Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:35 PM May 2016

Memo to Bernie supporters: It makes no sense to call Barbara Boxer a bitch and shout her down

- Bernie is losing when it comes to total votes
- Bernie is losing when it comes to pledged delegates
- Bernie is losing when it comes to states won

What does this mean? It means Bernie will need superdelegates in order to win.

Barbara Boxer is a superdelegate. You will need people like her to support Bernie if you want him to win.

That's why it makes no sense to hurl sexist insults at her.

It's self-defeating.

112 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Memo to Bernie supporters: It makes no sense to call Barbara Boxer a bitch and shout her down (Original Post) Cali_Democrat May 2016 OP
Aside from being a sexist slur, yep. WTF people, there is no excuse. bettyellen May 2016 #1
She is part of the problem, and tried to force people to stand still for handcuffing democracy larkrake May 2016 #64
"Men deal with sexist slurs too, without crying about it." Not at DU- they are a TOS violation..... bettyellen May 2016 #71
Exactly/ And how much sense did it make for Boxer to Antagonize as many as she could Ferd Berfel May 2016 #107
Lol, like there's any reason to think you could catch that fly with honey whatchamacallit May 2016 #2
Exactly, our third way Democratic were caught with money. nt Todays_Illusion May 2016 #103
Perhaps we should learn from Clinton supporters Warren Stupidity May 2016 #3
+1! KPN May 2016 #101
Bernie is losing. Quite sorely at that. nt LexVegas May 2016 #4
lets be realistic, he isnt losing sorely, he is losing barely larkrake May 2016 #109
"Barbara Boxer is a superdelegate. You will need people like her to support Bernie if you want... MadDAsHell May 2016 #5
Except that a large majority of Democrats support her over Sanders. Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #14
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #26
In the General Election they will have a chance to vote for Clinton or Trump. Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #28
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #33
If they vote for Trump they are bigoted, racist, sexists, just like Trump. Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #35
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #36
Then Clinton will win without them. Trump can keep the bigots, racists, and sexists. Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #41
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #42
I disagree. Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #44
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #45
Please link to every poll you are referring to because the one I have seen The Second Stone May 2016 #46
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #47
You called black people "timid, cowardly and subservient" and now you complain about a slur? arcane1 May 2016 #48
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #49
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #50
You can't be serious. NuclearDem May 2016 #51
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #52
... NuclearDem May 2016 #54
NuclearDem who wrote that BS? Setsuna1972 May 2016 #56
Low post count wonder named Malaba. NuclearDem May 2016 #57
Ah, this is where his other posts were. Starry Messenger May 2016 #63
I saw and alerted on a post by Malaba Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #67
Ooo, oooh!! I know! I know!! Number23 May 2016 #77
The same this former poster did? azurnoir May 2016 #78
If I had any idea what you were talking about or why you posted that to me, I'd have a different Number23 May 2016 #79
really you were grave dancing weren't you ? you must have checked out the links too azurnoir May 2016 #80
Perhaps if you'd actually read my post -- which was to NUCLEARDEM, by the way -- before choosing Number23 May 2016 #81
oh so sorry I talked out of turn and I suspect the post made sense but here let's repeat the info azurnoir May 2016 #82
I have no idea why you chimed in with this. Are you seriously that bored? Number23 May 2016 #83
why were you so concerned about the poster you cited ? azurnoir May 2016 #84
Spend more time reading and less time trying to argue over -- literally -- absolutely nothing Number23 May 2016 #85
I did read upthread to what you were replying to which is exactly why I commented azurnoir May 2016 #86
Sure you did. Number23 May 2016 #87
yep I did and reached my own conclusion about why such a comment was made on this thread azurnoir May 2016 #88
And your own 'conclusion' was as wrong as it was unnecessary. Seems your declaration that we're Number23 May 2016 #89
you seem upset but you did want to know if I was done azurnoir May 2016 #90
Every bit as pointless, unnecessary and weird as your other contributions to this thread Number23 May 2016 #91
Let me guess Setsuna1972 May 2016 #93
No, they wont vote Trump, but neither will they vote Hillary(she offers no future) larkrake May 2016 #65
Most will not vote for Trump Carolina May 2016 #112
I don't agree. Too many irregularities in the states she won. bkkyosemite May 2016 #59
LOL just LOL Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #60
.... bkkyosemite May 2016 #92
Her wins always have a "but", highly suspicious larkrake May 2016 #110
There is a small group of Sanders supporters that doesn't care. MineralMan May 2016 #6
K&R....n/t asuhornets May 2016 #8
+1 BootinUp May 2016 #9
They wont be successful leftynyc May 2016 #10
I'm sure you're right for the vast majority of them. MineralMan May 2016 #98
I can't worry about leftynyc May 2016 #99
Yup. We have to count on that, I think. MineralMan May 2016 #100
"Burn the village approach". You are correct sir. oasis May 2016 #29
+1, this very thing has been intimated to me multiple times uponit7771 May 2016 #97
It's not like she would support him anyway KingFlorez May 2016 #7
So what kind of relationship did they have with Sanders that would have led to that choice? Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #15
He seems to believe that he is right and everyone else is wrong KingFlorez May 2016 #16
That does explain it. Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #17
Has that been verified (calling her a b)? It is easy to add to a video and I never saw the face Skwmom May 2016 #11
Memo to Clinton supporters: Beating up women is kind of bad Prism May 2016 #12
well at least they didnt caller use democratic corporate w-word this time nt msongs May 2016 #13
It's not nice to lie about Bernie supporters. imagine2015 May 2016 #18
Memo to Hillary supporters: me b zola May 2016 #19
The owner of this website is a Hillary supporter.. nt Cali_Democrat May 2016 #20
I realize that. Does that mean that he also blinks away the election fraud that is occurring? me b zola May 2016 #22
IOKIYHRC bahrbearian May 2016 #23
Especially right before California votes TwilightZone May 2016 #21
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #24
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #30
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #31
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #34
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #37
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #38
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #43
Plus she's from CA ... and that primary is coming up. JoePhilly May 2016 #25
A 1-2 point bounce in the polls would be my guess Brother Buzz May 2016 #58
good point. nt JoePhilly May 2016 #61
Boxer is a Republican Lite and INdemo May 2016 #27
Boxer is on record of being one of the most liberal Democrats in congress. oasis May 2016 #32
Bull pucky, she is corporate and 3rd way- more repug than dem larkrake May 2016 #66
Not a socalist who is into your revolution, for sure. However, oasis May 2016 #69
well, if you prefer sociopath to socialist, that is your choice. I want the middle, do not believe larkrake May 2016 #70
Not in recent years INdemo May 2016 #73
What an ignorant post-the favorite BSS ad hom redstateblues May 2016 #104
I wouldnt call Boxer Progressive, she has been slipping right lately larkrake May 2016 #108
I am tired of the Bernie people being sooooooooooooooooooooooooo hateful. trueblue2007 May 2016 #39
But the BROletariat is the sole authority for saying whose votes The Second Stone May 2016 #40
The Democratic voters in CA won't take kindly to these attacks DesertRat May 2016 #53
So much straw, so little damn given. morningfog May 2016 #55
Memo to Hill supporters. peace13 May 2016 #62
A sane voice, thank you larkrake May 2016 #68
Question for Bernie supporters who shrug off sexist slurs as products of "frustration" whathehell May 2016 #94
Look to the process. peace13 May 2016 #95
For starters, I myself am a Bernie Supporter whathehell May 2016 #96
Well I am a woman and a feminist but .... peace13 May 2016 #106
Its politics to add adjectives to candidates, keep gender and religion out of politics folks larkrake May 2016 #111
K&R mcar May 2016 #72
Who the hell is doing THAT? MrMickeysMom May 2016 #74
There is no point calling her a bitch but then it was some random pissed dude TheKentuckian May 2016 #75
Winning!!! Winning!!! There's Charlie Sheen again. jillan May 2016 #76
Two Questions: KPN May 2016 #102
Lets see how the California Democratic voter feels about this. redstatebluegirl May 2016 #105
 

larkrake

(1,674 posts)
64. She is part of the problem, and tried to force people to stand still for handcuffing democracy
Mon May 16, 2016, 06:18 PM
May 2016

She needs to re-evaluate who and what she is, She had no business there in the first place and was the target of cheated folks who saw their voice silenced. So begins the revolution. I will stand with those holding pitchforks and tar/feathers. She is lucky she got out of there in one piece. Men deal with sexist slurs too, without crying about it.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
71. "Men deal with sexist slurs too, without crying about it." Not at DU- they are a TOS violation.....
Mon May 16, 2016, 07:55 PM
May 2016

and if you think that shit is okay- I am glad you're on your way out the door. No excuses.

Ferd Berfel

(3,687 posts)
107. Exactly/ And how much sense did it make for Boxer to Antagonize as many as she could
Wed May 18, 2016, 02:46 PM
May 2016


Boxer Trolling at the convention and doing what she can to enrage people.

https://www.facebook.com/seanaldenfitzgerald/videos/1734291036812104/
 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
3. Perhaps we should learn from Clinton supporters
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:39 PM
May 2016

and just beat people up instead of using inappropriate language.

Was that your point?

 

MadDAsHell

(2,067 posts)
5. "Barbara Boxer is a superdelegate. You will need people like her to support Bernie if you want...
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:44 PM
May 2016

...him to win."

I'll rewrite that: "Hillary Clinton is a toxic candidate unlikely to garner support outside of the political elites that our party is so derided for. You will need people like Bernie supporters to support her if you want her to win. That's why it makes no sense to hurl insults at them. It's self-defeating."

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
14. Except that a large majority of Democrats support her over Sanders.
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:04 PM
May 2016

So that she has won more pledged delegates, millions more votes, and more states.

Response to Agnosticsherbet (Reply #14)

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
28. In the General Election they will have a chance to vote for Clinton or Trump.
Mon May 16, 2016, 04:13 PM
May 2016

I think most of them will not vote for Trump.

Response to Agnosticsherbet (Reply #28)

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
35. If they vote for Trump they are bigoted, racist, sexists, just like Trump.
Mon May 16, 2016, 04:24 PM
May 2016

I doubt those people would vote for Sanders, who can not win the nomination.

Response to Agnosticsherbet (Reply #35)

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
41. Then Clinton will win without them. Trump can keep the bigots, racists, and sexists.
Mon May 16, 2016, 04:30 PM
May 2016

They have a good home there, and I am sure they will be happy.

Response to Agnosticsherbet (Reply #41)

Response to Agnosticsherbet (Reply #44)

 

The Second Stone

(2,900 posts)
46. Please link to every poll you are referring to because the one I have seen
Mon May 16, 2016, 04:40 PM
May 2016

shows Trump ahead, but quite the opposite. Clinton defeats Trump in a landslide.

http://www.270towin.com/maps/clinton-trump-electoral-map

I understand you hate women candidates with a fiery heat of a 1000 suns, but Clinton has beaten Sanders, and will continue to stay so far ahead that victory is out of reach. She will also defeat Trump, whom she is far ahead of.

Response to The Second Stone (Reply #46)

Response to arcane1 (Reply #48)

Response to arcane1 (Reply #48)

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
51. You can't be serious.
Mon May 16, 2016, 04:47 PM
May 2016
http://www.democraticunderground.com/118751285

I know that blacks have always been known for their timid, cowardly and subservient nature, but this takes black cowardice to a whole new level. Are you waiting for a pat on the head from Massa' Clinton or something? Are you so afraid of change and sticking your neck out that you're willing to cast your lot in with a woman who sees your children as animals who need to be brought to heel?

Dr Martin Luther King was never so timid and spineless. He knew that what he was doing was difficult and dangerous, but necessary. If he could see what sniveling little worms his people were being in 2016, he'd be turning in his grave. Do you really want it to be remembered for the rest of time that it was black cowardice that let us all down in 2016 and denied the country its possibly only chance to implement true change?

Response to NuclearDem (Reply #51)

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
63. Ah, this is where his other posts were.
Mon May 16, 2016, 06:12 PM
May 2016

He posted that hot racist mess in the AA group too.

One pathetic soul actually recced it:

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
67. I saw and alerted on a post by Malaba
Mon May 16, 2016, 06:23 PM
May 2016

It was pretty disgusting.

I did not realize Malabe had this discussion.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
78. The same this former poster did?
Tue May 17, 2016, 01:58 AM
May 2016

Jezebel Jackson (45 posts)
21. She has identified herself with New York

much like Bernie has identified himself with the Democratic Party. I think it's a bad idea. Besides, so many of us will be quite happy when Bernie just plain goes away.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1970322

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=333766&sub=trans

Number23

(24,544 posts)
79. If I had any idea what you were talking about or why you posted that to me, I'd have a different
Tue May 17, 2016, 02:01 AM
May 2016

response. Instead all I got is a for you.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
80. really you were grave dancing weren't you ? you must have checked out the links too
Tue May 17, 2016, 02:03 AM
May 2016

is that why you're speechless?, I'd reckon so

Number23

(24,544 posts)
81. Perhaps if you'd actually read my post -- which was to NUCLEARDEM, by the way -- before choosing
Tue May 17, 2016, 02:05 AM
May 2016

to respond to it for absolutely no reason, your posts to me would make a hell of a lot more sense.

Let me know if/when that happens. Or not. I'm good either way.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
82. oh so sorry I talked out of turn and I suspect the post made sense but here let's repeat the info
Tue May 17, 2016, 02:08 AM
May 2016

you asked NuclearDem to guess which candidate a ppred poster supported and I asked if it was the same one this former poster did


Jezebel Jackson (45 posts)
21. She has identified herself with New York

much like Bernie has identified himself with the Democratic Party. I think it's a bad idea. Besides, so many of us will be quite happy when Bernie just plain goes away.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1970322

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=333766&sub=trans

Number23

(24,544 posts)
83. I have no idea why you chimed in with this. Are you seriously that bored?
Tue May 17, 2016, 02:11 AM
May 2016

I have no idea who Jezebel Jackson is or why you think that I care about your obvious preoccupation with her/him.

So Jezebel got ppr'd too and you appear to be really bent out of shape about that and think that everyone else should care too. I don't. I really don't. Are we done yet?

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
84. why were you so concerned about the poster you cited ?
Tue May 17, 2016, 02:17 AM
May 2016

Number23 (23,695 posts)
77. Ooo, oooh!! I know! I know!!

Take a lucky guess which candidate they support.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1977552

and yes now we're done

Number23

(24,544 posts)
85. Spend more time reading and less time trying to argue over -- literally -- absolutely nothing
Tue May 17, 2016, 02:21 AM
May 2016

and perhaps you'll be a bit less confused the next time you decide to engage in other folks' conversations.

Tip: It was NuclearDem that asked 'guess which candidate that person supported,' not me. Which is, you know, the reason I put that bit in italics. Because I was quoting someone else.

And me responding to his/her question is by no means the same as me "being so concerned" about another poster. But please don't take my attempts to mitigate your obviously deep confusion over a fairly simple post to someone else as an invitation to continue this conversation. Your admission that we're done and your wavey smiley is the smartest thing you've said this entire conversation.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
88. yep I did and reached my own conclusion about why such a comment was made on this thread
Tue May 17, 2016, 02:26 AM
May 2016

which had sunk to page 2

Number23

(24,544 posts)
89. And your own 'conclusion' was as wrong as it was unnecessary. Seems your declaration that we're
Tue May 17, 2016, 02:29 AM
May 2016

now done with this incredibly stupid and pointless conversation is as correct as your earlier 'conclusion?'

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
90. you seem upset but you did want to know if I was done
Tue May 17, 2016, 02:32 AM
May 2016

Number23 (23,699 posts)
83. I have no idea why you chimed in with this. Are you seriously that bored?

I have no idea who Jezebel Jackson is or why you think that I care about your obvious preoccupation with her/him.

So Jezebel got ppr'd too and you appear to be really bent out of shape about that and think that everyone else should care too. I don't. I really don't. Are we done yet?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1977594

and I am done so you get the last word

Number23

(24,544 posts)
91. Every bit as pointless, unnecessary and weird as your other contributions to this thread
Tue May 17, 2016, 02:35 AM
May 2016

Folks that love to leap up and fight over absolutely nothing are almost as tedious as people that can't admit they misread whatever it is they're pointlessly fighting over.

Carolina

(6,960 posts)
112. Most will not vote for Trump
Wed May 18, 2016, 05:59 PM
May 2016

but they won't vote for HRC either! They will skip the POTUS selection, OR vote green, write-in Bernie where possible and concentrate on state and local candidates.

I will never vote for $hillary... the Third Way, Wall Street, MIC puppet

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
6. There is a small group of Sanders supporters that doesn't care.
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:45 PM
May 2016

They know they aren't going to win, so they're doing everything they can to poison the election. They aren't worried about superdelegates, because they know they've lost them already. They don't care about progressive Senators like Barbara Boxer, so they feel free to call her a "bitch" and shout her down.

They're no longer trying to make Bernie Sanders the nominee. That small group has switched tactics to a "burn the village" approach.

It's very sad. I hope that they aren't successful with that tactic. The prospect of Republicans in charge of all three branches of federal government with Donald Trump in the White House is too horrible to contemplate.

A small group of Sanders supporters is trying to poison the well, burn the village and retreat into the hills to snipe from cover.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
10. They wont be successful
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:50 PM
May 2016

They're nothing but a loud but teeny minority of Democrats. When their candidate suspends his campaigns and endorses Hillary there will be whining and rending of garments but the vast majority of his voters will vote for Hillary. Just as the vast majority of Hillary voters voted for Pres Obama.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
99. I can't worry about
Wed May 18, 2016, 01:58 PM
May 2016

them. They have to live in the same country as the rest of us so I assume they'll do the right thing and make sure a Democrat is filling those court vacancies (that's my biggest issue by far).

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
100. Yup. We have to count on that, I think.
Wed May 18, 2016, 02:05 PM
May 2016

It usually works out OK. When it doesn't, it can be terrible, though. We got GWB that way. Uff da!

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
7. It's not like she would support him anyway
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:46 PM
May 2016

I would imagine that she doesn't particularly care for him like most of his other Senate colleagues.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
15. So what kind of relationship did they have with Sanders that would have led to that choice?
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:07 PM
May 2016

The Senate is a collegial place, where personal relationships are critical to getting things done. What happened?

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
16. He seems to believe that he is right and everyone else is wrong
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:14 PM
May 2016
http://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/article/2015/09/29/bernie-sanders/

“Bernie believes that he’s right, and that what he wants is for the greater good,” says Houston consultant Susan Boardman Russ, formerly the longtime chief of staff for the late Vermont Senator Jim Jeffords. “Bernie is so certain that what he represents politically is unquestionably correct, therefore everyone should agree. Not much room for compromise…it was, ‘Play in my sandbox, or get out.’”

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
11. Has that been verified (calling her a b)? It is easy to add to a video and I never saw the face
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:50 PM
May 2016

of the person calling her that.
 

Prism

(5,815 posts)
12. Memo to Clinton supporters: Beating up women is kind of bad
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:51 PM
May 2016

Since we're doing PSA's, I figured I'd throw this out there. Because we're both concerned about civility, yeah?

A man beating up a woman is pretty bad. And making fun of the situation is also pretty bad.

It's not good for feminism, y'all.

Wait.

-Making
-A
-Dashed
-List
-For
-Reasons

There. Sorted.

me b zola

(19,053 posts)
19. Memo to Hillary supporters:
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:21 PM
May 2016

It makes no sense to support a candidate that suppresses and perverts the vote. This website was created in response to a stolen election, don't be on the wrongs side of history.

me b zola

(19,053 posts)
22. I realize that. Does that mean that he also blinks away the election fraud that is occurring?
Mon May 16, 2016, 03:13 PM
May 2016

Currently someone is filming, "Irony": Video recording the death of democracy.

You feel happy where you stand in the history of all of this?...I do.

TwilightZone

(25,471 posts)
21. Especially right before California votes
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:54 PM
May 2016

Sure, shout down a popular politician from an upcoming, extremely-important-to-your-candidate state.

What could go wrong?

Response to Cali_Democrat (Original post)

Response to Name removed (Reply #24)

Response to Name removed (Reply #30)

Response to Name removed (Reply #31)

Response to Name removed (Reply #34)

Response to Name removed (Reply #37)

Response to Name removed (Reply #38)

Brother Buzz

(36,440 posts)
58. A 1-2 point bounce in the polls would be my guess
Mon May 16, 2016, 05:11 PM
May 2016

A whole bunch of fence sitters just made up their mind.

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
27. Boxer is a Republican Lite and
Mon May 16, 2016, 04:12 PM
May 2016

Would never support Bernie Sanders under no circumstance She would still cast her vote for Hillary but what Barbara doesn't realize is that she would be the first one snubbed if Hillary should win.

oasis

(49,388 posts)
32. Boxer is on record of being one of the most liberal Democrats in congress.
Mon May 16, 2016, 04:19 PM
May 2016

She's been re-elected to congress numerous times and has a 30+year career in public service.

Your "Republican Lite" comment is not grounded in reality or fact.

oasis

(49,388 posts)
69. Not a socalist who is into your revolution, for sure. However,
Mon May 16, 2016, 06:32 PM
May 2016

There are millions of voters who obviously disagree with your charactization.

 

larkrake

(1,674 posts)
70. well, if you prefer sociopath to socialist, that is your choice. I want the middle, do not believe
Mon May 16, 2016, 06:46 PM
May 2016

extremes are healthy for anyone

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
73. Not in recent years
Mon May 16, 2016, 11:01 PM
May 2016

she is one of the wealthiest Senators in Washington.
Her campaign Big Banks/Wall St. contributors resemble those of Hillary's.
A Senator may claim to be "liberal" but her Corporate ties say otherwise.

trueblue2007

(17,223 posts)
39. I am tired of the Bernie people being sooooooooooooooooooooooooo hateful.
Mon May 16, 2016, 04:28 PM
May 2016

Bernie is an Independent. He isn't a Democrat. He needs to tell his supporters to KNOCK OFF THE ABUSE.

I think the bernie people are most abusive to women.

 

The Second Stone

(2,900 posts)
40. But the BROletariat is the sole authority for saying whose votes
Mon May 16, 2016, 04:29 PM
May 2016

count when and where. You having a family meeting? Well a BRO can just walk into your home and shout you down. You having a party convention? The BROs are allowed to just take it over and shout down anyone they don't like. It's called BROdom of speech.

John Lewis? They don't like him. Dolores Huerta? They don't like her. Barbara Boxer? They don't like her. You and me? They don't like us. They have posted here on the DU that they will have a "reckoning" within the party as soon as they take it over. They mean a purge.

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
62. Memo to Hill supporters.
Mon May 16, 2016, 06:07 PM
May 2016

We can't be responsible for every idiot out there. Some frustrated guy yells out and a crime on humanity happens. We don't control them. I imagine Bernie hears a few of your out of control folks too. The crowds are larger so it is harder to hear, I'll give you that.

As far as NE goes.....they shouldn't try to change the rules without majority. End story.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
94. Question for Bernie supporters who shrug off sexist slurs as products of "frustration"
Wed May 18, 2016, 11:18 AM
May 2016

Are racist slurs acceptable under the same circumstances? Would you minimize them as

no big deal, no "crime against humanity"?.. Women, after all, don't equate to 'humanity", right?

Is it okay to use them, when frustrated, at Black Hillary supporters?

I think not.

Is misogyny, as writer Katha Politt claims "The last acceptable bigotry of the Left"?

A no brainer, obviously.

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
95. Look to the process.
Wed May 18, 2016, 11:33 AM
May 2016

What happened on the floor at NE was election stealing. People are going to get upset. Most people never condone the words used be it against woman, man, or child of all colors and persuasions.

If you are speaking to the NE case. The people in charge were breaking the rules...folks get angry when their rights are stolen. Expect bad things when you go pulling strings to effect the outcome of something as important as this!

At the end of the day one has to ask themselves, did I do anything to cause this situation? Were these words used because I was out of line?

At the end of the day, if someone calls me a whore and I'm not one, I don't worry about it. My momma taught me well. Sticks and stones..........

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
96. For starters, I myself am a Bernie Supporter
Wed May 18, 2016, 01:45 PM
May 2016

and I don't blame them for being 'upset' -- The idea is, to refrain from calling a woman a 'bitch", a "cunt', or any of the many sexual

slurs reserved for females and attack their CHARACTER, not their gender.

It really shouldn't be hard to grasp. Feminism means more than "equal pay" -- It means equal RESPECT as half of the

human race. Women who don't fight the slurs as much ass PoC fight slurs against THEM, aren't serious, IMO -- Racial minorities

are discriminated against for the color of their bodies, women for the construction of their bodies -- Both are conditions of birth

and only bigots deny women equal humanity.

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
106. Well I am a woman and a feminist but ....
Wed May 18, 2016, 02:44 PM
May 2016

People are not perfect and some have no integrity. A person can be a $ick, or a @unt or many other things if they do not have integrity and respect for the rules and others. I don't agree that I can't comment on a woman's attire if I can say that a man needs a trim and a better fitting suit. There is a way to be $itchy and a way to act like a &astard. Men and women may fit either description.

I guess I care more about laws against woman's freedoms than I do the words people use in anger. Bombing the American women back to the stone age by rolling back abortion law and accessibility, adding demeaning health care procedures to intimidate women, those things get my attention. Equal humanity is a great thing to work for. This election season tells me that we don't have many thinkers left in this country and that equality has slipped drastically.

I wish you well. Keep swinging the hammer...and thanks for what you wrote.

 

larkrake

(1,674 posts)
111. Its politics to add adjectives to candidates, keep gender and religion out of politics folks
Wed May 18, 2016, 05:39 PM
May 2016

Hill doesn't care, no female politician gives a damn if they are called names

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
74. Who the hell is doing THAT?
Mon May 16, 2016, 11:04 PM
May 2016

You know, you do this quite often... headline something to make it appear true. I have aptly dubbed this kind of nonsense OPs, "drive-by commentary" Bam! What? Says who?

Sez no one here.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
75. There is no point calling her a bitch but then it was some random pissed dude
Mon May 16, 2016, 11:22 PM
May 2016

so I don't get the point of a missive to supporters. Talk to yelling guy about his comments, I have no connection via a hive mind this game is silly.

KPN

(15,646 posts)
102. Two Questions:
Wed May 18, 2016, 02:09 PM
May 2016

1) What sexist insults? Who? Proof?

2) What the hell was she doing at the Nevada Convention anyway? What was her role?

OK - 5 questions.

redstatebluegirl

(12,265 posts)
105. Lets see how the California Democratic voter feels about this.
Wed May 18, 2016, 02:35 PM
May 2016

Thanks for the help in California Bernie supporters. Boxer is a champion of progressive causes.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Memo to Bernie supporters...