Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A new low: The Democratic Establishment hiding behind the bully label. (Original Post) Skwmom May 2016 OP
That it is. LWolf May 2016 #1
Especially since they're behind the bullying themselves notadmblnd May 2016 #2
LOL Bernie's entire campaign has been about perpetual persecution and martyrdom. JaneyVee May 2016 #3
:) They're trying to "disrupt" the firestorm blowback Hortensis May 2016 #25
Wow ... At what point does Bernie get involved? 1StrongBlackMan May 2016 #31
Well Sanders and Clinton had Senator Boxer give a message Hortensis May 2016 #37
I guess that's a problem when you run a revolution when ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2016 #38
Which begs the thought, in me anyway, what if Hortensis May 2016 #40
We are seeing what it would look like ... chaos. 1StrongBlackMan May 2016 #42
It could be far worse than in the 1960s-70s. Hortensis May 2016 #43
Yeah ... I think that's a bit much ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2016 #44
The nice response I expected. Hortensis May 2016 #46
I will be glad, too ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2016 #47
Really? What are you thinking? Hortensis May 2016 #50
You mean like the children who were bullied in Cali by screaming Bernie fans? JaneyVee May 2016 #4
We don't know they were Bernie fans Gavile May 2016 #5
Let's see puffy socks May 2016 #9
Wow, David Brocks hired hit squad has been busy. -nt- NorthCarolina May 2016 #11
Gee puffy socks May 2016 #13
Well, being that it's NorthCarolina May 2016 #14
Listing several (but not all) blatant examples of Berniebro bullying behavior KittyWampus May 2016 #21
Only if one is puffy socks May 2016 #22
It is time for progressives to realize the Democratic Party is hopelessly corrupt BernieforPres2016 May 2016 #6
you think they are hopelessly corrupt, yet will permit other parties a fair shot? reddread May 2016 #10
k & r with thanks! ancianita May 2016 #7
They cram a shitty conservative candidate down our throats and then call us bullies. B Calm May 2016 #8
Nobody is "cramming" anything down your throats. It's a Primary in a Democracy. With voting. KittyWampus May 2016 #18
Before the primary even casted the first vote in Iowa, Hillary had B Calm May 2016 #23
exactly. eom Merryland May 2016 #26
So how do you explain the Pledged Delegate and popular vote lead? ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2016 #32
That Handicap liberalmike27 May 2016 #39
Clinton had a lead in super delegates in 2008 too mythology May 2016 #56
exit polls don't lie GreatGazoo May 2016 #36
This primary has been fixed from the get-go. B Calm May 2016 #45
Read something outside your bubble and then get back to us. truedelphi May 2016 #53
Omg, another virus warning. Thanks a lot! B Calm May 2016 #57
This message was self-deleted by its author FlatBaroque May 2016 #12
A new low: Excuses and justification made for bullying and intimidation. seabeyond May 2016 #15
"Think of the children! How dare anyone 'misuse' the word 'bully'? It's disgusting!" :-P NurseJackie May 2016 #16
Predictable low- Bullies blaming the victims. At this point so much evidence KittyWampus May 2016 #17
41% of the vote UP FRONT, is a bullying machine! ViseGrip May 2016 #19
Exactly. The Party Leaders know who is who when it comes to voting, and it scares them truedelphi May 2016 #52
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #20
The Establishment’s Message: Today’s Democratic Party = Tomorrow’s Republican Party CobaltBlue May 2016 #24
That's it! They are taking over and they expect B Calm May 2016 #27
B Calm—It is clear. Here is a recent take… CobaltBlue May 2016 #29
I never see posts from you NOT attacking Democrats Dem2 May 2016 #28
Your answer. B Calm May 2016 #30
So ... You are just seeking attention? Weird. 1StrongBlackMan May 2016 #34
Yes, that's the answer I'd expect from a juvenile Dem2 May 2016 #35
Because bullies so often admit to being bullies. n/t JTFrog May 2016 #33
Bullying takes many forms. Like the Berniebros in Nevada....many of them are bullies. nt LexVegas May 2016 #41
They have the unmitigated gall to call us bullies while hiding behind their brownshirts? VulgarPoet May 2016 #48
+1 B Calm May 2016 #49
Another new low: Sanders team instigated the chaos in NV convention with supporters the night before seabeyond May 2016 #51
It's slander against Bernie supporters. senz May 2016 #54
The Democratic Establishment hiding behind the bully label. As they LITERALLY hide behind pdsimdars May 2016 #55

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
2. Especially since they're behind the bullying themselves
Tue May 17, 2016, 08:52 AM
May 2016

HRC is a-Okay with running on being a victim.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
3. LOL Bernie's entire campaign has been about perpetual persecution and martyrdom.
Tue May 17, 2016, 08:54 AM
May 2016

Everything is a giant conspiracy against Bernie Sanders, the perpetual victim.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
25. :) They're trying to "disrupt" the firestorm blowback
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:49 AM
May 2016

on The Sanders Campaign from their successful attempt to turn the Nevada convention into chaos. This scandal is being reported across the nation, Skw, and is far beyond any little effort to spin away here on DU.

For any who haven't read it, this Nevada State Democratic Party's letter reporting on what happened is far more incendiary than even what it charges The Sanders Campaign orchestrated at their convention. It's really good reading too.

We believe, unfortunately, that the tactics and behavior on display here in Nevada are harbingers of things to come as Democrats gather in Philadelphia in July for our National Convention. We write to alert you to what we perceive as the Sander Campaign’s penchant for extra-parliamentary behavior—indeed, actual violence—in place of democratic conduct in a convention setting, and furthermore what we can only describe as their encouragement of, and complicity in, a very dangerous atmosphere that ended in chaos and physical threats to fellow Democrats.


https://www.scribd.com/doc/312844982/160516-Letter-DNC-RBC-NVDemsConvention

In case anyone is wondering, this isn't how democracy works, even when it's your candidate. This is anti-democracy. The Sanders Campaign is hundreds of delegates behind. What were/are they planning to do next after picking up the expected 4 or so (four!) delegates in Nevada?

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
37. Well Sanders and Clinton had Senator Boxer give a message
Tue May 17, 2016, 11:19 AM
May 2016

of unity for them, but sadly it was drowned out by Sanders Campaign-organized "disunity."

As for any other Bernie involvement, this is believed to have been planned and and witnessed to be orchestrated by his campaign staff, but the letter doesn't claim he knew a thing about it.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
40. Which begs the thought, in me anyway, what if
Tue May 17, 2016, 11:31 AM
May 2016

Bernie had incited the revolution he'd hoped for? What would that look like?

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
43. It could be far worse than in the 1960s-70s.
Tue May 17, 2016, 12:34 PM
May 2016

The population has exploded, while the typical city has 3 days of food available, and the water supplies depend not only on electricity but often aged and undependable backup water pumps. Terrorist tactics engaged in by political revolutionaries here could be devastating to hundreds of thousands. (And what if anti-American terrorist groups decided to help out?)

I know this is a bit much, but I do believe it could happen. Given the 2016 realities of extreme dependence and interdependence, many millions of our 330 million people depend on continuation of support systems just to live out the week. Relatively speaking, it would not take much of a disruption of our nation, instead of just a convention, to cause a hundred thousand deaths.

And political movements can't hand-pick their revolutionaries, they pick themselves. Some of these people are meaner than hell and some yearn for destruction.



 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
44. Yeah ... I think that's a bit much ...
Tue May 17, 2016, 01:07 PM
May 2016

But, whose to tell? ... Given the "revolutionary" spirit being born.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
46. The nice response I expected.
Tue May 17, 2016, 03:28 PM
May 2016

Extremism makes me wary at baseline, so of course I'm going to be kind of rattled these days. 58% of Republicans just said they trusted Trump to lead the party over Paul Ryan, a Koch brothers mole himself, and here on DU some will excuse any behavior, reject any truth, and believe any lie in support of their leader.

You're a good guy, 1Strong. I'll be very glad when this is over, we swear in a competent liberal president and Senate majority, and we get to continuing the advances President Obama has begun.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
50. Really? What are you thinking?
Tue May 17, 2016, 04:26 PM
May 2016

The worst for me has been knowing that visitors coming would be reading their noxious anti-Democratic messages instead of our happy aspirations, but otherwise...?

We always knew that some DUers were right wingers attracted to Sanders' anti-establishment message and that others came to support him briefly just to defeat Clinton. Add in that it is wide open to right-wing fifth columnists and no surprise they're flooding the forums with conservative poison.

On top of everything, the far left is a lot more sympathetic to the far right than either is to more moderate people, like liberal Democrats, so no doubt there is the usual movement from one to the other across the "bottom of the U."

But surely none of these could have ever been Hillary voters anyway?

 

Gavile

(107 posts)
5. We don't know they were Bernie fans
Tue May 17, 2016, 08:58 AM
May 2016

The only thing we do know for sure is that they were Hispanics who were unhappy with Hillary's stance on immigration.

 

puffy socks

(1,473 posts)
9. Let's see
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:13 AM
May 2016

Thus far we've seen their nasty antics
in Nevada (yes thats bullying)
a supporter has been arrested for threatening to cut out a super delegate's tongue.
thousands of nasty threats to E Warren for not endorsing Sanders after they previously put a fake endorsement ad in the NYT
Thousands of threats to other SDs
Stabbing your own supporters in the back Nina Turner
breaking through the DNC firewall and of course, as with every election lost by Bernie... conspiracies about a supposedly rigged system.


Yeah, it's safe to assume thise on LA were Bernie's nasty fanatics

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
14. Well, being that it's
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:29 AM
May 2016

(a) a juvenile tactic, and (b) that it comes just after Brock gathers his paid "forces", and (c) that his paid mercenaires are out in force taking about what "Bernie supporters did"...it all seems pretty obvious.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
21. Listing several (but not all) blatant examples of Berniebro bullying behavior
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:41 AM
May 2016

isn't a juvenile tactic.

Name-calling by saying "Brockian" is juvenile.

You can't face the truth of what many of your fellow Sanders supporters are doing or you need to excuse that behavior?

That's all on you.

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
6. It is time for progressives to realize the Democratic Party is hopelessly corrupt
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:08 AM
May 2016

It is not going to be changed from the inside. A third party movement is required.

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
10. you think they are hopelessly corrupt, yet will permit other parties a fair shot?
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:14 AM
May 2016

I think we better fight for one of the two parties permitted to fully participate.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
18. Nobody is "cramming" anything down your throats. It's a Primary in a Democracy. With voting.
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:38 AM
May 2016

Your candidate is losing and badly due to numerous faults within himself, his campaign and his surrogates and his supporters.

 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
23. Before the primary even casted the first vote in Iowa, Hillary had
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:43 AM
May 2016

over a 500 super delegate lead (easily googled). That is cramming their shitty candidate to the front of the line!

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
32. So how do you explain the Pledged Delegate and popular vote lead? ...
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:35 AM
May 2016

And I'm sure you know that the Super Delegates don't matter until the convention, right?

liberalmike27

(2,479 posts)
39. That Handicap
Tue May 17, 2016, 11:29 AM
May 2016

Would put Bernie in the lead right now, were he to have the largess of the established politicians and lobbyists who make up the rich, political establishment in this country.

Al Frankin mentioned how he trusted the vote of his constituents to allow him to vote the way he chose, which I interpreted as him saying "Well I care about what they thought back then, in electing me, but I don't care about what they want NOW."

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
56. Clinton had a lead in super delegates in 2008 too
Tue May 17, 2016, 05:33 PM
May 2016

But once Obama was going to win the pledged delegates, the super delegates flipped. It makes a rather awkward point for your position.

Response to Skwmom (Original post)

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
16. "Think of the children! How dare anyone 'misuse' the word 'bully'? It's disgusting!" :-P
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:32 AM
May 2016

Gurl-please! F'real? Okay!


 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
17. Predictable low- Bullies blaming the victims. At this point so much evidence
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:36 AM
May 2016

has been presented over the last few months of Berniebros and their bullying behavior I can only do an eye roll at the OP

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
52. Exactly. The Party Leaders know who is who when it comes to voting, and it scares them
Tue May 17, 2016, 04:29 PM
May 2016

Senseless that they cannot win against Trump in November.

Forty one to Forty three percent of all voters can't ahck Hillary, and they won't.

They needed to wake up and help Bernie secure the nomination.

Instead, you have this:

http://www.inquisitr.com/3096404/the-nevada-convention-where-democracy-went-to-die/

Response to Skwmom (Original post)

 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
27. That's it! They are taking over and they expect
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:07 AM
May 2016

(with their right-wing authoritarian attitude) that the old Democrats who built the party either join them, or get the hell out of the way.

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
48. They have the unmitigated gall to call us bullies while hiding behind their brownshirts?
Tue May 17, 2016, 04:08 PM
May 2016

If I wanted something repugnant shoved down my throat, I'd call my ex-boyfriend-- and yet, the DNC pushed Clinton, and then berate ideas of switching to a third party as "voting for Trump". To cacophonous whinging from the Clintonistas about how she's not being shoved down our throat. Tell that to the no doubt hundreds of thousands who mysteriously got their registrations changed, tell that to the easily hackable voting machines, tell that to fucking Debbie Downer.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
51. Another new low: Sanders team instigated the chaos in NV convention with supporters the night before
Tue May 17, 2016, 04:28 PM
May 2016

A planned mob to change the rules to their favor so they could cheat. They were stopped and threw their tantrum. Too unreal.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
54. It's slander against Bernie supporters.
Tue May 17, 2016, 04:32 PM
May 2016

They've been doing it from the start. When you have no strength as a candidate, you go dirty.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
55. The Democratic Establishment hiding behind the bully label. As they LITERALLY hide behind
Tue May 17, 2016, 05:24 PM
May 2016

the brown shirts to bully the Bernie supporters..


AND they don't get it.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»A new low: The Democrati...