Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

BlueDemKev

(3,003 posts)
2. What about the storm??
Sun Oct 28, 2012, 01:13 AM
Oct 2012

What's the plan for getting our voters to the polls if the storm has major impacts on heavily-Democratic areas such as Philadelphia?

BlueDemKev

(3,003 posts)
4. I don't believe so
Sun Oct 28, 2012, 01:25 AM
Oct 2012

But if the damage, etc. is so extensive, poorer folks in inner-city Philadelphia may not be able (or frankly even willing) to get to the polls on Nov. 6. I mean, if your home/condo/apartment has been reduced to firewood and you've lost everything you own, you're probably not going to think a whole lot about going to vote.

 

wisteria

(19,581 posts)
8. No, the Repubs here wouldn't allow something like this.
Sun Oct 28, 2012, 01:50 AM
Oct 2012

The storm should be well passed by election day. I just pray there is no lives lost and no major destruction.

 

FVZA_Colonel

(4,096 posts)
6. Do you know when he'll be posting a blog update explaining the change?
Sun Oct 28, 2012, 01:44 AM
Oct 2012

Unless the one from 5:16 PM was the update, in which case ignore this.

TroyD

(4,551 posts)
10. Sometimes Nate just sends a Tweet explaining the update
Sun Oct 28, 2012, 01:54 AM
Oct 2012

On his 538 Twitter account.

He doesn't always write a full blog post when the Model only changes by 1%.

TroyD

(4,551 posts)
12. The fact that Obama is taking such wild swings in Gallup's approval
Sun Oct 28, 2012, 01:57 AM
Oct 2012

May be a clue that their Obama-Romney numbers are off.

For example, it's not just that Gallup all of a sudden has Obama's approval so low, it's that only a week or so ago it was at a yearly high of 53 or 54%. Now it's plunged to 46%? What happened over the course of the past week to cause that?

 

FVZA_Colonel

(4,096 posts)
14. And given that so many others seemed to show him gaining ground around the country,
Sun Oct 28, 2012, 02:05 AM
Oct 2012

if in voting leads only and not job-approval numbers as well, it really does seem to indicate that something's off with their numbers.

gravity

(4,157 posts)
13. Every two days forward, expect one back.
Sun Oct 28, 2012, 01:58 AM
Oct 2012

I don't see the move being that significant. There were good gains the past couple of days, so a pull back should be expected.

I wouldn't worry unless it goes below 70%

OhZone

(3,212 posts)
15. Gallup is deja vu all over again!
Sun Oct 28, 2012, 02:18 AM
Oct 2012

I seem to remember them having insane swings about this time the last three elections.

I do not trust them or rasmussen. Don't really trust any of them, but they're the worst. Oh and maybe gravis.

Oh well.

TroyD

(4,551 posts)
16. Now I see why Obama decreased slightly in the forecast and in OHIO
Sun Oct 28, 2012, 02:24 AM
Oct 2012

Didn't see this poll reported today, but Nate posted it. Turns out the U. of Cincinnati published an Ohio poll showing a TIE. Obama dropped to 73% for Ohio.

http://www.ohio.com/news/local-news/presidential-race-tied-in-ohio-newspaper-poll-1.345675


But Obama's odds of winning Virginia went up to 60% because of the good Washington Post Virginia poll.


Also looks like there was a poll for Nevada by something called Callfire showing Obama +4 that raised Obama to 80%.

https://www.callfire.com/sites/default/files/pdf/press/NEVADA_PRES_POLL.pdf

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Nate Silver: 538 Update ...