2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumhas any one thought that maybe the right is backing bernie
not a big hillary supporter but does anyone really think that bernie can raise that kind of money from just small donations. president obama, set the standard for small donations and he still had to turn to the big money to finance his GE campaign.
Txbluedog
(1,128 posts)AgerolanAmerican
(1,000 posts)and a whole host of right-wingers have flocked to her side in the wake of Trump upending the GOP establishment, because they know she will give them the wars and corporatism they live for.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)The Koch Bros and Clintons have been buddies for Decades
Response to Txbluedog (Reply #1)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
jillan
(39,451 posts)puffy socks
(1,473 posts)The libertarian billionaire was making the not-at-all-debatable-or-controversial point that under George W. Bush, the size of government and its debts grew at a rate of about two and a half times what it had been under Bushs predecessor, Bill Clinton. This led Karl to ask if Koch thinks another Clinton will be a better president than a Republican:
KARL: So is it possible another Clinton could be better than another Republican
KOCH: Its possible.
KARL: Next time around?
KOCH: Its possible.
KARL: You couldnt see yourself supporting Hillary Clinton, could you?
KOCH: Well, I that her we would have to believe her actions would be quite different than her rhetoric. Let me put it that way. But on some of the Republican candidates we would before we could support them, wed have to believe their actions will be quite different than the rhetoric weve heard so far.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)There have been rumors for months that I have a bomb in my hair, also.
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)to Bernie's campaign. Bernie gets people excited and engaged in the political system, people that have been disengaged for a very long time.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)The numbers square, irrespective of your opinion on mathematics.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)uponit7771
(90,347 posts)ContinentalOp
(5,356 posts)How did he hire the Weavers and Devines before the $27 bills started rolling in?
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Sanders, the independent senator from Vermont who caucuses with Democrats, kicked off his dark horse campaign for the Democratic nomination on Thursday with an email to supporters and a press conference outside the U.S. Capitol. Since then, more than 100,000 people signed up for the campaign and 35,000 people donated money, according to a campaign press release.
The average donation was $43.54.
"This is a remarkable start for Bernie's campaign," said Tad Devine, the campaign's senior adviser. "People across America are yearning for authentic leadership that tells them the truth about what is holding back our nation. Bernie Sanders understands the problems we face."
Sanders' 24-hour fundraising haul puts him ahead of what every currently declared Republican presidential hopeful posted in their first day.
Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul's campaign announced that it had raised $800,000 a day in. Texas Sen. Ted Cruz's campaign raised $1 million in the first 24-hours of its existence. And Florida Sen. Marco Rubio's campaign raised $1.25 million in its first day.
The only other Democrat in the race -- former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton -- did not announce what her campaign raised in its first 24 hours and declined to do so on Friday.
Sanders is an outspoken critic of the proliferation of big money in politics. He regularly rails against the Koch Brothers, the Republican uber-donors, and has said that his campaign would be devoid of "billionaires."
At the bottom of his website, underneath the required phrase "Paid For By Bernie 2016," his website proclaims, "Not The Billionaires."
http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/01/politics/bernie-sanders-fundraising/
I guess you don't need to "wonder" how he got started, anymore. But we do thank you for your "concern".
ContinentalOp
(5,356 posts)Although I didn't care enough to actually google it. I was just mildly curious how a grassroots campaign gets off the ground. I suppose some advisers like Devine work for a deferred salary at the start?
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)payroll for the first few weeks. The problem came in knowing if he'd be able to make the long slog through the primaries.
merrily
(45,251 posts)April 30.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)while hillary has raised 256 million yet we know she's getting big donor dollars. with no big donor dollars at all bernie is only 70 million behing hillary clinton. you folks don't find that odd at all
[link:https://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/candidate.php?cycle=2016&id=N00000528&type=f|]
[link:https://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/candidate.php?id=N00000019|]
merrily
(45,251 posts)You should compare just at DU how much Hillary raised through the DU Act Blue Link and how much Bernie raised through the DU Act Blue link. Maybe then you'll get a clue.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)okieinpain
(9,397 posts)habits are hard to break. sorry.
That Guy 888
(1,214 posts)First up, Bernie Sanders
Democratic Underground Bernie Sanders... Donors 2,010 Total Raised $71,944.26
Then Clinton's support from DU
https://secure.actblue.com/entity/fundraisers/39658
DU dot com Hillary Group Donors 11 Total Raised $130.00
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)In fact the "right-wing" of the party, and even some conservatives, are backing Hillary Clinton the neocon.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)He hasn't even been touched yet, nor vetted. Hillary has been attacked for 25 - 30 years and is STILL ahead of Bernie. He'd fold like a cheap suit under serious scrutiny.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)okieinpain
(9,397 posts)where to start looking. but it just seems odd to me the guy is raising so much money yet he doesn't have this large number of people voting for him. don't you find it some what strange on how he is pulling this off.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)trudyco
(1,258 posts)Also, many states only allow closed primaries. Bernie pulls in a decent size of Democrats but pulls in a LOT of Independents and they are a huge part of the electorate now. In closed states Independents don't get to vote. There's also been a lot of Strip and Flip and Caging.
Just like in the Bush elections, nobody in the MSM is doing real investigations of this and pretending they don't know how easy it is to hack the vote counting computers.
I think the donor class is backing Hillary. Especially the military-industrial complex, oil, financial district, foreign dictators and other Clinton Foundation donors. As a backup, if she gets indicted, then they'd get a Republican. They are probably hoping they can manipulate Trump like they did Reagan. IDK. I think Trump is actually a foil for the Clintons, that they planned this (Clintons and Trump) to split the Republican vote so Hillary could win but they weren't expecting him to be this wildly successful and he's really enjoying himself. We will see if he starts making statements geared towards putting fear into the Dems. If he's truly trying to win the GE he will start veering to the left, to pull in independents. Instead I've heard him go more right. That would get more Sanders and Independents to vote Hillary as the lesser of two evils. He's trying to fear them into voting for her.
I also think the Clintons weren't expecting Bernie to be as successful as he's been. I'm not sure why they are provoking Sanders fans. What would they gain in splitting the party? If he goes independent then it's possible Ryan decides who the President will be. Very weird.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)some. if hillary or clintons can talk trump into helping them get elected is it really that far fetched for billionaires to put millions into sen. sanders campaign. you even say he's pulling large numbers of independents, so what are those independents going to be during the general election, are they just playing jedi mind tricks with the democratic primaries.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Response to okieinpain (Original post)
TM99 This message was self-deleted by its author.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)and so is hillary. bernie is getting small donations yet he raising just as much money as the others if not more.
Response to okieinpain (Reply #24)
TM99 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Jack Bone
(2,023 posts)Since last Sept... $50 here, $25 there, one month I gave $18... I got laid off that month...
Yeah, I believe he has raised it...people are really pissed...A whole shitload of people, just like me!
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)Bernie was at 3% in the national polls when he first announced. He is now virtually tied in the national polls. That's pretty amazing.
Dream Girl
(5,111 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)education and health care. Funny how wanting the ACA wasn't considered wanting free stuff, but somehow Medicare for All is.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)2008 woke a lot of people up. That is why Trump and Bernie are doing so well. People know that the economy is rigged to help the rich and screw the middle class and the poor and they are pissed. Whether Bernie wins or loses this election something has started here that can no longer be stopped. When the American people demand that we spend less money on war, tax the rich, and raise the minimum wage to a living wage, there will be plenty of money in the economy to spend on SS, disability, food stamps, education, health care and many other vital things that have been taken from the people.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)okieinpain
(9,397 posts)gets the nom. i have no problems with bernie and to be honest i probably like him a little more then hillary because i know less about him. but if you take what his campaign promises are you have to admit if he's trailing hillary where the hell is the revolution going to come from.
and if he has less votes the trump and trump is now getting a bag money team together to raise money. what the heck is bernie going to do when the general campaign starts. is he going to then start taking big money to try and keep up with trump, wouldn't that then make him beholding to wall street and the one percenters. lol.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)a month without a Super PAC and yet here he is. It does take some money to run an election but more money doesn't always mean victory. Historically Republicans have outspent Democrats and yet Democrats still win elections. Yes, you do need some money, but you don't have to have billions.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)large amounts of money yet he's behind in votes.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)have one vote unlike the superdelegates.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)donating the same way, plus we know she's taking big donars money. so how is bernie able to stay so close to her in funds. don't you find it just a little bit odd.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)Before Obama I had never donated a single dollar to any political campaign. I donated like $10 to Obama's campaign. I have donated over $200 to Bernie's campaign, and I am not alone. There are hundreds of thousands of people who have never donated to any political campaign who are now donating hundreds if not thousands of dollars to Bernie.
Jack Bone
(2,023 posts)towards primary results...many caucus votes aren't included in that tabulation/calculation. Bernie's won many of the caucus states and performed really well in the ones he's lost...not 3 million votes better, mind you...but if those votes were to be counted, Hillary's vote count lead would be much smaller.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)This dishonest OP seems to forget that math exists.
icecreamfan
(115 posts)ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)okieinpain
(9,397 posts)he is able to get so much money but he doesn't have a large number of votes.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)I don't.
/ignore list.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)you might not like hillary though.
argyl
(3,064 posts)Joob
(1,065 posts)Did Hillary ever get the Cruz/Bush Donors' money, her campaign was seeking out? I dunno, I was too disgusted to keep reading about it. Why would those backers back Hillary?
You'd think they'd back Bernie? Hillary's more conservative, not to mention.. easier odds with her.
You know what? I'm not even mad you suggested that, always ask questions. Better than not asking any at all..
Like some people.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)Sancho
(9,070 posts)and not unusual for RW millionaires. They've done it in other previous elections.
Todays_Illusion
(1,209 posts)and that means I have more reason to suspect Hillary is being supported by conservatives that there is that Bernie Sanders is. Those reported Koch ads, are were little distractions for the narrative.
They certainly were hilarious talking point generators., If the fanatically anti-socialist, anti-commie, anti-democratic republic (they hate this idea of the masses voting) Kochs approve of Sanders then he must not be a commie after all.
NewImproved Deal
(534 posts)From Goldwater Girl to Goldman Sachs...meet the "New" Democrats' choice.
[link:|
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)He is very weak in a lot of areas-If they only looped the video of bernie promising to raise taxes on the middle class his numbers would be in the teens. The last Dem to run on that platform won one state
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)Cuz that has been Hillary's answer to everything since the 90's and it continues to this day.
And then she turns into Charlie Sheen & follows it with "Winning! I am Winning Winning Winning!"
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)okieinpain
(9,397 posts)large amount of money to him, yet they aren't coming out to vote. i see people posting that they are donating 200, 300, 500 dollars to his campaign. do you really think that there are that many people donating those large sums to him. you don't find that odd.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)show up to vote for him? As has been stated a few times now, we have more than one dollar, we don't have more than one vote.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)start looking. I just saw how much he had raised and found it odd that he has been able to raise so much from small donations. especially when everyone else is taking big money and they haven't really pulled away from him. if he gets the nom i will vote for him no hesitation at all.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Bernie core platform is 180 degrees opposed to their interests, and virtually every poll indicates that he's a stronger candidate against Trump than Clinton. Bernie is literally such persons' worst political nightmare: a socialist with enormous popular appeal.
I'm not surprised in the least that there are donations of several hundred dollars from so many working-class individuals for whom they represent a significant amount of money. This is the first time many have ever had a candidate they are absolutely certain, deep down, is on their side. That have what isn't phony, focus-group-crafted "hope," but the real thing. I can't state too strongly how powerful that is.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)The rightwing money is going to Clinton, via Goldman Sachs and their buddies.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)or IoW it holds this
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)The OP should have a quick glance at any GE poll in the past 6 months.
farleftlib
(2,125 posts)I literally did this
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Clinton is banking on winning the election with
1) half of the Democratic party regulars
2) zero independents
3) Wall Street Republicans.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)Dream Girl
(5,111 posts)My suspicion has also been for a while that a good portion of those who are stirring up shit about Hillary on DU are also bankrolled by the right. My best guess is about a quarter to a third of Hillary bashers. The rest are true believers. It is working brilliantly.
jillan
(39,451 posts)Dream Girl
(5,111 posts)And yes I'm African American.
jillan
(39,451 posts)Dream Girl
(5,111 posts)Is that a problem?
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)TDale313
(7,820 posts)A Hillary supporter suggested this totally unfounded smear, but now that you mention it...
Nope, still baloney.
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)Nothing to Obama or Clinton in "08.
But, I'm maxxed out to Bernie in monthly and other contributions for the primary.
Hillary will get the same thing I gave her last time if she is the nominee. Zip.
imagine2015
(2,054 posts)And Hillary is trying to get more funding from right-wing Republicans who don't like Trump.
onecaliberal
(32,864 posts)Bernie polls way better against republicans than Hillary. The conservative business is ALL donating to Hillary, since Bernie takes none.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Shadowflash
(1,536 posts)In polls (Which is all we have to go by at the moment) He beats Trump by a bigger margin than HRC.
arendt
(5,078 posts)This is a transparent smear.
The only right wingers backing a Democrat are backing HRC.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)Dem2
(8,168 posts)I don't think the fund-raising is related though, just a strange link-up of right and left completing the loop. Those in my feeds are exhibiting a mixture of right-wing anarchist nihilism, bizarre pro-gun stances from people who would be afraid to touch a gun and Bernie or Bust. I don't know why this is happening, other than people feel disenfranchised and feel they are borrowing a lot of money on an education that they feel may be useless.
merrily
(45,251 posts)You're pulling stuff right out of your ear. Stop it.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)the primaries. lol.
merrily
(45,251 posts)He's been in the House and Senate for 25 years. On MSNBC many, many times.
You don't seem very well informed.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)run the tv people even said the same thing. hell i've seen the congress man from florida alan grayson on tv more then bernie. but yet here bernie is.
merrily
(45,251 posts)okieinpain
(9,397 posts)can get the nom, he has my vote in november. i won't even have to hold my nose to do it. hell i like the guy, i just think things are a little weird were he is concerned.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Last edited Wed May 18, 2016, 05:25 PM - Edit history (1)
And who you vote vor is your business.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)Just because you haven't heard of him doesn't mean anything.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)or ten for running for president.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)the typical presidential candidates are corrupt and represent rich people, not average people.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)they aren't going to back him in the general.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Just because you aren't that smart doesn't mean everyone isn't.
dana_b
(11,546 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
scscholar
(2,902 posts)is safer than standing in front of him with the chair throwing.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)serbbral
(260 posts)matt819
(10,749 posts)Hey, I'm not saying she's a hooker, but, hey, she could be a hooker.
I'm not going to call Ted Cruz's wife ugly. Not me. You're not going to hear that from me. Nosiree.
I'm not saying the right is behind Sanders' donations, just raising the question.
What a load of shit.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)okieinpain
(9,397 posts)a little bit that maybe someone is playing around with the dem primaries. you don't put that past republicans.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)Now ask yourself your question again. I think you can figure out who the right is backing.
There is no way Bernie could be getting big corporate donations without everyone knowing about it. It's not happening.
My Good Babushka
(2,710 posts)and saying crazier and crazier shit, so Hillary will win. Honestly, it wouldn't surprise me.
okieinpain
(9,397 posts)far fetched. thanks.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)She's got the corporate cash and the endorsements or semi-endorsements from many on the right, though.
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)VOX
(22,976 posts)COINTELPRO has been well documented in earlier times...wouldn't be a bit surprised if right-wing billionaires dropped a few mil on a privatized version.
There also were right-wing donors to Nader's campaign in 2000. Ben Stein was one of them.