Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
2. It wasn't a unilateral decision.
Wed May 18, 2016, 09:30 PM
May 2016

She ran it by the Board of Directors, who approved it. It was a real estate deal that went bad when the market collapsed. Bad decision in retrospect, but nothing illegal. Jane received her salary, not proceeds from the deal.

Demsrule86

(68,586 posts)
4. She was not truthful about the donations
Wed May 18, 2016, 09:37 PM
May 2016

It is against the law to lie on mortgage documents. You can be sent to Camp Fed.

Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #4)

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
8. Whatever. I think we should leave her alone and
Wed May 18, 2016, 09:40 PM
May 2016

go after Bernie Sanders for lying to and betraying his followers, and the Democratic Party whose door was wide open for him to enter.

George II

(67,782 posts)
14. The Board of Directors approved the purchase based on falsified "pledges"....
Thu May 19, 2016, 01:07 PM
May 2016

...what made the deal go bad was the inability of the college to continue payments.

We don't know that Jane received no proceeds from the deal, she's refused to release their tax returns.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
16. Yes, donors didn't follow through on their pledges.
Thu May 19, 2016, 01:12 PM
May 2016

That tends to happen in a recession, as you would know if you had any non-profit experience.

George II

(67,782 posts)
17. She never fully documented the pledges, and by the time the property was purchased the real estate..
Thu May 19, 2016, 02:17 PM
May 2016

....market was recovering and the recession was over. Besides, if we were mired in an recession it was irresponsible (or very poor judgement) to incur such debt.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Recession

Demsrule86

(68,586 posts)
3. Yeah well Hillary made money on the deal
Wed May 18, 2016, 09:36 PM
May 2016

Jane lost money and it was not even her own! It was pointed out to me (thanks) that I was thinking of a different right wing attack...my bad.

Demsrule86

(68,586 posts)
10. I thought this was the one where she made a great deal of money...in a short time.
Wed May 18, 2016, 09:42 PM
May 2016

so many rightwing bullshit scandals so little time! Thanks.

TCJ70

(4,387 posts)
15. You're thinking cattle futures...
Thu May 19, 2016, 01:08 PM
May 2016

...where she made $100,000 on a $1,000 investment.

I think that took less than a year.

Mnpaul

(3,655 posts)
13. I was reading about it too
Wed May 18, 2016, 10:38 PM
May 2016

They bought 33 acres of lakefront property(with buildings) from a church for 10 million. They sold 25 of those acres(no buildings) for 7.3 million. They retain the remaining 8 acres and the buildings

Now to Whitewater

They bought 200 acres(subsidized by a S+L bank), when the bank faced insolvency, Bill appointed a new commissioner(from the law firm representing the bank) to keep them from being shut down. Hillary's law firm came up with solutions to save the bank. The Clintons cheated the IRS by claiming interest payments that they didn't make. 15 people were indicted for 40 crimes. The wife of the bank owner(who fundraised for Bill) served 18 months in prison for contempt of court and was pardoned by Bill Clinton.

Yeah, probably not a good idea to bring up land deals.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I've been reading about J...