2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumShould Bernie pick a VP now, before the convention to get more traction?
Would doing so help him in the coming contest?
pkdu
(3,977 posts)scscholar
(2,902 posts)They've hinted they're investigating.
Maybe Bern should name the FBI Director as his runningmate. Kill two bords with one stone.
bluedigger
(17,086 posts)I'm thinking Lucinda Williams would kick her ass in a debate.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Sanders has not won on his own, a VP will not help.
IamMab
(1,359 posts)Although Warren largely appears to have successfully sat on the fence so far.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)She has her own agenda that she wants to enact, getting mired in a lost candidacy is not going to help.
So far she has stayed above the fray. When Clinton formally wins the necessary delegates, she will come aboard.
RKP5637
(67,111 posts)Mike Nelson
(9,959 posts)...not fair to his supporters or the Democratic Party. The nominee is going to be Hillary. Plus, Bernie is no fool.
Rebkeh
(2,450 posts)Besides, it would be fair to the people that have yet to vote.
You want to talk about fair? What about them?
Nah, to the convention it is.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)It also changes from election year to election year, e.g. in 2008 California was part of Super Tuesday, while this year they are a mostly irrelevant June 7th.
If the nomination gets wrapped up before the end, that has nothing to do with "fairness". Jesus, get over yourself.
RKP5637
(67,111 posts)Rebkeh
(2,450 posts)I trust them. But it's a good question for sure. I'd love to see it, myself.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Who is she?
apnu
(8,758 posts)RandySF
(58,900 posts)Don't follow in his footsteps.
RKP5637
(67,111 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I don't see a VP making much difference. And with Cruz being forced to, the medias right bent, it wouldn't be pretty.
Response to NCTraveler (Reply #17)
RandySF This message was self-deleted by its author.
RandySF
(58,900 posts)Even as VP.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Garrett78
(10,721 posts)I'm sure Sanders isn't even considering such a stunt. He's not a fool.
It wouldn't help.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)Nobody else would splash big enough to matter.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)And Sanders wouldn't ask her to.
Sanders is about impacting the platform, not winning the nomination, because that is not going to happen and never was.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)JI7
(89,252 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)surrealAmerican
(11,362 posts)I don't see any reason why any candidate should at this point.
masmdu
(2,536 posts)surrealAmerican
(11,362 posts)After the nomination it might, but not now.
It just looks like hubris before the nomination is a certainty.
MadBadger
(24,089 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Demsrule86
(68,586 posts)Bernie has lost. He should go out with dignity.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)thesquanderer
(11,989 posts)And if by some chance he manages to get the nomination (like, if Hillary gets indicted before the convention), he'll have a much stronger roster of VP candidates to choose from once he is no longer restricted to people who are (a) fine with losing and (b) fine being on the bad side of Hillary who will otherwise likely be the next president. I can't imagine anyone great signing up with him now, and I can't imagine it making a significant difference in the upcoming contests. It's not like anyone is going to suddenly get him 80% of California.