Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
14 replies, 873 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
14 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Maddow: Nomination is 'effectively out of reach' for Sanders. (Original Post)
wyldwolf
Apr 2016
OP
Segami
(14,923 posts)1. Hillary will LOSE the GE to Trump
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)3. No she won't.
oasis
(49,389 posts)7. Hope your popcorn doesn't get stale while waiting for that to happen.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)10. I thought Trump fluff pieces were banned on DU?
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)11. wishful thinking on your part
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)14. Our country is now officially fucked on climate change
So yeah, Madame President now "wins" to become the most despised president ever for her inaction on climate change.
Yay Dems!
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)2. K&R!
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)5. I'M SO EXCITED!
R B Garr
(16,954 posts)6. Yes, I just heard her say that. It's undeniable.
Go Hillary!
"effectively out of reach" for Sanders.
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)8. KICK AND REC
reddread
(6,896 posts)9. congratulations!
Peregrine Took
(7,415 posts)12. NO! Not fair minded Rachel??? The queen of objectivity??? n/t