2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum"correct the record"
If Hillary and her supporters wonder why bringing many Bernie supporters to heel is not going to be a forgone conclusion, they need to look no further than her superPAC headed by Brock as one of the major reasons. The crap that "correct the record" (cute name, btw) has pulled on Bernie's campaign and supporters has been truly despicable...many Bernie supporters use the Internet primarily for their communication and news and are fully aware of Brock's crap that isn't going to be forgiven easily, if at all.
If she chose to associate herself with scoundrels, she must be willing to own it.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)A look at her history should provide ample evidence.
tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)And who she has associated with and the terrible judgement she has displayed over and over again...paints a very bad picture. She would have been disqualified long ago had she not been who she is.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)she is awesome and everybody will love her. Quite the opposite is true.
Marr
(20,317 posts)the two candidates are miles apart in terms of policy, and the Hillary Campaign would've had to actually be even more conciliatory, less offensive, than the standard primary campaign if it ever wanted to attract Sanders' supporters. They've done the opposite every step of the way.
Assuming Hillary gets the nomination, it's going to be a very weird general election, and she could very well end up losing it because she's gone out of her way to drive off millennials and independents.
bbgrunt
(5,281 posts)Old Codger
(4,205 posts)Most indies and the r's hate her more than we do... where the fuck is she going to get the votes.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Interesting. Interesting.
Geez!
That would explain all the boasting and chest thumping and arrogance and strutting.
The I I I Me Me Me she does. Trumpian?
YouDig
(2,280 posts)like that he brought down Bernie's facebook groups, but is there anything truthful and concrete that Brock "pulled on Bernie's campaign" that's not just internet rumor?
tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)Brock: "Senator Sanders is trying to live in the purity bubble, and it needs to be burst,"
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/david-brock-bernie-sanders-218954
David Brock group hits Bernie Sanders with ethics complaints
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/david-brock-group-hits-bernie-sanders-ethics-complaints
Lots more out there.
If you study whats being said in social media, the media that millennials are consuming, it is filled with misinformation and vicious lies and sexism in terms that you cant even repeat from his supporters, from other trolls, Brock said. And you wonder why theres such a gap in the millennial preference for Sanders over Hillary. I think if people took a look at what theyre seeing, that would account for some of [the deficit] the fact that they have a misimpression of her."
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/david-brock-bernie-sanders-218954#ixzz472hasAxV
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
I don't strongly disagree with his assessment. Does that make me evil?
Brocks sharp elbows in dealing with Sanders have provoked the ire of Clinton aides on several occasions. Sanders has raised millions of dollars by invoking Brocks attacks to supporters. His camp believes Clinton officials private-but-noisy complaints about Brock are just cover so they have plausible deniability while he does the wetwork.
OK?
grasswire
(50,130 posts)...the ratfuckery on facebook. Bernie groups shut down by someone posting kiddie porn, etc.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)How about the email where Jeff Weaver claims she is a traitor? Will Bernie own that. How about the fact that his supporters literally threw good AAs like John Lewis to the dogs? Will Bernie own that. I think we know who the scoundrels are!
tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)Individual, uncoordinated Bernie supporters that the campaign has little control over vs an organized superPAC that pays people to launch coordinated attacks.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Dem2
(8,168 posts)blah blah blah - post's like this are just an easy "trash" - occasionally I comment to let u know.
tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)...as it reads like a framing attempt.
The practice you allude to is certainly an indictment of the superPAC concept, but maybe not of the actual campaign or the candidate herself. But if documented, we should indeed watch how the candidate disavows or tacitly endorses it.
Faux pas
(14,681 posts)Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)(re: elections, not spouses)
It's a quirk of mine.
In the past it wasn't this obvious before the election. Now, we are so morally and ethically bankrupt, it's done in the open and bragged about.
It isn't tough to conclude that's a deal breaker.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Just one. I'll wait...
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)I don't take orders from you.
Anyone who has been on this forum during the primaries knows exactly what I'm referring to: it has been continuous. If you don't know, then too bad for you.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Oops.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Great discussion. At least I didn't have to wait long for an answer.
There's a difference between demanding others disprove your claims, and simply refusing to waste time proving the sky is blue to intellectually dishonest people.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Have yet to see any proof, so I asked for it. There must be a link somewhere, don't you think?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Those of us who have been around politics for a long time fully understand the right wing machine and propaganda from those acting as if they are agents of the left. Morons promoting Benghazi, indictments, Vince Foster and such. We have to have these resources in order to ensure progressive victories.
tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)Thank him for running such effective smear campaigns! Maybe she can invite Anita Hill, too.
Btw, I look at these actions as an attempt to manipulate public perception away from the truth. That's been apparent with the email server issues where talking points have been so obviously distributed to deflect that the issue is as just another RW attack, there's no there there, etc etc
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I prefer the current arms reach relationship they have. A short arms reach. lol. I think that is how it can have the most impact. Not sure why she would have him on-stage. I don't see that as making any sense.
LexVegas
(6,067 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)JSup
(740 posts)...isn't a bunch of trolls pulling shenanigans. It's a bunch of people posting factual information against the giant disinformation campaign against Hillary.
So now there is a disinformation campaign against them. This world is ridiculous.
The Points
http://correctrecord.org/the-points/