Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
Sat May 14, 2016, 09:09 PM May 2016

Anyone remember George W. Bush?

Because it is pretty hilarious/sad seeing "progressives" blame all of America's problems on the Clintons and Obamas.

Remember that guy who was handed a budget surplus and turned it into an economic collapse? That guy who was handed a 3.3% unemployment rate and turned it into a 2nd Great Depression and catastrophic job losses? That guy who was handed documents titled 'Bin Laden Determined To Strike the US' and turned it into a national security fail known as 9/11? That guy who botched every detail of a hurricane response then told his team how they did a heckuva job?

Etc

etc

etc

Bill Clinton was a southern Democrat in the 90s who had to wrestle 12 years of power back from the Republican party during the height of the conservative revolution, not exactly an era of progressivism, yet his presidency also resulted in him creating 23 million jobs, the longest stretch of peacetime in US history, the lowest Af-American unemployment rate in US history, nominated the 2 most liberal justices in US history, taxed the rich, and left a budget surplus. Pretty impressive.

And then there's Barack Obama; THE GREATEST DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENT IN US HISTORY. The guy who saved America from a 2nd Great Depression. The most CONSEQUENTIAL president of our lifetime. 💯

But somehow here on DU, progressives have seem to forgotten George W. Bush and his legacy of destruction and incompetence. Weird. Everything is the Clintons and Obamas fault.

47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anyone remember George W. Bush? (Original Post) JaneyVee May 2016 OP
from my perspective bigtree May 2016 #1
That's because your prospective isn't from the left. Fawke Em May 2016 #25
BRAVO! Chasstev365 May 2016 #39
.+1 840high May 2016 #41
funny when internet people talk as if they know perfect strangers bigtree May 2016 #43
Funny when low-info thinkers can't distinguish the left from the right, which only Fawke Em May 2016 #47
I have come to the conclusion Andy823 May 2016 #2
Some are simply Purists who tend to exaggerate beyond exponential proportions. Lil Missy May 2016 #9
Then you would be wrong. Fawke Em May 2016 #26
Protest all you want. CorkySt.Clair May 2016 #35
Which would explain why this country is in the crapper. Fawke Em May 2016 #38
Thier all corporatists! %$%#%$%$ BootinUp May 2016 #3
Yes, Hillary Clinton is blamed for all of that now. And she single-handedly started the Iraq War. Lil Missy May 2016 #4
Very wrongheaded -- She was either naive or complicit or amorally opportunistic. Take your choice, Armstead May 2016 #8
She killed Kenny too. n/t Lil Missy May 2016 #11
No that's one thing she didn't do. Armstead May 2016 #12
Did you ever read her speech? JaneyVee May 2016 #13
GW Bush was selling a bridge in Brooklyn. Millions recognized that. Armstead May 2016 #14
I remember an empassioned speech in support of the iraq War that aided timmymoff May 2016 #5
Yes. Hillary is just as bad as W. HooptieWagon May 2016 #6
None of what you wrote is true though. JaneyVee May 2016 #32
Yea it is my hatred and not fact timmymoff May 2016 #44
No -- Bullshit from the GOP is expected. Similar bullshit from Dems is angering Armstead May 2016 #7
Corporations arent your enemy. JaneyVee May 2016 #33
Ok, Hillary might be better than PGB. JustABozoOnThisBus May 2016 #10
Sure. He considers Clinton a sister-in-law. lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #15
I've been astounded at the hate towards Bill Clinton. cwydro May 2016 #16
Some remember him lovingly whatchamacallit May 2016 #17
Disgusting, and this is who some people here want to elect? scscholar May 2016 #18
Boggles the mind huh whatchamacallit May 2016 #22
This is whats so warped about modern progressivism... JaneyVee May 2016 #34
K&R Progressive dog May 2016 #19
Unfortunately he is a nightmare for me. Four times I was given an opportunity to vote for Thinkingabout May 2016 #20
I have not seen a lot of dislike around here for President Obama. jillan May 2016 #21
Just like Lefty likes his steaks rock May 2016 #23
Gore-Lieberman turned its back on the left and failed to inspire progressives = Republican win. Vote2016 May 2016 #24
The greatest Democratic president in history is Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Fawke Em May 2016 #27
So the guy who interned US citizens and excluded women and blacks from the New Deal.... JaneyVee May 2016 #37
FDR was bold and progressive, but he left a lot of people out in the cold on Social Security bigtree May 2016 #40
This message was self-deleted by its author .99center May 2016 #28
Hate-scapegoat The Fictional Clintons have replaced Fictional Obama. betsuni May 2016 #29
I'll never forget that world class asshole war criminal n/t hibbing May 2016 #30
Most of the complainers weren't adults during Reagan, Bush I, and Bush II Yavin4 May 2016 #31
I'm 46. I remember all those presidents, although I really was a kid under Reagan Fawke Em May 2016 #36
You repeat a very popular netroots/Naderish meme like BootinUp May 2016 #45
There should be a bingo game. betsuni May 2016 #42
Or you could acknowledge these truths that would be sort of radical timmymoff May 2016 #46

bigtree

(85,998 posts)
1. from my perspective
Sat May 14, 2016, 09:13 PM
May 2016

...much of the progressive left's politics has been co-opted by the right, using the left's opposition as a cynical wedge between Democrats.

We've seen that in this campaign with millions spent in our primary by the right in opposition to Hillary in almost every key state, right alongside Sanders' money, and more than often using the exact same rhetoric.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
25. That's because your prospective isn't from the left.
Sat May 14, 2016, 10:48 PM
May 2016

We aren't talking about Benghazi or Bimbogate or Travelgate or whatever. We're talking about a REAL FBI investigation. We're talking about her corporate money (what Republican can talk about that, for Pete's sake?). We're talking about how she's for fracking, for bad trade deals.

We aren't using any of the right's rhetoric because we don't care about stupid crap any more than you do. What we care about is the having a party that represents the working class instead of the Party of the 1 percent vs. the Party of the 10 percent.

bigtree

(85,998 posts)
43. funny when internet people talk as if they know perfect strangers
Sun May 15, 2016, 12:20 AM
May 2016

...what you did there isn't progressive, it's as divisive as any right-wing slur.

You've run out of a real campaign and now you're just slurring Democrats. I know where you can find a ready audience for that.

Blocking.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
47. Funny when low-info thinkers can't distinguish the left from the right, which only
Sun May 15, 2016, 12:32 AM
May 2016

proves my point.

Your candidate is divisive. She has sidelined the working and middle class. She's gotten herself in criminal trouble by being so elite that she couldn't stand to play by the rules. She hangs out with Wall Street villains and right-wing neocons and you have the NERVE to tell ME I'm using right-wing slurs? Her candidacy is a right-wing slur against me.

And, yeah, you've blocked me, but others need to see this. I was NEVER going to vote for Hillary, well before Bernie because I was TIRED of the corporate influence. I didn't vote for her in the 2008 primaries and I won't do it now. Bernie was just icing on the cake.

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
2. I have come to the conclusion
Sat May 14, 2016, 09:14 PM
May 2016

That those who continue to spew that shit are not really "Progressives", but trouble makers who come here every election, though this one seems to have more of them, and stir things up trying to piss off the supporters of the candidates, get them mad at each other, and try and get them to not vote for the "other" candidate if their chosen one is not elected.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
26. Then you would be wrong.
Sat May 14, 2016, 10:49 PM
May 2016

Get ready to see your left flank - the real progressives - protest your corporate owned party who bends the rules for your war hawk candidate in Philly. You got a taste of it tonight and that was really nothing.

 

CorkySt.Clair

(1,507 posts)
35. Protest all you want.
Sat May 14, 2016, 11:32 PM
May 2016

The fringe left always loses. You could set your watch to it. Or, if you need a picture to illustrate:

/revision/latest?cb=20100523172400

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
38. Which would explain why this country is in the crapper.
Sat May 14, 2016, 11:48 PM
May 2016

Thanks for clarifying that we are an oligarchy, now.

Lil Missy

(17,865 posts)
4. Yes, Hillary Clinton is blamed for all of that now. And she single-handedly started the Iraq War.
Sat May 14, 2016, 09:15 PM
May 2016

She's obviously very, very, VERY powerful!!

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
8. Very wrongheaded -- She was either naive or complicit or amorally opportunistic. Take your choice,
Sat May 14, 2016, 09:22 PM
May 2016
 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
12. No that's one thing she didn't do.
Sat May 14, 2016, 09:43 PM
May 2016

But she did fall in line and voted for the Iraq War....which was a bad decision for America

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
13. Did you ever read her speech?
Sat May 14, 2016, 09:44 PM
May 2016

It was literally none of those things you named. It was all nuance and restrain. Try again.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
14. GW Bush was selling a bridge in Brooklyn. Millions recognized that.
Sat May 14, 2016, 09:47 PM
May 2016

There were no nuances. GW was determined to go to war, WMDs or no WMDs.

She either agreed with GW on the con game, or she got conned. Either way she was wrong.

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
5. I remember an empassioned speech in support of the iraq War that aided
Sat May 14, 2016, 09:16 PM
May 2016

President Bush. Well one candidate for the democratic nomination did that. We know who that was. So yea we remember Bush and we remember who helped him. So let us not forget how he was aided by a certain candidate.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
6. Yes. Hillary is just as bad as W.
Sat May 14, 2016, 09:17 PM
May 2016

War monger er. Corruption. Incompetent. Poor judgement. Represent the 1%.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
32. None of what you wrote is true though.
Sat May 14, 2016, 11:08 PM
May 2016

Bernie voted for more wars and war funding than any candidate running on either side. She has never been implicated for corruption. And as far as competency, every newspaper editorial board in the country has endorsed her calling her "the most qualified candidate in a generation".

Perhaps you are just blinded with hatred.

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
44. Yea it is my hatred and not fact
Sun May 15, 2016, 12:21 AM
May 2016

that Hillary voted for the regime change in Iraq, and to show us how she learned from her mistake she gave us Syria and Libya, Bravo Madame Secretary, Bravo

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
7. No -- Bullshit from the GOP is expected. Similar bullshit from Dems is angering
Sat May 14, 2016, 09:20 PM
May 2016

Unfortunately if you see the Big Takeover by Corporate America, Wall St. and their Elite Allies as an ongoing process, the Clinton years were forward movement for that -- with all the Trade deals, Deregulation, privatization and RW Crap about Fuiscal responsibility. They handed GW the keys. 2008 was a logical result of the inevitable screw-ups and power grabs. But a temporary setback for them. The results were very predictable, and WERE predicted by many -- including Sanders -- back in the 90's.

GW just advanced what Clinton handed to him.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
33. Corporations arent your enemy.
Sat May 14, 2016, 11:10 PM
May 2016

Seriously, that trope is tired. Want them to pay higher taxes? Fine. Then what?

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
16. I've been astounded at the hate towards Bill Clinton.
Sat May 14, 2016, 09:49 PM
May 2016

I remember when he was loved here.

I also remember who loved him then, and now suddenly seem to have developed a real aversion toward him. Things that make you go hmm.

I've not seen as much Obama hate (maybe I've missed it), but all the "voters are pissed off, miserable, in desperate straits, etc." threads certainly imply that his presidency has been a failure in their minds.

Sad to DU so down on good American presidents.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
34. This is whats so warped about modern progressivism...
Sat May 14, 2016, 11:17 PM
May 2016

Its all emotion, little nuance. They are at a funeral. It isnt some diabolical plot for new world order.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
20. Unfortunately he is a nightmare for me. Four times I was given an opportunity to vote for
Sat May 14, 2016, 10:07 PM
May 2016

The Post Turtle and four times I voted for someone else. I heard when he moved to Houston to establish residency, I researched him, found the information of missed Reserve duty, found he refused to have a yearly required medical exam and "told" them he was going to his personal physician and the rumor was because of cocaine use. I failed to copy the information to a personal file and soon the internet was scrubbed.

Since that time I have copied this type of information to a file. He was a terrible governor and equally a bad president.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
21. I have not seen a lot of dislike around here for President Obama.
Sat May 14, 2016, 10:09 PM
May 2016

There's been things he has done that we liberals have questioned, such as putting chained CPI on the table & drilling in the artic (thankfully that never happened!); and at the beginning he was too quick to compromise - but learned his lesson the hard way. There's been other things too. I'm not going to make a laundry list.

I do realize that there are people on this board that have had harsh words for him. But I believe they are in the minority.

Overall, he has been a great President. I am proud that I voted for him twice - and I would vote for him again.
I supported him in 2008.

Barack Obama was the right man to lead this country at the right time. It saddens me to think that his term is almost over.
Not only as our President, but the entire family. It has been such an honor to have such a loving family represent this country.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
27. The greatest Democratic president in history is Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
Sat May 14, 2016, 10:51 PM
May 2016

Obama has been fine and helped stave off total destruction, but he didn't do much for the working class. FDR actually pulled us all out of poverty.

You need to read some history, boo.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
37. So the guy who interned US citizens and excluded women and blacks from the New Deal....
Sat May 14, 2016, 11:45 PM
May 2016

Is the best Dem prez???

I think you need to read some history, boo. Life SUCKED for EVERYONE under FDR except STRAIGHT WHITE MALES. And even they struggled.

bigtree

(85,998 posts)
40. FDR was bold and progressive, but he left a lot of people out in the cold on Social Security
Sat May 14, 2016, 11:52 PM
May 2016

from Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Security_%28United_...

___ Most women and minorities were excluded from its benefits of unemployment insurance and old age pensions. Employment definitions reflected typical white male categories and patterns.

Job categories that were not covered by the act included workers in agricultural labor, domestic service, government employees, and many teachers, nurses, hospital employees, librarians, and social workers. The act also denied coverage to individuals who worked intermittently.

These jobs were dominated by women and minorities. For example, women made up 90% of domestic labor in 1940 and two-thirds of all employed black women were in domestic service. Exclusions exempted nearly half the working population.

Nearly two-thirds of all African Americans in the labor force, 70 to 80% in some areas in the South, and just over half of all women employed were not covered by Social Security. At the time, the NAACP protested the Social Security Act, describing it as “a sieve with holes just big enough for the majority of Negroes to fall through.”



. . . just a reminder that most legislative progress has been historically incremental, even with passage of sweeping initiatives. FDR is the epitome of leadership, yet he was as constrained by the politics of his time as our legislators find themselves today. Actually more so today, as FDR didn't have to get 60 votes to advance his initiatives.

Would FDR find DU as hostile to his historic achievement, as many here today regard the President's own historical health law?

Response to JaneyVee (Original post)

betsuni

(25,544 posts)
29. Hate-scapegoat The Fictional Clintons have replaced Fictional Obama.
Sat May 14, 2016, 10:59 PM
May 2016

Everything has to be either good or bad, black or white.

I knew someone would post a picture of Hillary touching a Republican. Where's Kissinger? Bill with the elder Bush? What, is everyone on a coffee break or something? Get back to work!

Yavin4

(35,443 posts)
31. Most of the complainers weren't adults during Reagan, Bush I, and Bush II
Sat May 14, 2016, 11:06 PM
May 2016

That 18 to 25 year was aged 10 to 17 during Bush II. They were under the care of their parents. Sure, they may have seen hardships, but not as an adult.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
36. I'm 46. I remember all those presidents, although I really was a kid under Reagan
Sat May 14, 2016, 11:39 PM
May 2016

but came of age under Bush I.

The reason I'm a "complainer" is because there used to be a clear difference between the two parties. Now it's all corporatism on both sides.

BootinUp

(47,165 posts)
45. You repeat a very popular netroots/Naderish meme like
Sun May 15, 2016, 12:24 AM
May 2016

its not worth debating. The parties are a reflection of the current political environment. Which is not a static thing. The primary processes help form the policies which results from the environment. We have just seen how it works. When there is enough pressure from the left it does affect the platform. We are a more liberal party than we were in 2008 and definitely more liberal than the 1990's. But change is normal and expected.

betsuni

(25,544 posts)
42. There should be a bingo game.
Sun May 15, 2016, 12:18 AM
May 2016

Even in this short thread, the talking points:

Hillary is under FBI investigation
She's a war hawk/warmonger
She bends the rules, cheats
She's immoral
Same as a Republican (photo of Hillary touching a Republican)
Iraq War vote (cheerleading/making "impassioned speech in support&quot
She's incompetent/has poor judgement
FDR
1%
Democratic party owned by Corporate America, Wall St. & The Elites
The "real progressives"
Trade deals
Myth about Obama (chained CPI, Arctic drilling)

Add a few more and we'll be done! Somebody should really make a bingo game to give us something to do while reading GDP.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Anyone remember George W....