Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumElection Fraud in Real Time: The results of Greenwich have been revised to 68/31!!! LOL
Still a win for Hillary, but not so embarrassing as the 87/12 number that posted earlier. Isn't that convenient?
And if the first set of numbers was an error, where on earth did they come from???
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
14 replies, 676 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
14 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Election Fraud in Real Time: The results of Greenwich have been revised to 68/31!!! LOL (Original Post)
reformist2
Apr 2016
OP
HOW? There IS NO CALCULATION INvolved! ONLY ADDING.. No Algebra, No Calculus, No "Factors!"
CorporatistNation
Apr 2016
#14
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)1. Errors on election night happen and it was corrected.
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)14. HOW? There IS NO CALCULATION INvolved! ONLY ADDING.. No Algebra, No Calculus, No "Factors!"
Even Jimmy Carter publicly states that America IS NOT presently a Democracy! Hand counted PAPER BALLOTS!
Get rid of the F'ing machines that are so simple to RIG!
Walk away
(9,494 posts)2. ...
msongs
(67,417 posts)3. bernie won 100% of all votes cast today don't ya know nt
RandySF
(58,900 posts)4. Have you ever worked in an election office on an election night?
This happens all the time.
Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)5. Maybe more vote came in?
They might also count the absentee's after the voting machines,
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)6. moving numbers to districts to up her delegate count?
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)7. AP misstated and corrected
It is not exactly unusual. More than likely a digit was misentered which threw off the total and the percentage.
MadBadger
(24,089 posts)8. Are you a political neophyte?
Is this your first election?
George II
(67,782 posts)9. Election Fraud? As additional numbers come in the percentages change.
Stallion
(6,476 posts)11. Right-More Precincts Report-Numbers Change
I believe we are dealing with a rookie
JSup
(740 posts)12. We really need...
...to add information like this to the public curriculum.
This is scary.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)10. Happens all the time
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)13. Wow, election fraud in reverse is a rare phenomenon
I don't think I've ever seen that before. Or maybe the voting precinct for the gardeners, cooks, maids and nannies didn't come in until late.