Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

denem

(11,045 posts)
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 07:58 AM Mar 2012

Romney slams Limbaugh on Sandra Fluke comments.

"I'll just say this, which is, it's not the language I would have used. I'm focusing on the issues I think are significant in the country today, and that's why I'm here talking about jobs and Ohio."

http://articles.businessinsider.com/2012-03-02/politics/31115905_1_rick-santorum-mitt-romney-rush-limbaugh

Democratic Strategists applaud Romney's stand.

- "Now, that's leadership" - Stephanie Cutter
- "Wow. Profiles in Courage" - David Axelrod
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Romney slams Limbaugh on Sandra Fluke comments. (Original Post) denem Mar 2012 OP
Get'm Mr Axelrod madokie Mar 2012 #1
And his remaining conservative supporters abandon Rmoney. Pab Sungenis Mar 2012 #2
"Now, that's leadership" - Stephanie Cutter DCKit Mar 2012 #3
"slams"? His statement can hardly be called a slam. In fact snagglepuss Mar 2012 #4
hint sarcasm itsrobert Mar 2012 #11
Ooooops snagglepuss Mar 2012 #12
Maybe the OP needed this icon csziggy Mar 2012 #20
lol snagglepuss Mar 2012 #21
More like an oh so delicate brush against the hand. Arneoker Mar 2012 #22
Limbaugh WORKS for Romney. Faryn Balyncd Mar 2012 #5
And Romney WORKS For Limbaugh. Paladin Mar 2012 #7
This is it. Lex Mar 2012 #15
Wow! A real profile in courage. TheCowsCameHome Mar 2012 #6
Romney would call her a "working girl" meow2u3 Mar 2012 #8
Or, a "trollop," "bawd," or "lady of the evening." The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2012 #17
Well, he can speak French. surrealAmerican Mar 2012 #9
Slams? Not really. "I'll just say this, which is, it's not the language I would have used." yellowcanine Mar 2012 #10
My thoughts exactly. polichick Mar 2012 #13
It was sarcasm. Lex Mar 2012 #14
I'm siding with Rush on this one. Texas-Limerick Mar 2012 #16
Does this mean he would have used even more insulting and cruder language? aint_no_life_nowhere Mar 2012 #18
That's a light tap on the wrist not a slam donheld Mar 2012 #19
 

Pab Sungenis

(9,612 posts)
2. And his remaining conservative supporters abandon Rmoney.
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 08:12 AM
Mar 2012

Sad that doing the right thing can be a fatal mistake for a Republican.

 

DCKit

(18,541 posts)
3. "Now, that's leadership" - Stephanie Cutter
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 08:23 AM
Mar 2012

OMG, the hilarity!

She must've seen something in his mom-jeans that just totally threw her off her game.

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
4. "slams"? His statement can hardly be called a slam. In fact
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 09:04 AM
Mar 2012

he doesn't take issue with what Limbaugh said, he simply doesn't like how Limbaugh said it.

Faryn Balyncd

(5,125 posts)
5. Limbaugh WORKS for Romney.
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 09:18 AM
Mar 2012

It is not only the Bain -> Clear Channel -> Limbaugh financial accountability.


But Romney was Limbaugh's "true conservative" in 2008, a fact that the GOP spin machine ignores in their creation of the 2012 fictitious narrative.






Paladin

(28,262 posts)
7. And Romney WORKS For Limbaugh.
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 11:17 AM
Mar 2012

The present-day Republican leadership consists of a bunch of pasty-faced white guys, perpetually waiting in line to kiss Limbaugh's ass, over and over. There's nothing that Pig Boy can do or say that will make the Republicans walk away from him---too much money involved.....

Lex

(34,108 posts)
15. This is it.
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 01:59 PM
Mar 2012

They are afraid of Rush trashing them to his sheeple so they don't speak ill of him EVER.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,731 posts)
17. Or, a "trollop," "bawd," or "lady of the evening."
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 04:56 PM
Mar 2012

He would never utter such a low-class word as "slut." Sluts are for peasants.

yellowcanine

(35,699 posts)
10. Slams? Not really. "I'll just say this, which is, it's not the language I would have used."
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 12:14 PM
Mar 2012

milquetoast and mild disagreement is more like it. He criticizes the language, not the content. So if Rush had said "loose woman" or " "prostitute" maybe he would have been ok with it?

Lex

(34,108 posts)
14. It was sarcasm.
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 01:28 PM
Mar 2012

What the OP posted was sarcasm.

When Axelrod says "profiles in courage" that was sarcasm too.

 

Texas-Limerick

(93 posts)
16. I'm siding with Rush on this one.
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 04:27 PM
Mar 2012

Because I've known he was a righteous guy ever since he said he reserved Saturday nights for LDS films over at Clarence Thomas' house.

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
18. Does this mean he would have used even more insulting and cruder language?
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 09:01 PM
Mar 2012

His failure to condemn and his vague comment leaves it completely open to that interpretation.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Romney slams Limbaugh on ...