So which of these are a problem in the GE?

[Bob41213]

Let's presume that Hillary walks away from the FBI investigation (no longer a security review)....

Which of these become a problem:

Sid Blumenthal indicted for something like treason (if it's not treason, please correct me on what the relevant charge is).

One of Hillary's close aides indicted for mishandling classified information or obstruction of justice.

A revelation that her server was in fact hacked.

A revelation that her server was hacked by a foreign government.

The incessant leaks that keep coming out on a weekly basis.

Anything else I missed?

[doc03]

1. You get that list from Rush or Fox? n/t

[Bob41213]

2. I don't really appreciate the insinuation.

Didn't get them from anywhere besides a little thought on what things are likely to happen.

[silvershadow]

5. I wouldn't have even responded to this obvious troll. Been here a whole month. I just placed

them on ignore.

[edbermac]

18. Jury results

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
On Wed May 11, 2016, 04:52 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

I wouldn't have even responded to this obvious troll. Been here a whole month. I just placed
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1943822

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Not appropriate to accuse new poster of being a troll.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed May 11, 2016, 04:58 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Alert stalking BS.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Cannot reply to automated messages

[silvershadow]

19. LOL!! OMG! They are insane. nt

[SheenaR]

22. Lol

I cannot believe that was alerted.

[silvershadow]

24. Probably just sticking a toe in the water, to measure the jury right now. Probably reported back

to headquarters.

[Ferd Berfel]

25. LOL manipulative cowards

THere are too many chicken-shits around here

[Actor]

3. Aything you missed? Yeah, your exit. You meant to get off on "Breitbart Boulevard"

[JoePhilly]

6. + 1

[pugetres]

4. The fact that Clinton

did not alert anyone to the fact that her friend was sending her classified info makes her an accessory to his crime?

[JoePhilly]

8. Some one outside the US government was sending Hillary classified information?

Is that what you are saying?

[NCTraveler]

13. They don't know what they are saying. That's the reason for the "?".

It's more of the "We Report, You Decide" approach to things.

[JoePhilly]

16. That was my sense. Its a nonsensical claim that I had not heard before.

[scscholar]

14. You can't control who sends you email...

so this entire thing is ridiculous.

[JoePhilly]

17. I'm wondering how ...

... a guy outside the government sends classified info to a person back inside the government.

Hillary was allowed to receive classified information.

Some of these folks don't make any sense.

[bvf]

7. Clinton in the GE is problem enough. n/t

[silvershadow]

20. No shit. nt

[Ferd Berfel]

26. THe Republican investigations, hearings, subpoenas

will be non-stop.
If she manages to pull this off it will become insanity on a daily basis.

Hey M$M, think about it. People will simply not tune in after awhile. Who ya gonna sell 'America' beer substitute to then?

[Lurks Often]

9. IF they indict Blumenthal or an aide is indicted, Clinton will be indicted as well

I don't think it is likely that Blumenthal or an indicted aide will be willing to go to jail for Clinton if the charges result in jail term of 5 or more years.

There will be no treason charge, the threshold for that is very specific. As far as to the charges, it will depend on both the quantity and classification level of what was leaked or mishandled.

[Attorney in Texas]

10. There are also over 3 dozen civil suits for deliberate violations of FOIA that the State Department

will likely lose.

I am not sure that the public understands the difference between the FBI's criminal investigation and the various civil suits. As the civil courts continue to rule against Hillary, I'm not sure the public will fully grasp that this is a separate issue and may -- instead -- incorrectly assume that Hillary is losing the criminal case involving her deliberate misuse of an insecure private email account for her handling of national security business.

[brooklynite]

11. "It's beginning to look a lot like Fitzmas..."

[NCTraveler]

12. In the end these right wing idiots will look like Gowdy.

Do you know that fool is literally trying to have an unknown guy who called into Hannitys show brought in? That is what those hoping for indictment are starting to look like.

You present a perfect mockery of them. Well done.

[elleng]

15. How Hillary Clinton Became a Hawk (NYTimes 4/21/16)

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511811090

[pdsimdars]

21. Yea, let's go with THIS candidate. What could go wrong?

And you wonder about what is wrong with their thought processes.

[SheenaR]

23. There's no winning here just so you know

You are presenting very plausible scenarios

But because they don't fit well with a certain group, it has to be RW trash.

Nevermind trying to save a GE. You will be accused of being a hack.

[MisterP]

27. plus she's well behind Sanders when it comes to beating Trump--already the headlines are about

Trump's newest GE surge

[Demsrule86]

30. It is over

No Democrat is going to advocate allowing Bernie to be the nominee based on polls after he has lost the primary.

[Trust Buster]

28. A pathetic thread.

[Demsrule86]

29. We have heard it all before

The right wing has always been after her or any Democrat really...not many elected during the so-called liberal time you all miss. We had gone we had gone 16 years since Carter. At least we won't have Bernie double teaming her with Trump.

[larkrake]

31. The Clinton Foundation investigation, an actual problem

[larkrake]

32. Her involvement with some banks ( shady or illegal)