2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSix Questions
The six questions HRC needs to answer to win the vote of this Citizen - yes or no:
1) HRC, will you reduce US military spending by 10% each year of your first term?
2) HRC, will you reign in Wall Street power by reinstating Glass-Steagall?
3) HRC, will you break up too big to fail big-banks?
4) HRC, will you actively support repeal of Citizen's United?
5) HRC, will you denounce the TTP, TTIP, and TISA and work to repeal all related legislation?
6) HRC, will you use the bully pulpit to openly support and lobby for single-payer health care?
If the answer to any of the above questions is no, then HRC has not won the vote of this Citizen.
Vote2016
(1,198 posts)by nominating her.
djean111
(14,255 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Armstead
(47,803 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)... thinks that the paid supporters meme is getting old fast. Actually, it was old before its time.
You got me. Hillary pays me a thou a week.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)I shall defer to your username.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
treestar
(82,383 posts)Think she has direct access to Hillary
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Here is a comprehensive article that will explain it to you if you are not able to read and comprehend what Bernie was writing about.
http://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/05/29/410606045/the-bernie-sanders-rape-fantasy-essay-explained
Here is an easy excerpt that explains it clearly for you.
"Sanders then goes on to explain his ideas about gender roles and eventually gets at a sharper point that traditional gender roles help create troubling dynamics in men's and women's sex lives.
"Many women seem to be walking a tightrope," he writes, as their "qualities of love, openness, and gentleness were too deeply enmeshed with qualities of dependency, subservience, and masochism."
He adds that men, likewise, are confused:
"What is it they want from a woman? Are they at fault? Are they perpetrating this man-woman situation? Are they oppressors?"
One way to read the essay is that Sanders was doing (in a supremely ham-handed way) what journalists do every day: draw the reader in with an attention-getting lede, then get to the meat of the article in the middle.
I am sure there are plenty of things you could criticize Bernie for - real things. But going after Bernie for this is article is silly especially since your candidate is married to a man that cheats, lies and has been actually accused of rape by women.
Better find another tact.
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)Secondly, people need to know it.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)nor did you read the link and quote or you would understand this is a falsehood. I am sorry that your passion for your candidate has blinded you.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)HRC, when are you going to release your transcripts from your HIGHLY paid Goldman Sachs speeches, now that ALL other POTUS candidates have released theirs? Unless that was just another lie from the lying liar.
Broward
(1,976 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)been noted. It will receive the attention it deserves.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
JPnoodleman
(454 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
JPnoodleman
(454 posts)She stands for nothing,
Means nothing,
Is nothing.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
tularetom
(23,664 posts)I seriously doubt that she has ever given a direct answer to a question in her life. And especially not anything as clear as any question that requires a yes-no response.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
sarge43
(28,942 posts)Cutbacks in health care, freeze on pay raises and allowances, etc. Cuts that will screw the troops, but leave money pits like the F-35 in place.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
sarge43
(28,942 posts)As you say, her allegiances.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)Just those things that effect the troops and their families. That is the sad thing about the idea of cutting the military. You never really touch the MIC.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)We don't care.
TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)That's the problem.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)sarge43
(28,942 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)puffy socks
(1,473 posts)I wonder if you were truly serious about her ever earning your vote?
HRC, will you reduce US military spending by 10% each year of your first term? 10% per year based on what criteria?
That's a ridiculous requirement.
Military budgeting isn't as simple as that. That sounds just like Romney's "cut taxes 20% across the board!" worthless proposal. not to mention it's the Congress that allocates tax payer dollars not the Executive branch.
Per the U.S. Constitution:
All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.
...All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.
...The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
To borrow Money on the credit of the United States
HRC, will you denounce the TTP, TTIP, and TISA and work to repeal all related legislation?
While not incredibly beneficial to American workers, not having any trade agreements may screw us more than you think . Companies can still trade over seas and still use cheap labor. With the trade agreements labor at least gets a minimum wage and that helps us as well as foreign workers. Like it or not the economy is global. fight for better labor benefits in trade deals ? absolutely. Eliminate them . No way. Reality is corporate America is in place and the standard of living for the 99% is intertwined with it and it's success. We need to change it from within and the only way to do that is by getting Progressives elected even if they aren't the most progressive. .
HRC, will you reign in Wall Street power by reinstating Glass-Steagall?
No and she has stated this. its not the removal of Glass Steagall that created the problem. It is the type of financial securities they are trading and selling them on the markets saying they had no risk.
HRC, will you break up too big to fail big-banks?
I also don't agree that this will stop the systemic risk. Is it legal? It took years to break up Standard Oil and a SCOTUS order. http://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/15/may-15-1911-supreme-court-orders-standard-oil-to-be-broken-up/?_r=0
HRC, will you actively support repeal of Citizen's United?
She already said she would. Hillary Clinton: I would consider anti-Citizens United amendment
07/21/14 07:28 PMUpdated 07/25/14 03:20 PM
HRC, will you use the bully pulpit to openly support and lobby for single-payer health care?
She has already stated we need to work from the ACA . That protects the nearly 500,000 employees of the health insurance industry by giving those that will not have jobs working for any government funded program time to find work in other areas as well as build a better system out of the two we already have...the ACA and Medicare. Big changes take time or good lots of people suffer in addition to the ones still suffering from lack of access to health care due to costs.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)That means $15, not $12. Really it should be $22.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
LWolf
(46,179 posts)her answers were acceptable, since what she says can't really be trusted.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
LWolf
(46,179 posts)That wouldn't be me. I could speculate, of course, but why?
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Zynx
(21,328 posts)I'd be shocked if he actually proposed such a thing.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)by 40%.
So presumably if Sanders doesn't pledge the same thing, This Citizen will not be voting for him either.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)or This Citizen will not be voting for anyone in November.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
samrock
(590 posts)Unless the democrats regain the house and get 60 in the senate.. 4-6 she or he can speak all they want, but again nothing can get done without democratic control of congress..
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)HRC, will you recognize the catastrophic damage being done to our planet by your supporters?
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom