Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIndependents won’t save Mitt
Romney backers keep hoping his lead among independents means undecided voters will break his way. It's an illusion
BY STEVE KORNACKI
To paint a scenario in which Mitt Romney is elected president next Tuesday, Republicans need to explain either how theyll generate a last-minute wave of momentum or how the polls that show their candidate lagging in states he has to win are flawed.
The momentum bit is a tough sell. Romney made real polling strides in the wake of the first debate on October 3, erasing the lead Barack Obama has enjoyed in the national horserace for the entire campaign and improving his own Electoral College outlook. But that momentum expired somewhere in the middle of the month, and since then the race has been frozen in place, with the candidates tied nationally (or with Romney ahead by a fraction of a point) and with Obama holding steady leads in Ohio and Wisconsin, one of which Romney pretty much must pick off to have a chance next week.
Plus, with Sandy and its aftermath dominating the news this week, and with one of Romneys top surrogates, Chris Christie, publicly vouching for Obamas leadership, its a lot easier to see Obama being the beneficiary of any late momentum than Romney.
So that leaves flawed polls, and on this front the right has found something to latch on to: Romneys support among independent voters. Poll after poll has shown the GOP nominee beating and in some cases crushing Obama among independents, in both the national horserace and in key states. An NPR poll earlier this week, for instance, put Romney 12 points ahead of the president with independents, 51 to 39 percent, and a CBS/New York Times survey found the exact same result. A Monmouth University poll last week pegged Romneys independent lead at 19 points.
more:
http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/the_independent_illusion/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 783 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Independents won’t save Mitt (Original Post)
DonViejo
Nov 2012
OP
doc03
(35,337 posts)1. Sorry but I listened to Glenn Beck and he claims all the independents will
will vote for Romney. Get this he said Romney will win the popular vote by 6-10% and the swing state by 3-6 % and will get 321 EV. He said Walker was 3 points behind in the recall but he won by 9%. So all the polls are wrong.
FBaggins
(26,737 posts)2. It all depends on what is meant by "independents"
Are these the swing-voter independents who really do shift from one election to the next... or are many of them people who used to consider themselves to be republicans, but who left the party (due to Bush or more recent congressional behavior)?