Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:47 PM May 2016

There appears to be a small group of Sanders supporters that doesn't care.

They know they aren't going to win, so they're doing everything they can to poison the election. They aren't worried about superdelegates, because they know they've lost them already. They don't care about progressive Senators like Barbara Boxer, so they feel free to call her a "bitch" and shout her down.

They're no longer trying to make Bernie Sanders the nominee. They recognize the futility of that. That small group has switched tactics to a far more destructive approach.

It's very sad. I hope that they aren't successful with that tactic. The prospect of Republicans in charge of all three branches of federal government with Donald Trump in the White House is too horrible to contemplate.

A small group of Sanders supporters is trying to poison the well, burn the village and retreat into the hills to snipe from cover. We need to recognize that when we see it. We saw a bit of it in Nevada. We'll see more.

Note: A version of this was posted by me as a reply in another thread.

This is my opinion. Thanks for reading it.

62 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
There appears to be a small group of Sanders supporters that doesn't care. (Original Post) MineralMan May 2016 OP
... Faux pas May 2016 #1
Careful. It might come back up your nose. riversedge May 2016 #11
Six years of FastTrack and trade deals LAST FOREVER- thats not honest politics, thats a trick- Baobab May 2016 #20
Thanks! Faux pas May 2016 #29
+1,000,001 dchill May 2016 #32
.that^ 840high May 2016 #59
If Trump wins, we seriously will not recognize the landscape of the US RKP5637 May 2016 #2
That is because he will cover it with faux marble and gold Lamé Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #14
It's truly a frightening prospect, Trump in the WH. FFS, I feel like I'm in some horrific RKP5637 May 2016 #26
me to. Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #30
Then do you agree with me that we all need carve outs, we cannot leave this up to politicians Baobab May 2016 #46
Thanks! Can't read them right now, but definitely will!!! n/t RKP5637 May 2016 #55
I await your thread on Hillary supporters committing actual assault against women. Matt_in_STL May 2016 #3
I already replied in another thread about that. MineralMan May 2016 #7
So it was important to start a thread about name calling and shitting on Sanders supporters Matt_in_STL May 2016 #10
Choices. We all make them. MineralMan May 2016 #48
Hillary has been hiding the fact they gave away our right to have affordable healthcare and educatio Baobab May 2016 #60
Bernie will fall in line before the convention, as will most of his supporters. nt LexVegas May 2016 #4
I'm starting to feel bad for Senator Sanders. onehandle May 2016 #5
They're actually Hillary haters. Bernie was just a conduit. CrowCityDem May 2016 #6
That is true, for some. auntpurl May 2016 #12
Oh and just wait until this formally moves to the national stage... Raster May 2016 #52
Then there is the larger group still getting over the disappointment BootinUp May 2016 #8
"The burn the village antics will speed up the process" auntpurl May 2016 #17
I think you may need one of these to keep going azurnoir May 2016 #9
I'm having no problems keeping going. MineralMan May 2016 #15
well you don't however ........... azurnoir May 2016 #19
If you ever advocated for liberalism Prism May 2016 #13
You respond with a personal insult? MineralMan May 2016 #18
Your OP is a personal insult Prism May 2016 #21
+1 Exactly B Calm May 2016 #42
Truth is, they don't care about anyone else except themselves Yavin4 May 2016 #16
I voted for Gore in Florida in 2000. Aerows May 2016 #33
You mean like the tens of thousand of conservadems? nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #58
Seems to me it's the other way around AgerolanAmerican May 2016 #22
They won't listen.until the party shrinks more.. tokenlib May 2016 #61
It appears? More like crystal clear. NCTraveler May 2016 #23
MineralMan Aerows May 2016 #24
Our MN precinct caucus went just fine. Bernie won it 37 to 21. MineralMan May 2016 #27
Don't worry jamese777 May 2016 #25
I'm not worried about most Sanders supporters. MineralMan May 2016 #31
There is such a small group jamese777 May 2016 #41
That 'don't' care whatchamacallit May 2016 #28
'Group' is a collective noun that takes the singular MineralMan May 2016 #35
"Doesn't" is correct because it goes with the singular noun "group." The Velveteen Ocelot May 2016 #43
Fine, but it still reads like shit IMO whatchamacallit May 2016 #45
The problem lies more with the content than the grammar, IMO. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2016 #50
Why don't we do something intelligent and put up a candidate that can libdem4life May 2016 #34
Batshit distraction. dchill May 2016 #36
Your estimation of the effect of a "small group" on DU effecting the outcome of the election Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #37
Not a small group on DU. A small group of Sanders supporters MineralMan May 2016 #49
How do you estimate the effect such a "small group" will have on the election? Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #51
The well was poisoned before Bernie declared his candidacy. JEB May 2016 #38
Ya got some specifics there to back up your OP? -none May 2016 #39
Its sad Sky Masterson May 2016 #40
With the 3 million black people and students who wont be able to vote, miscounting of another Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #44
Oh my god, remember when you were hilariously racist in 2008? Prism May 2016 #47
This message was self-deleted by its author cyberpj May 2016 #54
You better hope it's small. Dawgs May 2016 #53
No One Is Required To Vote jamese777 May 2016 #62
Thanks for admitting its a small group. phleshdef May 2016 #56
Go take a look outside. Go fora walk nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #57

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
20. Six years of FastTrack and trade deals LAST FOREVER- thats not honest politics, thats a trick-
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:58 PM
May 2016

Please read the links in my .sig and let me know you have any what you think of the problem described there.

We need "carve outs" to be explicitly put into all deals that explicitly establish and immortalize forever policy space for all public services- meaning healthcare insurance, healthcare, public higher and K-12 education, water and also the right to regulate must ALSO be preserved for drug pricing and net connectivity/communication. Policy space - the right to regulate needs to be protected- Otherwise they are stealing democracy.

No deals should be able to take away our rights to healthcare and education forever, like has been attempted.

And no services liberalisations when they pit the poor countries' skilled workers against the embattled US middle class in competition for the same jobs!

RKP5637

(67,109 posts)
2. If Trump wins, we seriously will not recognize the landscape of the US
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:49 PM
May 2016

in coming years (months?). I like Bernie, but I will not contribute to Trump winning.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
14. That is because he will cover it with faux marble and gold Lamé
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:54 PM
May 2016

after installing pro-life justices in the Supreme Court.

I would not vote for Trump if I were dead.

RKP5637

(67,109 posts)
26. It's truly a frightening prospect, Trump in the WH. FFS, I feel like I'm in some horrific
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:07 PM
May 2016

Twilight Zone episode.

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
46. Then do you agree with me that we all need carve outs, we cannot leave this up to politicians
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:34 PM
May 2016

and their revolving door plan?

Carve outs in all trade deals and maybe even in the Constitution- to preserve democratic policy space-

read the first two links in my sig for descriptions of the why and what of carve outs - there are examples in them-

the third link is worth reading too.

 

Matt_in_STL

(1,446 posts)
3. I await your thread on Hillary supporters committing actual assault against women.
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:49 PM
May 2016

I know it doesn't have the salaciousness of ass-grabbing but I am sure you can pull it off. I have total faith in you.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
7. I already replied in another thread about that.
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:51 PM
May 2016

I said that the man should have been arrested. He committed an assault. He was arrested. Here's the link:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1966859

 

Matt_in_STL

(1,446 posts)
10. So it was important to start a thread about name calling and shitting on Sanders supporters
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:53 PM
May 2016

But not to acknowledge at the same time that Hillary supporters can be just as shitty to people? Cool.

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
60. Hillary has been hiding the fact they gave away our right to have affordable healthcare and educatio
Mon May 16, 2016, 04:13 PM
May 2016

Thats in links 1 and 4 below in my sig- what else aren't they telling us?

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
5. I'm starting to feel bad for Senator Sanders.
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:50 PM
May 2016

He knows he needs to concede, but he has to take these small numbers of hotheads into account.

Raster

(20,998 posts)
52. Oh and just wait until this formally moves to the national stage...
Mon May 16, 2016, 03:13 PM
May 2016

...the United States will be divided in Hillary Haters and Not Hillary Haters.

And that preferred Clinton strategy of "not as offensive as Trump" will be turned right around to "not Hillary Clinton."

And then DU will be freshly charged with many new voices and *paying members* railing against the tRump Presidency.

BootinUp

(47,159 posts)
8. Then there is the larger group still getting over the disappointment
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:52 PM
May 2016

that he doesn't have a path, but eventually they will. Just a matter of time. The burn the village antics will speed up the process.

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
17. "The burn the village antics will speed up the process"
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:55 PM
May 2016

I agree. I already saw a thread today with a Bernie supporter saying he/she was embarrassed to be associated with these sorts of thugs.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
9. I think you may need one of these to keep going
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:52 PM
May 2016


because this poor little fellow is looking stressed and tired after the abuse he's taken during this election cycle

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
15. I'm having no problems keeping going.
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:54 PM
May 2016

That is one sad looking donkey, though. I hope it has gotten some help.

 

Prism

(5,815 posts)
13. If you ever advocated for liberalism
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:54 PM
May 2016

I might die of actual shock.

Carry on with your never ending, "Look At Me!" concern about liberals in the Democratic Party, though.

What is this, ten years of this shit now? Where a former freeper explains how liberals are always wrong and terrible and bad?

Lord. Do you ever get tired of you? I do.

 

Prism

(5,815 posts)
21. Your OP is a personal insult
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:59 PM
May 2016

Half your posting history is thinly-disguised personal insults.

What, like you're wearing a top hat and twirling around a cane? All you do is shit stir. Have since the day you arrived, fresh off your gays are pedophiles internet tour.

When I'm retired, I hope I've hobbies and friends enough to not resort to these lame ass pleas for negative attention.

Hey, MM. I'm looking at you! Happy? Yeah, you are.

Wait. Got a text. Not looking at you anymore. Maybe post something else?

Yavin4

(35,441 posts)
16. Truth is, they don't care about anyone else except themselves
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:55 PM
May 2016

We saw first hand what an incompetent presidency looks like under Bush II. 9/11, the Iraq War, Katrina, and the financial collapse. And Bush was far more qualified to be president than Trump. Hell, Sarah Palin is more qualified to be president than Trump.

But they don't care about anyone else, just what's important to them. Like "free" college or "free" healthcare.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
33. I voted for Gore in Florida in 2000.
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:09 PM
May 2016

I watched that election get stolen, and that entire production ushered in a presidency that was arguably the most disastrous of the entire century preceding it.

I don't want to hear about who doesn't care, when I have watched people on this very board mock, belittle and outright giggle as the voter suppression, electoral fraud and disenfranchisement that has gone on during this primary. Nevada was the last straw.

Don't you dare tell me who "doesn't care" when November comes and more than the Presidency is at stake. State and local elections will be taking place then, too.

I am absolutely stunned at Democrats that "don't care" that fellow voters are having their rights taken away.

 

AgerolanAmerican

(1,000 posts)
22. Seems to me it's the other way around
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:00 PM
May 2016

It's Clinton supporters that don't care that their actions are going to elect Donald Trump.

They don't care about widespread election fraud.

They don't care about the money-laundering and buyouts of state parties through the Hillary Victory Fund.

They don't care about the DNC rigging the game every step of the way.

They don't care about superdelegates being an explicitly anti-democratic institution that has no place in the party.

They don't care about having an election about real issues; endless rehashing of 25+ years of Clinton scandals in lieu of having public debate on the serious issues of the present day is just fine by them.

They don't care about the serious risk of an FBI indictment recommendation and all the consequences thereof.

They don't care about the survival issues that so many in this country face today - outrageously expensive housing and dead wages being two of the big ones.

And perhaps worst of all, they don't care that they support a candidate who has made no secret that she will promote corporatism and war every bit as stridently as the worst Republican.


So don't give us this blackmail bull. If we end up with a disaster it will be 100% without any reservation the fault of Hillary Clinton and those who adhere to her.

tokenlib

(4,186 posts)
61. They won't listen.until the party shrinks more..
Mon May 16, 2016, 04:16 PM
May 2016

,..and that 29% of registered voters once you deduct the Bernie surge is going to be even smaller with Hillary. They still think everyone will fall in line as always...

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
23. It appears? More like crystal clear.
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:01 PM
May 2016

When you have people claiming to be progressive making the argument that landowners votes should count as more........

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
24. MineralMan
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:02 PM
May 2016

As a precinct chair, if you *aren't* pissed off by all of the voting irregularities, running out of ballots, a 4+ million county reduced to 60 polling places, and everything that went on in Nevada Saturday, perhaps you should relinquish your chair to someone that respects the voting process.

The wailing and gnashing of the teeth in November of how Republicans stole the vote is going to be epicly sad, because there is a lot more at stake that just the Presidency. There are state and local elections that are just as important, if not more so, that will be affected by stolen votes, as well.

Before you examine the mote in a handful of Bernie supporters' eye, take the damn log out of your own. I'm absolutely fucking aghast that after 2000, there are DEMOCRATS that think it is funny enough to TEASE other Democrats that are stunned by fellow voters that their votes don't count.

After 2000 brought us Bush, and now suddenly it's absolutely hilarious to smirk because voters have been suppressed, disenfranchised and outright robbed of their right to vote? Give me a fucking break. You of ALL people as a precinct chair should give a damn about this.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
27. Our MN precinct caucus went just fine. Bernie won it 37 to 21.
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:07 PM
May 2016

It was orderly, friendly, and proceeded perfectly smoothly. There were no disruptions or even arguments. We did run out of printed ballots, but we have a procedure for that and everyone got to vote who was there to vote. I went to our district convention as a delegate, too. That also went fine, and was uneventful. The Minnesota delegation to the convention will be strongly for Bernie Sanders. I don't live in Nevada, and have nothing to do with their process.

So, I'm not sure what you're talking about, really. I have no plans to stop chairing my precinct. My term will be up in 2020, and I plan to not run for chair again, due to the fact that I'll be 74 years old and want to quit doing that.

jamese777

(546 posts)
25. Don't worry
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:05 PM
May 2016

in every election the most dedicated supporters of candidates who don't win have to go through the stages of grief and loss and the first two stages are denial and anger before people eventually get to the point of acceptance.
Hillary Clinton's supporters went through that process in 2008. Yes, there were some disgruntled Clinton supporters who voted for John McCain and Sarah Palin, but Barack Obama still won by ten million votes.
Donald Trump's $4.6 billion net worth and how he acquired it is the antithesis of everything that Bernie's supporters stand for.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
31. I'm not worried about most Sanders supporters.
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:08 PM
May 2016

Just that small group, really. That delegate who called Barbara Boxer a "bitch" is one of those. I do worry about folks like him.

jamese777

(546 posts)
41. There is such a small group
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:23 PM
May 2016

in every election known to man (and woman!). Don't sweat the small stuff!

The vast majority of Bernie Sanders supporters are wonderful, dedicated, caring individuals who want ths nation to be a better, more fair place.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
35. 'Group' is a collective noun that takes the singular
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:10 PM
May 2016

form of the verb. Sorry, but your correction is incorrect. Thanks for trying, though.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,731 posts)
43. "Doesn't" is correct because it goes with the singular noun "group."
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:29 PM
May 2016

That's about the only correct thing in the OP, but I have to stick up for correct grammar wherever it appears.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
34. Why don't we do something intelligent and put up a candidate that can
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:10 PM
May 2016

actually beat Trump? Bernie's baggage likely could fit on a baggage cart. OTOH, the other's requires a railroad baggage car.

I know, let's snatch victory from the jaws of defeat and run the least favorable War Hawk instead of the one who can truly beat Trump.

Sorry, but I'm closer to a FDR Democrat than what now passes for a Democrat. They may have taken over the Party, but the GE, not so much.

And this Poppycock about it being Bernie's fault and that it's silly to give a good slice of the Country a say/vote Prior to the Conventions is beyond me. This is not democratic.

"Hey, yall might as well just stay home...she's already got what she needs." is very sad.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
37. Your estimation of the effect of a "small group" on DU effecting the outcome of the election
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:12 PM
May 2016

is....laughable.

As is your "poison the well", "burn the village", "retreat to the hills" and "snipe from cover" more than a little turgid and laughable.

Get a grip.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
49. Not a small group on DU. A small group of Sanders supporters
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:58 PM
May 2016

in general. The world is much bigger than DU. Had I meant a "small group of DUers," that is what I would have written.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
51. How do you estimate the effect such a "small group" will have on the election?
Mon May 16, 2016, 03:09 PM
May 2016

I would guess that most of the Sanders supporters who won't hold their noses live in mostly Blue states. It's very hard to imagine Sanders supporters voting for Trump no matter where they live. So, how would that work?

Though, undoubtedly, we will get the blame if Hillary can't attract enough votes to elect her.

-none

(1,884 posts)
39. Ya got some specifics there to back up your OP?
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:15 PM
May 2016

Or just some fluffy innuendo that doesn't say anything, except you don't like Bernie Sanders? Your "facts" don't support what happened in Nevada. There was no effort to accommodate the Bernie people there. But there was an effort to disenfranchise the Bernie people there.

Sky Masterson

(5,240 posts)
40. Its sad
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:22 PM
May 2016

That people are capable of believing the crap above.
I find it sad that a candidates superpac has to hire online goons that post porn on facebook pages to get them shut down and I find it sad that a small group of Clinton supporters continuously post flame-bait and then act like victims when they get the same crap thrown right back at them.
Has it ever crossed peoples minds that its not about NOT caring at all.
If they didn't care they wouldn't be angry.
They care too much.
Myself, I see that Clinton is a weak and flawed candidate who will most likely lose in 2016.
Others seem to believe she is a shoe in. You can't blame people who see flaws in a particular candidate to do what they must to stop the candidate before its too late. Before we have a President Trump.
Our Electorate isn't that smart and the proof being is that Bush got a second term running against a war hero.


Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
44. With the 3 million black people and students who wont be able to vote, miscounting of another
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:31 PM
May 2016

approximately 2 million votes in red states where the republicans control the counting, and the actions of BoB (Bernie or Bust) I am now predicting Drumpf victory.

I will work more in one week than any ten BoB combined against this happening, first by supporting Bernie then Hillary if need be, but I am predicting this now.

I want to be wrong, but I also will never not be angry at BoB and I will hold them and ONLY them accountable if this happens.

GRRRRRR

 

Prism

(5,815 posts)
47. Oh my god, remember when you were hilariously racist in 2008?
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:35 PM
May 2016

I totally forgot about this nugget:

http://ec2-54-165-32-110.compute-1.amazonaws.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=18341&start=750#p401371

But please, lecture everyone here about voting from your neat perch.

Response to Prism (Reply #47)

 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
53. You better hope it's small.
Mon May 16, 2016, 03:13 PM
May 2016

Because in my little world I know at least a dozen people that will definitely be staying home if Bernie is not the nominee.

jamese777

(546 posts)
62. No One Is Required To Vote
Mon May 16, 2016, 04:59 PM
May 2016

The Clinton supporters who would stay home if Senator Sanders was to be the nominee and the Sanders supporters who would stay home if Hillary Clinton was to be the nominee and the "anyone but Trump" Republicans who will be staying home all cancel each other out.
Primary elections this year are drawing about 30% of the electorate. That means 70% of the people who will be voting in November will be people who are happy to simply chose between the two major party nominees. Those folks will decide the outcome of the general election.
Somewhere between an estimated 135 and 140 million Americans will actuaaly vote in November.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
57. Go take a look outside. Go fora walk
Mon May 16, 2016, 03:43 PM
May 2016

Read a book. Seriously, you are alienating people even further.

And yes that is my opinion too.

As to books to read "listen Liberal" and "Democracy Inc" are highly recommended.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»There appears to be a sma...