Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

imagine2015

(2,054 posts)
Sun May 15, 2016, 10:37 PM May 2016

Election Polls: Sanders has more potential to beat Trump than Clinton



Polls: Sanders has more potential to beat Trump
Recent data show Sanders has double-digit lead in support over Republican candidate while Clinton would face tight race.
By Ryan Rifai
5/15/2016


Recent polls have demonstrated that Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders holds a much higher potential to defeat Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee, in an election than Hillary Clinton, although the latter is the Democratic party's front-runner.

The Reuters news agency, RealClearPolitics, a US non-partisan polling data aggregator, are among the organisations that have released ratings indicating that Sanders would have the upperhand in the battle for the White House.

Clinton has so far won 1,716 delegates and Sanders has gained 1,433. Factoring in super-delegates, Clinton has 2,240 and Sanders has 1,473. But super-delegates can still switch allegiance until the July 25 Democratic convention is held.

However, RealClearPolitics showed on Tuesday that Sanders had a 13 percent advantage over Trump, while Clinton had five more points than Trump.

A Reuters/Ipsos poll released on Wednesday signalled a tight coin-toss race between Clinton and Trump, without reporting on Sanders.

In March, a Reuters poll said that Sanders would beat Trump by at least 14 percent, while reporting on the potential of a very close race between Trump and Clinton.

Dustin Woodard, an analytics expert who took a major part in the discovery of the Reuters poll trend, told Al Jazeera that a significant reason for Sanders' advantage was due to disproportional support from independent voters - a group that he says other polls failed to factor in.

"Independents are the largest voting population in the US. Gallup reports that independents are 42 percent of the voting population, while Democrats are only 29 percent and Republicans are only 26 percent".

Read the full article at:
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2016/05/polls-sanders-potential-beat-trump-160514170035436.html
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

woolldog

(8,791 posts)
1. Too bad he's never going to be the Democratic nominee.
Sun May 15, 2016, 10:41 PM
May 2016

Not that those numbers would hold up if he were. But it's academic at this point. The primary is over.

 

CobaltBlue

(1,122 posts)
10. woolldog—I see that posted a lot. If that’s true, Hillary Clinton voters don’t need to post that.
Sun May 15, 2016, 11:14 PM
May 2016

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
2. 'General election polls before and during the primary are predictive of absolutely nothing.'
Sun May 15, 2016, 10:41 PM
May 2016

Ignore hypothetical matchups in primary season – they also measure nothing. General election polls before and during the primary season have a very wide margin of error. That’s especially the case for candidates who aren’t even in the race and therefore haven’t been treated to the onslaught of skeptical media coverage usually associated with being the candidate.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/harrys-guide-to-2016-election-polls

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
4. Problem is that he will not beat Hillary in the DNC primary, though
Sun May 15, 2016, 10:43 PM
May 2016

There are wry super delegates who have not endorsed and one of those is Sanders, I think the 156 will go to Hillary, she only needs 148.

 

Txbluedog

(1,128 posts)
5. That's nice and all
Sun May 15, 2016, 10:46 PM
May 2016

But the rules are that the nominee us the one that has a majority of the delegates, nominating someone besides the person with the most delegates is UNdemocratic

 

imagine2015

(2,054 posts)
8. It seems you don't understand or haven't read convention rules.
Sun May 15, 2016, 11:01 PM
May 2016

Are you claiming that the candidate who has the most pledged (elected) delegates must be nominated?

If so, that is flat out wrong. And super delegates are not required to vote for the candidate who has won the most pledged delegates or most votes in the primaries.

Super delegates are free agents and may vote for whichever candidate they think has the best chance to beat Trump in the general election.

Isn't that right?
 

Jitter65

(3,089 posts)
9. Once the GOP turns their attention to Bernie it will be a blood bath. Those same white males will
Sun May 15, 2016, 11:03 PM
May 2016

chew him up and spit him out.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
12. K&R. Ditch the candidate that relies of Debbie's favors. and go with the candidate who wins indepen-
Mon May 16, 2016, 04:29 AM
May 2016

dents by double digits!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Election Polls: Sanders h...