Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
71 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Voicemails left for state Democratic Chairwoman Roberta Lange (Original Post) firebrand80 May 2016 OP
Ok that one with the phone number was uncalled for. RepubliCON-Watch May 2016 #1
Another one called her the c-word nt firebrand80 May 2016 #2
That's also not an appropriate thing to say, whether one is in the wrong or not. RepubliCON-Watch May 2016 #34
You can't argue inapproiate and justified. Blows my mind. seabeyond May 2016 #38
Wow. Don't even know what to say. RepubliCON-Watch May 2016 #42
Uncalled for? KingFlorez May 2016 #5
I know that's why I don't like that call. RepubliCON-Watch May 2016 #30
so your opinion counts more than the people who supported her for that position? CreekDog May 2016 #60
See my other post, LIS. RepubliCON-Watch May 2016 #61
Remember, these are good people who only want a fair system KingFlorez May 2016 #3
I'd be tempted to take out the sarcasm banner on your post, and I'll tell you why: PatrickforO May 2016 #23
You're talking about the super delegates, right? morningfog May 2016 #43
you should read Senator Boxer's Facebook page rbrnmw May 2016 #4
Sounds like the Brock puppets are putting in overtime. n/t winter is coming May 2016 #7
I have been here 8 years I am not a Brock puppet rbrnmw May 2016 #10
I didn't say you were posting on Facebook. winter is coming May 2016 #13
sorry rbrnmw May 2016 #19
So you're claiming a false flag operation? Any evidence of that? NT Adrahil May 2016 #54
Nope. None. Zilch. Agschmid May 2016 #67
Did you see this? DURHAM D May 2016 #53
I asked them to take it down. Aerows May 2016 #64
Are you sad that Clinton is losing this election because her corruption is being exposed? w4rma May 2016 #6
Clinton is losing this election? SFnomad May 2016 #8
The excluded delegates Fresh_Start May 2016 #9
The delegates showed up and sat outside the convention door for the entire time. (nt) w4rma May 2016 #12
I wouldn't trust ralstonreports to accurately report the weather, let alone politics. n/t winter is coming May 2016 #17
Jon Ralston is the most respected reporter in Nevada. JaneyVee May 2016 #22
Then he needs to retire. Fawke Em May 2016 #24
and that's supposed to mean something.... Jack Bone May 2016 #51
Bro did u just say Clinton is losing this election? JaneyVee May 2016 #11
Let's get this straight. I'm not your "bro", JV. (nt) w4rma May 2016 #15
Solidarity, bro. JaneyVee May 2016 #20
Post removed Post removed May 2016 #26
I've noticed. I can't stand people like JV. I avoid them in real life like the plague. (nt) w4rma May 2016 #28
I have a sneaking suspicion the smiles will be wiped off their faces soon. Fawke Em May 2016 #47
If she makes it to the general election, none of us are going to get anything of what we want. w4rma May 2016 #49
Is she loses creeksneakers2 May 2016 #62
If Sanders supporters "want her to lose", it will be because of Clinton. w4rma May 2016 #65
Hillary isn't working to alienate anybody creeksneakers2 May 2016 #69
Youre calling me a shithead, but Im the shithead? JaneyVee May 2016 #31
Were you one of those that called Obama supporters "boy" Luminous Animal May 2016 #25
LOL WTF. JaneyVee May 2016 #33
Indeed. Luminous Animal May 2016 #50
Bookmarking. Starry Messenger May 2016 #18
Bernie is an anger and envy merchant redstateblues May 2016 #36
Regular people? GulfCoast66 May 2016 #66
We live in a society that stopped teaching rhetoric and debate in high schools, PatrickforO May 2016 #14
Really? GulfCoast66 May 2016 #68
I just have to say "Wow!" to describe the high level of discourse used by Sanders Supporters Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #16
Winning hearts and minds. JaneyVee May 2016 #21
Roberta Lange is a disgusting person. reformist2 May 2016 #27
I watched a periscope of a Bernie fan that day, his viewers were repeating her phone # Tarc May 2016 #29
Roberta Lange, obviously, didn't get elected with her people skills. She's got the making enemies w4rma May 2016 #32
I like how you completely ignored the part where an internet mob solicited harassment Tarc May 2016 #41
with all due respect, there is something wrong with this country. hertopos May 2016 #35
I take it you are a Sanders support. I respect your post hugely. Nt seabeyond May 2016 #45
I am an old lady who has been dreaming about Hillary becoming president for a very long time. hertopos May 2016 #48
I agree with you. seabeyond May 2016 #56
I'm in the same leftist spot I've always stood in Kittycat May 2016 #70
" Acta Non Verba ". No words could be as harmful as this treacherous woman's actions... AzDar May 2016 #37
I always pegged you as an "ends justify the means" kinda Bernie fan Tarc May 2016 #44
That would be Hillary and the DNC, wouldn't it... or are you pretending to not see? AzDar May 2016 #46
Lol, you seriously just pulled a "I know you are but what am I? ??? Tarc May 2016 #57
Wow, those comments are just not acceptable. a kennedy May 2016 #39
Childish assholes. sufrommich May 2016 #40
I just wonder, is this the type of people we want in charge of maintaining peace and calm? Thinkingabout May 2016 #52
Oh but we have been assured here time and time again workinclasszero May 2016 #55
Actor arrested for beating a female "Bernie bro" LadyHawkAZ May 2016 #58
Ok here is the obvious question, nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #59
And these are the self-proclaimed purists? Shameful and I hope the ones who left threats are Maru Kitteh May 2016 #63
It is terrifying to me that this is what is happening to our democracy. barrow-wight May 2016 #71
 

RepubliCON-Watch

(559 posts)
1. Ok that one with the phone number was uncalled for.
Mon May 16, 2016, 09:42 PM
May 2016

I agree with the others, she should get a new profession. Politics ain't for her at all.

 

RepubliCON-Watch

(559 posts)
34. That's also not an appropriate thing to say, whether one is in the wrong or not.
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:12 PM
May 2016

I understand the frustration because it's justified. But to go about like that will not produce the results we're all looking for.

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
5. Uncalled for?
Mon May 16, 2016, 09:46 PM
May 2016

More like reprehensible. Where I come from it's messed up to call for someone to be murdered over politics, but that's just me. No shade, but.

 

RepubliCON-Watch

(559 posts)
30. I know that's why I don't like that call.
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:10 PM
May 2016

I mean does me saying that it was uncalled for have to politicized as well? My god, learn to understand that we all agree on that being heinous ok?

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
60. so your opinion counts more than the people who supported her for that position?
Mon May 16, 2016, 11:19 PM
May 2016

sounds like you want to choose the chairs of democratic conventions yourself.

a little dictatorship is okay, if you get to be the dictator. what was it about fairness you were saying?

PatrickforO

(14,576 posts)
23. I'd be tempted to take out the sarcasm banner on your post, and I'll tell you why:
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:05 PM
May 2016

They are people - the good, the bad and the ugly. But they are OUR people. OUR people who have been subjected to inferior public education, a popular culture that caters to the lowest of the lowbrow, and years of corporate propaganda about how bad the government is.

In my professional field, I'm known for telling people that we are only as good as our data, and now I'm suggesting here that our people are only as good as our culture allows them to be.

When did cheating become commonplace? Remember? When did stupidity begin to be celebrated? Remember?

So...you cannot blame them, and you certainly cannot determine based on a vulgar posting by someone with a fifth grade vocabulary who has been 'nurtured' on years of lowbrow 'sitcoms' and reality television shows is 'good' or not based on these posts. Seriously, when you look at celebrity tweets, twitter wars, internet bullying in the context of the vapid thing we call popular culture, they are doing what they know.

Just think if our education system was actually decent? And if we still had the fairness doctrine. And if the news was held sacrosanct from profits.

rbrnmw

(7,160 posts)
4. you should read Senator Boxer's Facebook page
Mon May 16, 2016, 09:45 PM
May 2016

they called her every deplorable name in the book. I couldn't read it.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
64. I asked them to take it down.
Tue May 17, 2016, 12:18 AM
May 2016
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511972000#post24

It is dangerous to publish people's address and phone number on the internet.

That also goes for whoever posts the callback number for the other one. We have no way of knowing if those are legitimate phone numbers, but in any case, I wouldn't sleep easy knowing I didn't speak up about it and something terrible happened in either case.
 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
6. Are you sad that Clinton is losing this election because her corruption is being exposed?
Mon May 16, 2016, 09:49 PM
May 2016

These are regular people. Angry people. Unfiltered. The kind of folks that aren't at Hillary's little private house parties with big donors.

It's not too late to send her on her well deserved early retirement.

 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
8. Clinton is losing this election?
Mon May 16, 2016, 09:51 PM
May 2016


It's sad to see people like you try to justify crap like this.

Fresh_Start

(11,330 posts)
9. The excluded delegates
Mon May 16, 2016, 09:52 PM
May 2016

On the 64 delegates the Sanders campaign insists should have been seated, the Democratic Party post reveals only six showed up and:

The remaining potential delegates were ineligible for two main reasons: 1) They were not registered Democratic voters in Nevada by May 1, 2016, and 2) Their information — such as address, date of birth and name — could not be found or identified, and they did not respond to requests from the party and campaigns to correct it.

Rules, it appears, have no place in a revolution.

“They're lazy, they don't read the rules and when the rules are pointed out to them, they cry by exaggerating some Democratic talking point (everyone should participate, rules are unfair, it's mean to do this),” said one longtime Democrat who attended what he called his "first and last convention.”

The credentials committee, made up of half Sanders and half Clinton supporters, had no ability to simply toss rules such as May 1 registration date. The Sanders folks repeatedly raised what neutral observers said were either red herrings or nonsensical arguments, including that parking was so difficult some got there very late.

One eyewitness described it thusly: "There was some guy testifying that he missed getting in line because he stopped for a cigarette or got the wrong directions from the concierge. Or some guy who wasn't registered to vote but brought an incomplete registration application with him, and the Bernie folks would say ‘He clearly wants to participate, we're Democrats and we're inclusive.’”

https://www.ralstonreports.com/blog/sour-grapes-revolution-rocked-paris-hotel

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
24. Then he needs to retire.
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:06 PM
May 2016

He lied several times and was called on it with proof during his live Tweets.

Hell, Nina Turner herself called him out when he said Bernie supporters booed her. They didn't. They were booing the process.

Response to w4rma (Reply #15)

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
47. I have a sneaking suspicion the smiles will be wiped off their faces soon.
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:25 PM
May 2016

They keep their heads so far in the sand that they won't know what's about to hit them (note: this isn't about Bernie).

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
49. If she makes it to the general election, none of us are going to get anything of what we want.
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:33 PM
May 2016

She's going to lose it. She's already dropping in the polls, compared to Trump. And, she seems to believe that pissing off just about every intellegently active Democrat is her meal ticket.

Hillary is either a saboteur or she is completely inside of her reality bubble.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
65. If Sanders supporters "want her to lose", it will be because of Clinton.
Tue May 17, 2016, 12:34 AM
May 2016

Remember that Sanders brought in independent voters. It's not Sanders's job to turn them into Clinton voters. It's Clinton's job. And she has, instead, worked very hard to piss them off and alienate them.

creeksneakers2

(7,473 posts)
69. Hillary isn't working to alienate anybody
Tue May 17, 2016, 01:23 AM
May 2016

Why would she do that?

We are part of a party. Its everybody's job to work for the nominee, including Bernie.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
31. Youre calling me a shithead, but Im the shithead?
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:10 PM
May 2016

I never did shit to you. Perhaps youre the shithead?

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
25. Were you one of those that called Obama supporters "boy"
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:06 PM
May 2016
http://www.ibtimes.com/bernie-bros-obama-boys-echoes-2008-medias-clinton-sanders-pundit-clash-2300707

‘Obama Boys’

Veteran observers of the 2008 election, of course, remember sexism as a hot-button issue during the showdown between Clinton and Obama. Hillary supporters hit the young senator hard for several slights that many felt were gendered (“you’re likable enough, Hillary”), and her campaign returned to these charges more frequently as the race dragged on.

But that broadside gave life to a more specific narrative in the blogosphere: the scourge of the “Obama Boy,” a term coined in a 2008 Salon headline , though not the body, of a piece by Rebecca Traister, one of same authors who has repeatedly weighed in on the Bernie Bro this season. In the 2008 piece, Traister described women who, while sympathetic to Obama if not outright supportive, felt alienated by latent and sometimes not-so-latent sexism from male supporters .

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
66. Regular people?
Tue May 17, 2016, 12:39 AM
May 2016

I have watched it. They are not regular people. Regular people do not act that way.

They are regular assholes. Looked like a bunch a tea party folks.

PatrickforO

(14,576 posts)
14. We live in a society that stopped teaching rhetoric and debate in high schools,
Mon May 16, 2016, 09:54 PM
May 2016

and has instead been inundated with gauche reality television shows like Keeping Up With the Kardashians.

The curse words and tasteless/dangerous-seeming voicemails are left by people who cannot summon better vocabulary.

It also has to do with the twitter/internet culture. How many messages have you seen where people have tweeted vulgar things like, "You should just die..?" Seriously, our civility seems to have died a grim death.

So, instead of something like, "I was disgusted by your reprehensible behavior at your state convention. It seemed to me that you were all about snubbing any attempt at a fair convention vote. You are wrong and should resign," we get messages like those left on the ralstonreports link.

I do not see this as a Sanders Supporter problem, though for political reasons I can readily see why Clinton supporters would position it as such. I see this as a problem with the general population of this nation. Certainly, it is a scathing indictment of our lame, lame, lame high school education processes. (Don't get me wrong, either - I'm NOT cutting down teachers, but the ignorant religio-political ideologues who are ruining our public education system).

I place the blame for this directly where it belongs - on oligarchs and corporate leadership who do not want our education system to produce critical thinkers and have spent billions of dollars and have for years cultivated the lowest common denominator of our society - funding them, empowering them, encouraging ignorance, celebrating anti-intellectualism, celebrating stupidity. How can we be surprised?

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
16. I just have to say "Wow!" to describe the high level of discourse used by Sanders Supporters
Mon May 16, 2016, 09:55 PM
May 2016

in their reasoned and respectful messages.

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
27. Roberta Lange is a disgusting person.
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:08 PM
May 2016

Ironically, this 30 second clip makes me laugh, and laugh. She is as Keith Olbermann might have said, this week she is "the worst person in the world".

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
29. I watched a periscope of a Bernie fan that day, his viewers were repeating her phone #
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:09 PM
May 2016

over and over, encouraging everyone else watching...over 1,000 at one point...to call and harass her. Not complain, not protest, but out-and-out harass.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
32. Roberta Lange, obviously, didn't get elected with her people skills. She's got the making enemies
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:11 PM
May 2016

part down, but she doesn't seem very good at making friends.

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
41. I like how you completely ignored the part where an internet mob solicited harassment
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:21 PM
May 2016

of a female politician, just because she did something they disagree with.

By all means, run with this mindset as far and as fast as you can; it is what cost you the primary, after all...

hertopos

(833 posts)
35. with all due respect, there is something wrong with this country.
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:17 PM
May 2016

Those language were for some ( not all ) Republicans and Freepers used for Democrats.

If Democrats calls other Democrats this way, this is not normal.

We are not Freepers. We are not like some Right wing nuts.

Anger and frustration won't justify such languages.

This is lynch mob type language.


It is very sad if some Sanders supporters are defending them


There is no hope when people turns into lynch mob.

It does not matter if you are right or left.

Just so awful.

Hertopos

hertopos

(833 posts)
48. I am an old lady who has been dreaming about Hillary becoming president for a very long time.
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:30 PM
May 2016

I believe it was good for Democrats to move towards left.

However, the language and actions are getting so agitated lately.

I am also concerned who are really Sander's supporters and who are actually Right wing
Hillary haters. This is why I actually prefer closed primary to exclude actually right leaning
so called independent.

In any case, lynch mob language and actions are just plain wrong.
There is a line we should not cross as Democrats.

Hertopos

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
56. I agree with you.
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:53 PM
May 2016

I went back and re read your post and realized I had read something into it making think you were a Sanders supporters. It was so refreshing to think it was possible to just call out wrong without justifying it some way.

I do agree with you.

Kittycat

(10,493 posts)
70. I'm in the same leftist spot I've always stood in
Tue May 17, 2016, 01:27 AM
May 2016

And I stand with Bernie supporters. I don't support the bad language, and haven't seen anyone condone the crazy voicemails (that could honestly be any deranged person or loser out there, given the number was public), but I understand the frustration after watching far too many continuous/uncut videos of their convention. That was a mockery of the democratic process, and I'm not even talking about the 64. The way the votes were done, the gaveling, ignoring motion after motion, her abusive actions and condescending behavior - if you can't see that, and understand how 15 hours of it contributed to that, then I don't know what to say.

What I do know is I haven't left my party, but it's clear by the actions of party leadership that they have left me. I'm standing beside fellow democrats, welcoming new, younger democrats and Independents. Meanwhile, I look across the aisle, and you all are spitting in our faces every chance you get. That's okay, keep spitting, Philly will be here before you know it. So too will November, and all the scorched earth that follows.

#unity

 

AzDar

(14,023 posts)
37. " Acta Non Verba ". No words could be as harmful as this treacherous woman's actions...
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:20 PM
May 2016

How MANY have fought and died for the right to do what that woman so sleazily and cowardly (attempted to) deny them. SHE is disgusting.


And THIS ISN'T OVER.

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
44. I always pegged you as an "ends justify the means" kinda Bernie fan
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:23 PM
May 2016

I guess this is why Sanders lost the women voters, and with them the primary, this year.

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
57. Lol, you seriously just pulled a "I know you are but what am I? ???
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:54 PM
May 2016

Man, I'm gonna miss you guys...

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
52. I just wonder, is this the type of people we want in charge of maintaining peace and calm?
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:41 PM
May 2016

Adults have to be responsible for their actions.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
55. Oh but we have been assured here time and time again
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:49 PM
May 2016

that there is no such animal as a berniebro!

The hateful pigs that made these terroristic phone calls need to get their asses horsewhipped!

Does anyone want to persuade me that these POS are liberal, progressive or democrats?

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
58. Actor arrested for beating a female "Bernie bro"
Mon May 16, 2016, 11:05 PM
May 2016

and she "berniebroed the wrong person", "made an ass out of herself", "walked into it", and, well, you gotta read this one to believe it.

I guess he must have spoken politely to the woman, and didn't call her any bad names? Because that would be an outrage.

Priyoritees.



 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
59. Ok here is the obvious question,
Mon May 16, 2016, 11:05 PM
May 2016

have our friends in state patrol uniforms, well most likely a detective or two, taken a report? This is how those tings are handled, and nope, I ain't gonna justify that! Sorry if you were expecting that, But covering courts, sorry for the real world intruding here, I will wait for the obvious investigation to be done, finished and for actual evidence that these were not issued by the usual loons that we have threatening public officials every year. The causes why they do it change, but many a times these are folks in need of mental health care.

I learned a while ago, that things like this at times are not what they seem. And they can be dangerous. Why I asked, is there an obvious investigation under way? I mean that.

Maru Kitteh

(28,340 posts)
63. And these are the self-proclaimed purists? Shameful and I hope the ones who left threats are
Tue May 17, 2016, 12:08 AM
May 2016

prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

barrow-wight

(744 posts)
71. It is terrifying to me that this is what is happening to our democracy.
Tue May 17, 2016, 01:37 AM
May 2016

Why won't Sanders speak out against this? It's awful that his campaign is acting like this.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Voicemails left for state...