2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumCali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)People called a hotline.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)kerry-is-my-prez
(8,133 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Cool beans. It was really close when I gave up and went to sleep.
Response to Cali_Democrat (Reply #1)
Name removed Message auto-removed
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)dubyadiprecession
(5,714 posts)I'm shocked!
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)postatomic
(1,771 posts)She'd get to the bottom of this.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)had a huge margin for Bernie..was done at SOS office...And one of the reported places for problems was you guessed it PIKE...and that SOS is on video kissing HRC's ring er endorsing her.
napi21
(45,806 posts)happens in every election. All the were mentioned involved one complaint about this, one about that, 2 about something else. I really don't see a problem.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)I go to bed around 8 p.m., up at 3:30, Nuclear. If SBSers are yammering that there must be fraud, I know Hillary won. It really is that simple, and that profoundly dishonest.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)All that fraud and he still lost. Sorry.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)Go ahead and laugh........
pinebox
(5,761 posts)I don't give a shit if it was Bernie or Hillary who reported it.
Each instance of claimed election fraud should be looked at.
I fail to see what is so hilarious about this.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Have you expressed a concern about "fraud" for any Sanders victory?
I haven't.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)I've not seen any reports of fraud under Sanders victory and if it's reported then it should be looked at ASAP.
It is no laughing matter when reports like this are filed.
Seriously, this isn't funny.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)There are all kinds of claims of irregularities in every election, because our piecemeal kluge of an election system is inefficient.
But I have seen NO evidence of systematic fraud. Voter suppression? Sure. The GOP is suppressing the vote all over the place.
But the idea that Clinton is cheating her way to victory is spurious.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Like how the initial switcharoo took place in Nevada at the first convention when Hillary ended up with fewer delegates when she won the popular vote and started with more. You know, after the Sanders sympathizer on one of the NVDP's committees illegally provided the Sanders Campaign with the list of Clinton delegates and their email addresses?
Hlllary's been well ahead all along, winning without the slightest need for cheating, while Sanders Campaign is showing itself to be ruthless and unprincipled.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Codeine
(25,586 posts)RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)Hillary won and Bernie lost. Enough of the NONSENSE!
brooklynite
(94,598 posts)What does that do to the outcome?
Demsrule86
(68,586 posts)not...just lost.
Brother Buzz
(36,444 posts)So Stop Saying That!!!
George II
(67,782 posts)Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)and I say this is verrrry suspicious. Now I drove through Kentucky once in 1994, thus I can assure you that the people on the ground in Kentucky are 2:1 in support of Sanders. Sanders should have won in a landslide and yet, he loses with less than 50% of the vote? Look at the biracial 20-22 year old high school drop out single mother retail worker vote from Kentucky. If sanders didn't win that demographic 57.2 to 42.8 then there is clear, massive voter fraud going on.
Scientifically speaking, I can feel it in my gut. Something aint right here.
YouDig
(2,280 posts)TimPlo
(443 posts)Making a big deal over this and insulting the OP? He just posted a story and posted the Headline the news paper used. If have to insult someone talk to the news paper in KY that posted it. You all seem rather childish being so quick to insult like you just have to win some petty little game.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)but I will. Is this above average? Every election you have those. If you have calls at a high level, that is when I get really, really concerned. And 71 in this case, might or might not influence the result. the way this has been going all night