2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary post from facebook
"SNIP.........
Were going to do everything we can to make sure every young person in this country has the skills and the education they need to succeed, from preschool to college. We need to expand access to high-quality early childhood education. Every kid should have a good school and good teachers from K-12 in his or her zip code. Community college should be free. Four-year college should be debt-free, so you dont have to borrow a penny to go to a public college or university. And if you already have student debt, you should be able to refinance it to relieve that burden. It's time to make sure costs or where you live aren't a barrier to a good education, and debt doesn't hold you back.
.......SNIP"
Prism
(5,815 posts)Which Hillary supporters have assured me, for the better part of a year now, is basic Soviet communism geared towards a lazy generation who doesn't want to work for anything.
So, are we chill with this now all of a sudden?
applegrove
(118,674 posts)the world.
Prism
(5,815 posts)After the months of vilification and denigrating an entire generation of voters for pushing for it?
It's like a black hole landed somewhere in Kansas with attendant time dilation, and no one can get their neurons firing quickly enough to figure out what they said as recently as two weeks ago.
So, I'll lay it plain.
I. Do. Not. Believe. Her.
Anyone who spends a year slamming an idea does not suddenly see the light in a little-viewed Facebook post.
And any of her supporters who slammed all this for the entirety of the primary cycle and who will now whirl around and pretend they supported it all along are the worst.
pmorlan1
(2,096 posts)MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)pmorlan1
(2,096 posts)why people don't trust her. This is so pathetic and yet so predictable. She is undoubtedly the WORST Democratic candidate ever. And you know what will come next....oh I thought this all along.
SpareribSP
(325 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Vattel
(9,289 posts)Last edited Tue May 17, 2016, 07:29 AM - Edit history (1)
It penalizes students who choose to do all four years at a university. Those students, on average, are brighter, which makes it even worse.
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...and it isn't just less-"bright" people who use them. I have a college degree. Got out into the world and discovered a new direction for myself. Rather than going back to a four year university I'm taking classes to get IT certifications to keep moving forward. $200 a class is better than ending up several thousand in debt. There are also plenty of bright people who just don't have the money for a four year university.
mindem
(1,580 posts)How elitist of you. Community college has nothing to do with how "bright" a student is.
SunSeeker
(51,559 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)Or do they maybe need to enter the workforce much faster and with better earning power than they previously had? Do they maybe already have their goals in order and this suits them as well financially?
Vattel
(9,289 posts)Setting that aside, I don't see why students who do all four years at a university should have to pay for their first two years while the student who goes two years to a community college should get two years for free.
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)Many CCs have courses that teach trades in addition to the 3 Rs.
Also there are specific courses related to contractor law.
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)do the four year route? ha ha ha
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)"Clinging to their guns and religion" and suchlike.
I liked Clinton better when she was Annie Oakley.
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)Hillary to one of her staff asking them to reply to Pagliano's email. He had sent her an email wishing her a happy birthday. . .and she had a staff person send a response. Nice touch.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)Either it's free or it's not.
DookDook
(166 posts)It means whatever you need it to mean and tomorrow it will mean something totally different.
If she promised free stuff then people would accuse her of promising ponies and we all know how crazy that would be, so she needs to 'borrow' the idea and wrap it up slightly different so that she can claim it was her idea all along. Just like how she always fought for 15/hr and thought that we should have some sort of Single Payer health plan that people could buy into, if they're over 50.
Kittycat
(10,493 posts)Input.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)You can count on Hillary to be the weathervane!
Response to pinebox (Reply #22)
cyberpj This message was self-deleted by its author.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)free stuff.
Response to applegrove (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)The fees were very affordable because that was the purpose of state colleges and universities.
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)Wheathervane, weathervane , where did the wind
blow from today?!
applegrove
(118,674 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)Ash_F
(5,861 posts)I have read that she intends for students to pay for it with work-study, but unless it pays like $80/hr I don't see them being able to work part time and go to school full time and still make ends meet.
I don't see how she can make it work without cost controls and tax subsidies.
I confess ignorance here. A link or brief explanation would be appreciated.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Mike__M
(1,052 posts)is how many degrees higher commitment than "look into it"?
I mean when using language as a legalistic implement.