Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
133 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
My party has sold it's soul. (Original Post) Splinter Cell Apr 2016 OP
16 Tons Xipe Totec Apr 2016 #1
But the ideas are still alive and well Ned_Devine Apr 2016 #2
Hoping for a new viable nationwide 3rd party The People's Party. Populists vs the 2 corp parties. RiverLover Apr 2016 #61
I second the motion. Great platform! nt Land of Enchantment Apr 2016 #84
and the Oscar goes to... dlwickham Apr 2016 #3
..Hilary Clinton, Neocon/Neolib, for greatest performance as a Democrat (a Republican method actor) Dragonfli Apr 2016 #6
Excellent! Ned_Devine Apr 2016 #12
So true Carolina Apr 2016 #13
.that^ 840high Apr 2016 #15
If she's a Repub, how come they hate her so much? VOX Apr 2016 #19
Well, now you're just trying to use logic and reason. nt BreakfastClub Apr 2016 #20
That has always been a mystery to me as she agrees with so many of their policies Dragonfli Apr 2016 #21
Bernie and Hillary voted the same 93% of the time. Try again. nt BreakfastClub Apr 2016 #22
not regarding war or bad trade deals, she is a tool of the rich, you count post office votes mostly. Dragonfli Apr 2016 #25
I don't know but I think more and more it's a good cop bad cop routine. Nt. Juicy_Bellows Apr 2016 #31
In a nutshell. /nt Dragonfli Apr 2016 #32
It's like some folks give up on that tough pistachio shell. Juicy_Bellows Apr 2016 #33
Professional Wrestling Secrets. Uncle Joe Apr 2016 #89
Exactly! RufusTFirefly Apr 2016 #117
It seems to make the most sense to me. Juicy_Bellows Apr 2016 #118
prove that. If you don't want to, you don't want to know treestar Apr 2016 #76
First of all, I did not make the claim, I responded to it, the "proving" of a statement is on them. Dragonfli Apr 2016 #86
Thank you Dragonfli LondonReign2 Apr 2016 #95
Wow! Amaril Apr 2016 #100
Thank you... TeeYiYi Apr 2016 #108
Thank you for this! Great post. nt riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #125
We share 98% of our dna with chimps but there's still a difference. Don't be dense. snowy owl Apr 2016 #35
Nor during primary season. We yet sit safely in our trees flinging poo at each LanternWaste Apr 2016 #69
Can't speak for you but I'm sitting at a computer. Enjoy your tree. snowy owl Apr 2016 #122
Figures lie and liars figure. 99Forever Apr 2016 #82
But wait aren't we being told that like 60% of them will vote for her? azurnoir Apr 2016 #23
That is a lie. A Koch did not endorse her. I really hate it when people lie like that. Gross. nt BreakfastClub Apr 2016 #24
sorry your right it's less than 60% but still it's a signifigant number and Koch did endorse her as azurnoir Apr 2016 #27
Hmm, he came pretty close and when asked, he didn't say no to the question of endorsement snowy owl Apr 2016 #36
I really hate it when Hillary continues to lie about Sanders' daily news hit piece. Gross. nt Chezboo Apr 2016 #113
It's just another cheap shot in her arsenal. Dishonest smears-my problem with her. snowy owl Apr 2016 #123
No, he did not endorse her. apcalc Apr 2016 #126
The Republican establishment bvf Apr 2016 #62
Because she has a D next to her name, not an R. nt m-lekktor Apr 2016 #73
I know! If they would believe the Republicans' fictional Hillary treestar Apr 2016 #75
Because they attack the Dem CENTRISTS as ULTRA-LIBERAL; that shifts everything to the RIGHT yodermon Apr 2016 #92
Which is exactly wy I will never vote for Hillary LondonReign2 Apr 2016 #96
They hate Bill and her Beowulf Apr 2016 #112
they don't hate her, they're just jealous. n/t RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #121
Bookmarked. Dem2 Apr 2016 #94
... Arugula Latte Apr 2016 #115
Yeah, talk about exaggerated drama treestar Apr 2016 #74
Amen to that. Here's an article on the effort from Obama on down to defeat MD and PA progressives BernieforPres2016 Apr 2016 #4
Pro-Israel Billionaire Haim Saban Drops $100,000 Against Donna Edwards in Maryland azurnoir Apr 2016 #26
And good riddence to that progressive nonsense! quantumjunkie Apr 2016 #5
Mammon: The greedy pursuit of wealth. Goldman-Sachs, the Koch Bros, the rhett o rick Apr 2016 #7
I will say this ... nolawarlock Apr 2016 #8
Yeah, its been fun, but if not Sanders I believe I'll be solely a down ticket voter. JPnoodleman Apr 2016 #9
There's nothing Carolina Apr 2016 #18
She consorts with all the slithering beings, Kissinger and Goldman Sachs. JPnoodleman Apr 2016 #30
She's proud of her Kissinger connection. Leslie Stahl: She's the biggest hawk in the race. snowy owl Apr 2016 #37
Sounds like Trump is for you then leftofcool Apr 2016 #54
Only an idiot would jump to that illogical conclusion LondonReign2 Apr 2016 #97
Exactly, both HRC & Trump are beholden to Wall Street/MegaBanks... Yurovsky Apr 2016 #110
Can you read?! Carolina Apr 2016 #99
Vote for the blue corporate warmonger or else you're voting for the red corporate warmonger Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2016 #116
... MoonRiver Apr 2016 #68
Someone should gild the Wall Street Bull nt felix_numinous Apr 2016 #10
gild? like cover in gold? I think that's been done and will continue unabated azurnoir Apr 2016 #28
Geld - to neuter or castrate: gelding - a male horse who can't. Gild-cover with gold is correct. snowy owl Apr 2016 #38
I know the difference between geld and gild but the Wall Street bull is gilded already azurnoir Apr 2016 #39
My apologies. I see why you made that comment. I thought it was bronze... Sorry again. snowy owl Apr 2016 #43
Your golden calf reference was apropos Fairgo Apr 2016 #93
Not dead, it is going to be reborn, as soon as Hillary loses to Trump. She's tied now ffs. ViseGrip Apr 2016 #11
And if he wins, he'll be one and done... Yurovsky Apr 2016 #111
Whoa! I tripped on your hyperbole Stuckinthebush Apr 2016 #14
FUCK IT.......Social Democratic Party. seekthetruth Apr 2016 #16
I'm sorry to tell you this, but FDR was also funded by Wall Street. BreakfastClub Apr 2016 #17
Wall Street in 1932 had been severely humbled , not so these days however azurnoir Apr 2016 #40
May have been but... "I welcome their hatred." Can Clinton welcome their hatred? snowy owl Apr 2016 #41
He was pandering. FDR did a lot of that. He ran on lowering taxes Recursion Apr 2016 #44
If 0.01%er FDR can forjusticethunders Apr 2016 #87
They do what they have to do to mount the campaign treestar Apr 2016 #77
Mine is doing just fine, and is on it's way to electing the first female POTUS Lucinda Apr 2016 #29
But it's really because she's a woman, huh? snowy owl Apr 2016 #42
Why, because we're nominating somebody who has been part of the D establishment for over 20 years? ContinentalOp Apr 2016 #34
The establishment was basically blindsided by Sanders, I don't see that happening again Fumesucker Apr 2016 #48
"its" auntpurl Apr 2016 #45
... Scuba Apr 2016 #46
Hillary's lies and a failing media have contributed to an ignorant populace. Broward Apr 2016 #47
Someone else who doesn't know history... Adrahil Apr 2016 #49
Bernie fights to save this party, if he loses. The war will be fought OUTSIDE this party. Joob Apr 2016 #50
God, one can only hope! COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #63
Ten million Democrats are "liars and fools"... brooklynite Apr 2016 #51
No not fools -- but conned....... I was once conned by the Clintons too. Armstead Apr 2016 #59
In a nutshell! Thread winner! COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #64
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Apr 2016 #52
Nah! The Party has rigged it's soul. bkkyosemite Apr 2016 #53
"its" not "it's" nt COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #65
Losing is rough workinclasszero Apr 2016 #55
If Hillary represents the Democratic Party - warmongering, fracking, giving away jobs, djean111 Apr 2016 #56
This is false on its face uponit7771 Apr 2016 #57
HRC supporters don't get it casperthegm Apr 2016 #58
By all means, start another party! auntpurl Apr 2016 #60
The more reasonable will accept that their candidate lost COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #66
So essentially, those who don't get on board with Hillary are silly dreamers? casperthegm Apr 2016 #71
Your words, not mine. But now that you mention it... COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #72
^ and that is why the Democratic party is continuing to shrink casperthegm Apr 2016 #80
Independents in their 20's have a way of becoming Democrats COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #98
You can start your own party or pick an existing one workinclasszero Apr 2016 #78
Agree, that option is on the table casperthegm Apr 2016 #83
It wasn't exactly voluntary. It began as a hostile takeover. Orsino Apr 2016 #67
least it's more known now, that's all. Joob Apr 2016 #70
Sold its soul... NCTraveler Apr 2016 #79
You're so right! LondonReign2 Apr 2016 #101
The Clinton Global Initiative does some great work. Thanks for highlighting that. nt. NCTraveler Apr 2016 #105
You're so welcome! LondonReign2 Apr 2016 #106
Most Admired Woman in World, Record 20th Time Gallup, December 2015. stonecutter357 Apr 2016 #81
Oh come on now... Carni Apr 2016 #85
Yeah, what's a little war and fracking, amiright? djean111 Apr 2016 #102
Rendell said he'd go third party if Bernie won pengu Apr 2016 #127
He never said that. apcalc Apr 2016 #129
Here you go pengu Apr 2016 #131
Ed's been through some tough battles apcalc Apr 2016 #128
yep, back in '92, but we just didn't know it then. 2banon Apr 2016 #88
After 12 years of Reagan-Bush, Clinton seemed LondonReign2 Apr 2016 #103
I know it feels defeating now and it's diffcult to dana_b Apr 2016 #90
I don't think he has been giving up. peace13 Apr 2016 #109
As has DU. Those guys with the banner on 1-20-2001 don't exist anymore. MadDAsHell Apr 2016 #91
+1,000 LondonReign2 Apr 2016 #104
I raise a glass of fracking water in toast to this. peace13 Apr 2016 #107
Hear this every cycle Dem2 Apr 2016 #114
Member since april 2015 PowerToThePeople Apr 2016 #124
I just love this chart pdsimdars Apr 2016 #119
It's been dead since 1992 eom LiberalElite Apr 2016 #120
Your candidate lost the primary.This happens to sufrommich Apr 2016 #130
third way took over the democratic party. Matt_R Apr 2016 #132
Kick Logical Apr 2016 #133
 

Ned_Devine

(3,146 posts)
2. But the ideas are still alive and well
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 01:00 AM
Apr 2016

They just need a new vessel. Bernie has run such a "hands off" campaign against HRC that she will get smoked when she has to face someone that is fearless about confronting her about all of her moral and character flaws. All of these people here and out there in the voting world that put their fingers in their ears and cover their eyes to the obvious are in for a rude awakening come November.

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
61. Hoping for a new viable nationwide 3rd party The People's Party. Populists vs the 2 corp parties.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 08:47 AM
Apr 2016

ie.

POPULISM 2015 PLATFORM: BUILDING A MOVEMENT FOR PEOPLE AND THE PLANET

https://populism2015.org/the-new-populist-agenda/

Would love FDR Dems to have something like this to get behind. 4 years of Trump will give us plenty of time to organize. Because Hillary will get shellacked in the GE, like you said.

Just dreaming...& hoping MoveOn & DFA see this and the many other posts out there in the interwebs pining for a 3rd party.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
6. ..Hilary Clinton, Neocon/Neolib, for greatest performance as a Democrat (a Republican method actor)
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 01:07 AM
Apr 2016

VOX

(22,976 posts)
19. If she's a Repub, how come they hate her so much?
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 01:54 AM
Apr 2016

With a ferocity that occasionally exceeds that of the average Bernie supporter? Why do Bernie supporters so often use right-wing talking points against her?

There are multiple performances playing out simultaneously.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
21. That has always been a mystery to me as she agrees with so many of their policies
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 01:56 AM
Apr 2016

I think it has to do with a combination of misogyny and 90's Rush limpballs propaganda.

Juicy_Bellows

(2,427 posts)
33. It's like some folks give up on that tough pistachio shell.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 02:25 AM
Apr 2016

They skip it, afraid to risk the effort to get to the nutmeat of the matter.

Uncle Joe

(58,366 posts)
89. Professional Wrestling Secrets.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 01:04 PM
Apr 2016




It looks a lot worse than it is, the corporate media conglomerates play the role of easily distracted "referees" and have turned Presidential Elections into a great show for the American People; at the expense of their best interests.

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
117. Exactly!
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:21 PM
Apr 2016

I've always thought that Trump was designed to scare us into voting for a corporatist in order to avoid electing Mussolini.

Think how relieved we'll all be when we elect a Wall Street tool instead of a dictator.

As for why the Republicans hate her, the answer is the same as why they accused the President of being a socialist: it forces the Democrats to move even further right and provides an excuse for doing so.

FDR would be shocked and saddened by what passes as the Democratic Party these days. Heck, even Richard Nixon would be appalled.

Juicy_Bellows

(2,427 posts)
118. It seems to make the most sense to me.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:44 PM
Apr 2016

"FDR would be shocked and saddened by what passes as the Democratic Party these days. Heck, even Richard Nixon would be appalled." Now THAT is saying something - and I concur.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
86. First of all, I did not make the claim, I responded to it, the "proving" of a statement is on them.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 12:17 PM
Apr 2016

Not to say Hillary Clinton did not achieve some things during her six year hobby involved in legislating (the last two were spent campaigning and fundraising)

She managed to vote for the Patriot Act, for an illegal war, and even whip some votes with her passionate selling of the Bush/Cheney lies. (she deserves some credit for that,) and those of you that enjoy war should be and are rightfully quite proud of that.

As a Senator Clinton did get some things accomplished, Clinton sponsored three bills that became law: S.3145, S.3613, and S.1241. The first of these renamed a highway in New York state, the second renamed a post office in New York City, and the third established the Kate Mullany National Historic Site in Troy, New York and authorized funding to set the site up.

To be truly fair, she also tried to put an end to the epidemic of flag burning and ban some media, but these, her most favorite things were too hard for her to get done, she just couldn't get them passed, she may have lacked the chops to do it, but BUT SHE TRIED REAL HARD!

The United States Family Entertainment Protection Act (FEPA) was a bill introduced by Senator Hillary Clinton (D-NY), and co-sponsored by Senators Joe Lieberman (D-CT), Tim Johnson (D-SD) and Evan Bayh (D-IN) on November 29, 2005. The bill called for a federal mandate enforcement of the Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB) ratings.

Unsuccessfully unfortunately for the more puritan among us, sigh, if only she were more effective at passing such laws, we would finally be safe from cluster bombs, eerr.. I mean f-bombs (she voted against ending the use of child killing cluster bombs, my "misspeak" or my bad, if you prefer) she likes cluster bombs, so much so that after some donations to very, very, special charity, she made sure as SoS to sell cluster bombs to those altruistic rulers of Saudi Arabia! She deserves credit for that!

The kids just love playing with those rather than video games.

http://www.commondreams.org/views/2008/03/13/cluster-bombs-are-not-good-children-hillary

This is a common result



Now, since I did not make the claim that she voted 92% for the same things as Sanders has voted for.

I would ask the poster to point out that 92% of even this partial record of his Congressional record as I believe she has always been a neocon, and an Neo-liberal, (yay a twofer!) and everything she has done in politics supports this.

The following is a list of every substantive bill and amendment Sanders sponsored from the floor of Congress that became law (substantive meaning legislation renaming post offices is not included). Many of the roll-call amendments he passed with majority approval — like limiting the federal government’s ability to spy on people’s library records — were removed from bills when the House and Senate negotiated over the final legislative text and did not become law.

Because the list is derived from Congress’ official database of floor actions, it does not include achievements like his insertion of funding for veterans health care into an Iraq war spending bill because that occurred off of the House floor while the bill was in conference. Nor does the list include what is perhaps his most significant achievement — providing health care to an additional 10 million mostly low-income Americans by getting Senate majority leader Harry Reid to add $11 billion in funding for community health centers that provide care regardless of a person’s ability to pay to the 2010 Affordable Care Act in exchange for Sanders rallying liberal Democrats who were considering voting against the bill once conservative Democrats removed the public option.

Those who mistakenly believe that a President Sanders would be powerless in the face of a hostile Republican Congress should bear in mind that he managed to pass these bills and amendments in spite of Republican control of both the House (1995-2006) and the presidency (2001-2008). Furthermore, it was Republicans in the House and Senate who compromised with him (not the other way around) on major veterans legislation in 2014. His original bill expanding services for veterans and fixing the scandal-ridden Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) cost $17.3 billion. The price tag of the final compromise bill? $16.3 billion.

H.R.4206 (Cancer Registries Amendment Act) enacted as S. 3312 (Cancer Registries Amendment Act).

H.Amdt. 98 to H.R. 665 (Victims of Justice Act of 1995)

H.Amdt. 210 to H.R. 830 (Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995)

H.Amdt. 1203 to H.R. 3666 Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1997

H.J.Res.129 enacted as S.J.Res.38 (A joint resolution granting the consent of Congress to the Vermont-New Hampshire Interstate Public Water Supply Compact)

H.Amdt.174 to H.R.1757 (Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998)

H.Amdt.267 to H.R.2160 (Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1998)

H.Amdt.289 to H.R.2266 (Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1998) -- National Guard Starbase program

H.Amdt.368 to H.R.2378 (Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 1998) -- Prohibit funds for the U.S. Customs Office from being used to allow the importation into the U.S. any material mined, produced, or manufactured by forced or indentured child labor.

H.Amdt.388 to H.R.2267 (Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1998)

H.Amdt.569 to H.R.6 (Higher Education Amendments of 1998)

H.Amdt.614 to H.R.3694 (Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999) -- Reduce the intelligence budget for fiscal year 1999 by 5% with an exemption for the CIA Retirement and Disability Fund.

H.Amdt.626 to H.R.10 (Financial Services Act of 1998) -- Require the Comptroller General to report to Congress regarding the efficacy and benefits of uniformly limiting any commissions, fees, markups, or other costs incurred by customers in the acquisition of financial products.

H.Amdt.706 to H.R.4101 (Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1999) -- Increase funding for nutrition programs for senior citizens by $10 million

H.Amdt.708 to H.R.4103 (Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1999) -- Prohibit funding to be used to enter into or renew a contract with any company owned, or partially owned, by the People’s Republic of China or the People’s Liberation Army of the People’s Republic of China.

H.Amdt.724 to H.R.4104 (Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 1999) enacted as H.R. 2490 (Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2000) -- National Archives and Records Administration improvements

H.Amdt.127 to H.R.1906 (Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2000)

H.Amdt.136 to H.R.1906 (Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2000) -- national pilot program to promote agritourism

H.Amdt.258 to H.R.2466 (Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2000) enacted as H.R.3194 (Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2000) -- deficit reduction; and reduces fossil energy research and development funding

H.Amdt.442 to H.R.2684 (Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 2000) -- health care services for veterans in rural areas

H.Amdt.791 to H.R.4577 (Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2001) -- (relating to the availability to the public of an invention and its benefits on reasonable terms)

H.Amdt.818 to H.R.4578 (Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2001) -- weatherization assistance and energy conservation programs and reduce fossil fuel energy research and development programs

H.Amdt.238 to H.R.2590 (Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2002) -- Prohibit the importation of goods made by forced or indentured child labor.

H.Amdt.376 to H.R.3061 (Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2002) -- relating to the availability to the public of an invention and its benefits on reasonable terms

H.Amdt.404 to H.R.3338 (Department of Defense and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations for Recovery from and Response to Terrorist Attacks on the United States Act, 2002) -- Provide $100 million for federally qualified community health centers.

H.Amdt.255 to H.R.2691 (Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2004) -- Increase funding for weatherization assistance grants

H.Amdt.336 to H.R.2861 (Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 2004) enacted as H.R.2673 (Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004) -- Prohibit the use of funds in the bill to implement any policy prohibiting the Directors of the Veterans Integrated Service Networks from conducting outreach or marketing to enroll new veterans within their respective networks.

S.Amdt.737 to H.R.1591 (U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans’ Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007) -- fund weatherization assistance program

S.Amdt.1515 to H.R.6 (Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007) -- Establish an energy efficiency and renewable energy worker training program

S.Amdt.1525 to H.R.6 (Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007) -- use of solar hot water heaters in certain Federal buildings

S.Amdt.4384 to H.R.3221 (Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008) -- Increase specially adapted housing benefits for disabled veterans.

S.Amdt.1658 to S.1390 (National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010) -- re child care available to deployed members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces

S.Amdt.2271 to H.R.2997 (Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010) -- funds for the school community garden pilot program

S.Amdt.2601 to H.R.3326 (Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2010) -- veteran outreach and reintegration services

S.Amdt.3738 to S.3217 (Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010) -- let the American people know the names of the recipients of over $2 trillion in taxpayer assistance from the Federal Reserve System

S.Amdt.306 to H.R.1 (American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009) -- Require recipients of TARP funding to meet strict H-1B worker hiring standard to ensure non-displacement of U.S. workers

S.Amdt.1658 to S.1390 (National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010) -- report to Congress on financial assistance for child care available to deployed members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces.

S.Amdt.4280 to H.R.4899 (Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010) -- make publicly available the contractor integrity performance database established under the Clean Contracting Act of 2008

S.2450 (Veterans’ Access to Care through Choice, Accountability, and Transparency Act of 2014) enacted as H.R.3230 (Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014) -- VA reform bill

S.893 (Veterans’ Compensation Cost-of-Living Adjustment Act of 2013) -- increase rates of veterans’ disability compensation, additional compensation for dependents, etc.

S.Amdt.2146 to S.1471 (Alicia Dawn Koehl Respect for National Cemeteries Act) – re interring the remains and honoring the memory of a person in a national cemetery

[font size="3" ; color="8B0000"]Also, compare her record to this perhaps you will get to the magic 92% of Congressional agreement with him here[/font]

So far I have posted this or variations of it (about 9 times):

The Right Wing implication appears to be that even with all his years of public service, a progressive like Bernie Sanders was too far to the left to accomplish anything.

That one has to be able to find the buypartisan way, in other words, adopt the least offensive GOP legislation as your own if you wish to accomplish anything, if one is not a member of the Republican party itself.

The problem with this bullshit GOP meme is that it is completely false, he's actually one of the most effective members of Congress, passing bills, of all sizes and shapes, that have reshaped American policy on key issues like poverty, the environment and health care.

[center][font size=3"]The Amendment King[/font][/center]

....Congress is not known to be a progressive institution lately, to say the least. Over the past few decades, the House of Representatives was only controlled by the Democrats from 2007 to 2010, and a flood of corporate money has quieted the once-powerful progressive movement that passed legislation moving the country forward between the New Deal era and the Great Society. Yet, as difficult as it may be to believe, a socialist from Vermont is one of its most accomplished members. ....

snip

....Sanders did something particularly original, which was that he passed amendments that were exclusively progressive, advancing goals such as reducing poverty and helping the environment, and he was able to get bipartisan coalitions of Republicans who wanted to shrink government or hold it accountable and progressives who wanted to use it to empower Americans.

Here are a few examples of the amendments Sanders passed by building unusual but effective coalitions:....


[font color="red"]Much more, but due to the three paragraph rule you will have to follow this link[/font]
I dare those that pretend the GOP meme is true and are spreading it for them, to read the article!

There are so many examples in fact that you really need to read the entire article as it completely dispels this current Right Wing myth that Bernie Sanders after all his time in Congress achieved almost nothing, when in fact he was literally one of the most effective members of Congress! Read the facts in the article itself, clearly the GOP is spreading lies about him, after all, who besides Rove and the GOP would use such lying sleazy bullshit tactics against someone that helped Democrats get as much progressive policy put into effect during his tenure?...


[font size="3"][center]Robert Reich, Clinton Secretary of Labor, on Bernie's effectiveness in Congress[/font][/center]



He was also very effective as Mayor

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511758469

LondonReign2

(5,213 posts)
95. Thank you Dragonfli
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:41 PM
Apr 2016

Excellent summation.

Unfortunately this will fly right over our self-proclaimed "pragmatic progressives".

Amaril

(1,267 posts)
100. Wow!
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:51 PM
Apr 2016

Excellent summation, Dragonfli! Kudos to you for pulling all of that together so neatly & succinctly!

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
69. Nor during primary season. We yet sit safely in our trees flinging poo at each
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 09:38 AM
Apr 2016

"but there's still a difference..."

Nor during primary season. We yet sit safely in our trees flinging poo at each other when someone disagrees with who support.
Don't be denser.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
23. But wait aren't we being told that like 60% of them will vote for her?
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 01:59 AM
Apr 2016

and one of the Koch's even endorsed her

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
27. sorry your right it's less than 60% but still it's a signifigant number and Koch did endorse her as
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 02:07 AM
Apr 2016

possibly the best candidate

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
36. Hmm, he came pretty close and when asked, he didn't say no to the question of endorsement
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 02:34 AM
Apr 2016

Perhaps a matter of interpretation? Who do you think the Kochs will vote for if Trump is the nominee? After all, Kochs were members of DLC in the nineties. They know Clinton better than Trump and Trump won't owe them a damn thing.

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
62. The Republican establishment
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 08:47 AM
Apr 2016

has no problem with her at all. She'd give them their war and keep the gravy train going as always.

The hate is something the establishment gins up in the hoi polloi as a distraction. Think Eastasia.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
75. I know! If they would believe the Republicans' fictional Hillary
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 09:55 AM
Apr 2016

they'd realize we have a communist running and be happy!

yodermon

(6,143 posts)
92. Because they attack the Dem CENTRISTS as ULTRA-LIBERAL; that shifts everything to the RIGHT
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 02:18 PM
Apr 2016

Bill Clinton was a centrist Dem by any measure, and look how they treated him.
Obama offered up compromise after compromise (chained CPI, public option gone), and they paint him as a communist and stonewalled him anyway.

Meanwhile we get the HERITAGE FOUNDATION's RIGHT WING HEALTH CARE PLAN (from circa 1993) in the form of the ACA, and it is attacked as a Communist Government Takeover of Healthcare.. What!

Let the Democrats shift to the right; attack those positions as if they are ultra-leftist; watch the Democrats shift even further to the right. It's worked beautifully, and HRC has telegraphed that she will continue this dance. She will offer a "compromise", the repukes will scream "BENGHAZI IMPEACH" and she will cave. Ratchet the Overton window to the right one more notch.

The problem is that the GOP has now shifted so far to the right that they are about to fall off the cliff (we can only hope).

LondonReign2

(5,213 posts)
96. Which is exactly wy I will never vote for Hillary
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:44 PM
Apr 2016

She will continue to happily shuffle the party even further to the right.

Bernie is far from a perfect candidate, but he is the only one that will move us leftwards back towards the center.

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
4. Amen to that. Here's an article on the effort from Obama on down to defeat MD and PA progressives
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 01:04 AM
Apr 2016
http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/26/politics/pennsylvania-democratic-senate-primary-joe-sestak-katie-mcginty/

<The Democratic establishment struck back Tuesday with major victories in the Maryland and Pennsylvania Senate primaries, showing the strength of the party leadership over the liberal base.>

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
26. Pro-Israel Billionaire Haim Saban Drops $100,000 Against Donna Edwards in Maryland
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 02:05 AM
Apr 2016

Saban dropped millions into the Clinton Foundation while Clinton was SoS, his wife is on the foundation BoD

IN THE FINAL DAYS leading up to Maryland’s Democratic voters going to the polls on Tuesday to choose their U.S. Senate nominee, Rep. Donna Edwards has been barraged by ads and mailers from the Super PAC backing her opponent, Rep. Chris Van Hollen, called the Committee for Maryland’s Progress.

A television ad assails Edwards as “one of the least effective members of Congress,” contrasting her career with Van Hollen’s legislative record. It mentions no foreign policy issues, despite the dominant issue motivating one of the Super PAC’s largest funders.

https://theintercept.com/2016/04/25/pro-israel-billionaire-haim-saban-drops-100000-against-donna-edwards-in-maryland-senate-race/

 

quantumjunkie

(244 posts)
5. And good riddence to that progressive nonsense!
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 01:06 AM
Apr 2016

We need realistic leaders that understand that democracy can only work when it is bought through legal bribes. Now tow
the line or get the hell out of our party you DINO! We only allow Democrats on this board. Skinner, ban hammer this Roosevelt-Kennedy lover. grrrrrrrrrrrrrr


JPnoodleman

(454 posts)
9. Yeah, its been fun, but if not Sanders I believe I'll be solely a down ticket voter.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 01:12 AM
Apr 2016

Hillary would have to actually earn my vote, and since she doesn't believe in that. It won't happen.

Carolina

(6,960 posts)
18. There's nothing
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 01:46 AM
Apr 2016

she can do to win my vote... Past is prologue and she/her ilk have already done too much harm:
DLC
NAFTA
Telecommunications Act (Media Consolidation)
Crime Bill (for profit prisons)
Welfare Reform (deepening poverty)
Overturning Glass-Steagall (too big to fail crash)
IWR (death, debt, destruction, destabilization)
Patriot Acts 1&2
Bankruptcy Bill
Honduras
Libya
Syria
TPP
Fracking
Monsanto
Goldman-Sachs
....

Lying, pandering, shrill nastiness... this who she is and nothing is going to change that. Any change exhibited between now and November is an act.

The party of the New Deal, the Fair Deal, the New Frontier and the Great Society died with the ascendancy of the Clintons. There no longer is a democratic Democratic Party.

JPnoodleman

(454 posts)
30. She consorts with all the slithering beings, Kissinger and Goldman Sachs.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 02:16 AM
Apr 2016

She might as well run on the "I sold my soul to the devil!" platform. IMHO.

Yurovsky

(2,064 posts)
110. Exactly, both HRC & Trump are beholden to Wall Street/MegaBanks...
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 04:23 PM
Apr 2016

His ugly fucking buildings don't get built without being underwritten by the same bastards who have bankrolled HRC's campaign. Oh sure, they both talk tough about Wall Street on the stump, but I'm sure Hillary rolls over and lets the CEO of Goldman Sachs rub her tummy when she's speaking at a corporate pep rally (for a quarter mill...). And Trump has certainly been on his knees before the money men when he was either getting project funding or attempting to modify the terms when it looked as though he was going under.

Two sides of the same corporatist coin, and just because she's pro-choice or (belatedly) come out in favor of equal rights for LGBT Americans doesn't excuse her greed and lack of progressive economic platform. The only silver lining in a Trump presidency is that it would be so horrifically bad we might actually get a progressive Democrat in the White House in 2020. That pendulum does swing... I'm not usually an advocate of losing in order to win down the road, but I think we lose either way in November. It's just a question of whether we have a corporatist whose a racist and misogynist, or a corporatist who's pro-war and possibly a felon (we won't know until the FBI decides whether to recommend an indictment and if the DOJ follows up if the answer is affirmative).

Carolina

(6,960 posts)
99. Can you read?!
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:51 PM
Apr 2016

Can you deny that any of what I have posted is true?

Speaking truth about HRC does not equate to being for Trump, but spin as you wish... typical $hillary logic.


azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
28. gild? like cover in gold? I think that's been done and will continue unabated
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 02:10 AM
Apr 2016

eta did you mean an e instead of an i ?

Yurovsky

(2,064 posts)
111. And if he wins, he'll be one and done...
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 04:26 PM
Apr 2016

I think we could see a real progressive backlash against his dumpster fire of an administration.

If Hillary were POTUS, progressives would have to sit at the kids table for the next 4-8 years, and be warned to "STFU or else..."

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
40. Wall Street in 1932 had been severely humbled , not so these days however
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 02:46 AM
Apr 2016

in fact they have been coddled, protected, and emboldened

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
41. May have been but... "I welcome their hatred." Can Clinton welcome their hatred?
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 02:47 AM
Apr 2016
It’s a fairly famous speech, the emotional heart of which is in the passage referring to his rich and powerful opponents:

“We had to struggle with the old enemies of peace--business and financial monopoly, speculation, reckless banking, class antagonism, sectionalism, war profiteering.

“They had begun to consider the Government of the United States as a mere appendage to their own affairs. We know now that Government by organized money is just as dangerous as Government by organized mob.

“Never before in all our history have these forces been so united against one candidate as they stand today. They are unanimous in their hate for me -- and I welcome their hatred.”


Can Clinton welcome their hatred after they've given so much?

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
44. He was pandering. FDR did a lot of that. He ran on lowering taxes
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:31 AM
Apr 2016

and "getting rid of burdensome regulations". Then he just threw whatever he could at the wall and saw what stuck and what didn't. And meanwhile the unemployment rate never dropped below 15% until the war started. Great president, but significantly more complex than a lot of DU seems to think.

 

forjusticethunders

(1,151 posts)
87. If 0.01%er FDR can
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 12:48 PM
Apr 2016

It's not completely out of the realm of possibility Hillary can. But FDR had strong grassroots activists pressuring him to "make him do it". I'm sure many of those activists would rather have voted for Debs or William Thomas instead.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
77. They do what they have to do to mount the campaign
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 09:57 AM
Apr 2016

Only the Bernie supporters have tried to make this into an evil.

Lucinda

(31,170 posts)
29. Mine is doing just fine, and is on it's way to electing the first female POTUS
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 02:10 AM
Apr 2016

And she happens to be the most qualified person running too.

ContinentalOp

(5,356 posts)
34. Why, because we're nominating somebody who has been part of the D establishment for over 20 years?
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 02:27 AM
Apr 2016

Former SOS of the current Democratic administration, and wife of the Democratic president before that? Come on man, this isn't some big turning point, it's where we've been for two decades. If anything, it's the end of a cycle. Just deal with it, move on, and work toward something better in the future.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
48. The establishment was basically blindsided by Sanders, I don't see that happening again
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:06 AM
Apr 2016

The main focus of a Clinton administration will be making absolutely sure there is no credible challenge from the left in 2020, no stone will remain un-turned in squashing any left populist movement.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
46. ...
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 06:59 AM
Apr 2016
"If the Democratic Party would fight as hard for the Working Class as the Republican Party fights for the Ruling Class, the Republicans would be a powerless minority party within a few election cycles.

The Democratic Party knows this, the Republican Party knows this, the Ruling Class knows this- and they've been astonishingly successful at making sure the Working Class never learns this. ~ Anon

Broward

(1,976 posts)
47. Hillary's lies and a failing media have contributed to an ignorant populace.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:03 AM
Apr 2016

The corporate elite must be laughing at us.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
49. Someone else who doesn't know history...
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:06 AM
Apr 2016

Let us remember that FDR order the imprisonment of American citizens of Japanese descent, and allowed the deportation of American citizens of Mexican descent in an attempt to funnel jobs to "real Americans." JFK cut the marginal tax rates... Especially those at the top, very significantly. And deregulated the airlines.

brooklynite

(94,598 posts)
51. Ten million Democrats are "liars and fools"...
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:10 AM
Apr 2016

WHY CAN'T EVERYONE BE SMART ENOUGH TO VOTE FOR --MY-- CANDIDATE?

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
59. No not fools -- but conned....... I was once conned by the Clintons too.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 08:43 AM
Apr 2016

I bought Bill's "I'll fight for you until the last dog dies."

Unfortunately, the final canine died very shortly after he got into office.

Response to Splinter Cell (Original post)

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
56. If Hillary represents the Democratic Party - warmongering, fracking, giving away jobs,
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 08:38 AM
Apr 2016

shrugging at children being blown up by cluster bombs - then I cannot be a Democrat any more. Simple, really, as that.

casperthegm

(643 posts)
58. HRC supporters don't get it
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 08:42 AM
Apr 2016

I suspect most of them think that Bernie supporters will just fade away if he loses the nomination. Sorry, we're not going anywhere. Essentially, we've been left without a party. Millions of disenfranchised Democrats and millions more Independents with no party? Where could this lead?

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
66. The more reasonable will accept that their candidate lost
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 09:35 AM
Apr 2016

and go and vote in the GE, hopefully many more for Hillary. The rest will spend the next 4 years posting about the 'revolution that's about to happen' and congratulate themselves for being part of a new 'movement'.

casperthegm

(643 posts)
71. So essentially, those who don't get on board with Hillary are silly dreamers?
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 09:44 AM
Apr 2016

Ah yes, the "Sanders supporters are so ideological and naive" comments. And HRC supporters don't get why Sanders supporters don't want to just jump on board. Funny.

casperthegm

(643 posts)
80. ^ and that is why the Democratic party is continuing to shrink
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 10:01 AM
Apr 2016

While the Independent movement grows. Your establishment candidate will most likely win the nomination, and possibly the GE. But the DNC can't/won't see their own demise coming down the tracks. You're not worried about losing the independent vote (that's clear, based on the closed primary process) or the youth vote (seen via the talk of naive young people who just want free stuff) and yet you think the party is going to somehow maintain or grow? Now who is naive?

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
78. You can start your own party or pick an existing one
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 09:59 AM
Apr 2016

which will never go anywhere or get anything passed into law if thats what you are looking for.

I choose and recommend the democratic party myself.

casperthegm

(643 posts)
83. Agree, that option is on the table
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 10:10 AM
Apr 2016

What I suspect is that the establishment dems and HRC supporters are generally thinking, eh they'll just slink back to the table in the end. Maybe they are right. I choose and recommend a new party myself. One that doesn't support fracking, no fly zones, trade deals that send jobs overseas, oppose Glass Steagall- you know, the stuff that the Democratic party used to stand up against...

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
67. It wasn't exactly voluntary. It began as a hostile takeover.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 09:36 AM
Apr 2016

I think our party is going to have to cope with revolution, and make its first little concessions to an agenda like Sanders'.

Success will depend on our efforts, since our so-called leaders aren't listening closely.

Carni

(7,280 posts)
85. Oh come on now...
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 12:12 PM
Apr 2016

Just heard Rendell say "Get on board don't pout" to Sanders supporters, yeah that'll win votes in the general...idiots.

pengu

(462 posts)
131. Here you go
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 08:14 AM
Apr 2016
In a three-way race featuring Mr. Sanders and Mr. Bloomberg, Mr. Rendell said he might back the former New York mayor.

“As a lifelong Democrat, as a former party chairman, it would be very hard for me to do that,” he said. “But I would certainly take a look at it — absolutely.”


link

Fuck him.

apcalc

(4,465 posts)
128. Ed's been through some tough battles
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 08:07 AM
Apr 2016

You just have to get up and move on.

What's that Oriental saying? Something like ' get knocked down five times get up six'?
Similar to that anyway.

dana_b

(11,546 posts)
90. I know it feels defeating now and it's diffcult to
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 01:15 PM
Apr 2016

see how things can change, BUT we must keep fighting. Bernie isn't giving up, I'm sure not giving up and eventually you may feel like fighting again.

I am an indy so maybe the fact that I already gave up on the Dems, it isn't hitting me as hard as it is some of you. I'm sorry about that though. I know that it sucks.

Also - ignore those who are being sarcastic, mean or laughing. Bullies. Literally put them on ignore.

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
109. I don't think he has been giving up.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 04:12 PM
Apr 2016

I do think he has been cheated at the press and in the polls. If he falls, there is no coming back. There is nothing but right wing level war mongering left. Nothing for the people. Oh ...except a raise in minimum wage sometime in the next five years. That's pretty grim!

 

MadDAsHell

(2,067 posts)
91. As has DU. Those guys with the banner on 1-20-2001 don't exist anymore.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 01:41 PM
Apr 2016

We're just another for-profit website supporting corporate hacks.

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
107. I raise a glass of fracking water in toast to this.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 04:06 PM
Apr 2016

Concern for the earth has been placed behind the almighty dollar and war and violence are expected in order to maintain our lifestyle. Pity the folks who will have to implement the endless global turmoil. Paying for the last fifteen years of war broke our infrastructure and social safety net. What is left?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»My party has sold it's so...