Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Godhumor

(6,437 posts) Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:45 PM Apr 2016

4

Current count at NYT: Hillary up +65 delegates as of 11:40 pm for a lead of +309

1640 - 1331 overall

With Supers allocated:
2150 - 1370

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/primary-calendar-and-results.html

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Current count at NYT: Hillary up +65 delegates as of 11:40 pm for a lead of +309 (Original Post) Godhumor Apr 2016 OP

This doesn't square with the Green Papers. TM99 Apr 2016 #1

Yes, Green Papers is more reliable DLnyc Apr 2016 #2

1599 to 1317, actually n/t Godhumor Apr 2016 #3

Yes, typo on my part - corrected. n/t TM99 Apr 2016 #4

TM99

(8,352 posts)

1. This doesn't square with the Green Papers.

Reply to Godhumor (Original post)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 12:04 AM

Apr 2016

They have 1599 to 1317 currently. They are not biased like the NYT's so I always wait for their final tally which may not come until tomorrow.

DLnyc

(2,479 posts)

2. Yes, Green Papers is more reliable

Reply to TM99 (Reply #1)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 12:16 AM

Apr 2016

The Times will agree with Green Papers in a couple of days, if the past is any guide.

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)

3. 1599 to 1317, actually n/t

Reply to TM99 (Reply #1)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 12:16 AM

Apr 2016

TM99

(8,352 posts)

4. Yes, typo on my part - corrected. n/t

Reply to Godhumor (Reply #3)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 12:20 AM

Apr 2016

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Current count at NYT: Hil...