.
merrily
(45,251 posts)went into politics.
One Black Sheep
(458 posts)The parallels are there, and are compelling.
Hillary and Mitt both are establishment candidates, who no one is excited about, are uninspiring, and are like white bread, just meh.
And I agree with your last statement as well, you read my mind with this OP, lol.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)you guys want this election to be about more than what is --
ram2008
(1,238 posts)Unfortunately, you need to win independents to win a general election.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)mythology
(9,527 posts)Sanders wins caucuses which have inherently low turnout. The stupid unsupported contention that Sanders wins open primaries needs to die.
Desert805
(392 posts)asuhornets
(2,405 posts)Desert805
(392 posts)But my guess is maybe? We sure dont have our best and brightest competing.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)Sanders can't get POC to vote for him. Just because Independents finally found someone to get excited about, does not mean everyone feels that excitement for that person
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)And Bernie has about 45 percent of the Democratic Party, plus the Independents.
She's got 55 percent of the Democratic Party and a handful of Independents. That doesn't bode well in a general election.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)Independents are just that independent. They aren't swayed as much, if at all, by party label. They don't want to be in a party. Yes, there are more independents than republicans and more than Democrats. About 40% of the electorate are independents.
Poll after poll show independents by a large percentage don't like Hillary. And that dislike is deeply held. She's not going to turn that around in a short GE campaign.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)why do you feel that you can pick the Democratic nominee.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)I never claimed to be. What I claim is that independents are the biggest pool of available votes in a GE. They also in poll after poll say they don't like or trust Hillary.
I am suggesting the Democratic party take that into consideration if they really want to win this election. Apparently for many Democratic voters it isn't an issue. They are going to be badly surprised in the fall.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)is because all we keep hearing from SOME Sanders' supporters is that we will lose without them. Obama won without Independent--Hillary will too.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)asuhornets
(2,405 posts)first black president and first woman president.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)Second Obama did win the independent vote in 2008 against McCain, contrary to your claim otherwise. The young people's vote propelled him to a big win. Hillary isn't doing that. Right now the young voters have pretty much had it with her.
If they were cloth, he'd be silk or satin, she'd be burlap.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Try and keep up.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)She's already sliding in the polls.
frylock
(34,825 posts)asuhornets
(2,405 posts)asuhornets
(2,405 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)asuhornets
(2,405 posts)Sanders is not specific enough. He was late to the game and the Democratic Party. He can't change the Democratic party from the outside. Lately he has been bashing the Party--even though he is under the Democratic party umbrella.
I would be too. He polls better versus Trump, is more liked, trusted, is not corrupt, and not under investigation by the FBI. Boo! Got ya.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)kaleckim
(651 posts)She's corrupt, is polling horribly, has a center-right economic record, and is hawkish, but she keeps on getting support from Democrats. You're right about that...awkwardly claps.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Maybe 'cause he got upstaged by his running mate.
Never fails to make me laugh
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)anything negatively said about Hillary Clinton, some Sanders supporters jump on it---no questions asked.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)But he won the primary. That's how he got into the general election in the first place. You know how this works, right?
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)But Sanders' supporters keep saying he beats Trump. But Sanders can't beat Hillary.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Sanders can beat Trump with Independent support, but since indies can't vote in closed primaries, he can't beat Clinton. On the other hand, Clinton can win those closed primaries, but has no Independent appeal, and so polls worse against Trump.
Turns out, you can't expect your GE voters to win a primary for you... but you also can't expect your primary voters to win the GE for you
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)procon
(15,805 posts)asuhornets
(2,405 posts)uponit7771
(90,347 posts)ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)Trenzalore
(2,331 posts)procon
(15,805 posts)Bernie is our... hmm, Michael Dukakis?
An out of touch, calculating and bitter curmudgeon, propped up by money from poor people he's duped into believing he can win, and he refuses to release documents electorate wants to see, he just wants to be president, just to be president, just like every other candidate for the office of president, and he's run a disorganized president campaign, he's a serial... ah, math flopper, and pretty much a cantankerous, unlikable character.
Serious thread, this!
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)Like " nonsense" if you need a clue.
procon
(15,805 posts)corkhead
(6,119 posts)That was a good thing for us during the last 2 election cycles.
The bad news is that it might come around and bite us in the ass this time.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)Peachhead22
(1,078 posts)Running for President basically from birth.
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)If so, the comparison could soon be complete.
Reter
(2,188 posts)He's terrible, but not a crook.
Flying Squirrel
(3,041 posts)But a smarter one.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)The_Casual_Observer
(27,742 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Clintons have a 25 year history of giving the middle finger to the Left and working class...can't undo that. Romney wasn't very inspiring to the GOP base, but at least he didn't have a long history of fucking them over.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)onenote
(42,714 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Zorro
(15,740 posts)Try that one on for size.
onenote
(42,714 posts)unless, of course, you believe there also are uncanny parallels between Trump and Obama.
Of course, for all I know, you do think that.
ram2008
(1,238 posts)This thread is about the similarities between Hillary and Romney, not Obama and Trump though.
onenote
(42,714 posts)You predicted the outcome of a Trump/Clinton election would be the same as the outcome of the Romney/Obama election: "She will have the same fate as him in a general election, unfortunately."
I can understand why you would want to run away from your words, but it doesn't work that way. You wrote it, you own it.
ram2008
(1,238 posts)Because of all the above characteristics listed in my OP. You can attempt you change the meaning of what I said, but the words are in the OP. I'm owning the entirety of what I said in my post.
And if you're asking me if Trump is more charismatic than Hillary, the answer is yes. But even a piece of toast is.
onenote
(42,714 posts)Which suggests that charisma is overrated.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)10%, even Romney paid about 14%. Sanders talks about rich people paying their share, he needs to jump on the pay my taxes wagon. Romney at least released two years of taxes, Sanders only released one year summary. Yes, even Romney did better than Sanders.
mythology
(9,527 posts)The incoherent frothing from some Sanders supporters is really sad.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)redstateblues
(10,565 posts)On DU these days
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)backing trump.