Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
who does SAUDI ARABIA want to see in the oval office next year? (Original Post) reddread May 2016 OP
Completely irrelevant. nt hack89 May 2016 #1
only if you hold terrorism to be a non-existant problem reddread May 2016 #3
Between Hillary and Trump hack89 May 2016 #6
because they like cutting the heads off of dissidents reddread May 2016 #8
Just look at the flavor of Islam ISIS worships VulgarPoet May 2016 #7
Someone who won't release the 28 pages...nt KansDem May 2016 #2
Somebody PNAC Friendly Octafish May 2016 #4
The one with the longest and deepest ties to the BFEE, of course. nt Electric Monk May 2016 #5
Remember, they don't like women. All the more reason for Hillary. nt Jitter65 May 2016 #9
they like the Clinton Foundation though reddread May 2016 #10
Pretty Obvious. HRC as outlined below. EndElectoral May 2016 #11
how much say do you think SA has in our internal affairs? reddread May 2016 #12
Ask yourself why the classified 911 documents Graham has been pushing for have not been released EndElectoral May 2016 #21
The last thing they want is a continuation of Obamas policy of buying less of their oil. NCTraveler May 2016 #13
you mean a pro-fracking policy? reddread May 2016 #14
That has been a big part of the transition. Yes. nt. NCTraveler May 2016 #15
well do me with a fork reddread May 2016 #16
Who in this scenario has given millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation? bjo59 May 2016 #17
BFF's reddread May 2016 #18
Clinton is more likely to escalate things in Syria to promote SA's pipeline interests icecreamfan May 2016 #19
talk about shit stirring reddread May 2016 #20

hack89

(39,171 posts)
6. Between Hillary and Trump
Fri May 6, 2016, 03:12 PM
May 2016

I suspect they support Hillary simply because Trump is too unpredictable.

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
8. because they like cutting the heads off of dissidents
Fri May 6, 2016, 03:19 PM
May 2016

and you know who they like doing business with.

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
7. Just look at the flavor of Islam ISIS worships
Fri May 6, 2016, 03:19 PM
May 2016

And then look at who made it.

I wouldn't trust Saudi Arabia as far as I could sling a piano.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
4. Somebody PNAC Friendly
Fri May 6, 2016, 03:11 PM
May 2016

I do know Bernie Sanders doesn't have a PNAC bone in his body or PNAC skeleton in his closet.

So that might leave him off the list.

Who are the Bushes backing?

EndElectoral

(4,213 posts)
11. Pretty Obvious. HRC as outlined below.
Fri May 6, 2016, 03:59 PM
May 2016
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/05/hillary-clinton-foundation-state-arms-deals\

Hillary Clinton Oversaw US Arms Deals to Clinton Foundation Donors
An investigation finds that countries that gave to the foundation saw an increase in State Department-approved arms sales.
—By Bryan Schatz

In 2011, the State Department cleared an enormous arms deal: Led by Boeing, a consortium of American defense contractors would deliver $29 billion worth of advanced fighter jets to Saudi Arabia, despite concerns over the kingdom's troublesome human rights record. In the years before Hillary Clinton became secretary of state, Saudi Arabia had contributed $10 million to the Clinton Foundation, and just two months before the jet deal was finalized, Boeing donated $900,000 to the Clinton Foundation, according to an International Business Times investigation released Tuesday.

The Saudi transaction is just one example of nations and companies that had donated to the Clinton Foundation seeing an increase in arms deals while Hillary Clinton oversaw the State Department. IBT found that between October 2010 and September 2012, State approved $165 billion in commercial arms sales to 20 nations that had donated to the foundation, plus another $151 billion worth of Pentagon-brokered arms deals to 16 of those countries—a 143 percent increase over the same time frame under the Bush Administration. The sales boosted the military power of authoritarian regimes such as Qatar, Algeria, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, and Oman, which, like Saudi Arabia, had been criticized by the department for human rights abuses.

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
12. how much say do you think SA has in our internal affairs?
Fri May 6, 2016, 04:02 PM
May 2016

not to be paranoid,
but could they take over one (or more) of the political parties?

EndElectoral

(4,213 posts)
21. Ask yourself why the classified 911 documents Graham has been pushing for have not been released
Sun May 8, 2016, 02:23 AM
May 2016

That tells you it's already run deep in both parties.

The financial ties to SA run deeper than the populist ties to our citizens.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
13. The last thing they want is a continuation of Obamas policy of buying less of their oil.
Fri May 6, 2016, 04:04 PM
May 2016

Though they are undergoing a massive shift in economic policy.

icecreamfan

(115 posts)
19. Clinton is more likely to escalate things in Syria to promote SA's pipeline interests
Fri May 6, 2016, 06:09 PM
May 2016

and more likely to let them escalate things in Yemen and ship them a lot more bombs to kill people with.

Given how much money Saudi Arabia has given to Clinton's foundation, I suspect they'd be pretty happy with a Clinton presidency.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»who does SAUDI ARABIA wan...