2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumClinton surrogate Ed Rendell: There are "more ugly women in America than attractive women"
A Hillary Clinton surrogate said Donald Trumps controversial remarks regarding women will hurt him in November because "there are probably more ugly women in America than attractive women."
Ed Rendell, the former governor of Pennsylvania, is the chairman of the Philadelphia 2016 Host Committee for this Julys Democratic National Convention.
...
For every one hell lose 1 1/2, two Republican women. Trumps comments like You cant be a 10 if youre flat-chested, thatll come back to haunt him, Rendell said in the interview. There are probably more ugly women in America than attractive women. People take that stuff personally.
...
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/280375-clinton-surrogate-on-trump-more-ugly-women-in-america
madaboutharry
(40,212 posts)Ed Rendell has a history of saying dumb things.
One Black Sheep
(458 posts)Looks like the Hillary campaign needs to "remove the stick from their own eye first"
Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)Oh wait
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)Would be kinda like having Joe "Foot in Mouth" Biden all over again
Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)to say something stupid. Trump will jump on it.
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)If we are having a contest.
Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)Jeb Bush would make a good President
h/t to Segami
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025752341
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Case in point...
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)If you are using the bell curve model. Case in point
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)There was a reason why I chose "not smart" instead of "dumb".
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)I guess it is really a continuum, anyway.
UMTerp01
(1,048 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)He must rate every woman he sees. Creepy man.
2cannan
(344 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)OK, He's with Her (Majesty), so no.
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)Nothing like calling most American women ugly. That is beyond creepy and he sounds just like Trump.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)They always do but in boomerang fashion. They always end up making a sexist smear. Coincidence?
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)wildeyed
(11,243 posts)And a sense of humor. For both genders
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)A gaffe!!!!! Call the Gaffe Police!!!
benny05
(5,322 posts)Right about the time HC is ending the primaries.
Fox is going to salivate on this one.
senz
(11,945 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)Ash_F
(5,861 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)YOU ARE NOT HELPING!
speaktruthtopower
(800 posts)should stay away from beauty contest judging.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)some shit you cannot even predict. A statement like this from a surrogate. M'kay
eastwestdem
(1,220 posts)I really should look into Botox...
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)toddwv
(2,830 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)first day in the news cycle?
Merryland
(1,134 posts)Rendell's nasty comment or the "reporter" contending he thought Rendell was just "being funny."
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)I really do think Rachel Maddow and all those people would make a huge thing of it.
When is Bernie Sanders going to get his misogynist bros under control?
spinboas
(48 posts)mak3cats
(1,573 posts)...is the inference that women will not vote for Trump based on one stupid comment (yes, I know he has thousands of those - I'm not defending Trump). Or the inference that women will not vote for Hillary based on one stupid comment by a supporter. We are, you know, capable of taking everything we see, hear, feel, read, or experience into consideration.
Case in point: Hillary lost my support very well all by herself - she didn't need any help from Rendell.