Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(146,333 posts)
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 04:14 PM Apr 2016

On the question of paid DU posters during the Democratic Primaries:

Some people seem to believe that there are posters on DU who are paid to post. Yet nobody has ever produced any evidence that any such thing occurs. I argue that it does not occur. Here are some of the reasons:

1. DU is not all that influential in the real world.
2. There are plenty of posters who are happy to post their opinions here without being paid.
3. Many posters here are quite coherent, logical and pretty good writers.
4. Professional writers with good skills get paid quite a bit to write for money.
5. See reason 1.

I'm a professional writer. I've been making my living doing that since 1974, and have written for a long list of major publications and have several books under my belt as well. I get paid for the writing I do for money. Here's what I'm doing now:

I write the entire content for small business websites, most with over 100 pages. I write new websites and complete revamps of business websites. I'm good at it and am well paid for my work.

I always refuse to write two types of websites: Pornography sites and political sites. The first, because I think they're exploitative of women. The second, because I never want to be paid to write political material. I've turned down political website contracts a number of times. Websites are all I write for money these days. It's steady work and it's easy. Marketing writing is simple, and I write quickly and get paid well to do that.

I write a lot on DU. I would never accept any money to do that. I do it because I'm very interested in politics, and it is something I enjoy doing. I like discussions. I like arguments. I like writing on DU. But, nobody pays me to do it, and I wouldn't accept payment for it if someone offered.

Unless someone can demonstrate that a DU is paid to post here, I must conclude that nobody is being paid, for the reasons above.

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
On the question of paid DU posters during the Democratic Primaries: (Original Post) MineralMan Apr 2016 OP
OK, dad. nt grasswire Apr 2016 #1
Yep, more condescension from the op cali May 2016 #36
Yep, more condescension from the op cali May 2016 #36
Neat. hellofromreddit Apr 2016 #2
MineralMan concludes, it must be true! PowerToThePeople Apr 2016 #3
lol TheDormouse Apr 2016 #5
Thread win. berni_mccoy Apr 2016 #7
None of your arguments refute that there may be paid propagandists here TheDormouse Apr 2016 #4
Where your 'logic' fails: HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #6
I can't believe that anyone thinks DU is relevant in the real world. leftofcool Apr 2016 #8
People vote. You reach them in places like this. Campaign 101. snowy owl Apr 2016 #9
Why don't you go to the mall, and ask 500 people if they have heard of this website snooper2 May 2016 #35
Some people appear to think just that, though. MineralMan Apr 2016 #12
DU is relevant in one of the most important ways. Google picks it up leveymg Apr 2016 #14
Vanity. NurseJackie Apr 2016 #17
Then why budget $1M towards it? Is Clinton/Brock team stupid? snowy owl Apr 2016 #10
They're not spending that on DU. Why would they? MineralMan Apr 2016 #13
Why anywhere? Tweets are seen by Eric J in MN Apr 2016 #18
Calling people paid... JSup Apr 2016 #11
It's a subject that makes a handful of DUers froth and freak out and act as if it really, really Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #15
Nobody that I know has/had ever heard of this place before. Nobody. NurseJackie Apr 2016 #16
Hmm...everyone who watches or listens to Hartmann knows about DU snowy owl Apr 2016 #19
Oh, DU gets more hits than Hartmann... MineralMan Apr 2016 #21
You're wasting your time. These are people who believe that sufrommich Apr 2016 #20
Twitter is a lot less pro Bernie fun n serious Apr 2016 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author SixString Apr 2016 #23
A member of the right-wing of the Democratic Party is not paid to post here, so no one does. Scuba May 2016 #24
FYI DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #26
I'm sorry, I can't hear you over the sound of my new Lamborghini Tarc May 2016 #33
I agree with most of what you say to a point. Bob41213 May 2016 #27
I know you don't take payment for your OPs on DU: Betty Karlson May 2016 #28
Agreed. nt. jack_krass May 2016 #29
1. DU is not all that influential in the real world? Omaha Steve May 2016 #30
While I agree with you for the most part wryter2000 May 2016 #31
Perhaps one will be good enough to show us their contract? Octafish May 2016 #32
There have been trolls here since the beginnning. blue neen May 2016 #34

TheDormouse

(1,168 posts)
4. None of your arguments refute that there may be paid propagandists here
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 04:25 PM
Apr 2016

(not that I am arguing that there are or there are not)

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
6. Where your 'logic' fails:
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 04:26 PM
Apr 2016

Brock has publicly announced the hiring of paid trolls, so we know they're present on the Internet. DU is a well-known forum for Democrats, there is no reason to assume Hillary trolls would ignore it during the primary. The trolls aren't being hired for their writing ability, they're hired for their ability to disrupt and cause FUD.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
35. Why don't you go to the mall, and ask 500 people if they have heard of this website
Wed May 11, 2016, 12:53 PM
May 2016

Not like I'm going to hold my breath LOL

MineralMan

(146,333 posts)
12. Some people appear to think just that, though.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 04:31 PM
Apr 2016

I'm sure there are paid posters for most major campaigns. But, they're charged with posting on active Facebook pages, reddit addresses, and other such social media venues, where many thousands of naive people are reading every day. Pay for such work is really, really crappy, and I've seen calls for writers for commercial businesses and corporations. Someone I'm close to once edited that kind of content mill stuff. It was awful.

The word rates for that kind of social media posting are so low that they appeal only to unskilled writers, for the most part. It's crappy work, all around. I'm familiar with content mill stuff. It's obvious when it appears, really.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
14. DU is relevant in one of the most important ways. Google picks it up
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 05:21 PM
Apr 2016

And that's an undisputable fact. At least some of my stuff.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
17. Vanity.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 06:27 PM
Apr 2016

And overplaying their hand. They're too wrapped up in it to realize the truth. A disconnect from reality. It's fun, but it ain't all that. If DU went offline because their web server failed, you wouldn't hear about it on the evening news. If facebook went offline for 10 minutes, it would IMMEDIATELY be an item on the CNN scroller/ticker.

MineralMan

(146,333 posts)
13. They're not spending that on DU. Why would they?
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 04:32 PM
Apr 2016

See my list. And $1 million isn't really all that much of a budget, either.

JSup

(740 posts)
11. Calling people paid...
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 04:29 PM
Apr 2016

...is just a way to reject something that can't be rejected with (known) facts.

Like when I was a teen and people didn't like what I said they called me "long haired commie hippie f*****t".

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
15. It's a subject that makes a handful of DUers froth and freak out and act as if it really, really
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 06:15 PM
Apr 2016

matters to them. I think that's very amusing.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
16. Nobody that I know has/had ever heard of this place before. Nobody.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 06:24 PM
Apr 2016

Not my husband, not my son or my son in law, nor my "baby" sister or my "little" brother... and ALL of them are much more "out there" and computer savvy than I am. I do have a FB account, but I don't do the Twitter thing (although I know what it is.)

Anyway, my point is... from the perspective of the small fish who live in this coral-reef ecosystem, THIS is the entire world... nothing else exists beyond this reef. But it's just one little reef in a big ocean. A very VERY big BIG ocean.

It's interesting and fun for the people who hang out here, but outside of that NOBODY KNOWS about it. (Figuratively speaking, obviously we know about it.) It's not like this is Facebook or something.

I'll bet Myspace has more active users that DU. (Nothing personal, but this is a very niche market.)

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
19. Hmm...everyone who watches or listens to Hartmann knows about DU
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 06:44 PM
Apr 2016

Maybe you don't watch or listen to him? You see, the world is big and there are lots and lots of small groups that make it up. I agree about facebook and reddit being bigger. But small groups are important too. Why all those little meets between candidates and small venues? The more hands you shake, the more people you reach, the more votes you're likely to get.

You guys sound like experts but I don't think you're right. You win votes a few at a time unless you've got name recognition and celebrity. If you don't, you better start shaking hands and if you do, you still bet start shaking hands. Now that's politicking 101.

MineralMan

(146,333 posts)
21. Oh, DU gets more hits than Hartmann...
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 07:45 PM
Apr 2016

Last edited Sun May 1, 2016, 09:38 AM - Edit history (1)

It's funny that you mention him, really. Cartman is far better known..

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
20. You're wasting your time. These are people who believe that
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 06:54 PM
Apr 2016

the first thing you would do if you were going to unleash a secret army of paid trolls is issue a press release announcing it.

Response to MineralMan (Original post)

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
24. A member of the right-wing of the Democratic Party is not paid to post here, so no one does.
Sun May 1, 2016, 08:06 AM
May 2016

If you were better at logic, perhaps you wouldn't represent the right-wing of the Democratic Party.

Response to MineralMan (Original post)

Bob41213

(491 posts)
27. I agree with most of what you say to a point.
Sun May 1, 2016, 09:27 AM
May 2016

BUT I would say that REGARDLESS (and my opinion is meaningless here because I'm not a site owner), it SHOULD be a term of service that one is not a paid contributor.


 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
28. I know you don't take payment for your OPs on DU:
Sun May 1, 2016, 09:32 AM
May 2016

Your OPs never regurgitate the daily talking points David Brock seeks to introduce. But other posters do. The homogeneity of their OPs and replies leaves us to wonder who is supplying them with these talking points, and what else they receive from the talking-points-generator.

Omaha Steve

(99,741 posts)
30. 1. DU is not all that influential in the real world?
Sun May 1, 2016, 03:16 PM
May 2016

The DU is #5 at raising funds for Bernie. Even our friends at JPR raised $20,000 since December 20th.


FULL long live list here: https://secure.actblue.com/entity/fundraisers/39795


wryter2000

(46,082 posts)
31. While I agree with you for the most part
Sun May 1, 2016, 03:37 PM
May 2016

You don't have to be paid to be a troll. Every electronic forum attracts trolls. It was true of one we had where I used to work, and we could even identify the trolls and where they worked. They kept on trolling, anyway, for fun, I guess.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
32. Perhaps one will be good enough to show us their contract?
Wed May 11, 2016, 12:17 PM
May 2016

PDF would be fine.

Is there a reason you can think of why they wouldn't want to show us their contract?


blue neen

(12,328 posts)
34. There have been trolls here since the beginnning.
Wed May 11, 2016, 12:37 PM
May 2016

I find it comical that some posters are only pointing their fingers at Hillary or Brock trolls. Doesn't that strike you as a little odd, like look over THERE! There are plenty of trolls pretending to be Democrats, but all the do is slam Democrats day in and day out, year after year.

No one is going to give you the proof you want, Mineral Man. Just open your eyes and you'll get your proof.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»On the question of paid D...