Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum2014: HRC got $10.2 million speaking fees, including $4.6 million from groups lobbying Congress
http://time.com/3889577/hillary-clinton-paid-speeches-lobbyists-influence/HRC got $10.2 million in 2014, her first full calendar year after leaving the State Department.
Groups with giant lobbying budgets gave Clinton big speaking fees ahead of 2016 presidential campaign.
Almost half of the money from Hillary Clintons speaking engagements came from corporations and advocacy groups that were lobbying Congress at the same time.
Of that, $4.6 million came from groups that also spent on lobbying Congress that year, according to data compiled by the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics.
For critics, the arrangement shows that many of people who booked an appearance saw it as another way to gain influence with a leading contender to become the next President.
Its big money. Theyre spending it because they have far greater sums riding on those decisions that theyre trying to shape, said Sheila Krumholz, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics. Corporations or associations must justifiably make these investments because everyone knew for many years that Clinton would always remain a power broker. Every man or woman on the street thought Hillary Clinton would run again.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 422 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
2014: HRC got $10.2 million speaking fees, including $4.6 million from groups lobbying Congress (Original Post)
amborin
Apr 2016
OP
Good for her, recognizing her monetary value as is customary for men, and breaking that ceiling.
seabeyond
Apr 2016
#1
LOL, I assume you only want her because she is a woman, but Warren was 1000 times better. nt
Logical
Apr 2016
#4
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)1. Good for her, recognizing her monetary value as is customary for men, and breaking that ceiling.
Logical
(22,457 posts)4. LOL, I assume you only want her because she is a woman, but Warren was 1000 times better. nt
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)5. You ASSume incorrectly.
Logical
(22,457 posts)6. LOL, calling me an ass like that? Are you 10 years old? LOL. nt
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)7. " I assume you only want her because she is a woman"
With a comment like that....
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)2. And she was a private citizen at the time. Why do you hate the Free Market so much? n/t