2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIs Romney's "lead" underestimated?
Flawed Poll Models Underestimating Romneys Lead
http://www.wallstreetexaminer.com/blogs/winter/?p=5565
From the Tampa Bay Herald: Mason-Dixon, which has been polling in Florida for 28 years, uses a survey sample based on peoples voter actual registration to match the electorate in Florida, while Marist uses a sample based on whether people say they consider themselves a Republican, Democrat or independent. About 20 percent of the likely voters in the Marist poll were Hispanic, while 13 percent were Hispanic in the Mason-Dixon poll, more in line with the Florida voting patterns.
Nationally, Pew Research illustrates Obamas problem, as does a new Washington Post poll. The first Pew chart shows Romneys strong supporters exploding in October, once he showed up at the debates appearing to be a moderate. Right now, each candidate has about the same level of strong supporters..
However, the badly flawed state polls dont show that 5 percent fewer strong Obama supporters are more likely to vote than among Romneys base.
discuss...
(images, graphs, and more at the link)
Lex
(34,108 posts)WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)Roland99
(53,342 posts)I don't agree.
demwing
(16,916 posts)"...that 5 percent fewer strong Obama supporters are more likely to vote than among Romneys base."
That is one wickedly inside out sentence...
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Axiomatic.
Thrill
(19,178 posts)I notice President Obama has huge leads in all the polls when they show RVs?
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)in the states he needs to carry. That is what matters. Not a few points here and there in some polls.
rzemanfl
(29,565 posts)I have never heard of the Tampa Bay Herald. Googling the name takes me to the Sarasota Herald-Tribune.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I think I'll go with the latter:
And as Professor Wang (Princeton) says any findings in a poll are already factored into the results, i.e. if Obama supporters are less enthusiastic that is already baked into the polls. That's why you see some larg RV-LV discrepancies.
TexasCPA
(527 posts)Romney is showing acts of desperation though. Trying to expand the map one week before the election shows that he knows he is losing OH, WI, and NV.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)but don't hold your breath.
progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts)is it a right wing rag like Washington Examiner?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)When Romney appeared to be doing well they were no where to be found.
OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)....who don't believe the President's numbers are too low.
fujiyama
(15,185 posts)about potential over-sampling of Democrats or using turn out figures and self identification numbers at the '08 level. It's clear that this time not nearly as many identify as Dems, and that many are now republican leaning independents.
But his analysis is sort of shallow. He basically overlays national independent identification figures for various states. It's obvious that more independents from say TN are going to be republican leaning, but that same % won't necessarily hold true for CO.
His map at the bottom is an even bigger joke, giving WI, IA and NV to Romney. Once again, this guy is assuming Obama has lost the same % of white voters all over the nation.
regnaD kciN
(26,044 posts)But what is underestimated is Obama's GOTV