Chris Hayes just said the Sanders campaign was going to take a close look at the numbers

[silvershadow]

and decide by Wednesday on whether or not to challenge Kentucky...

[azurnoir]

1. good 'bout time too

[CorporatistNation]

16. As Someone Who Has Contested An Election... This One MERITS A Look! Too Many Untoward Happenings!

Broken machines.. Votes going through Grimes office? WTF? Contest it Bernie!

[merrily]

2. The delegates are split evenly. Unless he expected to win by a big margin, I am not sure

it's worth the candle.

[MadBadger]

3. He's a selfish ass hole if he does

[winter is coming]

4. Because? The margin is 0.5%, and there were major problems with machines

in one of the more populous counties. I don't see anything "selfish" about wanting to be sure of the results when the margin is that close.

[MadBadger]

5. Huge waste of time and money only to serve his ego so he can say he won another state

Delegates won't change.

[winter is coming]

6. Uh huh.

[hellofromreddit]

10. That money will serve my ego too. I would take pride in seeing a fair election.

[Time for change]

20. If he does it, the purpose would be to defend democracy -- not for his ego

[cliffordu]

7. Because -no one- should inhibit

The coronation.

[ThePhilosopher04]

13. Really? Please explain.

[MadBadger]

15. I already have

[Logical]

18. Lol, no you haven't, but calling names is cute. Nt

[MadBadger]

21. Look up

[dchill]

30. I know you are but what am I?

- Peewee Herman

[Peregrine Took]

31. Classy! ........................nt

[DURHAM D]

8. That would be a good way to waste some money.

Please send him your last $27 everyone.

[silvershadow]

9. Ooh...thanks for the reminder...I think I will! nt

[ThePhilosopher04]

14. If I have it, I certainly will. Thanks for reminding me.

[snowy owl]

19. It won't be my last but thanks for the reminder. Seems to me we have several more primaries?

I'm prepared to do my $27 for each one. Money well spent.

[uponit7771]

22. +1, the privileged among us can throw good money after losing causes.

[kerry-is-my-prez]

26. Well at least they won't be sending it to Trump or Republicans.

Kind of cruel/thoughtless for him to be taking it from these kids (or most likely their parents) some of them can't afford it, I'm sure.

[snowy owl]

11. Good decision. Grimes has been sort of ambiguous about the "official" count.

First she said official by end pf May but agreed it was probable Clinton win so sort of official then Wolf Blitzer said unusual to get "official" immediately but she said yes, official.

Too close to be official this soon. Sanders should demand recount and confirmation. Esp. considering how close this is. Grimes is too close to Clintons to be trusted.

[silvershadow]

17. ^^True, that. nt

[ViseGrip]

12. zeroing out counties is never a good idea. if it happens then you have to hand count that.

[kerry-is-my-prez]

23. So ridiculous. What is the point? He cannot win. He's really trying to screw over the Dem Party....

So disappointed in him.

[workinclasszero]

24. Good let him waste his dwindling funds on BS

Instead of California.

Bernie's brain trust is really on the ball I must say!

[Jitter65]

25. Yeah, be sure to accuse those "uncommitted" voters of cheating. That ought to do it.

Bernie get over it: Most of your votes in KY were votes AGAINST Hillary not FOR you. And she still won in a state that was tailor made for you.

[spinboas]

27. He let them cheat in many of the early states, time to take it to the courts, no more free passes!

[RandySF]

28. All that for one delegate?

I doubt it or they would have challenged Missouri as well.

[Blue Meany]

29. I'd rather have a random sample hand-counted

than a second machine count. It would be more likely to yield any machine-driven manipulation.

[silvershadow]

32. You have a point. nt