Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
1. The too early was for Sanders. Too close means they expect Hillary has good precincts left
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:46 PM
Apr 2016

Exit polls weren't for too early as they showed only a +3 race.

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
5. Not by enough for a too early call
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:55 PM
Apr 2016

Results have been steadily for Bernie through the first post of the country, and the too early was for an expectation that he would build a lead that SW CT for Hillary wouldn't overcome. However, she closed the gap and much of SW hasn't reported, so it was switched to too close. Bernie didn't put it away early.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
6. Her three counties aren't moving and Sanders is. She has many more votes in her areas than Sanders.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:56 PM
Apr 2016

It will be interesting.

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
7. To be honest, she is in decent shape for a state win with what is still out
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:58 PM
Apr 2016

Will mean piddly Jack in delegates regardless of outcome, though.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
8. I am more comfortable now, for sure. She has three counties with lower percentage in. Sanders has
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:13 PM
Apr 2016

two counties with higher percentage in.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»MSNBC moves CT from too E...