2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDon't blame Bernie for your shitty candidate
We tried to warn you that she wasn't fit for the GE and that Trump is going to be tougher than her supporters thought.
But already the drums of 'THANKS BERNIE' are beating, because he dared to offer an alternative during the primary.
We were told she was vetted. We were told she was tough.
If she can't handle the rigors of the GE, well then, we warned you.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]If you're not committed to anything, you're just taking up space.
Gregory Peck, Mirage (1965)[/center][/font][hr]
realmirage
(2,117 posts)The bitterness at losing is palpable
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Not to gloat, but to drive the message home that no amount of Superdelegates makes a weak candidate strong. To conclude, once and for all, that Third Way is a dead end. And for everyone to wake up and smell the coffee: the 20th century is over, stop party-ing like it's 1999.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)realmirage
(2,117 posts)It's the voters.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)he'll have more delegates that Clinton going into the convention. She'd need like 96% of the remaining pledged delegates to win outright. So actually: both candidates will need Superdelegates to win. BOTH. That is the measure of Clinton's weak candidacy: she can't even win when every scale has been tipped in her favor.
realmirage
(2,117 posts)all the remaining states by big enough margins (a miracle), and get more pledged delegates, the supers will switch as they did in 08. But she's winning by a much larger margin than Obama was in 08. And btw, she got more votes than Obama, technically, in the 08 primaries. And she's gotten more votes than any candidate running for pres this year. So she's not weak at all.
annavictorious
(934 posts)and no one saw that as a measure of a weak candidacy, so you clearly have no idea what you're talking about.
I expect Sanders to drop out before the convention. Now that the money is drying up, Weaver and Devine will take their spoils and go home, and all the energized young revolutionaries will move on to the next fad. Cheer up, though. Maybe the bird will stick around.
Sanders and the missus will always have Rome....and your parent's $27 dollars.
"Janie...remember the time we chartered the Delta 767 to go to Europe for my pretend meeting with the Pope?"
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Insult everyone!
I'll take a hide for this, as it needs to be said. Your vitriol and bitterness is soul deadening, and not worthy of Democrats.
And stop posting the crap in the Bernie group!!
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)I've seen too many like this from Hill supporters.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)Amaril
(1,267 posts)It only took you 88 posts to make it to my ignore list. I'm not sure, but that might be some kind of record.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)There's few open caucus, white dominant states left, I'm afraid.
Cal33
(7,018 posts)is allowed to vote the way s/he chooses to. This is where Bernie has always beaten Hillary - and
by wide margins every single time.
realmirage
(2,117 posts)Cal33
(7,018 posts)scheduling of the Democratic Primary debates, all favoring Hillary and very destructive to
the other Democratic candidates.
In November the DNC itself will be busy trying the fend off the dirty tricks of the Republicans.
realmirage
(2,117 posts)I like Bernie too, but reality needs to be respected. In a competition, one side loses. Sometimes you win, sometimes the other competitor wins. That's life.
leeroysphitz
(10,462 posts)Rockyj
(538 posts)Voter suppression, Wall St. money, corporations, 1%, war mongers & profiteers, and corruption.
realmirage
(2,117 posts)"It's the refs! They're against us! It's a conspiracy!" The answer is one side beats the other. That's competition.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)I only hear those two words here at DU by his supporters..
dchill
(38,502 posts)Third Way? DNC? HRC?
Don't think so...
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)asuhornets
(2,405 posts)lancer78
(1,495 posts)asuhornets
(2,405 posts)not here.
lancer78
(1,495 posts)But the Clintons are big supporters.
ThirdWayToTheHighway
(72 posts)Democracy originated in Europe? AIDS began in Africa? Paper was invented in China? Obviously those things don't exist in America.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Though I really should not. But the media has done a terrible job explaining this Third Way, DLC, New Democrats. Not like the NYT or CNN has run stories really. I also apologize for tjey lack of imagination in covering (I crack myself because they really do not) climate change, banking rules and other issues. In the meantime...she said, he said is covered usually. Now back to the climate change materials.
For the record, the British press does cover New Labor fairly well...it is the same triangulating philosophy. And abroad climate change is taken far more seriously. I recommend some reading in the foreign press. The web...wonderful thing
Kittycat
(10,493 posts)Hopefully my post below doesnt distract from what you shared. I wanted to highlight the merging of the philosophy with the more public think tank also in operation. Both can obviously operate separate of each other, since it's like one stating I'm a democrat (belief), but not subscribing to the DNC as a member.
Kittycat
(10,493 posts)This really should be its own OP, but none the less. The Third Way is not just a political ideology, though thisnisnthe foundation. Like it's predecessor, the DLC, the Third Way is also a Political Think Tank, actively pursuing a corporatist agenda within the Democratic Party:
Please read this first for evolutionary background, and how the ideology mixes with the think tank:
https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2014/10/06/struggle-for-soul-democratic-party-pits-wall-street-backed-think-tank-against-elizabeth-warren/pYk3SXRnZDmpi7C7N4ZpXN/story.html
Here is a good article leading up to the race today, with understanding on today's ThirdWay centrist role vs populism against Sanders.
http://www.huffpost.com/us/entry/third-way-presidential-campaign_us_563237f2e4b0c66bae5b4066
And here is their website where you can find current board members, and read articles they've released.
www.thirdway.org
There's a lot more information out there. It's easier to search ThirdWay or third way Clinton to find associated reading. It's founded on Clinton's DLC legacy, and they and many political and business associates are part of it.
Fir further historical context, I recommend searching the history of Clinton and the Blue Dog Democrats. Then reading up on why the DLC failed. Including involvement and funding from the Koch Brothers.
Hope this helps.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)The Reugs have turn their party so far to the right that they are almost unelectable.
Kittycat
(10,493 posts)They should identify as republicans.
frylock
(34,825 posts)insta8er
(960 posts)Baobab
(4,667 posts)we wont be able to do it.
The subsequent legislators and Presidents hands will be tied.
The whole point of those deals is to sign away democracy, not trade.
That's just their pretext.
So they only need one corrupt President and Congress, once, to pass them.
Read the paper linked in my sig.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Hillary's been attacked more than almost any candidate in history, and she keeps kicking ass.
And she'll continue to do so. The GOP has never been able to do it. Bernie's army of the disgruntled has failed. And Trump will fail.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...from 2%-45% in the span of a few months is nowhere near failure. Especially with all the advantages she has. They're also extremely quick to write off all those people as "not real dems", republicans, etc. It's ver short-sighted in the extreme.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)As they are not real democrats
Spacedog1973
(221 posts)Not just about what he says, but also the optics are wrong. On the back of the first black president, we don't need another old white guy representing a 'Revolution' comprised of ostensibly white hipsters and grandmothers.
But thats just me.
Ron Green
(9,822 posts)TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...really winning hearts and minds there.
Tell me, why do you think it's right to automatically write off someone because of their gender or age?
Spacedog1973
(221 posts)Can you spell hyperbole? The history of american presidency is sexist. A moron can inform you of that. We don't need another old white man in a long line of old white men. Suck it up. Unless you can point to a different history were young POC and women have held the presidency, I think your faux outrage is becoming old.
And as for 'hearts and minds' on DU? Are you joking? Who cares in attempting to convince such stone and entrenched views of a tiny minority of extremists?
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)History can't be anything, it just is. I'm not mad, just pointing out your biases. You don't think old white men are capable of leading the country. That's fine if you're OK with being a ageist, racist, sexist.
I think policies and the history of an individual are more important than either of the aspects you rail against. Which policies of Sanders do you disagree with?
MrTriumph
(1,720 posts)It is the message that important. And, by the way, from out of nowhere, this "old white guy" brought back the best hopes of FDR and HST. Very impressive.
But then again, not to you. After all FDR and HST were just old white guys to your way of thinkin'.
Spacedog1973
(221 posts)Don't you know your own history? Why would 'bringing back' a hope of FDR be of interest to those who were excluded? And you wonder, if you do, why your rhetoric falls heavily on ears that have long been tuned out of your ignorant self serving waffle, hyped up as some in depth knowledge. When in fact its the drone of a fully grown adult who was clearly homeschooled.
Demsrule86
(68,582 posts)Saying that African Americans were being held captive in the south mostly...as slaves and asking for help. As far as I know...FDR never received or replied to those letters. They were so sad. Everyone here loves FDR and I do too...but no man is perfect...and no decade in history has been fair to those with a darker skin.
http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/137/
insta8er
(960 posts)were pointing out he flaws, which helped drumpf etc. And then we had the audacity to not vote for her, after we were called not pure enough to be democrats.
MaeScott
(878 posts)Kittycat
(10,493 posts)republican- I mean democrats! Stop questioning, she knows best. We came, we saw, he died.
frylock
(34,825 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)In the end, Bernie supporters may have actually already helped Hillary for the general election.
By spending the last couple months recycling old RW smears, talking about Bill's dick, and so on ... she's probably been inoculated against much of that nonsense by now.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)If Bernie and supporters really wanted to "smear" her, there's plenty of fodder there.
Bernie's been in DC a long time...He knows a lot of skeletons in closets that he never even went near.
And, FYI disagreements over issues and the criticisms of the nature of the political system is not automatically a "smear."
(Yes there have been smears too...But not only from Sanders, and not everything critical.)
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)... by his angriest supporters.
Just look at DU, endless RW smears recycled.
There's not much left for Trump. He'll be recycling the recycled.
puffy socks
(1,473 posts)in closets that he never even went near. "
About Hillary? and you know this how?
Armstead
(47,803 posts)...no not that.
But there is enough already out there that has been investigated and reported on (by reputable people, not just RW media) that Bernie has not touched.
Plus he has been in on the sausage making process in Congress, and that sausage is filled with feces.
puffy socks
(1,473 posts)Skeleton in the closet (idiom) or skeleton in the cupboard is a phrase used to describe a shameful secret.
when I ask how you know
you say:
"But there is enough already out there that has been investigated and reported on..."
Isn't it easier to just admit you made that " Skeleton in the closet" crap up?
Care to fill me in on all these investigations Bernie hasn't touched on that will magically sink Hillary's campaign simply because they are uttered from Bernard's lips?
Armstead
(47,803 posts)I know the drill..."Show me a link that proves it." "Okay here's a link."...."No that not a credible source."...."Okay here's another."...."Still not good enough"....etc. ad nausea.
Been there, done that. If you care enough to do your own research, you are free to agree or disagree. But I'm not wasting my time.
puffy socks
(1,473 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)Bern has lost, yet he and his supporters still continue to whine. Whine, whine, whine.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)This post is in reference to the 'OH SHIT THANKS BERNIE, TRUMP SAYS SHE'S QUALIFIED TOO!!!!' hand wringing.
whine whine whine
senz
(11,945 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)she failed miserably. She chose to be tough on the poor people in Iraq. The hundreds of thousands that she knew would die if we invaded. But not only did she betray our Party, she read the script they gave her. She lied to us about the need to invade.
She is tough but always tough on the 99% and not the 1%.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)She is tough on drug crimes that fill her Prisons For Profits that in turn feed her huge wealth.
― Michelle Alexander, The New Jim Crow
She is tough on denying those in pain that need medical marijuana.
She is tough on those that want fracking to stop poisoning their water supplies.
For some her toughness trumps empathy.
lancer78
(1,495 posts)delegate count since March 8th. What I mean is that since March 8th, Bernie Sanders has gotten more pledged delegates then HRC.
840high
(17,196 posts)these attacks on.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)And the arguments that she would lose will be soon forgotten.
By the way, weren't you supposed to be winning by now?
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)remember, he will only win his home state, he will be gone by super Tuesday, he will be gone by the second super Tuesday ... etc etc.. the prediction business is not your niche
Demsrule86
(68,582 posts)No chance at all. I want him in until California...to turn out the Dem vote...after that, he will concede in my opinion.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)and if you can't see that I'm sorry.
She turns way more people off than she ever turned on. I'm talking politics here. People will come out of the wood work, so to say, to vote against her. That you can bet on.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)It doesn't really matter, though. Like I said, nobody will remember these little temper tantrums masquerading as analysis.
chknltl
(10,558 posts)Broward
(1,976 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)- Most of the slurs, insults, and disparaging comments issued by Sanders supporters and exaggerations, hyperbole, or simple lies in an silly attempt to prove that simply because she is to the right of Sanders that she is to the right of center. That's bullshit.
- I agree with all her documented (i.e., not fabricated crapoloa) policies.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Good to know it was not him or his policies.
I do not like her policies on fracking, minimum wage, taking quarter million dollar speaking fees and hiding what she said to her best friends on Wall Street. I do not care for her health care plans or her closeness with the healthcare and insurance lobby. I do not care for how she directly coordinates with her superpacs breaking at least the spirit of the law. I can keep going on about her policies but I think that is a start.
Of course the smears and insults directed at Bernie supporters here and by her surrogates ensure I will not vote for her. I am glad I am in a safe state where my vote will not matter but I will vote down ballot for the democratic selection.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)I said the same in 2008 and I will not advocate or encourage anyone to not vote or vote third party and I will be very careful on what I post until November. I will vote or not vote as I see fit, as it it is a secret ballot.
I do not have 8 hides and have not needed a rules change to post unlike you my friend
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Keep up you attitude, and you'll be gone.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)because it will be solely on what I post unless Skinner, EarlG or other admins decide to drop me for no cause
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)As stated in your above 'reason I love Hill!' post, your arguments with supporters of other candidates shape your actual political views. That is sad.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)That sort of comment could be construed as symptomatic of a deep spiral of moral decline.
That's some creepy shit.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)The floor is yours.
Good luck.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)You're the one who took it down a very dark and narrow path.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Demsrule86
(68,582 posts)because your feeling were hurt or whatever.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Oklahoma is so red my vote or non-vote will not matter. I will vote down ticket of course.
FYI, my best interest is probably not Bernie, he would raise taxes as I do nicely for a single guy. I think the best interest of the country is his health care and community college paid for in his proposals. Hillary would be in my best interest personally.
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)Very, very few people over the age of 50 would vote for Bernie in the general election. what so many younger people and the politically naive do not understand is that one word that Bernie has so proudly put on his chest - Socialist. Like it or not, people over the age of 50 do remember what a socialist is. Try reading the Mother Jones about this same thing.
Old Codger
(4,205 posts)A whole hell of a lot more of us old farts are for Bernie than you seem to be able to comprehend... I lived through the cold war and commy scares and all that bullshit time and the word "socialist" doesn't scare me one fucking bit... you on the other hand are perfectly wiling to attempt to us the scare tactics and the be afraid tactics that absolutely reek of rove and bush and cheney etc.. take them all back to your hill crowd and stay there the smart side of this campaign doesn't need that shit...it also reeks of desperation..
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)in favor of Hillary. Most of us have seen the pols that make unrealistic promises before. Like the Who sang "Won't Get Fooled Again"
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)and I remember real democrats and she is not one
Thirties Child
(543 posts)I suspect all the talk about us old folks voting for center right forgets that we cut our Democratic teeth on the party of FDR. Not only do we remember what once was, but we feel cheated by what the party has become. If I live to be 100, I've only got four more presidential elections. I'm tired of holding my nose to vote.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)public schools, public libraries, public parks, student loans, mail service, bridges, garbage collection, vaccines, city transportation, the National Weather Service, and so forth?
So terrible! Who would want any of those things?! We should strive to be more like Somalia, which is unfettered by that terrible Socialism!
desmiller
(747 posts)I believe that most people don't like socialism because it contains one frightening factor: REVOLUTION. Oh by the way,
I'm 35 and on behalf of my younger Berners, we will not be overruled by this out-dated socialist scare you and others have cooked up. People who support and work for Hillary have ridiculed and belittled us for far too long. If your candidate pushes away the young ones, even with AA votes, she's good as fucked. period.
Oh yeah,
.....naughty list you go.
senz
(11,945 posts)Bernie's vision continues Democratic social and economic progress that was stopped and reversed by Reagan and the DLC/Third Way/Blue Dog Democrats.
I can't wait for the day we get on with long overdue social and economic justice.
J_J_
(1,213 posts)and she couldn't deal with his 'tone'
I really don't want to listen to Republicans go after her for the next 4-8 years,
because this time they have real ammo.
I just want someone to focus on fixing the problems in this country.
A Hillary presidency will be all Republican attacks all the time.
They are already getting ready to impeach her.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Trump's crew will dig deeper (or be more shallow) in establishing their approach.
eridani
(51,907 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)- He didn't support single payer
- He never called his opponents neocons
- He never called his opponents neolibs
- He never called his opponents Republicans
Golly, either I don't know what the fuck I'm talking about, or you intentionally missed the point.
I'm guessing it's the latter.
eridani
(51,907 posts)But go on pretending that they are exactly the same.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Lazy Daisy
(928 posts)investigating every sneeze. Can't fund education, healthcare, SS, or any other worthwhile policy but the Republicans will find plenty of money to keep her dodging scandal after scandal. So much for getting anything of substance done.
yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)Autumn
(45,096 posts)You would think this is the first time they have ever seen a primary or an election.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)the Republicon decision to invade Iraq was a good decision. Why did she abandon Democratic values when the chips were down? Maybe she doesn't agree with Democratic Values. I wouldn't be able to defend her.
Response to Joe the Revelator (Original post)
rjsquirrel This message was self-deleted by its author.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)Yeah it's kind of uphill, regardless of the relative merits of candidates
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)can't close the deal on a virtually unknown 74-year old socialist with the backing of the entire Party Machine behind her.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)If the tallies were flipped and Sanders were ahead by 300 pledged delegates and 500 supers, you'll would think so, too.
Response to PeaceNikki (Reply #130)
Marr This message was self-deleted by its author.
senz
(11,945 posts)Still, people sense something's wrong, just wrong, with that candidate.
Marr
(20,317 posts)Every imaginable advantage and she *still* hasn't officially sealed the deal against an unknown, 74 year old, Jewish socialist from Vermont. That is a weak candidate. Or a very unhappy electorate.
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)puffy socks
(1,473 posts)if he can't even beat the "shitty" candidate in the primaries?
Trenzalore
(2,331 posts)Ignoring bitter dead enders like you
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)When you are outspending that candidate....can't buy votes and can't be better than crap,....
Response to Joe the Revelator (Original post)
savalez This message was self-deleted by its author.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)revmclaren
(2,524 posts)Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)Squinch
(50,950 posts)not going to have any fun without me!
The special snowflake Sanders supporters are certainly distinguishing themselves from the rational and reasonable Sanders supporters these days. Thanks for making identification easy for us!
savalez
(3,517 posts)Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)Did you guys really think he wouldn't go there? That is the tip of a very very large and deep iceberg.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Can I get you a tissue?
Sid
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)He outspent Clinton big and still managed to lose BIG!
Merryland
(1,134 posts)because the options most likely will be abysmal, so enjoy your candidate before Trump has demolished her.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)You all overall inflate your power. There aren't enough Sanders extremists to throw the election to Trump. Even if Sanders were to campaign for Trump, he'd still get destroyed.
Go sit down.
LuvLoogie
(7,009 posts)Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)Well played.
LuvLoogie
(7,009 posts)1monster
(11,012 posts)What a decision: Bernie or Cookies with Hillary....
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)Amaril
(1,267 posts)Like Pennywise the Clown creepy?
dbackjon
(6,578 posts)But your posting is
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Is orders of magnitude worse than "shitty"
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Apple, meet orange...
ProTip: when the operating parameters vary radically between scenarios, simple direct comparisons of the outcomes are meaningless. I'll leave it to you to puzzle out the differences between 30% of the electorate and 100%, open vs closed elections, and so forth...
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)That shit won't fly in the general.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)thats bullshit.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)She WAS leading by what...50%-60%?
Clinton, Inc. HAS to fight so hard the kitchen sink and scorched earth policy platform has to be deployed along with a "little" help from ALL her lil buddies and dig this: SHE'S STILL NOT BLOWING HIM AWAY!
So the the facts are either #1. Sanders is an exceptional candidate or #2. Hillary is a really terrible awful one to not hold on to any of that 60% lead from 11 months ago.
How unnerving that's gotta be for Clinton and Clinton, Inc.
rock
(13,218 posts)which reads, "Bernie is NOT an asshole?" Think about it.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)rock
(13,218 posts)Message 27. I just picked the first I could find. You're welcome.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)and I think I know what you are pretending it means. Either way I don't approve of using graphics or messages that way against either candidate. I've given up asking Bernie people to stop doing shit like that because too many of them really don't care how nasty they come across anymore; because they have been inundated with it from Hill camp.
You see, if both sides weren't doing it, neither side would be doing it. Nobody here can try to appear morally superior. And it just keeps escalating. I've seen a shit ton of uglies coming from Hill camp lately.
Funny you would want to bring attention to it, considering how it is meant to be read.
I just wish both sides would quit with this kind of childish behavior.
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)You gotta know that went through intense scrutiny and a million billion focus groups. Who exactly was the campaign targeting from the beginning? She's used the Democratic party for power. I really have thought long and hard about it, and I would be mad as hell if I were one of the one's fooled.
rock
(13,218 posts)It points stage left. (If you see it as right, well, maybe you're the one with inclinations).
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)rock
(13,218 posts)It seems to be your disposition.
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)rock
(13,218 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)interested.
msongs
(67,413 posts)anigbrowl
(13,889 posts)Beacool
(30,249 posts)Well, there goes that theory.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)mentioned in many threads, that 'OMG, TRUMP IS GOING TO SAY HILLARY IS UNQUALIFIED, THANKS BERNIE!!!!'
That is the kind of bullshit I am talking about.
Beacool
(30,249 posts)Calling her a "shitty" candidate is not cool.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)Gotta make you people click somehow.
mythology
(9,527 posts)Specifically it makes a point about who the poster is.
CobaltBlue
(1,122 posts)When a party has a difficult, contested primary, and there are fundamental differences in how the two leading candidates would serve as president of the United States the people who voted for the runner-up candidate are not obligated to vote for the candidate who wins the partys nomination in the general election. Not all 100 percent of them do. It is up to the eventual nominee to win over the voters who didnt support him/her for nomination.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)This is in response to more and more threads shocked...SHOCKED...i tell you that Trump may parrot things like Hillary being 'unqualified' and blaming Bernie for that. My argument remains, if she can't handle something as small as THAT, Trump is going to eat her alive.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)And all Bernie followers can do is strap on the tinfoil hat for an explanation.
lancer78
(1,495 posts)Sanders has been winning the pledged delegate race since mid-March. Hillary just ran up the score early enough in the southern states.
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)Regardless of WHEN the delegates were won, she still won them and has an insurmountable lead.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)How this thread wasnt hidden is beyond me.
CentralCoaster
(1,163 posts)At least I think that was you.
Off to check. Apologies if I'm wrong.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)I actually use Obamacare. They're just looking for shit to nail me with.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)Gomez163
(2,039 posts)Marr
(20,317 posts)Of course, you really ought to be on a timeout with that number of hidden posts-- and would be, if not for the Hillary Fan Behavior Curve.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)Said it was total BS. All the other jurors were Bernie people.
Marr
(20,317 posts)Your hides were deserved.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)You deserved every one of them.
Amaril
(1,267 posts)Unless he personally polled the other jurors and asked their candidate of choice, which he would not be able to do because the jurors aren't identified, then he is just guessing, and he was probably wrong. I don't vote to hide unless it is an unwarranted personal attack, so I've voted to leave plenty of stuff from both camps, and of the 15 or so juries I've been on the last 2-3 weeks, I've voted in the majority on all of them except one.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)1. Making a joke about Obamacare (which I use) - calling it Obummercare.
2. Making a joke about Bernie kissing the Pope's ring. (I'm a Catholic)
3. Making a joke about Bernie supporters being birdbrains. Because of the bird.
4. Saying I'm not taking orders from a Bernie bot.
5. A comment about giving Bernie the $40 million he would get in may if he would just drop out. I HAVE SEEN MUCH WORSE ABOUT HILLARY THAT WAS NOT ALERTED.
6. Suggesting Bernie supporters might be republicans because they hate Hillary. HOW MANY TIMES HAS HILLARY BEEN CALLED A REPUBLICAN???
7. Calling Bernie a grifter. HOW MANY TIMES HAS HILLARY BEEN CALLED CORRUPT HERE???
8. Asking a Bernie person to hang around on a primary night so I can gloat. REALLY??
THIS IS BULLSHIT.
Demsrule86
(68,582 posts)We Hillary supporters were getting creamed. Every post was alerted.
Marr
(20,317 posts)Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)Your tirade (tantrum) makes no sense anyway.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)stevil
(1,537 posts)Sounds shitty, right? Look in the mirror.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)Civil, gentlemanly politicians like Bernie Sanders who is too decent to get down in the gutter with her.
She likes to beat up on hippies, but she kisses up to real assholes like Kissinger and Bush Jr.
senz
(11,945 posts)Just what we need in the Oval Office.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)They do not call on me.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)First there was #berniemath, now there's #bernielogic
Rex
(65,616 posts)Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)"How dare you offer an alternative to our carefully prepared shit sandwich!? You MONSTERS!!" So of course it'll be Bernie's (and our) fault that people got a taste for something other than shit-based dining.
senz
(11,945 posts)That really, truly is what is being offered to the American people.
MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)supporters.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)And all these posts are pointless
John Poet
(2,510 posts)Can't wait for her secret wars to begin.
senz
(11,945 posts)Interesting..she is in...and I hope for the sake of the country she wins...I want her to win...I would never idolize a candidate enough to support the GOP by not voting Dem.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)BootinUp
(47,156 posts)that is the question:
Whether tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
Or to take arms against a sea of troubles,
And by opposing end them?
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Feathery Scout
(218 posts)I think Hillary will have the most extraordinary group of amazing people campaigning with her:
Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, Joe Biden, Bill Clinton, OBAMA!!
Such an amazing advantage over the Repubicans will give us a strong chance at keeping the White House....along with the fact that Trump is a terrifying monster.
And we still haven't taken into account her VP pick...
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)It is rude and insulting and not something we should be doing here.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)It's how the Sanders supporters roll, these days.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)[/center][/font][hr]
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)If that makes any difference.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)[/center][/font][hr]
Amaril
(1,267 posts)It's pretty much 50/50 and has been all along.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)I guess we each tend to gloss over our uglies, but I'm pretty observant of this kind of disrespect, no matter which side it comes from, and I don't see it as often from Bernie fans. I don't read all the threads though; and people I find exceptionally obnoxious are on ignore, no matter who they support. Maybe you should try that. It's nice not to have that in your face all the time.
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)And she will become a disaster because there is absolutely nothing ahead of her that will not be swamped by the liabilities she has created through all of the self-serving, law-breaking things she has already done, which will only become more prominent as time goes on.
The disaster will be even more the supporters' responsibility than hers because they will have chosen it and enabled it.
amborin
(16,631 posts)Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)leeroysphitz
(10,462 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)Look like the problem is DWS, and not Bernie's fault, and absolutely not Bernie's job to fix. Bernie is just being scapegoated. That's all that is happening. The usual deflection and lies. From the DNC.
rock
(13,218 posts)I don't, I blame him for yours.
Baitball Blogger
(46,720 posts)...but I am so getting ready for the inevitable disappointment that will come from the ethical breaches that neo-liberalism are known for. So, I'm working my frying pan arm maneuver:
I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, vI told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so,
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)act like neoliberal Neocon and screw progressives over six ways to Sunday whenever she gets the chance.
Baitball Blogger
(46,720 posts)I expect there will be people who will finally understand what we have been trying to tell them.
basselope
(2,565 posts)THEY jump to the defense of the person with the D next to their name no matter what they do. Vote for a war, the patriot act, fracking, free trade agreements... it all doesn't matter. Heck, put our healthcare system MORE into the hands of the insurance companies.. s'oaky by them!